EPTHogwarts Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:41 Holyflare wrote: Pointing it out without waiting for him to do it again later or changing defeats the object of it doesn't it? It's totally baseless, especially if he isn't a native english speaker. On a different topic let me reiterate: + Show Spoiler + On October 17 2013 06:52 Holyflare wrote: Can we assume so though? It is randomly distributed after all. We had something similar in our QT. Storrzerg asked pretty much the same thing. Then there was Grack, he said he would not be participating in the pick up line event unless we had some spare, never knew google was a hard concept for some. What would be the point in not participating at this point as these items seem to be game changing, does he not want to win? What would be people's motive (Grack) to not participate in an event? These items seem to be useful for finding scum and he implied that he didn't care which house they went to in the QT. Seeing as scum is randomly distributed it would be detrimental to go to another house that you don't know how many scum are in it. Why does he not care? (From phone) Re: gracks indifference to the item. I think he is of the opinion that the houses are just a flavor thing and that we have no real way to manipulate the item/contest to benefit town by getting it all for his self. Assuming town>scum in each house the overall effect should be the same, no? Who cares if townie A or townie B gets it? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:35 Mattchew wrote: a lot of soft accusations being thrown at Skanjab1s and dont we always have to lynch the self aware miller or is that some other weird role? We don't KNOW (winkwink) if he is or isn't, I think he gets benefit of the doubt to try and prove townieness. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
| ||
