|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So BH, who do you actually want to lynch? You've now given 3 target all of which you have retracted from...
Yeah, I have huh. I'll reread Dirk and see if there's a good reason tehre, and since clarity's on my dick he deserves a reread as well.
For now? I guess I'm actually gonna have to go with you, or Oats if that gains traction (since we need 5 votes). This departure from your normal play is still huge, even if you claim mitigating circumstances, and I think I can make a decent case that we need to lynch Oats eventually anyways.
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
Hm okay actually Risen is a great lynch
##unvote
##vote Risen
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
|
What is this "clarity is on my dick" malarkey that you're been going on about, blazing?
|
About sloosh. What I don't understand still is how he came to the conclusion the clarity is scum. When he is talking about Risens case on Clarity he actually gives Clarity town points. Then sloosh claims he wiffle-waffles and he is scum and sloosh is "feeling good"
I see the post quoted by BH as even more scum indicative then not. He wants you to post something so the whole thread is about clarity. same goes with this post right after his vote on clarity:
On October 03 2013 13:30 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 12:50 Risen wrote:
I would like more people's thoughts on my case on Clarity and Clarity's response. I think it would be good if you distill it down to like, 2 or 3 quotes and explain how it is indicative of him being scum. That way it forces clarity to respond to the heart of the points and clears stuff up so other people can more easily lend their opinions.
But I can't really move forward before I hear him respond.
|
Okay i don't like BH at all..
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm super-curious how BH is gonna justify the Risen lynch when he defended the slOosh lynch on meta.
Best include Risen's recent town meta too.
|
On October 04 2013 01:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 01:16 Dirkzor wrote:
@rayn:
1) I can understand this, but I've explained what happened pretty thoroughly by now.
2) Doesn't mean anything.
3) I dont get it. You both made big posts. I view them differently even though they both make the same mistake because of gamehistory. Could you explain this further? (1) Yeah and i am not sure if i buy it, atm i don't. (2) Yes it does. You say me and Sloosh are scummy. Then when other people go for Sloosh, you go too. (3) Yes, you call out HF for his post. No mention of me. When i ask you about the differences of them, you suddenly go for "oh, you are scummy too". That's fucking fishy. That's what you have been doing the whole game.
3) You asked me how I felt about HF big post - I answered. Then you asked me about your post in comparison - I answered. How is that scummy?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
So basically despite his mondo case I don't see Risen as actually trying to get clarity lynched in a legitimate way. What am I saying here? Well okay check dis shit out
Oct 03 3:33 Risen posts case (link). I think we can generally agree that this case was, whether Risen is town or scum, written AFTER he decided clarity was scum. Most of this shit is just innocuous crap that clarity wrote and Risen saying "HAHA JUST LIKE A SCUMMER" or something like that. Now granted, we all tunnel and write bad cases from time to time. Not even I am immune from this! But tunnelling and overlooking bad evidence isn't something you do by accident as a townie. It's something you do because you really genuinely believe your target is scum. You are so blinded by the "fact" that he's scum that you overlook evidence that he's town. You tunnel him. You try to get people on his wagon. You drive the wagon, but it is because you are DRIVEN. you believe.
Risen does not believe. This is his followup:
On October 03 2013 05:41 Risen wrote:
And so the cycle continues where I accuse someone of being scum and they're immune to lynch.
On October 03 2013 12:50 Risen wrote:
I would like more people's thoughts on my case on Clarity and Clarity's response.
2 and 9 hours later, respectively. And it's been 12 hours since then, for almost 24 hours now.
He doens't care about his clarity case, hwich doesn't match up with "risen tunnels clarity". You either don't care about the case, or you do. It's not "I care about it enough that i'm blinded by my fervor, but somehow am not gonna attempt to actually convince people of it"
that isn't a case, that's a fucking excuse for his vote.
|
On October 04 2013 01:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay i don't like BH at all..
I do, actually. All his recent posts produce a feeling of "forming an opinion as I'm writing" which is hard to fake.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
yeah he did that in Noir, BH
what of it?
|
Dirkzor: So you just do what pther people tell you to do? Nothing else?.....srsly?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay i don't like BH at all..
yeah well rayn there's a non-trivial chance you're scum so NYAAAAA
On October 04 2013 01:33 marvellosity wrote:
I'm super-curious how BH is gonna justify the Risen lynch when he defended the slOosh lynch on meta.
Best include Risen's recent town meta too.
too much effort. my analysis is good
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Further, why aren't you using meta in your case on someone, when you keep defending people with meta?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:37 marvellosity wrote:
yeah he did that in Noir, BH
what of it?
yes, Noir is a good example of town play we should use that to determine people's metas.
brb 24 hours not posting
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:37 marvellosity wrote:
Further, why aren't you using meta in your case on someone, when you keep defending people with meta?
too lazy
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Like, this is how it goes.
1) slOosh is scummy, but he also did this scummy shit as town
2) Risen is scummy, but I don't care that he did this scummy shit as town
That's a fair representation, is it not?
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
In any case, I'm down still for like an Oats or Rayne lynch. I want to see what people think of my Risen case besides "herp derp Risen played like dick in noir" or whatever
|
|
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On October 04 2013 01:38 marvellosity wrote:
Like, this is how it goes.
1) slOosh is scummy, but he also did this scummy shit as town
2) Risen is scummy, but I don't care that he did this scummy shit as town
That's a fair representation, is it not?
1) sloosh isn't scummy, since his thought process makes sense. He also does this as town, so double not scummy
2) risen is scummy, since his thought process doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
