purple, Grackster, Spaghetticus, Cora (when he comes back) -> far more better targets of discussion atm imo.
II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
purple, Grackster, Spaghetticus, Cora (when he comes back) -> far more better targets of discussion atm imo. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
Spaghetticus is more interested in defending himself than contributing onto anything that's been going on in the game. He just pops in and gives some irrelevant comments about something. Cora needs to answer Plutarch's case on him. I think i've been pretty clear in what i think about purple. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 00:18 Xatalos wrote: Hm. That seems to mirror my thoughts pretty well. I'll have to reread yet though. What about Kush? I think that, weirdly enough, he's started to move from the policy lynch category into somewhat useful. That list post though... So easy for Mafia to do something like that. So pretty null for now IMO. What Vayne says about kush is most likely true. While i hate it i can't say he's scum for it. I would love to see something other than "these dudes are town because of activity" - even a piece of kush-logic-scumhunting. If he remains useless vigi's shoot him. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
Don't you think this way you effectively refrain from contributing towards any lynch and therefore towards scumhunting? Do you think this is townie? Because to me you are as useless as Slam atm.. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 01:03 Corazon wrote: Is anyone else concerned that Xatalos is taking pains to call his own play townie? I am more concerned in you finishing up reading the thread and commenting on things you should comment on / feel are worth commenting. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 03:01 bumatlarge wrote: Don't worry, I'm reading your posts ![]() Put it this way. I'd like to enter Day 2 with everyone here except pandain. I'm not advocating a sort of no-lynch policy, but I don't think we have a good lynch. What is important in this thread at the moment is debatable. I want to keep the accusations streamlined, and I don't want 6 kushmastas giving me their green reads. The pressure levels are sweet. That's probably what's most important. Wait what? We are under 24h into the game and the only thing you want to talk about is someone who has not posted. Do you think people voting for him now does: 1) make him magically come here posting sooner? 2) leave us with more information than pressuring other people even if he does not come back and we lynch him? Also do you think Pandain as mafia is type of a player that goes inactive for any other than non-game related reasons? If not, why exactly are you trying to shut down discussion? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 03:16 bumatlarge wrote: But he hasss posted. Information is overrated! He will come if we vote him. He is the missing corner piece to a fully fledged town! MEGAZORD ASSEMBLED! ?!?!?! I don't meta this early. Why would you think that last statement. Am I distracting you? To me it seemed like you wanted to vote for an inactive, encouraged everyone else to vote for an inactive and therefore shut down any productive discussion until Pandain returns. Apparently this is not true (since you started talking about other things) so carry on, my post is no longer relevant. ![]() What do you think of my cases on Grackaroni and purpletrator? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
What do you think of Grack & purple? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 04:57 Grackaroni wrote: lol all of the cases were shitty. Plutarchs case on Cora was shitty. Artanis' case on Xatalos was shitty. That doesn't really tell me much about who is what. fyi that is how I filled up my filter at the start of the game in time to die. I just looked for the bad cases being thrown about and made an effort of showing why they were bad. How about you make a good one then yourself? Your case on me atm seems quite convincing. Is there any reason you seem to only want to contribute towards bad town atmosphere? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 05:22 Artanis[Xp] wrote: So you're just going to throw your vote away if he's not a lynch candidate today? Come on man. Talk to me about Spaghetticus. Actually my plan was to convince you guys into voting him but there is still 24h to go on this phase. Spaghetticus looks scummy for being overly defensive when people were just trying to get him into reading the thread and giving out reads. He always found some excuse to comment on something that did not make him go towards telling who is mafia. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 05:29 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Can you tell me exactly what you find suspicious of Grack? Is it that he voted you without pressuring you? He hasn't really done anything but this: The problem is he is not really going after me. His posts about me have no other motive than trying to make me angry and therefore play bad. I don't know what purpose that serves or how he thinks he is helping the town. By telling me i am not allowed to call out people for shitting on other people because i played bad in another game? Why would someone who is town do that? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 10 2013 16:33 VayneAuthority wrote: I will say though that playing as scum last game you probably realize that Slam basically adds another scum to the game as either alignment. So I'm fine with lynching him regardless unless something very convincing goes down. I don't see anything that tells me otherwise at least yet. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
![]() Spaghetticus, this has now been asked many times. Who are your scumreads? Last day you managed to not catch up while you were doing it, instead you made ~60 posts that said just about nothing. Now it's time to start giving out reads. If you say you don't have any, i won't believe you, because while you were not comfortable with any scumreads in LXIII at this point, you still had this to say: + Show Spoiler + On November 16 2013 03:50 Spaghetticus wrote: I started this a little after Artanis' prodding, it's taken me awhile. I’m going to have to read through again soon, as not everything is sticking with me. It’s currently 5am and I’ve had four hours sleep in the last 48 hours. I’m also having difficulty catching up on some of the terminology, though I’m gradually cluing in. I’ll just splurge out my impressions. I won’t make any formal cases just yet, I want to put my thoughts on paper then attend to them once I’m rested. Apologies in advance for poor formatting. I’m comfortable with confirming Yamato town. This may seem redundant since that’s the general consensus, but I’m very stringent so this is actually a pretty big step. On my next readthrough I’ll be fine tooth combing for Mocsta and VE. I’ve got precious history with Mocsta, but he’s also quite active. I want to confirm him town if possible. VE seems like the next most obvious, given the amount of material he has provided. I don’t like some of VE’s towncalls, but I think they’ve already been covered by others. LoneMeow masoning incident: I find this unsuspicious. I’m probably more interested in those who tried to force this to be an issue. Artanis and SS: SS seems dense. The projected paradigm within which he claims to view the world where everyone’s decision making is based entirely on the single factor of whether or not victory is achieved, is silly. Does he seriously expect people to sit through a month of his needless abuse in order to slightly increase their chances of winning a prizeless endeavour? Does he seriously think that by espousing his (so far generally unimpressive) logic to the exclusion of compromise in the pursuit of cooperation, he will achieve his intended position of mayor? I understand that some people have difficulty getting along with others, but it seems to me a cover. I’d like to hear people’s thoughts on his meta. For someone who proclaims his own competency as a vet at the beginning of the thread, this incompetency is not consistent from my (admittedly limited) perspective. It could very easily be used to obscure scummy motives. Admittedly, there have also been town tells. I've mixed feelings here. Grack: The trolling seems a poor move. BC is hammering him, and IMO rightly so. Grack has fluffed, and Grack has not done much else. I can only think that: - Grack does not care (useless town) - Grack is in some way trying to modify his meta (unlikely) - Grack is trying to scumbait (somewhat more likely) - Grack is scum (most likely) The Kush4prez line was possibly scumbait, but honestly I don’t see how a town Grack was planning on taking that bait (if successful) and then convincing town of his plan post hoc. The inevitable arse biting his actions have reaped was entirely foreseeable. It’s difficult to see him as town, as his actions have caused little but discord. Yamato lynching BC: I’m not sure, but did I miss the case? I see BC as good, I don’t want him to be scum. I’m not sure why that makes us need to lynch him without further information, as so far he’s been valuable. Unless I’m missing something, Mocsta was right to demand more reasoning for yamato’s platform based on BC. That said, Mocsta’s reasoning about cost/benefit for lynching BC confused me. If it’s what I think it is, it’s suspiciously dull. Sharrant: I’m not entirely certain how this became a thing, I’ll look into it in my next read. There didn't seem enough information at the time to make reads, that it was mentioned so many times sort of makes me think of artificial intervention. Kushmasta: His propensity for unpredictable play makes him unsuitable for mayor. Everyone knows this, though I think some take it too far. Policy lynching him seems both poor play and in poor taste. Using him as a vehicle for lynchbait/trolling is also pretty shit. I think people attempting to bring Kush into the spotlight are hard pressed to provide a believable town motive. Other than that, there are a lot of people that are sliding around on my scale, but also a lot of undercommitment in posts. If you have a read, please don’t just state your conclusion, as it only begs the question, and junks up the thread with people demanding that you elaborate. You may feel like you’re getting straight to the point #lessismore #quietconfidence but the end result is a less cohesive discussion, and a less effective town. Alakaslam do you understand people do not want to decipher your posts? I have no clue what you are talking about besides you seem to be thinking me and Spaghetticus are same alignment? Why is that? Why can't you just write your thoughts instead of making them an unreadable code? That does not help anyone because unless you have something to say that only one of the people should hear that's not productive, and at this point of the game you can't possibly have something that only one person needs to hear. We need to all hear and understand what you are thinking, and tbh i am willing to lynch you if what you are doing now does not stop. It does not help. It's not also people's job to ask you about your thoughts. It's your job to make yourself heard and offer opinions that help us lynching mafia. You can't just behind "but noone talked with me". If that's so, make people talk to you. Offer them something to talk about. Who should we lynch in your opinion? Why? bumatlarge i am a bit puzzled, why exactly do you want to lynch Pandain and do you think he is the best lynch today? I'll ask straight up here, are you even trying to find mafia? It does not really look like it atm. Pandain why exactly did you oppose the policy lynch idea so hard? I think you are good enough to know that even if Slam is town and he continues doing what he does he's never an asset to the town. He'll not be listened to, he is a lynchbait later on unless you want to decide that he is town now (which is stupid in the first place) and he is less likely to make right decisions in his voting because he does not let his train of thought to be know for other people -> does not get feedback regarding it. So all in all he is a random vote and a really likely mislynch in a situation town might not have mislynch. How do you justify lynching / not lynching him then? Also do you have anything else to say than opposing the policy lynch and accusing bumatlarge for his vote? yes it's bad - does it make him mafia? Why will mafia bumatlarge say "Spaghetticus is mafia, i will vote for Pandain"? Do you think he is some random noob that contradicts himself every sentence he writes? Other than that i agree with you, bumatlarge has not really been helping. Plutarch you here? Or anyone? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
##unvote | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
purple starts contributing or we lynch him. In case both of those do not happen one gets lynched other one vigged. In case both of those happen we lynch the scummiest dude. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On December 11 2013 20:15 Xatalos wrote: I'd prefer lynching someone like Artanis or Corazon over Alakaslam. Anti-town/lurker lynches tend to be just giant bandwagons where nobody learns anything. Even if the coin-flip is a success and he flips scum, it doesn't tell almost anything about the voters/non-voters. It's easy to vote for a player like that no matter what alignment the player or his voter is... Well if you do not want them lynched better start telling them to contribute. | ||
| ||