EPTHERE'S A THING ABOUT THRAWN
Within 2 hours of joining the game, he wants me to give him a recap of D1. But not a recap, he really wants people who were active but I find scummy. But not that, he wants people who intentionally posted so as not to get noticed (hid in easy spots?). + Show Spoiler +
On November 17 2013 12:36 thrawn2112 wrote:
hey austin.. or whoever but austin I specifically want you to answer this... can you give me a recap of D1 with emphasis on people who were at least above the lurker threshold, but not one the main talking points of D1 because of sneaky reasons?
hey austin.. or whoever but austin I specifically want you to answer this... can you give me a recap of D1 with emphasis on people who were at least above the lurker threshold, but not one the main talking points of D1 because of sneaky reasons?
On November 17 2013 13:18 thrawn2112 wrote:
lol goddamn
can you give me tldr of that and focus on what I asked for you to emphasize? i'm less interested in a play by play and more interested on who you think has been "active"
lol goddamn
can you give me tldr of that and focus on what I asked for you to emphasize? i'm less interested in a play by play and more interested on who you think has been "active"
On November 17 2013 13:28 thrawn2112 wrote:
yeah I read it. i did not want him to tell me who lurked and who didn't, I want to know if HE has scumreads as per what I asked him to emphasize
what i told kush. just forget about anything related to activity. who in your opinion has intentionally posted in such a way that caused them to avoid being talked about?
yeah I read it. i did not want him to tell me who lurked and who didn't, I want to know if HE has scumreads as per what I asked him to emphasize
what i told kush. just forget about anything related to activity. who in your opinion has intentionally posted in such a way that caused them to avoid being talked about?
Couple things about that. (1) I don't like when people give moving target tasks. I want x, no I want y, no I wanted z. In this case, he wants a summary, but he actually wants my reads. And he wants my reads of active people, but no, he wants people who posted in a way that they avoided discussion (to me, active =/= that). (2) His conclusion, at the end of that chat, is + Show Spoiler +
On November 17 2013 13:58 thrawn2112 wrote:
yeah that's what I was looking for
dibs on BH I got this
lol you should have just said this o.0
So where do your reads lie and what do you think VE's choice of lynch says about his alignment?
i'm out for tonight. my only experience in a large game was as scum and the 100 pages of what austin told me amounts to a lot of trolling/fighting looks like a headache. hopefully 420 will help with that lol
VE please bestow that mind meld upon me
BH whats up talk to me baby
yeah that's what I was looking for
dibs on BH I got this
lol you should have just said this o.0
So where do your reads lie and what do you think VE's choice of lynch says about his alignment?
i'm out for tonight. my only experience in a large game was as scum and the 100 pages of what austin told me amounts to a lot of trolling/fighting looks like a headache. hopefully 420 will help with that lol
VE please bestow that mind meld upon me
BH whats up talk to me baby
I gots two thoughts here. (1) he wanted a summary from anyone, but specifically me (focus there appears to be on getting a summary, he just replaced in); (2) at the end of our chat, he appears to be fine with the fact that my reads aren't in line with what he wants, and gives credence to my summary of thread (to me, this indicates that I'm not overly scummy. He doesn't call me scummy, he doesn't poke further, he seems happy with where things are at).
However, with no intervening posts, I become scummy - + Show Spoiler +
On November 17 2013 15:19 thrawn2112 wrote:
I will once he's answered. I didn't like how objective his WoT post was, I was looking for alignment related information (his reads) but what he gave was more of a play by play of the entire game. When I pressed him for scumreads he gave me MRCC and rayn, and the amount of analysis he gave me to back up those reads pales in comparison to the aforementioned play by play.
then there's his questions to you which I think he's being artificially stubborn with. I'm pretty sure I know what town austin tries to do with those and I would think that the answers you were giving him are more than enough for him to get a read.
so yeah, fuck your super town read lol
I will once he's answered. I didn't like how objective his WoT post was, I was looking for alignment related information (his reads) but what he gave was more of a play by play of the entire game. When I pressed him for scumreads he gave me MRCC and rayn, and the amount of analysis he gave me to back up those reads pales in comparison to the aforementioned play by play.
then there's his questions to you which I think he's being artificially stubborn with. I'm pretty sure I know what town austin tries to do with those and I would think that the answers you were giving him are more than enough for him to get a read.
so yeah, fuck your super town read lol
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: He asked for a summary of the day from anyone, particularly me, with emphasis on people who were active but scummy. He didn't want to read a summary, and never asked anyone else for a summary. He didn't like that my summary was objective. He moved his request from active scummers to people who were hiding. He seemed fine with my reads/lack of reads at first, and then only later decides it's a scummy point.
HERE'S ANOTHER THING ABOUT THRAWN
He's somewhat inconsistent. He doesn't like the amount of reads/reasoning I give. That's his thing with me.
On November 17 2013 15:19 thrawn2112 wrote:
I will once he's answered. I didn't like how objective his WoT post was, I was looking for alignment related information (his reads) but what he gave was more of a play by play of the entire game. When I pressed him for scumreads he gave me MRCC and rayn, and the amount of analysis he gave me to back up those reads pales in comparison to the aforementioned play by play.
then there's his questions to you which I think he's being artificially stubborn with. I'm pretty sure I know what town austin tries to do with those and I would think that the answers you were giving him are more than enough for him to get a read.
so yeah, fuck your super town read lol
This is his only actual post on my lack of reads. Which is coo. But the lack of analysis I add into reads is naughty naughty. Bad austinmcc, bad. (see rayn's posts for more of the same, but rayn's posts are from rayn, not thrawn).I will once he's answered. I didn't like how objective his WoT post was, I was looking for alignment related information (his reads) but what he gave was more of a play by play of the entire game. When I pressed him for scumreads he gave me MRCC and rayn, and the amount of analysis he gave me to back up those reads pales in comparison to the aforementioned play by play.
then there's his questions to you which I think he's being artificially stubborn with. I'm pretty sure I know what town austin tries to do with those and I would think that the answers you were giving him are more than enough for him to get a read.
so yeah, fuck your super town read lol
However, compare to thrawn on pandain
On November 18 2013 16:52 thrawn2112 wrote:
lol at least you're honest about it
you do know that at some point you will need to talk about scumreads? if you don't have any scumreads why are you wasting everyone's time posting about nothing instead of filter diving or whatever?
make sure that your next post in the thread includes what I've asked for
I may be a bit biased here, but imo, this is treating similar things ENTIRELY differently. Pandain has no opinions except for BH/SS, on D2, and it's coo that he's honest about it and maybe in the future he needs to have scumreads pretty please. Compare to me being scummy for GIVING some reads, just not based on the shifting factor that thrawn wanted, just not giving them detailed enough.lol at least you're honest about it
you do know that at some point you will need to talk about scumreads? if you don't have any scumreads why are you wasting everyone's time posting about nothing instead of filter diving or whatever?
make sure that your next post in the thread includes what I've asked for
Also note that, in his list of likely scummers,
On November 20 2013 03:12 thrawn2112 wrote:
in order of likeliness scum are grack pandain (one of HF or Austin, their mason chat was way too friendly and I don't detect any real suspicion coming from either of them) oats
pandain is #2. His #2 scumread (although this is over a day later when pandain = #2 scumread, we don't know how he read pandain at the time), was okay not giving scumreads, because he was honest and maybe he needed some in the future. However, it was most definitely not cool for me to only give a couple and not in the detail he wanted right when he had just joined the game.in order of likeliness scum are grack pandain (one of HF or Austin, their mason chat was way too friendly and I don't detect any real suspicion coming from either of them) oats
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: thrawn (i think) finds me scummy for lack of scumreads/detailed reads, beyond 2 I gave him. thrawn half-jokes with pandain that it's okay he only has thoughts on two people, but maybe he should have scumreads later. thrawn is also more scummy on pandain than on me. This behavior does not make sense if he's town, as we should BOTH be scummy for this, especially if pandain scummy for other reasons and so already looks bad to thrawn.
HERE IS ANOTHER THING ABOUT THRAWN
For not entirely clear reasons, BH claimed assassin AND said he was fakeclaiming tracker to thrawn in alleged mason chat.
But Thrawn calls BH townie early today, sticks with it
On November 18 2013 08:41 thrawn2112 wrote:
panda i'll vouch for bh. he's been townily cooperative in mason chat
IF SOMEONE CLAIMS ASSASSIN AND TRACKER AND NOT REALLY TRACKER IN MASON CHAT WITH ME I DON'T THINK THEY'VE BEEN SUPER TOWNIE AND I MIGHT WANT TO BRING THIS TO THREAD'S ATTENTION EARLIER RATHER THAN JUST CALLING HIM TOWN BASED ON SECRET MASON STUFF. panda i'll vouch for bh. he's been townily cooperative in mason chat
I do not understand how Thrawn has handled his BH read and his releasing of mason logs to town IF he is town.
HERE IS I THINK ONE LAST THING THAT WILL TIE INTO A BC POST
Thrawn likes BC, finds him the towniest vet, and seems to agree with a lot of what he's posted. This is only important if you see the world as I do, and will be fleshed out with another post. + Show Spoiler +
On November 19 2013 01:29 thrawn2112 wrote:
BC are you calling rayn mafia? What's your srs-ness level on this rayn stuff?
BC are you calling rayn mafia? What's your srs-ness level on this rayn stuff?
Implying BC is to be given credence
On November 19 2013 01:45 thrawn2112 wrote:
oats read gracks filter. what has he done besides not commit to actual scumhunting and resort to trolling whenever people try to get him to commit to scumhunting? ignore mocsta. tbh I agree with BC 100% on his analysis of moc's posts concerning grack and BH has made good points about the possible interactions between moc/grack. but ignore all of that. what is your read on grack when you ignore all of that?
@BC
oats read gracks filter. what has he done besides not commit to actual scumhunting and resort to trolling whenever people try to get him to commit to scumhunting? ignore mocsta. tbh I agree with BC 100% on his analysis of moc's posts concerning grack and BH has made good points about the possible interactions between moc/grack. but ignore all of that. what is your read on grack when you ignore all of that?
@BC
BC's mocsta/grack analysis so goooood
On November 19 2013 08:24 thrawn2112 wrote:
Hey super
Who do you want me to mason tomorrow out of:
VE
BC
yourself
Hey super
Who do you want me to mason tomorrow out of:
VE
BC
yourself
On November 20 2013 06:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
STUFF
lol actually no i'm not lynching BC. imo he's the towniest out the vet group and I distinctly remember marv participating in a heated discussion about balancing teams
can everyone on BH look and panda and grack one more time?
STUFF
lol actually no i'm not lynching BC. imo he's the towniest out the vet group and I distinctly remember marv participating in a heated discussion about balancing teams
can everyone on BH look and panda and grack one more time?
On November 20 2013 06:57 thrawn2112 wrote:
why is BC scum? explain it in 3 sentences or less.
btw I don't think you answered my question, about "what is your impression of austin's impression of you during your mason chat"
why is BC scum? explain it in 3 sentences or less.
btw I don't think you answered my question, about "what is your impression of austin's impression of you during your mason chat"
So. I think that thrawn is scummy. I want to know whether other people see a different reaction to pandain/my lack of scumreads, or whether I am seeing things there. This influences my read. I do believe that he reacted differently, and that his reaction is not sensible, given his pandain scum read.
I would also like to know whether other people see what I'm getting at in the first thing. Moving target/delayed decision that I'm scum for a thing that was cool earlier.
Apart from that, now going to write up the BC post.
