EPT"##" Mafia - Page 71
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:26 strongandbig wrote: I'm in class you assdouche. Go take a chill pull. Preferably a suppository. I assume you're referring to this post: This actually isn't the same as what I said, what I'm talking about is the tone of the cases and summaries in his longer posts whereas i read your post as being about whether or not hes asking questions and whether hes mixing soft busses with "defenses against thread sentiment." I was pretty specific and so were you. I agree they are similar though. Even if they were exactly the same, I would have posted my thing anyway because I want people to know what my thought process and analysis were. When I was making up my mind about pandain I did it without thinking about what you or other people said about him, I was looking at the evidence and making my own read. Are you claiming that you think I just took your conclusion and then spent twenty minutes making it more specific, reading old games and filters and getting the evidence for it that you didn't, because that's easier than making up some shit? Or is it maybe more likely that I happened to come to a similar analysis as you? No i don't. I would have expected you to say something about my post or me when you made a post quite similar. Is there a reason you didn't? | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: Then again, why are you voting for Sentinel? Well I happen to have put a whole lot of effort into making a case against him. After Wave, myself, and Pandain all explicitly revealed it became evident that Wave fake-claiming wasn't likely, and so long as we had an alternative target we could test everyone's powers without needed to lynch voting power that may become critical as the game goes on. There was also a mess of confusion once Wave started martyring himself. If my idea also got everything on track so town wasn't running around like crazy, all the better. I'll admit there's a chance we lose a useful power with Sentinel as well, but at the moment I think he looks scummier than Wave. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:28 marvellosity wrote: Wave and Seuss's unwillingness to kill each other is totally baffling to me. He's afraid I won't ever carry him in League of Legends again. More seriously, in terms of semi-independent arguments I can make against him versus Sentinel I think I've got a better case against Sentinel, but no one's really responded to it yet. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
[QUOTE]On October 30 2013 01:43 marvellosity wrote: As far as Seuss, I REALLY don't like his play now. When i originally faked my role use on him i figured he'd come back with strong analysis and play like he did in his newbie and would prove himself a good choice for my power, but he has done basically the opposite: sheeping town sentiment, no reads, and no strong posts one way or another. [/QUOTE] Can anyone tell me why, when Wave apparently didn't have a clue who to lynch, this was not enough to vote on? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 01:47 WaveofShadow wrote: As far as Seuss, I REALLY don't like his play now. When i originally faked my role use on him i figured he'd come back with strong analysis and play like he did in his newbie and would prove himself a good choice for my power, but he has done basically the opposite: sheeping town sentiment, no reads, and no strong posts one way or another. Can anyone tell me why, when Wave apparently didn't have a clue who to lynch, this was not enough to vote on? | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:33 Seuss wrote: He's afraid I won't ever carry him in League of Legends again. More seriously, in terms of semi-independent arguments I can make against him versus Sentinel I think I've got a better case against Sentinel, but no one's really responded to it yet. Calm your jimmies, I am in the process of responding to it just like I promised | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:31 Seuss wrote: Well I happen to have put a whole lot of effort into making a case against him. After Wave, myself, and Pandain all explicitly revealed it became evident that Wave fake-claiming wasn't likely, and so long as we had an alternative target we could test everyone's powers without needed to lynch voting power that may become critical as the game goes on. There was also a mess of confusion once Wave started martyring himself. If my idea also got everything on track so town wasn't running around like crazy, all the better. I'll admit there's a chance we lose a useful power with Sentinel as well, but at the moment I think he looks scummier than Wave. I think your case on Sentinel is fine and correct. But tbh i don't know if what you say makes him scum. Someone not trying to do much on D1 is not necessarily scummy, especially considering we are talking about Sentinel here, who is usually quite useless even as town. However, WaveofShadow is not usually useless as town on D1. In addition to that, WoS has done things, but the things he has done are nowhere near what i would expect from town!WoS and he is not helping the town in any way or trying to find mafia. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:33 Seuss wrote: He's afraid I won't ever carry him in League of Legends again. More seriously, in terms of semi-independent arguments I can make against him versus Sentinel I think I've got a better case against Sentinel, but no one's really responded to it yet. This is the post i was supposed to quote in my last reply. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:42 marvellosity wrote: who cares, answer me, i need to go me? what do i need to answer? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: No i don't. I would have expected you to say something about my post or me when you made a post quite similar. Is there a reason you didn't? I was writing out my thought process and giving evidence in that post, not evaluating the opinions of others. More importantly, I didn't take notes when I read through the thread, so picking through and finding what each person said would have been a waste of time and effort. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:36 marvellosity wrote: Reposting: Can anyone tell me why, when Wave apparently didn't have a clue who to lynch, this was not enough to vote on? no I cannot. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:36 marvellosity wrote: Reposting: Can anyone tell me why, when Wave apparently didn't have a clue who to lynch, this was not enough to vote on? Because scum. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 30 2013 03:34 Promethelax wrote: so, sorry, to clarify Suess: you believe that we shouldn't lynch someone because they have a power useful for town and yet you believe that that person may be, and in fact probably is, scum? You've called wave scum and your whole plan is about proving the claimed powers while lynching sent but you haven't said why proving the powers matters at all. Can you explain to me what it is about those powers that needs to be confirmed? I don't think it's absolutely necessary to verify the voting powers, but at the time the vote train was solidly on Wave and I thought other possibilities were being overlooked. You specifically have been on my case for lacking independent thought, so when I had a unique idea that seemed to have merit I went for it. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
| ||
