II Titanic Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
jk I want to /in | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On November 30 2013 07:33 cDgCorazon wrote: jk I want to /in | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Lol | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 08 2013 06:38 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Hear ye, hear ye, puny little towns On behalf of our friend LoneMeow Ask yourselves if you would like a friend Shadowing your game from start to end. If you wish he join you in your play PM me by start of the first Day. ![]() 10/10 would read in a sing-songy voice again but I'm too bad to let people shadow me...sorry LM =( | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 05:09 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Those of you just now complaining about the deadline, it's been unchanged in the OP ever since the creation of this thread. It shouldn't be a surprise. And a few of you have yet to tell me the name of your favorite boat ![]() I hope the Black Pearl counts even though it is a ship, not a boat. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
If you are town and you are lurking, expect to be under the gun during the game and expect me to not be very nice to you post-game. I will be weighing activity a lot heavier in my voting decision this game than I have in the past. You all are warned. If you are going to take a sieste the entire time and not participate, I am going to be on you until you do so. That is all. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:07 Plutarch wrote: I see some dissonance between your first point and your second. Why would you be so inclined towards policy on low activity players when you have just acknowledged that people can be town and not be active? Perhaps as you say you only require town to be active and you are, in fact, scum? Hi Marv. I plan on having my filter be longer than 2 pages. My filter in D1 for Basics was about 6 pages and I would consider that to be "super active" for me. I know that my filter will still be acceptable and I will be working towards that goal even though my time to play this game will not be as much as it usually is. I was talking more about how I would react to their play post-game. It's another reaction to Basics where we had a very lurky town. I require town players to be moderately active. If all the town players are active and the scum decide to lurk, then it shouldn't be a problem to find the scum. If all the town players are active and contribute to the discussion, scum are forced to post more and more to blend in with a more active town. The more scum are forced to post, the more misdirection they are forced to use and the easier it will be to find the holes in their stories and out them as scum. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Off to work on English. Be back in an hour or so. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:16 Holyflare wrote: Asking about the same thing because new information was made available that your activity would be justifiably alright so there was no need to even post that your activity would be dwindling when you say that it won't be. Making the point that although I will not have as much time as usual, I will do everything in my power to contribute to the discussion. Which is what every townie should do. Do you have a problem with everyone being active? | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Off for realsies. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Do you guys really think I'm more scummy at this point than Spag and Slam? I'm being open and honest with all of you. I'm not hiding anything. I've always tried to be genuine and not put up façades or wear masks. I'm telling you that I was going to be busy and I told you how I felt coming into this game. If you guys want to call me scum for that, go ahead. But just know that it is really silly to call me scum when Slam and Spag made one post and peaced out. Spag had to be coerced back into the thread and Slam still hasn't come back. Plutarch wasn't trying to prod me for discussion; he was trying to twist my words and call me scum. Holyflare is just piggybacking off of everyone else's arguments to take town credit. If you guys would look into the game, you would see that I am far from the scummiest player here. Also, it is good to know that you are all down for pressure voting so now I don't have to take your votes seriously until very close to the deadline. Sweet. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:54 VayneAuthority wrote: lynching lurkers was also the way he started titanic one, and he was scum there Yeah that was before lurkers ruined Basics | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:55 Xatalos wrote: Actually I think Corazon has a surprisingly good chance of flipping Mafia (considering it's this early). Slightly scummy opening post, slightly OMGUS response, apathetic tone in next post... Definitely not looking good. Has anyone played with him before though? How does this compare to his town/Mafia play? Why do you need meta to make your read on me? My opening post was not scummy. My OMGUS wasn't an OMGUS. I'm going to call people out for not reading. That isn't scummy to you? Holyflare was just piggybacking off of Plutarch. I'm going to call people out for piggybacking. That isn't scummy to you? I hate to tell you that you are wrong but you are wrong. Sorry. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 07:03 Spaghetticus wrote: Why do you think me scummy Corazon? Surely if you have material it would be best to place it out in the open for all to see, given the current lack of information available to town? You said I had to be coerced back into the thread? Is that it? I was going to watch a single ep. Shit son. Sue me. I was an alt-tab away... I didn't end up watching that ep either. Something happened in the game, so my reason for passing time was no longer motivating my actions. Are you going to FOS me for not being the one person in eighteen to get this discussion off the ground? Nice work buddy. Yay that makes 2 people who understand how dumb the pressure votes for me are. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 07:01 Xatalos wrote: Spagetticus and Alakaslam certainly didn't start in a townish way. But I have to ask which is worse: weak non-contribution (them) or passable non-contribution (you)? "passable non-contribution" doesn't exist. Your logic is flawed. My first post was contribution. You can call me out on it later if I contradict myself. You can't call Slam and Spag out on anything that they wrote in their first posts. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
| ||