EPTHOST DID THE SAME THING LIKE 5 POSTS AFTER ME LOL
TL Mafia Ban List 2.0 - Page 31
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
HOST DID THE SAME THING LIKE 5 POSTS AFTER ME LOL | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
RLLY? | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
EDIT: oh missed the fact that he was dead. no comment then | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On February 09 2014 03:17 Coagulation wrote: no man. how is posting the lurker smiley indicative of anything other than "coag is at tlmafia" Can u guys like see into the 6th dimension?? RLLY? you were a player in the game. It was innocent, but its like how people like to say scumslips exist - subconsciously you could have been responding to something in thread that compelled you to post because it affected your team. In any case, I could care less if you literally posted a blank post with no content and never edited it. The fact that a dead player posted during a time that there were decisions to be made is a distraction and can be seen as manipulation of the game if you really twist your arguments and squint a little from 5 feet away from your monitor. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Popcorn is popcorn and always has been. (Holy sheet I agree with coag lol) | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
 immediately following that case. No WoS, that had zero impact on the game whatsoever. None at all. No one would ever try to read anything into that action. No sir.Seriously, there is a reason why you arent supposed to post after death. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On February 08 2014 23:00 Mocsta wrote: I think Coag needs to be warned/banned for this post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440856¤tpage=115#2296 It was created posthumous late into a cycle at a pivotal moment (read close to hammer in IML) during a mislynch. Some I was talking to live at the time, were discussing the WIFOM of flipped scum Coag making this post and how it was preventing them from unvoting Grack. Frankly, i think this constitutes cheating as per the posting after death clause. Because it was only a popcorn... I am comfortable if the reprimand is only a warning; however, I think regardless of outcome this needs to be brought to attention. Banning for popcorn? What has this thread come to? EDIT: I love my popcorn and wouldn't ban anyone for it. WIFORM will always be WIFORM | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:24 Promethelax wrote: For those of us that didn't follow the gam, I.e. me can you explain the coag one? In every game Coag was town, he posts his seal of townieness. People requested for him to post his seal or be lynched and he refused to. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440856¤tpage=105#2092 I suggest for future hosts to explicitly ban Coag from posting his seal, or forcing Coag to post his seal early. On February 08 2014 20:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: If you are going to warn Coag for playing against his wincon (which really even wasn't, even if you consider him claiming mafia with not posting his seal - because the other target for lynch was mafia roleblocker) you should probably also warn other people for the same thing. Playing against wincon is incredibly difficult to judge, and I'm not that big of a fan of bans that are murky. I want to warn him for more of Metagame Trickery. This is a fair point (coag probably should have claimed mafia in some way or another and took not posting his seal), however I just want to make it clear that future games should have explicit considerations from preventing this from being an issue. You could also think of it this way, if coag posted his seal, it would be much harder for him to be lynched, so it was an unfair advantage for the mafia team. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9639 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
If not, how come it hasn't been brought up before? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On February 09 2014 05:13 WaveofShadow wrote: Is this somehow different from Starsenses? If not, how come it hasn't been brought up before? because trying to ban someone because of not posting a particular thing is really stupid and no one has had the gall to suggest it before afaik. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On February 09 2014 05:06 LSB wrote: In every game Coag was town, he posts his seal of townieness. People requested for him to post his seal or be lynched and he refused to. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440856¤tpage=105#2092 I suggest for future hosts to explicitly ban Coag from posting his seal, or forcing Coag to post his seal early. Playing against wincon is incredibly difficult to judge, and I'm not that big of a fan of bans that are murky. I want to warn him for more of Metagame Trickery. This is a fair point (coag probably should have claimed mafia in some way or another and took not posting his seal), however I just want to make it clear that future games should have explicit considerations from preventing this from being an issue. You could also think of it this way, if coag posted his seal, it would be much harder for him to be lynched, so it was an unfair advantage for the mafia team. this is a lie. I have refused to post my badge while town MULTIPLE TIMES. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On February 09 2014 05:31 Coagulation wrote: this is a lie. I have refused to post my badge while town MULTIPLE TIMES. mmkay if that is true I'll rescind my warning request. My recent experience with playing with coag is quite limited | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
The "i'll post X always as town and never as scum" has been going on for a while. gumshoe's STARSENSES, I believe Kenpachi's "I'm town", etc. Seems kind of unfair to unload all that built in frustration to Coag right now, when it's not his fault that kind of behaviour was never punished nor frowned on all these years. If you don't like it, which, to be honest, I don't like it that much either (other than some fun inside joke of course), then make it official somewhere, make everybody understand, etc. Post it in the rules, make a rally in your city, contact your senators, make a viral video, whatever. THEN if someone does it ban/warn/whatever. Doing it now seems kind of harsh and inconsistent | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 09 2014 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote: This is dumb. Popcorn is popcorn and always has been. (Holy sheet I agree with coag lol) Wubbybumpkins is right. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 09 2014 05:33 LSB wrote: mmkay if that is true I'll rescind my warning request. My recent experience with playing with coag is quite limited I also would then like to apologize. It just seemed like people were using it as the be all end all way to know your alignment, which I don't think is fun or fair. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On February 09 2014 05:35 gonzaw wrote: lol The "i'll post X always as town and never as scum" has been going on for a while. gumshoe's STARSENSES, I believe Kenpachi's "I'm town", etc. Seems kind of unfair to unload all that built in frustration to Coag right now, when it's not his fault that kind of behaviour was never punished nor frowned on all these years. If you don't like it, which, to be honest, I don't like it that much either (other than some fun inside joke of course), then make it official somewhere, make everybody understand, etc. Post it in the rules, make a rally in your city, contact your senators, make a viral video, whatever. THEN if someone does it ban/warn/whatever. Doing it now seems kind of harsh and inconsistent I cant wait to see gmarshs reaction when you guys petition him to make claiming town in a mafia game ban worthy. Its not the action thats broken its the game. | ||
| ||
