EPTHogwarts Mafia - Page 73
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 19 2013 06:35 Sn0_Man wrote: To paraphrase toad, he states that he could be killed if one of us (his housemates) claims a character name in thread and he wouldn't be happy about that. He later expounds that he has a voting restriction, that he considers his role anti town, and that he may die if he votes incorrectly based on afaik flavour role. And that me being female allows him to vote for me. Beyond that Skanjab once posted "all females are scum" BEFORE claiming female, an interesting comment in hindsight. That was a joke regarding you claiming female, and me thinking you are scum. bh 10/10 wud lol agin. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
this is unbelieveable. you just dont lynch certain players d1. now i remember why i have to be so mad every game and why i quit playing mafia on a regular basis... i really loved Aces bangbang mafia where i just shot people in their faces. it was beautiful. okay now seriously i have no gun. you dont need to roleblock me. sn0 will survive :----) | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:05 supersoft wrote: i am still puzzled why palmar seriously got killed d1 for no reason... this is unbelieveable. you just dont lynch certain players d1. now i remember why i have to be so mad every game and why i quit playing mafia on a regular basis... i really loved Aces bangbang mafia where i just shot people in their faces. it was beautiful. okay now seriously i have no gun. you dont need to roleblock me. sn0 will survive :----) Caller's "everybody has a gun half the thread are non-self-aware-death-millers and scum don't exist" game was decent. I was actively campaigning against the palmar lynch btw. My vote on it was solely to ensure nothing swapped back to Ceph (since the votecount couldn't really keep up with the votes so I didn't know how much of a landslide it was). | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:04 syllogism wrote: Sn0_man isn't a good vig target tonight. Can we calm down and not do anything hasty? Who is then? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
any lurker | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:21 Sn0_Man wrote: Stutters seems like a solid vig shot too. You can trust modconfirmed-townie syllo that I'm a bad vig shot lol. No he seems not. Stutters is no vigshot. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:36 Hopeless1der wrote: a good vig shot is anyone you feel has a good chance to not play the game. unless you think you can point your wand at scum that is. You so wise... | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:27 supersoft wrote: No he seems not. Stutters is no vigshot. Why? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:27 supersoft wrote: No he seems not. Stutters is no vigshot. Why not? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:16 syllogism wrote: LoneMeow, for instance I suggest you look at his filter from Noir (don't worry it's short). | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
LastArgument
United States152 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:44 justanothertownie wrote: I suggest you look at his filter from Noir (don't worry it's short). It's not the same, you can think about it a little. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:45 supersoft wrote: Just trust me on this one. Why would I. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:45 LastArgument wrote: It's not the same, you can think about it a little. Does he looks more confident to you or what are you hinting at? | ||
|
LastArgument
United States152 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:49 justanothertownie wrote: Does he looks more confident to you or what are you hinting at? He was wracked with indecision there, there seems to be little of that here. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On October 19 2013 07:50 LastArgument wrote: He was wracked with indecision there, there seems to be little of that here. A simple yes would have been enough. Hm, I see your point. | ||
| ||
