EPTWhite Flag Mafia - Page 32
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On November 03 2013 03:20 Oatsmaster wrote: Ill try to be less helpful. Do you think Pandain is more likely to lurk as scum or as town? I don't think Pandain would completely screw over his teammates as scum. I could see pandain being "busy" and doing little scumhunting as scum, but this Pandain had done nothing and was putting a target on his back. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
That applies to Mig too. Ofcourse you can consider that perhaps they are players who rely more on their ability to read people than on any strategy, but a D1 anti-town vote is still a black mark. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On November 02 2013 19:40 Laughing Jack wrote: I voted hzflank over fuba because of all the lurkers coming back and bandwagoning fuba felt really strange and scum-driven. I really did not expect mkfuba to flip scum after seeing that. I'm glad he did though. You went from: Wanting to lynch me for information, to Wanting to lynch a lurker, to the above. At the time of your vote there were four people on mkfuba: myself, Pandain, Grack and Odin. Obviously Grack and myself were not lurkers, so the bandwagoning lurkers that you refer to must be Pandain and Odin. At that time, there were three votes on me (Mkfuba, Asinine and Mig) and three votes on Pandain (Bereft, Oats and JJD). Now, if you wanted to lynch a lurker and you thought that Pandain's vote was scum-driven, why did you vote for me as opposed to Pandain? | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On November 03 2013 03:44 Pandain wrote: The problem is bus reasons were pretty crappy to defend asinine. His reasons for you were bordering okay but again scum can be reasonable. I don't like how all his posts are to save Fuba and then he just gives up when it became obvious I think it was fair to say that he was hard-(directly) defending Fuba rather than directly attacking me. I have seen town hard-defend other town day one, so I am sure that town can accidentally hard-defend scum on day one, but for a lurker? Asinine did not even think that Fuba was town. To put it very simply: Asinine hard-defended a lurker who he thought was scum. That is anti-town play. Is there anyone here who would honestly do that as town? | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On November 02 2013 07:17 Asinine wrote: I'm still unimpressed with hzflank. His filter reeks of careful posturing which is reminiscent of standard scum play. Pursuing hzflank directly isn't netting immediate results because his posting is so meticulously crafted. However, I'll be leaving my vote on him if I cannot find any more convincing candidates. I'll filter a few other players. Be back soon. Why is it important as to whether or not he saw Odin's vote before he posted? Asinine was casual in that post. He wanted to lynch me but he was also going to look for other candidates. Almost nothing happened in the thread for the next 32 minutes. Then Asinine makes his next post, which is his detailed case in defence of mkfuba. What happened to make Asinine go from being casual and looking into other people to writing up a case in defence of mkfuba? Well it has to be Odin's vote. So maybe you think: well Asinine really wanted hzflank to be lynched, so Odin's vote spooked him?...Nope. Before Odin voted Pandain was set to be lynched. So why did Odin's vote spook Asinine? In my opinion it is because Asinine is scum. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On October 31 2013 23:19 Laughing Jack wrote: I think we should be one Jarjar less at the end of this day. ##Vote: JarjarDrinks Very bold and draws suspicions to himself. Don't think most scum would do this though it isn't out of the question. I thought it was a joke post but later he defends himself, which leads me to think he's town in that he literally doesn't give a fuck(at the time) about explaining his read further. I actually do like how he stopped the Grack-Oats debate even though I thought it was scummy at the time. Looking at it nothing came of it, and nothing probably would have. On November 01 2013 17:52 Laughing Jack wrote: Cool, and why would you want to see them spotlighted over others? I think Odin is a terrible pick really. Since he's not been around, why did you pick him? I love how he says Odin is a terrible pick because he hasn't posted yet. He's been putting a whole bunch of effort into the game two, which makes me think he's town. And finally, even though it's suspicious On November 02 2013 07:57 Laughing Jack wrote: ##Unvote: ##Vote: hzflank It's still ballsy to do as scum. Basically do not lynch tomorrow. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
The rest of the players don't seem that scummy. Although there are some like Oats who I can't read. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
He says he's played with me before but I don't remember him at all | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
That changes everything. | ||
|
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
I don't really like Bereft either. Pandain looks pretty good to me so far. I'm not sold on Jack one way or the other but I'd buy poor townie play more than scum. I'll go into analysis in a while since I've been neglecting this game other than keeping up with the thread. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On November 03 2013 05:08 Pandain wrote: Oh what wow. That changes everything. Also do not forget the white flag mechanic. I would avoid thinking too much about the replacement at the moment. There is nothing we can do about that yet. | ||
| ||
