|
On September 15 2013 02:33 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 02:30 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 02:26 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:44 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:40 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:37 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:
[quote]
Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless. You do subscribe to the notion that useless=scum Which I dont agree with. And which is never ever true. i cannot remember who, but somebody had meta reasons showing that Zealos does play this way as scum. lol. This attitude. So scum. I'm very confident that Pandain/Zealos are scum. I'm doing what I can to try to convince you, but you won't be convinced either because you are scum and defending your buddies or just dumb. but you're wrong or scum.
Explain to me why my vote switch is scummy and Pandain's is not.
Pandain gave no good reason for his vote switch but you say Pandain's switch isn't scummy because Zealos is town for being Useless.
I gave my reasoning for switching my vote, and you say that BH is 3rd party, which is not scum aligned with a scum team so its basically the same thing as switching off of town. What are my motivations for switching the vote if not what I said they were?
Why is Pandain switching off of "town" ok but me switching off of BH, who for all intents and purposes to the mafia team is "town" considered scummy?
|
Lol reasons. Everyone has reasons.
Scum has reasons. Town has reasons.
Why are you calling having reasons townie? Not having reasons is more townie.
|
@Scum: Please shoot me tonight, thanks.
|
If I ever play as scum in a game with you I am going be completely useless and give absolutely no reason for anything I do and watch how you respond.
|
On September 15 2013 02:54 Grackaroni wrote:
If I ever play as scum in a game with you I am going be completely useless and give absolutely no reason for anything I do and watch how you respond.
k cool.
You know, thats what all the town dudes say when they are irritated with my foolproof way of reading people.
I guess you're town. Vayne did that another game.
|
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way
|
On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way
Man. Debears.
Are you ok with lynching Umansi?
|
On September 15 2013 03:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way Man. Debears. Are you ok with lynching Umansi?
idk haven't taken a close look at him
|
On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way
yay
Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow!
|
On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow!
I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him
|
On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him
Im confused why you didnt notice the vote before Grack pointed it out.
|
On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him
Yes Zealos is safer, I had Pandain down as very town until I reread his behavior in the last minutes before the deadline. If Zealos somehow ends up town then I'm a lot less suspicious of Pandain.
|
On September 15 2013 03:22 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him Im confused why you didnt notice the vote before Grack pointed it out.
there was so much shit going down during that final 10 minutes that it was easy to miss things. I spent most of my time trying to figure out who actually died.
|
On September 15 2013 03:22 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him Im confused why you didnt notice the vote before Grack pointed it out.
I wasn't there at lynch. I just skimmed to the deathpost
And looking back, if zealos is red, pandain is likely red and SnB is most likely town due to SnB's post at deadline
On September 14 2013 06:57 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2013 06:55 Pandain wrote:
I don't know there's a chance Zealos is blue.
There's too much I don't know. I haven't looked at his prior games either really. If he's blue why would you vig him. What happened to your conviction that the wagon on OP is wrong.
On September 14 2013 06:56 Zealos wrote:I like how Pandain is making points to try and make a lynch happen. Then you get SnB: Show nested quote +On September 14 2013 06:00 strongandbig wrote:
Ryan what about lynching zealos instead of kush
Show nested quote +On September 14 2013 06:51 strongandbig wrote:
Look people in thread vote zealos. We can still make it happen Show nested quote +On September 14 2013 06:53 strongandbig wrote:
Pandaind come on vote zealos. Kush isn't happening, people either have town reads on him or are on OP. Show nested quote +On September 14 2013 06:53 strongandbig wrote:
Pandain if its between old partner and zealos why not vote zwalos
Look the the SnB qutoe inside the zealos quote
|
On September 15 2013 03:24 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him Yes Zealos is safer, I had Pandain down as very town until I reread his behavior in the last minutes before the deadline. If Zealos somehow ends up town then I'm a lot less suspicious of Pandain.
I guess I can be suspicion free of Pan.
Kill SnB tomorrow.
|
On September 15 2013 03:27 Zealos wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him Yes Zealos is safer, I had Pandain down as very town until I reread his behavior in the last minutes before the deadline. If Zealos somehow ends up town then I'm a lot less suspicious of Pandain. I guess I can be suspicion free of Pan. Kill SnB tomorrow.
What do you mean?
|
Well, you said you wouldn't be suspicious of pan if I was town.
|
On September 15 2013 02:38 Zealos wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:15 Koshi wrote:
Pandain and Zealos are scummers. That's certain. Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:23 Koshi wrote:
OP and Pandain are just both scum.
BH & Pandain are just jerking each other off in teh scum QT for old time sake.
It's obvious. Stop speaking in absolutes. It makes you look very scummy.
|
|
|
@Debears, What do you think about Vayne?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
