II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 2

On December 10 2013 21:24 Plutarch wrote:


To be honest games tend to blend together and unless you make a real effort to refresh your memory (i didn't) you make mistakes. I made a mistake. The simple truth is that I just didn't realize it had been that long.

On December 10 2013 21:32 Plutarch wrote:


If I played in dessert why would I be using an older game as meta? You guys....

On December 10 2013 21:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:

My thoughts on Artanis have not really changed since i last posted them (after the "i don't like him" post).
I agree with what Plutarch said about Corazon as i said, i don't think anything else in his posting is scummy.

Grackaroni basically does not even address my case because it's not about if purple is clueless or not. That's scummy as hell.

On December 10 2013 22:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:

My case on purple is that his interactions with LSB have no intention in proving his towniness or figuring out LSB's alignment. You certainly are misrepresenting the case intentionally or do not understand it.

On December 10 2013 22:10 Holyflare wrote:
Well in lxiii the moment I cast some misrepresentation you jumped all over it as a scum tell and wouldn't let down about it. What's changed that you are so compliant with Grack doing it now?

On December 10 2013 17:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The whole evolution of his LSB-read and interactions with him are completely nonsensical, can't possibly achieve anything and do not even have any sort of logic behind them.

On December 10 2013 22:38 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

Are you scumclaiming?

On December 10 2013 22:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:

It's not even a matter of if he knows LSB's alignment in that game. Whatever his alignment in PYP is if he does something he did there in this game it does not make him any alignment here. If he does "miss key points in posts" as town, he could as easily miss them as scum and vice versa.

It's a weak ass backpedal from a vote that was weak-ass in the first place (as i clearly pointed out in my case).
The whole interaction between purple and LSB does not make any sense because nothing purple says is can't evolve into an alignment indicative answer from LSB and he does not even give a clear read on LSB after the interaction. He is not interested in finding out LSB's alignment -> what's the point of the conversation?

On December 11 2013 00:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Grackaroni has not offered any insight into anything that has happened in this game. He did not comment on my "shitty case" before i asked him to. If he thinks the case in fact was shitty why would he not shoot it down in the first place? Townies should not let shitty cases lie around because it distracts from actual scumhunting. Then he OMGUSes me (for what?) and leaves.

Spaghetticus is more interested in defending himself than contributing onto anything that's been going on in the game. He just pops in and gives some irrelevant comments about something.

Cora needs to answer Plutarch's case on him.

I think i've been pretty clear in what i think about purple.

On December 11 2013 01:03 Spaghetticus wrote:


Be less bad please.

How do you expect to convince anyone with this garbage?

So we should take you word for it that not only are you trustworthy, you are able to discern smurfs at a glance, and you deem that this smurf is marv, and you also deem that Marv tunnels you, that he does so unfairly, and we should therefore disregard it? How can you not see that this is too much to swallow?

HF is biased because he thinks you're scummy and doesn't change his vote with the wind?

Artanis can't be scum because you agree with him on something?

You're either making terrible arguments because you're terrible town, or you're just bullshitting to look like you're doing something. Can someone weigh in on how good Corazon is supposed to be? If he's at all capable at mafia I want him hung.

On December 11 2013 04:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:

How about you make a good one then yourself? Your case on me atm seems quite convincing. Is there any reason you seem to only want to contribute towards bad town atmosphere?

On December 11 2013 05:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The problem is he is not really going after me. His posts about me have no other motive than trying to make me angry and therefore play bad. I don't think i am switching my vote off him today.

On December 11 2013 05:44 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Grack you mentioned a very forced post of Spaghetticus. Would you be happy to lynch him on D1?

On December 11 2013 03:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:

To me it seemed like you wanted to vote for an inactive, encouraged everyone else to vote for an inactive and therefore shut down any productive discussion until Pandain returns.

Apparently this is not true (since you started talking about other things) so carry on, my post is no longer relevant.

What do you think of my cases on Grackaroni and purpletrator?

On December 11 2013 05:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

After checking his filter I can see where you're coming from. I can see a scum grack, but I also know that grack likes to troll. Picking a fight with you early on seems like a terrible idea as scum, but he skated by due to terrible ideas in LXIII too whilst being scum. I wouldn't oppose a Grack lynch at this point but I'm not convinced on it.

On December 11 2013 12:51 kushm4sta wrote:
slam you have to have self confidence in your own way or these assholes will make you feel bad. just act how you are gonna act. if we lynch you and you flip town then that teaches us a lesson for next game and we wont lynch you so easily.