EPTI don't really know what to tell you; given I was the one who fucking nailed Dirk to the wall for what he did, then yeah, whatever. I can't describe my doubts very elegantly, I just feel much more confident in a slOosh lynch right now.
World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 35
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I don't really know what to tell you; given I was the one who fucking nailed Dirk to the wall for what he did, then yeah, whatever. I can't describe my doubts very elegantly, I just feel much more confident in a slOosh lynch right now. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
On October 04 2013 00:53 raynpelikoneet wrote: Waht i say in my listpost and that post is 100% the same. Dispite the fact that they aren't you are also wrong. It's clear here Link and here link why I regard you and sloosh scummy. I changed my mind about the HF thing and maybe thats why you are calling me wishy-washy. Other then that I don't see it. So please point where?! Regarding the timestamp on my vote on Sloosh. I don't see that as anything that can point to my alignment. I was waiting for him to answer and he never did. I was leaving for work. I left my vote so he would respond when he could (which he haven't yet btw). | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:07 Dirkzor wrote: Dispite the fact that they aren't you are also wrong. It's clear here Link and here link why I regard you and sloosh scummy. I changed my mind about the HF thing and maybe thats why you are calling me wishy-washy. Other then that I don't see it. So please point where?! Regarding the timestamp on my vote on Sloosh. I don't see that as anything that can point to my alignment. I was waiting for him to answer and he never did. I was leaving for work. I left my vote so he would respond when he could (which he haven't yet btw). I am talking about these things: (1) Your vote and backpedalling on HF. (2) Your comments and timing on voting for Sloosh. (3) Your stance on HF's big post and your comments on his post compared to mine when asked by me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I find your play very hard to get a handle on this game, because it's been totally warped by the original Holyflare thing. Which skews perceptions - I can't tell if you're mafia talking your way out of a hole, or town who made a silly mistake. Reminds me of Dwarf Fortress mafia where town pursued forumite like a hound all day for a mistake he made at the start, and he flipped town. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
1) I can understand this, but I've explained what happened pretty thoroughly by now. 2) Doesn't mean anything. 3) I dont get it. You both made big posts. I view them differently even though they both make the same mistake because of gamehistory. Could you explain this further? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:14 Blazinghand wrote: Man I'm just gonna throw this out there but we don't have a cop or a vigi this game right? How good are you gonna be with that oats read Marv? cause, well, as you, me, rayne, and clarity know, towns have been burned before for letting Oats live to lylo. BH, i can tell Oats' alignment at last on N2. If i die on N1 grill him hard. This is a fact. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:16 Blazinghand wrote: I guess I'm happier with this new more active Rayn and would be okay letting him live for a day since we need to get together into a majority in the next ~8 hours or we no-lynch. I can't really justify lynching him, even if he's pretty damn scummy, over Oats when I'll be able to get a more solid read on Rayn over time (if he's scum he'll screw up). Then again, Oats doesn't seem to be happening either. fack. Could you condense your read on oats for us? Rather than going "welp my lynch aint happening, bummer" | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:17 Clarity_nl wrote: Could you condense your read on oats for us? Rather than going "welp my lynch aint happening, bummer" Agreed with this. If you're really convinced Oats is the best lynch, then argue coherently for it. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 03 2013 11:10 slOosh wrote: Ohh BH, thoughts on clarity? it looks to be like slOosh may have been changing his mind on clarity then, at 11 (at 10, he was null or town on clarity. at 12 he voted clarity). Perhaps he was rereading the filter, and the thing popped out at him, so he popped into the thread to ask me a question. I find this a reasonable explanation of sloosh's actions. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:18 marvellosity wrote: Agreed with this. If you're really convinced Oats is the best lynch, then argue coherently for it. Man I'm really not which is the problem. Like, I think oats a dick and a liability, but I'm not convinced he's scum from his posting. I wouldn't mind lynching him since I'm not sure I'll be able to get a read on him all game, and he loves to fuck things up at lylo, but if I had a case I'd be posting it and yelling at you guys to vote with me. I think we're not lynching Oats today. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:16 Dirkzor wrote: @rayn: 1) I can understand this, but I've explained what happened pretty thoroughly by now. 2) Doesn't mean anything. 3) I dont get it. You both made big posts. I view them differently even though they both make the same mistake because of gamehistory. Could you explain this further? (1) Yeah and i am not sure if i buy it, atm i don't. (2) Yes it does. You say me and Sloosh are scummy. Then when other people go for Sloosh, you go too. (3) Yes, you call out HF for his post. No mention of me. When i ask you about the differences of them, you suddenly go for "oh, you are scummy too". That's fucking fishy. That's what you have been doing the whole game. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:20 Blazinghand wrote: Man, I kinda like this sloosh lynch. I do see what's being said about him changing his mind between here (link) and here (link) and why that's a bit suspicious. I will say that there are a couple mitigating factors. 1, he initially was reacting to a case and said it wasn't too compelling. Risen's case didn't directly address the point that sloosh brought up later, so it's possible sloosh was a lazy ass and didn't actually read clarity's filter. 2, there's an in-between post that actually imo makes this ok: it looks to be like slOosh may have been changing his mind on clarity then, at 11 (at 10, he was null or town on clarity. at 12 he voted clarity). Perhaps he was rereading the filter, and the thing popped out at him, so he popped into the thread to ask me a question. I find this a reasonable explanation of sloosh's actions. It is a reasonable explanation, I agree - but it's also weak if that's the case. I don't really associate slOosh with weak play. I've kinda always been a slOosh fanboy though, because his style is generally the opposite of mine | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
OK, so I take it back. Sloosh lynch is lynching sloosh for being sloosh imo | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:25 Blazinghand wrote: In any case, a sloosh lynch is a lynch for the same reason I thought rayne was a good lynch. Sloosh has been effectively inactive. Taking a look at his catch-22 filter, though, http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=417453&user=slOosh&view=all he's clearly capable of this play as town. Though, that time, he questions DP and pushes other people for info before dropping his (without case) vote. OK, so I take it back. Sloosh lynch is lynching sloosh for being sloosh imo That leaves who for your choice of lynch? Risen? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:27 Clarity_nl wrote: That leaves who for your choice of lynch? Risen? Hm. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
| ||
