EPTTL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 10:10 Holyflare wrote: To each his own. Arbitrarily throwing your vote onto someone is not something that I like to do often. Either way: How can you call mine bad whereas the other candidates that have put themselves forward so far did so in a manner that was with 3 or 4 lines? What are your reasons for your other reads too, supersoft has been "aggressive" so far and confrontational and I know you have played with him before, why is it just an IDK? Quite frankly, your establishment of yourself so far is mediocre. Off the top of your head is not something I see you doing often. Because the only thing anyone can do at this point to campaign for themselves is to find scum and prove to other people their findings are in fact scum. If that person is going to be kushm4sta at the end of D1 then i will vote for kushm4sta. I give no fucks about who is running but i am going to vote for who i think is the best scumhunter in this game (obviously i am going to vote for myself - but if i needed to choose someone else). All these campaigns are full of shit because OBVIOUSLY everyone running for mayor (even if they are scum) will say "i will do my best to find scum and listen to other people and yeah yeah bla bla..". I will not listen to anyone i don't think has decent enough opinions, i will lynch scum. That's my campaign. Yours have many fancy words that say very little. And then there was the "because noone has said anything at all at this point" which is completely false. And this: 1. Determine my top scum reads based on analysis. These choices will be my most preferred lynches. 2. Failing to lynch my top scum reads, i.e if thread sentiment does not follow, I will only lynch into people that I consider scum by way of a convincing case from other people or actual knowledge based play (meta, good points etc.) 3. Get rid of people that have contributed nothing, only if we are in a fit state as a town to be able to do this. Why would you fail to lynch your top scumreads? You decide the lynch. No need to read further. supersoft promotes bad town atmosphere and that's like the worst thing you can do at the start of the game. If he is as good as he claims h should know that does not help. Being aggressive =/= promoting bad town atmosphere before anyone says anything about it. He picks unnecessary fights with people for completely arbitary reasons. Yo Pandain i like that you didn't like Sharrant. Dat post you brought up was pretty bad. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 11:05 Risen wrote: I'll vote anyone who makes their platform lynching rayn. You get modkilled for not voting. :p What's wrongwith Oats this game? He's like a bit more dick than usually. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 12:13 austinmcc wrote: rayn, risen, and sharrant, I want to sit down and chat with you guys. Individually, for the most part. rayn (1) Are you town? (2) Please unpack this statement:What, in particular, did you not like about that post? Does the rest of sharrant's filter do anything for you? 1) yes 2) the tone of his first post is too serious (regarding electing kush) and idk why would he even entertain the idea of voting for someone who hasn't actually posted yet. like giving out townreads on people before they posted? already putting up some arbitary group he will choose his mayoral vote from? why? For same reason i dislike supersoft. It's not like the mayor will "YOLO i lynch this guy and not listen to anyone" unless they want to get lynched the next day. So yeah, not considering every player in the game for possibly mayor at the start of the game is really scummy. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 21:36 yamato77 wrote: lonemeow hasn't posted in the thread yet masoned me interesting thought process I kinda think that makes him town. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Risen has overly paranoid reads as both alignments, there is no way of telling his alignment from those posts. supersoft you can't say what you said before. You can't possibly know if BC and Mig are town and you should not be electing scum. Therefore your post was useless (assuming you are town) or buddying up to other vets (if you aare scum). | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:07 supersoft wrote: I just don't buy his story. It's artificial and exaggerated That's the problem when you're being a dick. Some people hate it. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:14 Artanis[Xp] wrote: So what's your plan of getting a read on Risen? Your initial post said that you wanted to ignore him on day 1 leading me to believe you thought he was town being dumb. Why did you make that initial statement? I am planning on getting a read on him after D1. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote: ok yeah What is this Rayn? Can you show that he fakes overly paranoid reads as scum? World heavyweight lifting game everything after D1. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:25 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah surreal is different from being overly paranoid. Not necessarily and in this situation no. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:29 Oatsmaster wrote: Where do you get all this extensive experience with Risen? I actually pay attention to what people say in games and i have been masoned with him in GoT and i played scum with him in WHLC. I dunno, maybe you need 100 games with someone to get a grasp on how they play but i don't. | ||
| ||
