|
On October 04 2013 09:13 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 09:12 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 09:09 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 09:05 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 09:04 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 08:54 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 08:46 VayneAuthority wrote:
if you want people to take you seriously Pandain, start by not being a hypocrite. You can't say my voting is scummy when we were both on town the entire game. It doesn't work like that.
A lot of the other stuff people are ignoring because that is my town meta whether you like it or not. You are basically just perfectly describing my town meta right now. So your case is kinda just helping me, as a heads up. I think you are playing a good scum game but your role speculation which isn't sensible and logical unless you have inside knowledge reveals you. Additionally your lack of pushing reveals you. It's day three and you say usually by now you're fitting pieces together and you're dangerous in the end-game. It's 8-5 town/scum ratio. Where's your end-game fitting in? All I see is an easy vote on FT. On October 04 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:On October 04 2013 08:39 Pandain wrote:
Palmar besides that has been playing as town, I don't think he's as lurkery as you think. I don't mean to imply he's the lurkiest lurker that ever did lurk. But his posting is on subjects that I don't think matter. He's got a boatload of posts today on his VOTE yesterday. Palmar shouldn't care about his vote yesterday. Mislynches happen. Vote switches happen. He's not even getting serious votes or anything for it. But he spends forever going over the ins and outs of voting and bovine reproduction or whatever else. His activity, in cases like that, is about subjects that just don't matter as far as scumhunting goes. Plus again. You both have Pa- names. Someone gots to go. I'm not as concerned about Pa's due to the fact that I know what I post. I also think we should actually lynch scum, and my reasons for lynching Palmar are too policy oriented(although there are some good suspicions) to justify me voting him and to justify you voting him. An easy vote isn't necessarily wrong. It's easy for a reason. He martyred and left the game. As others have stated, if you martyr there is nothing else that will take my vote off of you. Some one else could claim scum in the thread and I would still have my vote on the martyr. Nothing else pisses me off more. Ignore that for the most part, I'm more concerned with the Grack vote and the failure to actually push or prod me palmar or Grack . You voted Grack but never advocated for him. grack was playing exactly the same way as in golden sun and this is only my 2nd game with him so I don't know his town game. Associated it with him being scum again, but it appears he plays both alignments similarly. The pushing thing is repetitive and boring, as stated multiple times it is not alignment indicative in the slightest. So you're just going to vote someone and hope they get lynched? When you voted Grack you immediately got called out by two players, and never pushed him further. Palmar never got voted and only vote on me was by you. well you miss the point on how I play town I don't get people lynched, I just make sure I don't get lynched.
Then why even post at all?
To me all your proving is that you should get policy lynched every day.
|
And I will vote for you in every future game.
|
On October 04 2013 09:17 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 09:13 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 09:12 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 09:09 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 09:05 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 09:04 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 08:54 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 08:46 VayneAuthority wrote:
if you want people to take you seriously Pandain, start by not being a hypocrite. You can't say my voting is scummy when we were both on town the entire game. It doesn't work like that.
A lot of the other stuff people are ignoring because that is my town meta whether you like it or not. You are basically just perfectly describing my town meta right now. So your case is kinda just helping me, as a heads up. I think you are playing a good scum game but your role speculation which isn't sensible and logical unless you have inside knowledge reveals you. Additionally your lack of pushing reveals you. It's day three and you say usually by now you're fitting pieces together and you're dangerous in the end-game. It's 8-5 town/scum ratio. Where's your end-game fitting in? All I see is an easy vote on FT. On October 04 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:On October 04 2013 08:39 Pandain wrote:
Palmar besides that has been playing as town, I don't think he's as lurkery as you think. I don't mean to imply he's the lurkiest lurker that ever did lurk. But his posting is on subjects that I don't think matter. He's got a boatload of posts today on his VOTE yesterday. Palmar shouldn't care about his vote yesterday. Mislynches happen. Vote switches happen. He's not even getting serious votes or anything for it. But he spends forever going over the ins and outs of voting and bovine reproduction or whatever else. His activity, in cases like that, is about subjects that just don't matter as far as scumhunting goes. Plus again. You both have Pa- names. Someone gots to go. I'm not as concerned about Pa's due to the fact that I know what I post. I also think we should actually lynch scum, and my reasons for lynching Palmar are too policy oriented(although there are some good suspicions) to justify me voting him and to justify you voting him. An easy vote isn't necessarily wrong. It's easy for a reason. He martyred and left the game. As others have stated, if you martyr there is nothing else that will take my vote off of you. Some one else could claim scum in the thread and I would still have my vote on the martyr. Nothing else pisses me off more. Ignore that for the most part, I'm more concerned with the Grack vote and the failure to actually push or prod me palmar or Grack . You voted Grack but never advocated for him. grack was playing exactly the same way as in golden sun and this is only my 2nd game with him so I don't know his town game. Associated it with him being scum again, but it appears he plays both alignments similarly. The pushing thing is repetitive and boring, as stated multiple times it is not alignment indicative in the slightest. So you're just going to vote someone and hope they get lynched? When you voted Grack you immediately got called out by two players, and never pushed him further. Palmar never got voted and only vote on me was by you. well you miss the point on how I play town I don't get people lynched, I just make sure I don't get lynched. Then why even post at all? To me all your proving is that you should get policy lynched every day.
Spoken like true scum, pc3 im done here
|
You're not playing town and you keep ignoring the fact your night action speculation is too definitive and knowledgeable of actions. There are literally like 6 different abilities that each faction can do and you somehow know that scum shot this person or cops shot this person, this team saved their KP and this team probably used bullet proof actions.
There's no way a townie knows this. I tried to reason out what could be possible and there were too many variables for me to make definitive statements. For example SnB could have been shot by either cop or scum team.
If you say you don't aim to lynch and instead try to avoid getting lynched, then you contradict even your previous play as town that I posted in persona 4 where you clearly tried to analyze.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=425521&user=VayneAuthority&view=all
|
So. We lynch Palmar. Who opposes this?
|
Yeah PAndabearguy is csum. ggnore.
|
Vote for PALMAR!
If you don't, ima shout you post game.
|
On October 04 2013 08:35 VisceraEyes wrote:
Give me some votes guys, I need incentive to do something in this game. Whether you actually want to lynch me or not, the pro-town thing is to put votes on me until I contribute something. Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. On October 04 2013 08:37 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 08:35 VisceraEyes wrote:
Give me some votes guys, I need incentive to do something in this game. Whether you actually want to lynch me or not, the pro-town thing is to put votes on me until I contribute something. Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. You're gonna need to take a number. VE I don't care if you're not motivated, give me something...neat. A weird kooky read. A post that really caught your attention but you don't know what to do with it. On October 04 2013 08:39 VisceraEyes wrote:I did, he flipped cop  I'm working on it austin just bear with me. Resuing
![[image loading]](http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h116/austinmcc11/63a1d370-0877-4099-a18c-29bec10fdcd4.jpg)
VE. This bear wants to CONSUME YOUR SOUL. I don't know what kind of motivation votes give you, but THIS IS YOUR SOUL. ABOUT TO BE CONSUMED BY A BEAR.
I got your coded message. I understand that bear crumb. I know you're under attack right now. And I promise, we can PROBABLY still save your soul.
But you're gonna have to help us out here. We're the town VE. We're stuck in nasty-ass detroit (as best I can tell?). There are soul-eating bears. It's dark, and it's detroit, and there are soul-eating bears VE. Shit's serious.
So you're going to need to post some thoughts. Some musings. People are DYING, VE. They are DYING. And a bear is going to eat your soul. I don't know if I can reinforce these things strongly enough.
I know there's a bear with you. But you're only going to last so long. The bear will win if you don't post.
The bear will win.
|
Well I AM afraid of bears. :3
You're one of my favorite players ever austin. Ever brothers in tinfoil hats are we, and I swear on everything I'll help you figure this game out.
|
On October 04 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:
wtf oats has 9 pages of filter. When did he make posts?
This is exactly why Oats is scum.
ALso I want to lynch FT despite Pandain's posting.
Am I jerk?
|
On October 04 2013 09:17 Pandain wrote:
And I will vote for you in every future game.
So again, literally what I've been saying about him since the start of the game.
Thanks for playing Pandain but you're days late.
|
On October 04 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:
wtf oats has 9 pages of filter. When did he make posts? This is exactly why Oats is scum. ALso I want to lynch FT despite Pandain's posting.Am I jerk?
Why
|
On October 04 2013 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 04 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:
wtf oats has 9 pages of filter. When did he make posts? This is exactly why Oats is scum. ALso I want to lynch FT despite Pandain's posting.Am I jerk? Why
Dunno 'cause either FT is scum and I win, or he's town and I think it would be hilarious if we lynched a townie despite the biggest defense case I have ever seen anyone make.
It's win-win.
|
Honestly if FT gets lynched and flips town I will feel too bad about myself for
|
On October 04 2013 10:11 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote:On October 04 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 04 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:
wtf oats has 9 pages of filter. When did he make posts? This is exactly why Oats is scum. ALso I want to lynch FT despite Pandain's posting.Am I jerk? Why Dunno 'cause either FT is scum and I win, or he's town and I think it would be hilarious if we lynched a townie despite the biggest defense case I have ever seen anyone make. It's win-win.
you also know about that which cannot be named
|
|
|
On October 04 2013 10:11 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote:On October 04 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 04 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:
wtf oats has 9 pages of filter. When did he make posts? This is exactly why Oats is scum. ALso I want to lynch FT despite Pandain's posting.Am I jerk? Why Dunno 'cause either FT is scum and I win, or he's town and I think it would be hilarious if we lynched a townie despite the biggest defense case I have ever seen anyone make. It's win-win.
Like, I'll admit that I'm not trying very hard, but this attitude of yours is really starting to grate on my nerves. At least when I don't have anything to say, I say nothing instead of shit like this.
I love you Wave, but seriously if you're town, then please enough with the "Woe is me, towns are horrible so I guess I'll just troll this whole game" crap.
|
Conversely if you're scum, keep it up and annoy me into wanting to lynch you XD
|
On October 04 2013 10:14 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 10:11 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 04 2013 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote:On October 04 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 04 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:
wtf oats has 9 pages of filter. When did he make posts? This is exactly why Oats is scum. ALso I want to lynch FT despite Pandain's posting.Am I jerk? Why Dunno 'cause either FT is scum and I win, or he's town and I think it would be hilarious if we lynched a townie despite the biggest defense case I have ever seen anyone make. It's win-win. Like, I'll admit that I'm not trying very hard, but this attitude of yours is really starting to grate on my nerves. At least when I don't have anything to say, I say nothing instead of shit like this. I love you Wave, but seriously if you're town, then please enough with the "Woe is me, towns are horrible so I guess I'll just troll this whole game" crap.
Don't you even dare accuse me of trolling.
I don't want to get into it with you again, but I was telling teh truth and that's honestly how I feel right now.
You want contribution? Read the last page or so of my filter. I contribute plenty without trolling.
Vayne I may or may not know what you're talking about.
|
Wave between myself and Palmar who would you rather lynch? Like, assume a town full of sheep: which of us dies and why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
