|
On October 18 2013 00:15 LastArgument wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2013 00:08 Hopeless1der wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On October 17 2013 23:51 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2013 23:49 LastArgument wrote:On October 17 2013 23:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
LA, any comment on my supposed town mentality when it comes to policy? What supposed town mentality? You've simply asserted that magically you now like policy lynching having been staunchly against it previously in your town career. On October 17 2013 23:29 Hopeless1der wrote:
quotes that are literally MONTHS ago, and I've taken a rather long break from mafia. My stance on policy votes can't have changed? Not only that, but the first quote was in regards to a specific player, simply for existing (grush). For the 2nd quote, pressure =\= policy. This even misrepresents your own quotation, as the quotation in question clearly puts you against policy lynches in general, even though it was applied to one player at the time. Reading the quotation, you are obviously talking in general terms. Okay LA, lets try again. From the same quote: Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.@wbg voters: dafuq? See the red. Your rebuttal? LastArgument, you've ignored this. Because it's a silly line of questioning. I'll probably be looking elsewhere than you for now though, don't really feel like explaining why.
So, you're unvoting me, right?
|
On October 18 2013 00:52 LastArgument wrote:
I can't think of an occasion in the last however long that a self-aware miller didn't claim on Day 1.
And they were certainly never lynched for it.
Mattchew was lynched...about a year ago due to a self-aware claim day1.
Sidenote, get your vote off me or re-explain why im scum.
On October 18 2013 01:00 yamato77 wrote:
Also, if anyone wants to comment on the waffle from Toad, I'd like some other perspectives.
Short answer is he sees a bunch of null tells and a couple town tells. ergo you're a townread. Grats.
Palmar, you're not much for discussing closed setups iirc, but what do you make of Yamato and Mattchew outing their QT playerlists (Top of page 25)? If you'd rather not comment on this, can you do something other than sit and wait on mocsta's return?
In other news, we're on track to policy lynch someone. Will it be the lurker, the troll, or the claimed self-aware miller?
|
Vayne, is yamato scum? if yes, why? If no, who is?
|
On October 18 2013 02:21 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2013 02:20 yamato77 wrote:On October 16 2013 02:39 You-Know-Who wrote:On October 16 2013 02:37 Ange777 wrote:On October 16 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
If there isn't already such a rule, can we forbid mass claiming flavor and what not? I could quickly see this turning into everyone claiming their character and using the flavor to lynch. Or will the game make no sense and people like harry potter can be mafia? There is no need for such a rule. Claiming your flavor is allowed.
"No need for such a rule" heavily implies that claiming flavor as a reason for being town is bullshit. I dont give a shit, they said that in golden sun too and the 4 main characters of the game were all blue roles but nobody knew the flavor thankfully. Im confirmed town as far as im concerned until a main character flips scum.
I am confirmed town. To myself. Because I have my PM. That tells me I'm town. I do not have this information for you. Therefore you are confirmed full of shit. Stop antagonizing yamato. After that, you can hunt scum or die. Its your choice.
|
Mocsta blatantly lied about SAM claims being the correct move according to Palmar (i.e. trying to use Palmar's video to manipulate him) I don't know why he'd be so bold as to use something that can be proven false without checking it, but it makes me want to lynch him. I need to actually read the rest of his content, but that caught my attention.
Discussion starts around the 8 minute mark lasts maybe 5 minutes.
|
Mocsta, why is syllo getting a free pass day1 for being a potential town asset and BH(Zaragon) is not?
|
cba to push anyone since all my reads come down to shitty policy reasons right now.
##Unvote
##Vote: Cephiro
I'll be back before deadline, but not by more than 20-30 minutes.
|
deal with palmar tomorrow please. especially if he's going to get himself modkilled, but I'd rather give him a chance to try instead of last-minute hammering him. I also dislike mocsta insisting we lynch the guy who has been replaced, but I guess thats just me.
##Unvote
|
On October 19 2013 04:46 Mocsta wrote:
OK, I know I didnt build a case on zaragon for the rest of the thread to understand.
But what actually is the objection? Does anyone have a town read on him?
I have a BH is drunk read. I dont lynch drunk BH
|
On October 19 2013 04:50 Cephiro wrote:
Also for the "Palmar modkill speculation"
Assuming worst case scenario: (Both me and him are town)
If we lynch Palmar -> Palmar dies (-1 Town?)
If we lynch Me -> I die (-1 Town, possibly -2 if palmar gets modkilled and is town)
All aboard the Palmar wagon? >_>
please stahp.
|
mocsta, no one is going to join you there....would you rather have palmar or mattchew around tomorrow?
|
|
|
|
|
On October 19 2013 05:11 Grackaroni wrote:
They had to put the big red text in the post too... Which house was the victor?
we find out with daypost. contest just ended, now they judge
|
On October 19 2013 05:28 syllogism wrote:
Palmar perhaps next time day vig the person you want to policy lynch instead of whining about him all day
save this kind of stuff for post game. palmar's dead, it wont help anymore
|
a good vig shot is anyone you feel has a good chance to not play the game. unless you think you can point your wand at scum that is.
|
(I thought it was Koshi)
His reasoning makes complete sense when your starting point is cephiro's voteing pattern (and figure hes scum because of it). He SHOULD have stayed on mattchew according to his reads. There was no self preservation to consider when he ended up on palmar. It starts at Ceph IMO, and leads to mattchew.
|
On October 20 2013 06:00 Stutters695 wrote:
To answer some questions about me with the flips:
I obviously was his mason partner.
I'm assuming supersoft didn't want me viged because LA was more than capable of determining my alignment.
We weren't modconfirmed as far as we know (and acted as such) unless you consider being twins modconfirmed, which we didn't.
I was interested in super in the griff qt because LA hadn't told me he shared with his qt. I figured it out after looking over the qt lists then had LA confirm it.
The reason for my inactivity in that qt was a mix of my usual inactivity d1 and that I stated early that I was going to use that qt sparingly because we weren't confirmed, but picked it up a bit after he was clearly town in the thread.
Any other questions?
scumreads? you're one of mine due to lackthereof.
|
On October 20 2013 06:11 StorrZerg wrote:
Would it be a safe call, if a "cop" had a check on mafia, to come out?
If it were a one-shot cop, its probably a good idea. If you could cop again, probably not.
|
On October 20 2013 06:24 Holyflare wrote:
Going to do an analysis on these events when I have the time. There are some people that come out looking scummy from these kills.
I dont see how...but okay, looking forward to it. The only strange kill to me is Pandain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
