|
11589 Posts
On November 17 2013 01:46 Koshi wrote:
##unvote
##vote: Koshi
I don't support your reads.
Skanj4b: nha
Pandain: nha just isn't playing
hiro protagonist: Did nothing at all so nha.
Grack: Disappeared. also nha. Not today.
Oatsmaster: where is the case? Why?
Koshi, please don't just tunnel Rayn.
|
On November 17 2013 01:34 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:22 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 23:50 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 16 2013 13:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 13:49 Mig wrote:
VE do you still plan on lynching into the same group of 4 you listed earlier or has it changed?
It's changed, and incomplete. Right now I'm somewhere around [b] Skanjab, Pandain, SharrantAnd I'm torn on my last couple. I'm still not interested in lynching rayn or BC and I'm starting to come around on StorrZerg. His last round of posts, while not super enlightening, felt genuine enough. I'm still filtering, and still rereading. Sup? (1) Why am I, pandain, and sharrant scum? You have not given any reasoning at all for these reads. (2) Also, could you please quote which posts from StorrZerg made you drop your scumread of him? (3) Why do you no longer suspect Grack? 1) Your lack of interest in anything that happens in this game makes me think you're scum. Pandain is in a similar boat - it's like you guys are completely disinterested in trying to find scum at all. Sharrant is....probably not going to get lynched by me. I literally pulled that name off my previous list to make it look more impressive. 2) Maybe. Maybe not. I'll go take a look, but it was more of a feeling thing. Stay tuned. 3) I don't no longer suspect Grack. I actually forgot about Grack and the fact that he's done nothing noteworthy puts him up on my radar again. Thx bra. Well, (1) is just wrong, as I am interested in this game. Basically, you just want to policy lynch, why not say that?. And if you are so content with lynching people who are disinterested, why is Sharrant not going up for lynch anymore? He has only made a single post since you were last here. Finally, why do you just want to lynch inactive people? You are a self-professed mayoral god, having NEVER failed to lynch scum D1 as a mayor, why have you shown zero interest in trying to lynch a scum-read? A large portion of your mayoral campaign is how good you are at reading peeps, so why go after a group of people who haven't posted much instead of attempting to find scum in the people who have? (2) Do it pls.
I don't just want to lynch inactive people. I want to lynch people who are clearly not interested in helping me win the game. I'm going to lynch someone I think has the highest chance of flipping scum, period.
|
On November 17 2013 01:44 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
VE, Yamato, can I get any of you on board for a Mocsta lynch? Comment on any other of my reads and tell me why Mocsta is more likely mafia than any of them. Right now, I don't think he is.
Am I correct in thinking those are Onegu, Grackaroni, Holyflare and BH?
|
Yeah, let's lynch the people that do nothing instead and be really disappointed and angry when they flip town. The only positive thing about lynching into afkers this game is that the 1 guy we elect might actually pick the right guy.
Anyway. I am only up for a rayn lynch today.
Tomorrow I will see.
|
11589 Posts
On November 16 2013 21:27 Clarity_nl wrote:Votecount: yamato77 (5): yamato77, OOHCHILD, Grackaroni, Pandain, Spaghetticus VisceraEyes (9): VisceraEyes, Hopeless1der, Koshi, Coagulation, Alakaslam, Risen, StorrZerg, LoneMeow, Artanis[Xp] OOHCHILD (0): Grackaroni, Pandainhiro protagonist (1): hiro protagonist
Mocsta (1): OOHCHILD, Mocsta
supersoft (2): supersoft, BloodyC0bbler
raynpelikoneet (1): raynpelikoneet
Bloodyc0bbler (1): Mr. Cheesecake
Blazinghand (2): Blazinghand, VayneAuthorityNot voting (9): Mattchew, Sharrant, Mig, Onegu, Skanjab1s, Stutters695, austinmcc, Holyflare, Oatsmaster Election is in . Voting is mandatory.
Currently VisceraEyes will be elected Mayor and yamato77 will be elected Pardoner!
If you see that a vote out of place please inform me or someone else on the hosting team so that we can correct it.
All votes in italics should be scrutinized. CC in particular is someone I've overlooked.
|
On November 17 2013 01:46 Koshi wrote:
##unvote
##vote: Koshi
I don't support your reads.
Skanj4b: nha
Pandain: nha just isn't playing
hiro protagonist: Did nothing at all so nha.
Grack: Disappeared. also nha. Not today.
Oatsmaster: where is the case? Why?
This is your right. I wish you luck in your future endeavors sir.
|
11589 Posts
On November 17 2013 01:48 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:44 yamato77 wrote:On November 17 2013 01:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
VE, Yamato, can I get any of you on board for a Mocsta lynch? Comment on any other of my reads and tell me why Mocsta is more likely mafia than any of them. Right now, I don't think he is. Am I correct in thinking those are Onegu, Grackaroni, Holyflare and BH?
BH, Austin, Grack, Onegu
Haven't looked at holy yet honestly.
|
On November 17 2013 01:49 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2013 21:27 Clarity_nl wrote:Votecount: yamato77 (5): yamato77, OOHCHILD, Grackaroni, Pandain, Spaghetticus VisceraEyes (9): VisceraEyes, Hopeless1der, Koshi, Coagulation, Alakaslam, Risen, StorrZerg, LoneMeow, Artanis[Xp] OOHCHILD (0): Grackaroni, Pandainhiro protagonist (1): hiro protagonist
Mocsta (1): OOHCHILD, Mocsta
supersoft (2): supersoft, BloodyC0bbler
raynpelikoneet (1): raynpelikoneet
Bloodyc0bbler (1): Mr. Cheesecake
Blazinghand (2): Blazinghand, VayneAuthorityNot voting (9): Mattchew, Sharrant, Mig, Onegu, Skanjab1s, Stutters695, austinmcc, Holyflare, Oatsmaster Election is in . Voting is mandatory.
Currently VisceraEyes will be elected Mayor and yamato77 will be elected Pardoner!
If you see that a vote out of place please inform me or someone else on the hosting team so that we can correct it. All votes in italics should be scrutinized. CC in particular is someone I've overlooked.
Dang good call. What do you make of people not voting yet? I find them more scummy than off-voters to be honest.
|
On November 17 2013 01:48 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:34 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 17 2013 01:22 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 23:50 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 16 2013 13:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 13:49 Mig wrote:
VE do you still plan on lynching into the same group of 4 you listed earlier or has it changed?
It's changed, and incomplete. Right now I'm somewhere around [b] Skanjab, Pandain, SharrantAnd I'm torn on my last couple. I'm still not interested in lynching rayn or BC and I'm starting to come around on StorrZerg. His last round of posts, while not super enlightening, felt genuine enough. I'm still filtering, and still rereading. Sup? (1) Why am I, pandain, and sharrant scum? You have not given any reasoning at all for these reads. (2) Also, could you please quote which posts from StorrZerg made you drop your scumread of him? (3) Why do you no longer suspect Grack? 1) Your lack of interest in anything that happens in this game makes me think you're scum. Pandain is in a similar boat - it's like you guys are completely disinterested in trying to find scum at all. Sharrant is....probably not going to get lynched by me. I literally pulled that name off my previous list to make it look more impressive. 2) Maybe. Maybe not. I'll go take a look, but it was more of a feeling thing. Stay tuned. 3) I don't no longer suspect Grack. I actually forgot about Grack and the fact that he's done nothing noteworthy puts him up on my radar again. Thx bra. Well, (1) is just wrong, as I am interested in this game. Basically, you just want to policy lynch, why not say that?. And if you are so content with lynching people who are disinterested, why is Sharrant not going up for lynch anymore? He has only made a single post since you were last here. Finally, why do you just want to lynch inactive people? You are a self-professed mayoral god, having NEVER failed to lynch scum D1 as a mayor, why have you shown zero interest in trying to lynch a scum-read? A large portion of your mayoral campaign is how good you are at reading peeps, so why go after a group of people who haven't posted much instead of attempting to find scum in the people who have? (2) Do it pls. I don't just want to lynch inactive people. I want to lynch people who are clearly not interested in helping me win the game. I'm going to lynch someone I think has the highest chance of flipping scum, period.
Well, your lynch list is incomplete then, and it also shows this to be untrue, unless you are trying to convince me that town-VE would be so dense as to believe that inactivity=scum.
|
11589 Posts
On November 17 2013 01:50 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:49 yamato77 wrote:On November 16 2013 21:27 Clarity_nl wrote:Votecount: yamato77 (5): yamato77, OOHCHILD, Grackaroni, Pandain, Spaghetticus VisceraEyes (9): VisceraEyes, Hopeless1der, Koshi, Coagulation, Alakaslam, Risen, StorrZerg, LoneMeow, Artanis[Xp] OOHCHILD (0): Grackaroni, Pandainhiro protagonist (1): hiro protagonist
Mocsta (1): OOHCHILD, Mocsta
supersoft (2): supersoft, BloodyC0bbler
raynpelikoneet (1): raynpelikoneet
Bloodyc0bbler (1): Mr. Cheesecake
Blazinghand (2): Blazinghand, VayneAuthorityNot voting (9): Mattchew, Sharrant, Mig, Onegu, Skanjab1s, Stutters695, austinmcc, Holyflare, Oatsmaster Election is in . Voting is mandatory.
Currently VisceraEyes will be elected Mayor and yamato77 will be elected Pardoner!
If you see that a vote out of place please inform me or someone else on the hosting team so that we can correct it. All votes in italics should be scrutinized. CC in particular is someone I've overlooked. Dang good call. What do you make of people not voting yet? I find them more scummy than off-voters to be honest.
Hah, there are a lot of inactive useless assholes in those 9, rofl. I think scum have no one to vote for so everyone is in disarray about what to do.
|
On November 17 2013 01:49 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:48 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On November 17 2013 01:44 yamato77 wrote:On November 17 2013 01:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
VE, Yamato, can I get any of you on board for a Mocsta lynch? Comment on any other of my reads and tell me why Mocsta is more likely mafia than any of them. Right now, I don't think he is. Am I correct in thinking those are Onegu, Grackaroni, Holyflare and BH? BH, Austin, Grack, Onegu Haven't looked at holy yet honestly.
What exactly do you find scummy for Austin?
For the other three, none of the things they've done can only be explained from a scum mindset which I feel is different from how Mocsta has played thus far. I can't see the motivation for his actions from a town mindset. Can you?
|
11589 Posts
On November 17 2013 01:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:49 yamato77 wrote:On November 17 2013 01:48 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On November 17 2013 01:44 yamato77 wrote:On November 17 2013 01:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
VE, Yamato, can I get any of you on board for a Mocsta lynch? Comment on any other of my reads and tell me why Mocsta is more likely mafia than any of them. Right now, I don't think he is. Am I correct in thinking those are Onegu, Grackaroni, Holyflare and BH? BH, Austin, Grack, Onegu Haven't looked at holy yet honestly. What exactly do you find scummy for Austin? For the other three, none of the things they've done can only be explained from a scum mindset which I feel is different from how Mocsta has played thus far. I can't see the motivation for his actions from a town mindset. Can you?
I made a post about Austin.
Mocsta is playing quite similar to how he plays as town. It's definitely not how I, or you, play town. He commonly forces things early and he often gets into spats like he did with you. I don't see much in his content that I find particularly abhorrent that I haven't already mentioned.
|
On November 17 2013 01:52 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 17 2013 01:34 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 17 2013 01:22 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 23:50 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 16 2013 13:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 13:49 Mig wrote:
VE do you still plan on lynching into the same group of 4 you listed earlier or has it changed?
It's changed, and incomplete. Right now I'm somewhere around [b] Skanjab, Pandain, SharrantAnd I'm torn on my last couple. I'm still not interested in lynching rayn or BC and I'm starting to come around on StorrZerg. His last round of posts, while not super enlightening, felt genuine enough. I'm still filtering, and still rereading. Sup? (1) Why am I, pandain, and sharrant scum? You have not given any reasoning at all for these reads. (2) Also, could you please quote which posts from StorrZerg made you drop your scumread of him? (3) Why do you no longer suspect Grack? 1) Your lack of interest in anything that happens in this game makes me think you're scum. Pandain is in a similar boat - it's like you guys are completely disinterested in trying to find scum at all. Sharrant is....probably not going to get lynched by me. I literally pulled that name off my previous list to make it look more impressive. 2) Maybe. Maybe not. I'll go take a look, but it was more of a feeling thing. Stay tuned. 3) I don't no longer suspect Grack. I actually forgot about Grack and the fact that he's done nothing noteworthy puts him up on my radar again. Thx bra. Well, (1) is just wrong, as I am interested in this game. Basically, you just want to policy lynch, why not say that?. And if you are so content with lynching people who are disinterested, why is Sharrant not going up for lynch anymore? He has only made a single post since you were last here. Finally, why do you just want to lynch inactive people? You are a self-professed mayoral god, having NEVER failed to lynch scum D1 as a mayor, why have you shown zero interest in trying to lynch a scum-read? A large portion of your mayoral campaign is how good you are at reading peeps, so why go after a group of people who haven't posted much instead of attempting to find scum in the people who have? (2) Do it pls. I don't just want to lynch inactive people. I want to lynch people who are clearly not interested in helping me win the game. I'm going to lynch someone I think has the highest chance of flipping scum, period. Well, your lynch list is incomplete then, and it also shows this to be untrue, unless you are trying to convince me that town-VE would be so dense as to believe that inactivity=scum.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything friend, in case you hadn't noticed you're on the chopping block and I'm about to become mayor. Obviously I don't have to convince you of shit. <3
|
so who are the mayor candidates and who are the lynch candidates
this game is moving fast
|
I mean, the fact that you're trying to cover up that you are just policy-lynching is incredibly scummy. "whelp, he flipped town, it doesn't matter he did nothing"
On November 17 2013 01:55 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:52 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 17 2013 01:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 17 2013 01:34 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 17 2013 01:22 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 23:50 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 16 2013 13:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 13:49 Mig wrote:
VE do you still plan on lynching into the same group of 4 you listed earlier or has it changed?
It's changed, and incomplete. Right now I'm somewhere around [b] Skanjab, Pandain, SharrantAnd I'm torn on my last couple. I'm still not interested in lynching rayn or BC and I'm starting to come around on StorrZerg. His last round of posts, while not super enlightening, felt genuine enough. I'm still filtering, and still rereading. Sup? (1) Why am I, pandain, and sharrant scum? You have not given any reasoning at all for these reads. (2) Also, could you please quote which posts from StorrZerg made you drop your scumread of him? (3) Why do you no longer suspect Grack? 1) Your lack of interest in anything that happens in this game makes me think you're scum. Pandain is in a similar boat - it's like you guys are completely disinterested in trying to find scum at all. Sharrant is....probably not going to get lynched by me. I literally pulled that name off my previous list to make it look more impressive. 2) Maybe. Maybe not. I'll go take a look, but it was more of a feeling thing. Stay tuned. 3) I don't no longer suspect Grack. I actually forgot about Grack and the fact that he's done nothing noteworthy puts him up on my radar again. Thx bra. Well, (1) is just wrong, as I am interested in this game. Basically, you just want to policy lynch, why not say that?. And if you are so content with lynching people who are disinterested, why is Sharrant not going up for lynch anymore? He has only made a single post since you were last here. Finally, why do you just want to lynch inactive people? You are a self-professed mayoral god, having NEVER failed to lynch scum D1 as a mayor, why have you shown zero interest in trying to lynch a scum-read? A large portion of your mayoral campaign is how good you are at reading peeps, so why go after a group of people who haven't posted much instead of attempting to find scum in the people who have? (2) Do it pls. I don't just want to lynch inactive people. I want to lynch people who are clearly not interested in helping me win the game. I'm going to lynch someone I think has the highest chance of flipping scum, period. Well, your lynch list is incomplete then, and it also shows this to be untrue, unless you are trying to convince me that town-VE would be so dense as to believe that inactivity=scum. I'm not trying to convince you of anything friend, in case you hadn't noticed you're on the chopping block and I'm about to become mayor. Obviously I don't have to convince you of shit. <3
lol u so scum its funny.
|
But I'm not policy lynching that's the thing - so there's nothing to cover up! LOGIC!!
|
|
|
Wait so are you saying that I'm lynching you by a strict inactivity policy? And that I'm somehow trying to cover it up?
So like...how are you inactive if you're in here trying to smear shit on me? That's the question - if I'm talking about lynching you and you're not inactive, what's the policy exactly?
|
Given your only reason for want me dead is "isn't interested, except now, when he is just ACTING interested", it is safe to conclude that you are.
|
Please, go ahead and give a reason why you want to lynch me that isn't "he is disinterested"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
