EPTWhite Flag Mafia - Page 35
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
 | ||
|
Asinine
Qatar66 Posts
Tehpoofter Laughing Jack Bereft Oatsmaster OdinOfPergo Stutters695 Laughing Jack: I have a few particular issues with his filter. On November 01 2013 01:24 Laughing Jack wrote: Jarjar doesn't bring up anything new but just says he's against randomlynching, However most of the post is just fluff about what rng-lynching is to make it seem like his saying more then "Yeah I agree". And it's very certainly fluff because he doesn't reach a conclusion with it. It's scummy to try to make yourself look more townie then you are. His hzflank vote is really weak. He says he wants to lynch hzflank for being one of the rng-supporters but provides no reasoning other then that others seemed to lynch him. It's a very un-townie park-vote. He's still not contributing but just talking about rng-lynching trying to make supporters look scummy for supporting it. This is a post that basically establishes that Laughing Jack doesn't like JJD. See bold. How is it scummy to try and look more townie? This statement is just blatantly false. The rest of his reasoning is okay, imo. LJ is fishing for reasons to vote for JJD. Hard to say at this point as to whether this is coming from a town or scum perspective. The rest of his filter is basically LJ insulting people for accusing him of anything. Posts like these are designed to make people angry post irrationally. Not very conducive to a town environment. On November 01 2013 19:46 Laughing Jack wrote: This might be difficult for you but try to use your head. I'd love to hear what kind of backwards logic makes you want to lynch me. However, LJ does have quite a few posts where he voluntarily pressures people. A type of playstyle that scum are not very adept at mimicking. There are posts where he is initiating conversations. This point is critical. In general, scum want to diffuse conversations, not initiate them. Here a few posts in which LJ does this: On November 01 2013 03:28 Laughing Jack wrote: Bereft while your vote on the lurker is most admirable I don't really care about it, and you're floating around without any real opinions so would you mind sharing any of your current scumreads? On November 01 2013 16:12 Laughing Jack wrote: Your sacrifice is noted, What do you two think about the current votes? On November 01 2013 16:18 Laughing Jack wrote: No, Are you happy with them? Do you think anyone's vote suck, do you think my vote suck? How would you like the votes to be, who do you want pressured?, is Pandain really your top scumread? Plenty to talk about. These types of posts are usually indicative of a town mentality, but not always. Then, you have the vote on hzflank. On November 02 2013 07:57 Laughing Jack wrote: ##Unvote: ##Vote: hzflank This doesn't make much sense when you compare it to the rest of his filter. Sequence of Events: LJ was intially arguing for a JJD lynch and then slowly grew to favor an Oatsmaster lynch. the transition here, while not obvious, is understandable considering their heated exchange. However, the transition from thinking Oats was scum to thinking hzflank is scum is completely untraceable. He is a post he made during the latter half of Day 1. On November 01 2013 22:17 Laughing Jack wrote: To elaborate. hzflank hasn't done enough to make me lean town or scum on him. Early on cases are generally weak and when the majority of the players gives very little to go on it's better to lynch the person who will give us most information going into day2. LJ has established that hzflank is basically a null read. For some reason, he wishes to vote him over his scum read Oatsmaster because hzflank is more active. This type of logic is terrible. Considering that he never returned to the thread until post-flip, it is clear that he is hiding something. Although he started off Day 1 kinda-sorta townie, the flip incriminates him heavily. Advice: Lynch with fire. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Asinine
Qatar66 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
On November 03 2013 07:02 Pandain wrote: Don't you think mafia would, as a whole, take a backwards stance to this. Ideally just step back from the conflict? After all, I was the one who had to lead a counter lynch to lynch fuba. Scum don't want to be defending him, nor do they want to be prosecuting him. It would all be indirect. Biggest reasoning as to why me and Grack are town. i think whether they choose to prosecute him really depends on how they're evaluating risk/reward in the scenario. obviously as you and grack were the ones that put hard pressure where none previously existed you are town, unless that was some fucking brilliant play. but to the voters who followed you, no, i don't see avoiding the conflict entirely as the obvious overarching mafia strategy here. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On November 03 2013 07:17 Bereft wrote: i think whether they choose to prosecute him really depends on how they're evaluating risk/reward in the scenario. obviously as you and grack were the ones that put hard pressure where none previously existed you are town, unless that was some fucking brilliant play. but to the voters who followed you, no, i don't see avoiding the conflict entirely as the obvious overarching mafia strategy here. Do you agree JarJar is town for being the fourth to follow and therefore really pushing him into the limelight? | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On November 03 2013 07:19 Pandain wrote: By the way if mafia shoots Grack I'll find your house and kill you not really but in feeling I will die | ||
|
Asinine
Qatar66 Posts
| ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
if you are town as you say and you are vig'ed, assuming no doctor saves, we now have 2 instead of 3 mislynches: On November 03 2013 05:17 Pandain wrote: 9-3 DAY 2 STARTS 8-3 MISLYNCH 7-3 DAY 3 STARTS 6-3 MISLYNCH 5-3 DAY 4 STARTS 4-3 MISLYNCH So we have at least three more lynches, unless a vig shoots a town. Last lynch will of course be trickiest if we don't lynch scum. 8-3 DAY 2 STARTS 7-3 MISLYNCH 6-3 DAY 3 STARTS 5-3 MISLYNCH | ||
| ||
