• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:28
CEST 06:28
KST 13:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202578RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder0EWC 2025 - Replay Pack1Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced26BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 I offer completely free coaching services
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 579 users

Back To The Basics Mini Mafia - Page 69

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 145 Next
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=437262
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 23 2013 23:37 GMT
#1361
On November 24 2013 08:36 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:32 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:30 Mocsta wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:24 cDgCorazon wrote:
Please vote me. It's about time someone put their vote where their mouth is.

So I'm curious Mocsta, why am I so scummy now that I've been prodded to death? Shouldn't I have been scummy for a lot longer? If so, why didn't you point it out earlier? It's called confirmation bias, bro.

You have confirmation bias. I did not state any of the things you mentioned.

It will be clear once I have done my filter-dive. Currently you are null for me.

IF YOU HAVE A NULL READ ON ME I DONT WANT ANY CASE ON ME FROM YOU. YOU DONT MAKE "NULL CASES"

Once you are done answering Aquanim question; can you please give me your opinino on Scibs response to Onegu.

And give you a chance to find a phantom "scum slip"? No
Grubby's #1 Fan
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
November 23 2013 23:38 GMT
#1362
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 23 2013 23:45 GMT
#1363
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

I really want to know if Corazon has a different PoV to you.

Can you please convince him to respond.

I'm not chasing any scum slips - I promise Corazon.
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 23 2013 23:47 GMT
#1364
On November 24 2013 08:45 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

I really want to know if Corazon has a different PoV to you.

Can you please convince him to respond.

I'm not chasing any scum slips - I promise Corazon.

Bullshit
Grubby's #1 Fan
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 23 2013 23:51 GMT
#1365
On November 24 2013 08:47 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:45 Mocsta wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

I really want to know if Corazon has a different PoV to you.

Can you please convince him to respond.

I'm not chasing any scum slips - I promise Corazon.

Bullshit

Mate answer the question.

I have an opinion on Scibs interaction with Onegu; and I first want to know if you agree with Aquanim PoV

Just say yes or no if you dont want to detail it in a paragraph.
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 23 2013 23:52 GMT
#1366
I've been too busy making pre-planned posts to explain myself to care about anything else.
Grubby's #1 Fan
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 23 2013 23:55 GMT
#1367
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

Corazon
Do you agree.

Yes or No


You've had time to think about it, so now you can respond as a pre-planned answer
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 23 2013 23:56 GMT
#1368
On November 24 2013 08:55 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

Corazon
Do you agree.

Yes or No


You've had time to think about it, so now you can respond as a pre-planned answer

Who cares? I'm scum anyways. Aren't I, Moc?
Grubby's #1 Fan
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
November 23 2013 23:56 GMT
#1369
On November 24 2013 08:47 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:45 Mocsta wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

I really want to know if Corazon has a different PoV to you.

Can you please convince him to respond.

I'm not chasing any scum slips - I promise Corazon.

Bullshit

uh... pretty pretty please with a cherry on top, Corazon?

+ Show Spoiler +
I got nuffin'


Seriously though, I think Mocsta's asked a reasonable question and given you an opportunity to contribute, as opposed to just baiting you out. Getting angrier won't solve the impasse we're currently at.

If you need to take a break for a while, go and do it. I've found it's helped me in similar situations in the past (this game and others).
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 23 2013 23:59 GMT
#1370
On November 24 2013 08:56 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:55 Mocsta wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

Corazon
Do you agree.

Yes or No


You've had time to think about it, so now you can respond as a pre-planned answer

Who cares? I'm scum anyways. Aren't I, Moc?

Actually, Having gone through the first 2 pages of your filter, I find your early day1 play extremely townie.

I shouldnt have to tell you this, to illicit a response from you though.

Heres an example
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 20 2013 13:07 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:01 Bereft wrote:
On November 20 2013 12:57 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 20 2013 12:54 Aquanim wrote:

...
On that note, sciberia needs to stop analyzing the first page so hard and just discuss. We're not going to find scum on the first page. You guys just need to talk instead of being at each other's throats 30 minutes into the game.

The way I see it, sciberbia analysing the first page at least gives us something to talk about. Why don't you think what he's doing is productive?


I think it is sciberia either not understanding that the first page of a game is usually just joking around or he is trying to rock the boat ridiculously early in the game.

Seeing as sciberia is not new to this game, I think it's the latter.

and what's wrong with rocking the boat ridiculously early in the game?

did you notice that mocsta also did the same thing? according to him, from the 1st page, aqua, sciberia, and I are scum.

do you only take issue with sciberia's page 1 analysis only because it's about you?

He didn't do it with just me. He told Moc and I that it was scummy that we made troll posts. At least Mocsta was direct in saying who he thought was scummy instead of sciberia who is only doing a "window looking" version of scum hunting.
Another confusing post due to the injection of "Moc & I"
1. Does he have a town lean on me, hence thinks, Scibs calling out of trolling to Corazon then applies to me? (i.e. typecase town) - Unlikely
2. Does he know I am town, hence, trying to lump himself with me (i.e. scum knowledge) - Again, I would have to assume Corazon is good at scum and non-emotional to assume he could be capable of this. Unlikely
3. Misread the argument - Unlikely: He came back from a shower and made that post to Scibs very calmly. It is clear he was in control of what he was writing.
4. Mentioned my name because Bereft brought up my name: Very likely.

Working off point 4 it shows Corazon is at least trying to have a baseline to compare things. Hes putting himself out there whether right or wrong. This is early Day1 and hes already gone out guns blazing and then backing up his views.
Gotta be town.
Think about this <unfortunately its a tell that only works for me>
I know Mocsta is town.
Corazon has a track record with me that isn't too flash.
He *should* be scared of me if he is scum; he *should* be reluctant to post when I am here if he is scum.

Instead, hes putting himself out there, in particular calmly as well. Hes trying to play this game well - just like me. Pretty damn townie.
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 24 2013 00:03 GMT
#1371
For every 1 good post you write about me, you write 5 of these...
On November 23 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2013 10:54 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:38 sciberbia wrote:
Have some questions for you Cora.

1) Can you explain what you were talking about in this post? How exactly did you think rayn was trying to gain town cred by going on a rampage and martyring himself?
On November 22 2013 04:45 cDgCorazon wrote:
I really do not like Rayn martyring...tbh the concept of martyring has been beaten to death and I think he's just using it as a ploy to gain town cred.


2) If you think it would have been beneficial to scum to keep rayn alive yesterday EVEN given that he is town, why would you not vote for him yesterday? Surely if you think lynching town!rayn would be bad for scum, then it would be good for town? And if he flipped scum even better, right? I don't see how you reconcile voting for no lynch with claiming that it would have been better for scum to no-lynch yesterday.

Ok, to be honest, the Rayn lynch was basically impossible for me to pick a side. On one hand, I really thought Rayn was town. On the other hand, Rayn's play was very anti-town. It is a very narrow playstyle that Rayn's townplay fits into. He can be town but not an asset to town at the same time. That is the reason I'm not attacking Mocsta after Rayn's flip.

I think I'm being misrepresented (or perhaps I have misrepresented myself) to say that I was against the Rayn lynch. Rayn's really bad townplay, along with the fact that it was a majority lynch, gave me a choice of either lynching someone who I was very confident was town or having him shit up the thread.

I think my thought process would make more sense if I went through it.

At the beginning, when I made all of those "OMG this fight is stupid" posts, it was due to the fact that the thread had become a shitfest and Rayn/everyone else were simply shitting up the thread. I was truly exasperated and angry that the thread had gone out of control and we had gone from some very good discussion on Aqua/myself/Rean to Rayn and only Rayn.

After I came back from school, I was still trying to make a decision whether to vote Rayn or not. When I made the post that you quoted, I think I was trying to justify a Rayn lynch to myself. I knew that it was a dumb lynch but I also knew that I could not do anything about it. Rayn had basically lost it and I did not know whether to give him a second chance or not.

When I got back (about 45 minutes from the deadline), I said to myself "Fuck it, I'm not going to be dragged around and be forced to follow thread sentiment". So I voted for a no-lynch. I knew it was useless to try and suggest because Rayn was already bleeding badly and all of the sharks were floating around him. You guys were tunneled way too hard on Rayn and that was a mistake that I tried to correct earlier but gave up out of frustration.

TL;DR: My town read on Rayn + The shitty town atmosphere Rayn was causing= scenario where no one wins and I'm forced to walk a very fine line to take a neutral stance on Rayn's lynch.

On a lunch break.

This is a really bad post.

Its very constructed and uses analogies. This is the first time Corazon breaks out a post with this type of construction and notably, he is answering a very important question from Sciberbia that - I think - produces an alignment indicative response.

Do you understand why I am frustrated with you?

If you want me to cooperate, I'm going to make a request from you. You have to not call me "scummy" unless you make a case that encompasses my play the entire game and accompany said case with a vote. I don't want anything else from you about your read on me, even if others ask you for your opinion on me. Is that clear?
Grubby's #1 Fan
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 24 2013 00:05 GMT
#1372
On November 24 2013 08:56 Aquanim wrote:
If you need to take a break for a while, go and do it. I've found it's helped me in similar situations in the past (this game and others).

I wish that would work but I get all of these bullshit "Cora is scummy but not scum" posts when I'm not around.
Grubby's #1 Fan
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 24 2013 00:06 GMT
#1373
On November 24 2013 09:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
For every 1 good post you write about me, you write 5 of these...
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:54 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:38 sciberbia wrote:
Have some questions for you Cora.

1) Can you explain what you were talking about in this post? How exactly did you think rayn was trying to gain town cred by going on a rampage and martyring himself?
On November 22 2013 04:45 cDgCorazon wrote:
I really do not like Rayn martyring...tbh the concept of martyring has been beaten to death and I think he's just using it as a ploy to gain town cred.


2) If you think it would have been beneficial to scum to keep rayn alive yesterday EVEN given that he is town, why would you not vote for him yesterday? Surely if you think lynching town!rayn would be bad for scum, then it would be good for town? And if he flipped scum even better, right? I don't see how you reconcile voting for no lynch with claiming that it would have been better for scum to no-lynch yesterday.

Ok, to be honest, the Rayn lynch was basically impossible for me to pick a side. On one hand, I really thought Rayn was town. On the other hand, Rayn's play was very anti-town. It is a very narrow playstyle that Rayn's townplay fits into. He can be town but not an asset to town at the same time. That is the reason I'm not attacking Mocsta after Rayn's flip.

I think I'm being misrepresented (or perhaps I have misrepresented myself) to say that I was against the Rayn lynch. Rayn's really bad townplay, along with the fact that it was a majority lynch, gave me a choice of either lynching someone who I was very confident was town or having him shit up the thread.

I think my thought process would make more sense if I went through it.

At the beginning, when I made all of those "OMG this fight is stupid" posts, it was due to the fact that the thread had become a shitfest and Rayn/everyone else were simply shitting up the thread. I was truly exasperated and angry that the thread had gone out of control and we had gone from some very good discussion on Aqua/myself/Rean to Rayn and only Rayn.

After I came back from school, I was still trying to make a decision whether to vote Rayn or not. When I made the post that you quoted, I think I was trying to justify a Rayn lynch to myself. I knew that it was a dumb lynch but I also knew that I could not do anything about it. Rayn had basically lost it and I did not know whether to give him a second chance or not.

When I got back (about 45 minutes from the deadline), I said to myself "Fuck it, I'm not going to be dragged around and be forced to follow thread sentiment". So I voted for a no-lynch. I knew it was useless to try and suggest because Rayn was already bleeding badly and all of the sharks were floating around him. You guys were tunneled way too hard on Rayn and that was a mistake that I tried to correct earlier but gave up out of frustration.

TL;DR: My town read on Rayn + The shitty town atmosphere Rayn was causing= scenario where no one wins and I'm forced to walk a very fine line to take a neutral stance on Rayn's lynch.

On a lunch break.

This is a really bad post.

Its very constructed and uses analogies. This is the first time Corazon breaks out a post with this type of construction and notably, he is answering a very important question from Sciberbia that - I think - produces an alignment indicative response.

Do you understand why I am frustrated with you?

If you want me to cooperate, I'm going to make a request from you. You have to not call me "scummy" unless you make a case that encompasses my play the entire game and accompany said case with a vote. I don't want anything else from you about your read on me, even if others ask you for your opinion on me. Is that clear?
Hunny, that is precisely what i am donig.

I am making a stream of consciousness right now as I read your *entire filter*

Hence why I said before that my read before was null.

What I am asking you about scibs -> Onegu is a side story related to Scibs.

I have an opinion on it that I would like to share but I wanted to get some other opinions first. Aqua shared; please, just a yes or no to whether you agree with him.
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 24 2013 00:07 GMT
#1374
On November 24 2013 09:06 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 09:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
For every 1 good post you write about me, you write 5 of these...
On November 23 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:54 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:38 sciberbia wrote:
Have some questions for you Cora.

1) Can you explain what you were talking about in this post? How exactly did you think rayn was trying to gain town cred by going on a rampage and martyring himself?
On November 22 2013 04:45 cDgCorazon wrote:
I really do not like Rayn martyring...tbh the concept of martyring has been beaten to death and I think he's just using it as a ploy to gain town cred.


2) If you think it would have been beneficial to scum to keep rayn alive yesterday EVEN given that he is town, why would you not vote for him yesterday? Surely if you think lynching town!rayn would be bad for scum, then it would be good for town? And if he flipped scum even better, right? I don't see how you reconcile voting for no lynch with claiming that it would have been better for scum to no-lynch yesterday.

Ok, to be honest, the Rayn lynch was basically impossible for me to pick a side. On one hand, I really thought Rayn was town. On the other hand, Rayn's play was very anti-town. It is a very narrow playstyle that Rayn's townplay fits into. He can be town but not an asset to town at the same time. That is the reason I'm not attacking Mocsta after Rayn's flip.

I think I'm being misrepresented (or perhaps I have misrepresented myself) to say that I was against the Rayn lynch. Rayn's really bad townplay, along with the fact that it was a majority lynch, gave me a choice of either lynching someone who I was very confident was town or having him shit up the thread.

I think my thought process would make more sense if I went through it.

At the beginning, when I made all of those "OMG this fight is stupid" posts, it was due to the fact that the thread had become a shitfest and Rayn/everyone else were simply shitting up the thread. I was truly exasperated and angry that the thread had gone out of control and we had gone from some very good discussion on Aqua/myself/Rean to Rayn and only Rayn.

After I came back from school, I was still trying to make a decision whether to vote Rayn or not. When I made the post that you quoted, I think I was trying to justify a Rayn lynch to myself. I knew that it was a dumb lynch but I also knew that I could not do anything about it. Rayn had basically lost it and I did not know whether to give him a second chance or not.

When I got back (about 45 minutes from the deadline), I said to myself "Fuck it, I'm not going to be dragged around and be forced to follow thread sentiment". So I voted for a no-lynch. I knew it was useless to try and suggest because Rayn was already bleeding badly and all of the sharks were floating around him. You guys were tunneled way too hard on Rayn and that was a mistake that I tried to correct earlier but gave up out of frustration.

TL;DR: My town read on Rayn + The shitty town atmosphere Rayn was causing= scenario where no one wins and I'm forced to walk a very fine line to take a neutral stance on Rayn's lynch.

On a lunch break.

This is a really bad post.

Its very constructed and uses analogies. This is the first time Corazon breaks out a post with this type of construction and notably, he is answering a very important question from Sciberbia that - I think - produces an alignment indicative response.

Do you understand why I am frustrated with you?

If you want me to cooperate, I'm going to make a request from you. You have to not call me "scummy" unless you make a case that encompasses my play the entire game and accompany said case with a vote. I don't want anything else from you about your read on me, even if others ask you for your opinion on me. Is that clear?
Hunny, that is precisely what i am donig.

I am making a stream of consciousness right now as I read your *entire filter*

Hence why I said before that my read before was null.

What I am asking you about scibs -> Onegu is a side story related to Scibs.

I have an opinion on it that I would like to share but I wanted to get some other opinions first. Aqua shared; please, just a yes or no to whether you agree with him.

No, I want a promise from you to fulfill my request. Nothing less.
Grubby's #1 Fan
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 24 2013 00:10 GMT
#1375
On November 24 2013 09:07 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 09:06 Mocsta wrote:
On November 24 2013 09:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
For every 1 good post you write about me, you write 5 of these...
On November 23 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:54 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:38 sciberbia wrote:
Have some questions for you Cora.

1) Can you explain what you were talking about in this post? How exactly did you think rayn was trying to gain town cred by going on a rampage and martyring himself?
On November 22 2013 04:45 cDgCorazon wrote:
I really do not like Rayn martyring...tbh the concept of martyring has been beaten to death and I think he's just using it as a ploy to gain town cred.


2) If you think it would have been beneficial to scum to keep rayn alive yesterday EVEN given that he is town, why would you not vote for him yesterday? Surely if you think lynching town!rayn would be bad for scum, then it would be good for town? And if he flipped scum even better, right? I don't see how you reconcile voting for no lynch with claiming that it would have been better for scum to no-lynch yesterday.

Ok, to be honest, the Rayn lynch was basically impossible for me to pick a side. On one hand, I really thought Rayn was town. On the other hand, Rayn's play was very anti-town. It is a very narrow playstyle that Rayn's townplay fits into. He can be town but not an asset to town at the same time. That is the reason I'm not attacking Mocsta after Rayn's flip.

I think I'm being misrepresented (or perhaps I have misrepresented myself) to say that I was against the Rayn lynch. Rayn's really bad townplay, along with the fact that it was a majority lynch, gave me a choice of either lynching someone who I was very confident was town or having him shit up the thread.

I think my thought process would make more sense if I went through it.

At the beginning, when I made all of those "OMG this fight is stupid" posts, it was due to the fact that the thread had become a shitfest and Rayn/everyone else were simply shitting up the thread. I was truly exasperated and angry that the thread had gone out of control and we had gone from some very good discussion on Aqua/myself/Rean to Rayn and only Rayn.

After I came back from school, I was still trying to make a decision whether to vote Rayn or not. When I made the post that you quoted, I think I was trying to justify a Rayn lynch to myself. I knew that it was a dumb lynch but I also knew that I could not do anything about it. Rayn had basically lost it and I did not know whether to give him a second chance or not.

When I got back (about 45 minutes from the deadline), I said to myself "Fuck it, I'm not going to be dragged around and be forced to follow thread sentiment". So I voted for a no-lynch. I knew it was useless to try and suggest because Rayn was already bleeding badly and all of the sharks were floating around him. You guys were tunneled way too hard on Rayn and that was a mistake that I tried to correct earlier but gave up out of frustration.

TL;DR: My town read on Rayn + The shitty town atmosphere Rayn was causing= scenario where no one wins and I'm forced to walk a very fine line to take a neutral stance on Rayn's lynch.

On a lunch break.

This is a really bad post.

Its very constructed and uses analogies. This is the first time Corazon breaks out a post with this type of construction and notably, he is answering a very important question from Sciberbia that - I think - produces an alignment indicative response.

Do you understand why I am frustrated with you?

If you want me to cooperate, I'm going to make a request from you. You have to not call me "scummy" unless you make a case that encompasses my play the entire game and accompany said case with a vote. I don't want anything else from you about your read on me, even if others ask you for your opinion on me. Is that clear?
Hunny, that is precisely what i am donig.

I am making a stream of consciousness right now as I read your *entire filter*

Hence why I said before that my read before was null.

What I am asking you about scibs -> Onegu is a side story related to Scibs.

I have an opinion on it that I would like to share but I wanted to get some other opinions first. Aqua shared; please, just a yes or no to whether you agree with him.

No, I want a promise from you to fulfill my request. Nothing less.
I can't do that. I haven't finished my stream.

Whatever, its your loss.
Corazon
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States3230 Posts
November 24 2013 00:11 GMT
#1376
On November 24 2013 09:10 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 09:07 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 24 2013 09:06 Mocsta wrote:
On November 24 2013 09:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
For every 1 good post you write about me, you write 5 of these...
On November 23 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:54 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 23 2013 10:38 sciberbia wrote:
Have some questions for you Cora.

1) Can you explain what you were talking about in this post? How exactly did you think rayn was trying to gain town cred by going on a rampage and martyring himself?
On November 22 2013 04:45 cDgCorazon wrote:
I really do not like Rayn martyring...tbh the concept of martyring has been beaten to death and I think he's just using it as a ploy to gain town cred.


2) If you think it would have been beneficial to scum to keep rayn alive yesterday EVEN given that he is town, why would you not vote for him yesterday? Surely if you think lynching town!rayn would be bad for scum, then it would be good for town? And if he flipped scum even better, right? I don't see how you reconcile voting for no lynch with claiming that it would have been better for scum to no-lynch yesterday.

Ok, to be honest, the Rayn lynch was basically impossible for me to pick a side. On one hand, I really thought Rayn was town. On the other hand, Rayn's play was very anti-town. It is a very narrow playstyle that Rayn's townplay fits into. He can be town but not an asset to town at the same time. That is the reason I'm not attacking Mocsta after Rayn's flip.

I think I'm being misrepresented (or perhaps I have misrepresented myself) to say that I was against the Rayn lynch. Rayn's really bad townplay, along with the fact that it was a majority lynch, gave me a choice of either lynching someone who I was very confident was town or having him shit up the thread.

I think my thought process would make more sense if I went through it.

At the beginning, when I made all of those "OMG this fight is stupid" posts, it was due to the fact that the thread had become a shitfest and Rayn/everyone else were simply shitting up the thread. I was truly exasperated and angry that the thread had gone out of control and we had gone from some very good discussion on Aqua/myself/Rean to Rayn and only Rayn.

After I came back from school, I was still trying to make a decision whether to vote Rayn or not. When I made the post that you quoted, I think I was trying to justify a Rayn lynch to myself. I knew that it was a dumb lynch but I also knew that I could not do anything about it. Rayn had basically lost it and I did not know whether to give him a second chance or not.

When I got back (about 45 minutes from the deadline), I said to myself "Fuck it, I'm not going to be dragged around and be forced to follow thread sentiment". So I voted for a no-lynch. I knew it was useless to try and suggest because Rayn was already bleeding badly and all of the sharks were floating around him. You guys were tunneled way too hard on Rayn and that was a mistake that I tried to correct earlier but gave up out of frustration.

TL;DR: My town read on Rayn + The shitty town atmosphere Rayn was causing= scenario where no one wins and I'm forced to walk a very fine line to take a neutral stance on Rayn's lynch.

On a lunch break.

This is a really bad post.

Its very constructed and uses analogies. This is the first time Corazon breaks out a post with this type of construction and notably, he is answering a very important question from Sciberbia that - I think - produces an alignment indicative response.

Do you understand why I am frustrated with you?

If you want me to cooperate, I'm going to make a request from you. You have to not call me "scummy" unless you make a case that encompasses my play the entire game and accompany said case with a vote. I don't want anything else from you about your read on me, even if others ask you for your opinion on me. Is that clear?
Hunny, that is precisely what i am donig.

I am making a stream of consciousness right now as I read your *entire filter*

Hence why I said before that my read before was null.

What I am asking you about scibs -> Onegu is a side story related to Scibs.

I have an opinion on it that I would like to share but I wanted to get some other opinions first. Aqua shared; please, just a yes or no to whether you agree with him.

No, I want a promise from you to fulfill my request. Nothing less.
I can't do that. I haven't finished my stream.

Whatever, its your loss.

Congratz, then you get unhappy and uncooperative Corazon. Enjoy.
Grubby's #1 Fan
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 24 2013 00:12 GMT
#1377
On November 24 2013 08:38 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2013 08:21 Mocsta wrote:
Aquanim
What do you think of Scibs response to Onegu regarding that Bereft case?

I think he raises fair points about the Bereft case. I would have worded them quite differently, but that's unimportant.

Sciberbia didn't touch on every point, which honestly makes me feel better about him - he adressed the ones he thought were important and therefore made a judgement about which were important. I'm inclined to agree with his judgement. Points he didn't talk about, like "tunnels Rayn but is OK to vote Cora now", the Venn diagram, and some other miscellaneous posts, were in fact more peripheral to Onegu's case and generally far less conclusive.

I disagree - that it makes me feel better about him.

I'm concerned.

So heres context for question 2.
- Scibs from late Day1 has Onegu as his best scum read.

Do you think Scibs was addressing Onegu's case as if he was talking to a top scum read?
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
November 24 2013 00:13 GMT
#1378
@Mocsta: Can you go on and make your point about Sciberbia's reply without Corazon's input? I'm curious to see what it is.
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
November 24 2013 00:13 GMT
#1379
lol never mind
Mocsta
Profile Joined December 2012
Australia9388 Posts
November 24 2013 00:26 GMT
#1380
(A)
I'm not happy with how this cycle has started.
Theres been a couple cases - resulting in delurks to dismiss (e.g. Scibs to Onegu); but in my opinion, no one has seriously tried to drive the thread towards a lynch.

Maybe the weekend is a valid excuse - heck I was busy as, yesterday; and somewhat today.
However, I still expect town to make check-ins (much like I did yesterday). Its not hard, is it?
This leads to be disappointed people like Rean/jampidampi are non-existent, and in particular, players like JJD/Bereft have barely posted.

The game is not solved, everyone needs to step up and contribute more: query posts, build cases, push a scum target


(B)
Corazon is starting to become an easy target - and I am concerned.
1. As mentioned already, he is making people hesitant to question him -- which is ideal for scum
2. He is losing his right to be held accountable -- again, this is deal for scum
3. He is losing his transparency (in regards to scum reads) -- again, this is ideal for scum

To me: in order to obtain enough harmony to faciliate a majority lynch I think Corazon needs to be put to bed as the highest priority in this thead.
Either we decide he is town and stop nitpicking him (until there is 1 scum left??); Or decide he is scum and lynch him.

Why?
11 players remain; 3 scum + 8 town.
Majority = 6 votes.
If scum do not want to join us for majority and Corazon is town; that means only one townie can object to the lynch ==> Pretty damn high chance of no-lynch.


(C)
My read on Corazon via Stream of Consciousness
+ Show Spoiler [Day1] +

On November 20 2013 12:06 cDgCorazon wrote:
Moc obv town. Fuck da police!
Trolling. Weird for Corazon. No read off it.

On November 20 2013 12:37 cDgCorazon wrote:
I took a shower. Sorry for not wanting to smell bad.

Moc, I'm quite concerned that you have already used up >25% of your "self-allotted posts". If you're going to start spamming, it's going to be a problem.

Now to my goals/early game statements:

1. I'm not gonna make any meta crap posts. TBH I don't remember anyone's meta and it's ridiculously stupid logic. I'm not going to stand for it and I don't think you guys should either.

2. I'm voting for the scummiest person. My last game was Titanic and it came down to 3-4 days of "X is scum, Y/Z/Q is scum as well". That led the town way off of the path and allowed my scum team the easiest scum win in a very long

time. I don't care if they're not on the two lynch trains that are going to form. It's not instant majority so as long as I feel like I'm voting for the scummiest person in my opinion, I'm going to be happy with my vote.

3. I'm going to do my best to not be just an onlooker. I'm gonna try and facilitate discussion and ask a lot of questions instead of just answering questions and throw my ideas out there and just create more chaos.

On that note, sciberia needs to stop analyzing the first page so hard and just discuss. We're not going to find scum on the first page. You guys just need to talk instead of being at each other's throats 30 minutes into the game.

corazon is a player that likes to be overly pro-town (like me); so I get why a town Corazon would post the above 3 points. Even though the energy inserted is "selfish" I like the last note. It means hes not posting generic

pro-town spiel for the sake of a contribution. Hes also talking to Sciberbia quite calm (and with hindsight, we know what he builds up to). I do think this is a town indicator - for Corazon.

On November 20 2013 12:40 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 12:28 thrawn2112 wrote:
Who wants a free town read? I've only got one, get it while supplies last! All you need to do is be the first to respond to this post!

mocsta is ineligible because him and I are already confirmed town to each other


I'd like to say that mason falls under the role of "standard roles" and could be potentially in this set-up. Very intriguing...
This post still confuses me (i.e. to be able to jump to this conclusion); however, nothing since has

been made of it, so its useless/meaingless.

On November 20 2013 12:44 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 12:43 sciberbia wrote:
On November 20 2013 12:28 thrawn2112 wrote:
Who wants a free town read? I've only got one, get it while supplies last! All you need to do is be the first to respond to this post!

mocsta is ineligible because him and I are already confirmed town to each other


@thrawn
You are masons?

Thx for piggybacking on my post. I really appreciate it.
I'm confused here. Most times I see players scream for credit on non-confirmed information its scum trying to get town cred for when the flip happens. Its why i didn't

like this post now; nor when i first read it. However, when I think about this: the content of the piggyback is not goign to lead to any town cred. Its such a stupid & meaningless conversation.
It really reads as an emotional outburst of a post.
I haven't read Titatnic to confirm if Corazon is capable of this outburst as scum; but in my mind even if he wasn, as scum you often think before pressing post. I think a scum corazon logically would know this is a waste of a post -

regardles of his emotions - and not bother to post it. Its additional heat for no reward.
I am giving this a town lean.

On November 20 2013 12:57 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 12:54 Aquanim wrote:

...
On that note, sciberia needs to stop analyzing the first page so hard and just discuss. We're not going to find scum on the first page. You guys just need to talk instead of being at each other's throats 30 minutes into the game.

The way I see it, sciberbia analysing the first page at least gives us something to talk about. Why don't you think what he's doing is productive?


I think it is sciberia either not understanding that the first page of a game is usually just joking around or he is trying to rock the boat ridiculously early in the game.

Seeing as sciberia is not new to this game, I think it's the latter.
Pages of the thread have gone out to this quote.
1. Previously he asked Scibs to stop looking into him.
2. Aqua suggests that there could be content in the first page.
3. Corazon reinforces his comment by stating Scibs is <scummily> "rocking the board".

Now when I think about this: I am not sure why Corazon now upgrades (*publicly) his read to scum on Scibs. If I have a guess, Corazon originally treated it was a weak scum lean so called it out mildly. When queried by Aquanim he uses

stronger language to reinforce his point. I don't think this series of events is out of line for town or scum to make. What I do think is relatively townie is that first part. "Sciberia could be town not understanding people joke".

This actually demonstrates he has an open mindset and is considering both sides of the fence.
Pretty weak, as good scum play also do this -- but I don't know if Corazon fits into this category. I will give a minor lean towards town.

On November 20 2013 13:07 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:01 Bereft wrote:
On November 20 2013 12:57 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 20 2013 12:54 Aquanim wrote:

...
On that note, sciberia needs to stop analyzing the first page so hard and just discuss. We're not going to find scum on the first page. You guys just need to talk instead of being at each other's throats 30 minutes into the game.

The way I see it, sciberbia analysing the first page at least gives us something to talk about. Why don't you think what he's doing is productive?


I think it is sciberia either not understanding that the first page of a game is usually just joking around or he is trying to rock the boat ridiculously early in the game.

Seeing as sciberia is not new to this game, I think it's the latter.

and what's wrong with rocking the boat ridiculously early in the game?

did you notice that mocsta also did the same thing? according to him, from the 1st page, aqua, sciberia, and I are scum.

do you only take issue with sciberia's page 1 analysis only because it's about you?

He didn't do it with just me. He told Moc and I that it was scummy that we made troll posts. At least Mocsta was direct in saying who he thought was scummy instead of sciberia who is only doing a "window looking" version of scum

hunting.
Another confusing post due to the injection of "Moc & I"
1. Does he have a town lean on me, hence thinks, Scibs calling out of trolling to Corazon then applies to me? (i.e. typecase town) - Unlikely
2. Does he know I am town, hence, trying to lump himself with me (i.e. scum knowledge) - Again, I would have to assume Corazon is good at scum and non-emotional to assume he could be capable of this. Unlikely
3. Misread the argument - Unlikely: He came back from a shower and made that post to Scibs very calmly. It is clear he was in control of what he was writing.
4. Mentioned my name because Bereft brought up my name: Very likely.

Working off point 4 it shows Corazon is at least trying to have a baseline to compare things. Hes putting himself out there whether right or wrong. This is early Day1 and hes already gone out guns blazing and then backing up his views.
Gotta be town.
Think about this <unfortunately its a tell that only works for me>
I know Mocsta is town.
Corazon has a track record with me that isn't too flash.
He *should* be scared of me if he is scum; he *should* be reluctant to post when I am here if he is scum.

Instead, hes putting himself out there, in particular calmly as well. Hes trying to play this game well - just like me. Pretty damn townie.

On November 20 2013 13:20 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:18 thrawn2112 wrote:
##vote: cDgCorazon

Is that you Marv?
This joke post is quite telling as well. This is the first vote on Corazon and he makes a joke about it. We obviously know how he now responds to critiques against him, however, the response early game when hes

trying hard to be a better player I think is COMPLETELY indicative of being town.
If scum and trying to play better; I think Coerazon would instantly question/fling shit at Thrawn - or even just ignore it. Instead he just brushes it off and continues on.

On November 20 2013 13:24 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:20 Aquanim wrote:
@Corazon
I'd like you to elaborate more on why you think sciberbia is scum. I don't entirely understand your argument at present.

He's trying to get us to tunnel each other early so he can just sit around and piggyback on town lynches and point the finger at others.

This is demonstrated when he essentially copies my post asking thrawn if he was a mason (deliberately, his post was at least 2-3 minutes after mine) and then decides that he can take my words and twist them when I pressure him about

it.

This is what troubles me about sciberia right now.
Corazon is consistent in his message. At the time he was very confusing to understand, but in hindsight reading this I know that this all aligns with his posts later on. Good

scum play can be consistent like this too though. I do like that he is willing to keep explaining his message though; it does seem he is phrasing thigns in a way to be clear *and* convincing. Its hard to argue he does not have

emotional conviction either. I disagree scum would be this emotinally involved early game - regardless of being voted/pressured.

On November 20 2013 13:46 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:44 Rean wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:43 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Rean
Talking about town reads is silly. I'd rather just have 1 scum read from Aqua.


Why is it silly?

Would you vote someone on being the "least townie"? Talking about town reads is only good to high-five and pat each other on the back and compliment each other's town play. It doesn't get scum lynched.
As I stated before. I

think this is town indicative. He was in the midst of a convo with Aqua/Thrawn; and decides to interject here to talk about pro-town stuff (i.e. giving out town reads). Hes not actually calling out Rean as scummy here which to me

indicates he is stating this opinion because he believes in it. Look, scum love to butt in with stuff like this. Its easy - especially if you do believe it. For me the telling point is that he interjected whilst being pressured.
It probably should be a null tell; but I do like it as town. Especially because he explains his ratoinale in his next post:
On November 20 2013 13:50 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:47 Rean wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:46 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:44 Rean wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:43 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Rean
Talking about town reads is silly. I'd rather just have 1 scum read from Aqua.


Why is it silly?

Would you vote someone on being the "least townie"? Talking about town reads is only good to high-five and pat each other on the back and compliment each other's town play. It doesn't get scum lynched.


Sure, a good scum read is far more useful. But it might still say something useful. Put it like this, a town read and a scum read is better than just a scum read.

In my opinion, a better thing to ask would be a scum read and someone you would like to know more about. That would facilitate a lot more discussion than only a town/scum read due to the fact that having a town read on someone doesn't do anything for discussion.
what I like here is that he tries to improve the line of reasoning. Yes its still generic spiel, but the moment he chose to pick doesn't scream scum timing to me.

On November 20 2013 13:56 cDgCorazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:54 Rean wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:50 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:47 Rean wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:46 cDgCorazon wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:44 Rean wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:43 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Rean
Talking about town reads is silly. I'd rather just have 1 scum read from Aqua.


Why is it silly?

Would you vote someone on being the "least townie"? Talking about town reads is only good to high-five and pat each other on the back and compliment each other's town play. It doesn't get scum lynched.


Sure, a good scum read is far more useful. But it might still say something useful. Put it like this, a town read and a scum read is better than just a scum read.

In my opinion, a better thing to ask would be a scum read and someone you would like to know more about. That would facilitate a lot more discussion than only a town/scum read due to the fact that having a town read on someone doesn't do anything for discussion.


Both are ways to get discussion going, which one is the better just depends on the situation/person I guess. Sometimes people don't have strong scumreads but get a strong townvibe from someone, it's always good for discussion.

Think it just comes down to preference.

Fair enough. I would like to hear Aqua's reads if he's done dodging Rean (although to be fair to him as well he did mention Thrawn's vote as a town indicator for him).
I don't like this post due to the condescension placed. I'm guilty of this all the time though. Its not scummy per se; just makes the person become more unlikeable.

On November 20 2013 15:42 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Moc
First of all, you skipped 11.
Second of all, are you trying to say that sciberia and I would be shit-flinging at each other in order to...bus each other? Gain town cred for after the lynch? I don't understand why you are trying to ship sciberia and I together.

If you didn't take a look at pregame, I made a bunch of comments about how towns self-destruct. As scum, I would let you guys shit-fight amongst each other and pick and choose my votes.

@sciberia
Put your vote where your mouth is.
Importantly, Corazon has a story that Scibs is scum. As town he truly believes it, as scum he pretends it.
I like "why are you trying to ship scib and I together".
He has consistency in his story; and in this scenario, cares MORE that I think scibs is scum, than that Corazon is scum. This is really telling as town. I don't see how this can be argued. Especially, when he asks Scibs to vote now.
(He was called out for this by me later on, and he suggested voting early is useless) but it is clear he did this ebcause he became emotionally excited.
Yes I sound tunneled on cora as town, but its not making sense to me a scum could play like this so far.

On November 21 2013 00:44 cDgCorazon wrote:
Alright I'm going to respond to the general criticism on me, the brunt of it being in Mocsta's case and then everyone else just rewording it.

First of all, most of Mocsta's filter analysis on me said that I had problems reading and that I was scummy. It's really shit casework from Mocsta because he's played multiple times with me and should know that I had a reading problem in general, whether I'm town or scum.

The rest of his case is his confirmation bias and calling sciberia my scummate. Lol.

I'm really surprised and disappointed that I got all the flak for the conversation between sciberia and I. In my opinion his actions were way more scummy and non-conclusive then mine and I believe that it is really hypocritical of everyone to attack me and simply ignore him.

On Aqua: I really agree with a lot of the points raised up against him. What troubles me the most is that he basically attacked Ream for sticking up for me and starting attacking Ream when it looked like my lynch wasn't going to go down. It felt like he was trying too hard to keep the lynch on me and that is what troubles me.

On others: I'm going to reread the thread but I already do not like the fact that sciberia and LoneMeow insist on keeping the conversation on me when the talk is about Aquanim. It's just making the town less focused and less able to discuss a good lynch candidate if they continue to ramble on about me. In my opinion, the first 24 hours should be allowed to free-flow and not have focused discussion (on one person) and the last 24 should be focus on the 2-3 wagons that pop up.

I'm going to reread Aqua and then reread the rest of the thread (pgs 10-13).
Good scum can make posts like this - at least content wise. Its pretty hard to fake the confidence here. Its written naturally. Because its from the standard checklist of how to play scum, I will stick with null.

On November 21 2013 01:16 cDgCorazon wrote:
On Aqua (again):

My problem with Aquanim is that he goes from a very neutral stance on me:

Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:45 Aquanim wrote:
On November 20 2013 13:36 Rean wrote:
Aquanim, you're constantly asking but never saying much about what you think. Gimme one town and one scum and reasons why please.

I reckon Thrawn's town because I liked the vote on Corazon. That is the kind of action which will get us doing truly productive things. (His unvote doesn't change that.)
As for scum, I'm not sure yet. Not enough information.

I don't much like Corazon's case on sciberbia but I can think of reasons why Corazon would make that argument as town, regardless of how good it is. I'm still null on Corazon but I'm very interested in what he chooses to do next.

I still want an answer to this from you:
On November 20 2013 13:04 Aquanim wrote:
On November 20 2013 12:55 Rean wrote:
On November 20 2013 12:52 Bereft wrote:
Rean, what do you think of Mocsta thus far?


Talks a lot, seems awfully certain of everything he says.

@Rean
Given this, which way are you leaning on Mocsta in terms of alignment?



To an all-out "he's scum!" stance without really having a transition between the two stances. It really troubles me that this was only after all of the cases on me came out. It just looks like Aqua just wants to follow thread sentiment for the big issues and branch out only for things related to his "reads". For example, his case on Rean screams to me that he wants to attack Rean for defending me. His case is weak and he blatantly lies about Rean's questioning of him and calls them not important when in fact he failed to read the reason they were asked in the first place:

Show nested quote +
On November 20 2013 13:36 Rean wrote:
Aquanim, you're constantly asking but never saying much about what you think. Gimme one town and one scum and reasons why please.


It's obvious that Aquanim did not read the reason that Rean threw out this post and simply calls Rean scummy for asking this question. This was a good post because Rean wanted to continue discussion and get a read on Aqua who he had felt was not contributing enough information and enough opinions to the conversation. The fact that Aqua calls this scummy is absurd and can only be attributed to his own scumminess.

TL;DR
Changes opinion on me to follow thread sentiment
Attacks Rean (and says his question about town/scum reads accomplishes nothing when in fact it does) for defending me
This guy is scum

I'm confident enough in this case to throw a ##Vote: Aquanim out.
I disagree with the case i.e how hardline it is: but its clear with the amount of content that specifically relates to Corazon that he is getting butt-hurt. A tunneled townie could definitely make this post.
I like that he uses a case to justify his decision to not push Sciberbia anymore. It indicates transparency in play. Not a great town tell due to the ease of doing this, but still a good sign none-the-less.

On November 21 2013 01:22 cDgCorazon wrote:
No offense JJD that case is really weaksauce.
None of that stuff points to Rean being hardcore scum. It just points to him needing to be more active in the thread and throw some opinions out.

Do you really think that all of that stuff makes Rean more scummier than Aqua, myself, and sciberia?
I like that Corazon includes himself in the list of scummier people. Not entirely sure why, but it takes balls to do that. Its prob a null read though.



There are then a bunch of posts between him and JJD where there is a genuine misunderstanding based on how long it dragged out and Corazon becoming progressively frustrated. Null overall.


I am running out of time quickly. Got stuff to do today as well.

I will try and look at Corazon stances on important matters (closer to the rayn lynch/rean votes etc) when i get time today (possibly 12 hrs away)

However, from Day1, Corazon is FUCKING townie.

we need to move on and start treating him as an asset to town. Corazon *Can* find scum, we need to let him do this thing.

/ciao
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 145 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 32m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 269
RuFF_SC2 193
ProTech54
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4277
ggaemo 3847
Zeus 882
Leta 363
zelot 69
Sacsri 38
Noble 24
Bale 9
Icarus 6
League of Legends
JimRising 1056
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K228
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox2858
Other Games
summit1g14759
tarik_tv6045
Maynarde187
ROOTCatZ145
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1579
BasetradeTV226
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta98
• practicex 31
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity1
• iopq 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift6157
• Rush1451
• Lourlo943
Other Games
• Scarra2072
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
6h 32m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 5h
WardiTV European League
1d 11h
Online Event
1d 13h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.