|
|
On November 26 2013 05:43 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:34 Alakaslam wrote:On November 26 2013 05:23 Onegu wrote: @Slam did you read my mocsta case? No, and huh? What delay? Catch me up on that please. What page is that case on? You are aware Cora had a case on you? Yes I know he had a case on me Ill post my response and my case on mocsta, its long and long winded just so you know. Just the page number the. Do t mess up the thread
|
On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode
Did you read it or just glance at it? I mean yes I fail at bbc code but why wasnt it obvious it wasnt the same case you had defended yourself from already? The top part of it looked exactly the same. From what you wrote it looks like you at least look at it because you say those are old arguements and I bring nothing new to the table.
|
On November 26 2013 05:46 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode Did you read it or just glance at it? I mean yes I fail at bbc code but why wasnt it obvious it wasnt the same case you had defended yourself from already? The top part of it looked exactly the same. From what you wrote it looks like you at least look at it because you say those are old arguements and I bring nothing new to the table. I've looked at that post 5 times and outside of the part where you talked about Mocsta's posts at the end, I have no clue what is your writing and what is Mocsta's.
|
On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode Acceptable: "I fail at x" Questionable: "you fail at x" Acceptable: "you messed up x" Questionable: "shitting on the thread"
So take it or leave it, knowing it comes from a hypocrite.
|
|
On November 26 2013 05:48 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:46 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode Did you read it or just glance at it? I mean yes I fail at bbc code but why wasnt it obvious it wasnt the same case you had defended yourself from already? The top part of it looked exactly the same. From what you wrote it looks like you at least look at it because you say those are old arguements and I bring nothing new to the table. I've looked at that post 5 times and outside of the part where you talked about Mocsta's posts at the end, I have no clue what is your writing and what is Mocsta's.
All mocsta, mine is only the part at the bottom.
|
On November 26 2013 05:52 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:48 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 05:46 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode Did you read it or just glance at it? I mean yes I fail at bbc code but why wasnt it obvious it wasnt the same case you had defended yourself from already? The top part of it looked exactly the same. From what you wrote it looks like you at least look at it because you say those are old arguements and I bring nothing new to the table. I've looked at that post 5 times and outside of the part where you talked about Mocsta's posts at the end, I have no clue what is your writing and what is Mocsta's. All mocsta, mine is only the part at the bottom. You mean the part where you go
1 analysis 2 analysis 3 analysis
and so on?
|
Its mocsta who failed at bbc code in his spoiler btw not me
|
On November 26 2013 05:54 Onegu wrote: Its mocsta who failed at bbc code in his spoiler btw not me Well I wrote that post you quoted because I thought it was a case on me. If you were reading you would've seen that I realized that.
|
On November 26 2013 05:52 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:52 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:48 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 05:46 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode Did you read it or just glance at it? I mean yes I fail at bbc code but why wasnt it obvious it wasnt the same case you had defended yourself from already? The top part of it looked exactly the same. From what you wrote it looks like you at least look at it because you say those are old arguements and I bring nothing new to the table. I've looked at that post 5 times and outside of the part where you talked about Mocsta's posts at the end, I have no clue what is your writing and what is Mocsta's. All mocsta, mine is only the part at the bottom. You mean the part where you go 1 analysis 2 analysis 3 analysis and so on?
Yeah thats me at the bottom with the numbers, the rest is mocstas case that you had already responded to. Just trying to see why you didnt know they were the exact same points already brought up against you and that you responded to.
|
|
On November 26 2013 06:00 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:52 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 05:52 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:48 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 05:46 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode Did you read it or just glance at it? I mean yes I fail at bbc code but why wasnt it obvious it wasnt the same case you had defended yourself from already? The top part of it looked exactly the same. From what you wrote it looks like you at least look at it because you say those are old arguements and I bring nothing new to the table. I've looked at that post 5 times and outside of the part where you talked about Mocsta's posts at the end, I have no clue what is your writing and what is Mocsta's. All mocsta, mine is only the part at the bottom. You mean the part where you go 1 analysis 2 analysis 3 analysis and so on? Yeah thats me at the bottom with the numbers, the rest is mocstas case that you had already responded to. Just trying to see why you didnt know they were the exact same points already brought up against you and that you responded to. Because the BBCode was so bad I didn't know what was yours and what was Mocsta's. You're not going anywhere with this.
|
On November 26 2013 05:56 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:54 Onegu wrote: Its mocsta who failed at bbc code in his spoiler btw not me Well I wrote that post you quoted because I thought it was a case on me. If you were reading you would've seen that I realized that.
Trust me Im reading very close. You wont like what I found since I will prove you are scum, since its 4am Im going to give you the big things now, and do a full case like mocsta where I dont cherrypick and show all your scummyness tomorrow, but since I am now right onto the real scumteam I might be shot tonight.
Preview + Show Spoiler + Mocsta, cDgCorazon, rean/alakaslam
|
On November 26 2013 06:06 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 05:56 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 05:54 Onegu wrote: Its mocsta who failed at bbc code in his spoiler btw not me Well I wrote that post you quoted because I thought it was a case on me. If you were reading you would've seen that I realized that. Trust me Im reading very close. You wont like what I found since I will prove you are scum, since its 4am Im going to give you the big things now, and do a full case like mocsta where I dont cherrypick and show all your scummyness tomorrow, but since I am now right onto the real scumteam I might be shot tonight. Preview + Show Spoiler + Mocsta, cDgCorazon, rean/alakaslam LOL
|
On November 26 2013 06:01 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 06:00 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:52 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 05:52 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:48 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 05:46 Onegu wrote:On November 26 2013 05:42 cDgCorazon wrote:On November 26 2013 04:28 Onegu wrote:On November 21 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote: Onegu, I know you are better at this game then your case on me. You fail to look at anything I have said about those posts and the information/logic you are using to vote for me is nothing original. I have not seen anything original in that case which leaves me worried about whether you are scum or not.
The whole game you've done nothing productive to the town. That case was so bad it's anti-productive. Try harder. Cora earlier you had responded to the mocsta case that I posted, yet then you thought my post was a new case with old arguements, how did you not see it was the exact same case you had defended yourself from earlier? Because you fail at BBCode Did you read it or just glance at it? I mean yes I fail at bbc code but why wasnt it obvious it wasnt the same case you had defended yourself from already? The top part of it looked exactly the same. From what you wrote it looks like you at least look at it because you say those are old arguements and I bring nothing new to the table. I've looked at that post 5 times and outside of the part where you talked about Mocsta's posts at the end, I have no clue what is your writing and what is Mocsta's. All mocsta, mine is only the part at the bottom. You mean the part where you go 1 analysis 2 analysis 3 analysis and so on? Yeah thats me at the bottom with the numbers, the rest is mocstas case that you had already responded to. Just trying to see why you didnt know they were the exact same points already brought up against you and that you responded to. Because the BBCode was so bad I didn't know what was yours and what was Mocsta's. You're not going anywhere with this.
Its not that important just you answered the same exact worded questions already, just shows you arent actually reading the thread. but in your filter you never link the case and give a bad defense, I dont think that case was real as alot of the points were bad, and so early in day one, also mocsta never followed it up.
|
Finish my notes then give you guys why cora is scum. Then sleep.
|
Haha Onegu, it's so cute how you are feigning activity and scum-hunting. Watch when Mocsta and I don't die and then HF/Onegu start calling us the scum team. It's gonna be too easy to figure out who is scum.
|
Onegu,
Your case turned me off after two things.
1: you double quoted a long Mocsta post 2: you attack Mocsta for both attacking my slot and defending it. What would be the townie reaction?
It would be great for such a long case to distract a replace as scum, otherwise, are you certain there is no summary?
|
On November 21 2013 01:00 cDgCorazon wrote: When did I say that sciberia was bad town? Please find a post where I said he was bad town.
I didn't vote for sciberia because 0% of wagons in the first 2 hours of a game actually get to the deadline? None. What is the point of vote-jumping? It just allows people to skim my cases once they see the bold vote and only really look at it once it's my turn to be under the gun. Voting for people at this stage is pretty useless because it's not going to get a lynch going. I guarantee you that our reads and opinions are going to change before the deadline and it's useless to lock yourself in (or at least making a statement saying you are going to) 2 hours into a game.
That case was confirmation bias because you took 1-2 decent points about me (which alone are not enough to justify a vote or my lynching) and then supplemented them with saying "Corazon is doing stuff that he always does in every game, he has to be scum for it in this one".
Ok first look at the bolded part. Im not going to make a case and vote because people only skim them and read them fully only when they think I am scum. How is this a townies mindset? He is worried about people makeing a case on him. This does not come from someone townie. Now look at the underlined part, there is no reason to make a case this early as they never stick. What out giveing someone pressure and makeing them answer questions with a early case and getting a read on them.
Cora answer me this what is really so bad with cases and votes in the first few hours of day one?
|
On November 26 2013 06:17 Alakaslam wrote: Onegu,
Your case turned me off after two things.
1: you double quoted a long Mocsta post 2: you attack Mocsta for both attacking my slot and defending it. What would be the townie reaction?
It would be great for such a long case to distract a replace as scum, otherwise, are you certain there is no summary?
Did you read it all? Ill link you to the tl;dr it might be hard to follow but the points are good. Like mocsta defending jamp to rayn for tunneling on aqua. Then makeing a case on jamp for tunneling aqua.
And dont get all up on me for double quoteing when phone posting.
|
|
|
|