|
On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:12 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nice extremely useless Post Grack. EXTREMELY. *sigh* Looks like I'm getting myself into the classic game of scum or dumb. *sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum.
BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow.
I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared.
Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not.
Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch?
|
Read page 77. It's were I am.
I am happy with where I am.
|
|
|
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well.
|
Grack do you like my scumteam?
|
On September 15 2013 00:46 Koshi wrote:
Grack do you like my scumteam?
Not really, I'll look over it again because maybe I'm missing something but it doesn't make sense for me that scum would be pushing Zealos over BH as a vote switch rather than Kush if they are all scum.
|
On September 15 2013 00:38 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:12 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nice extremely useless Post Grack. EXTREMELY. *sigh* Looks like I'm getting myself into the classic game of scum or dumb. *sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum. BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow. I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared. Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not. Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch?
It was excellent. BH was playing anti townish. I was the second person to talk about OP and I arguably caused him to be almost lynched. See.
OP's post were way more bullshit than Pandain.
Also Pandain's vote switch is only scummy if Zealos is scum. Which I dont think so.
|
On September 15 2013 00:49 Grackaroni wrote:Not really, I'll look over it again because maybe I'm missing something but it doesn't make sense for me that scum would be pushing Zealos over BH as a vote switch rather than Kush if they are all scum.
Hmm. Yeah but I think they wanted to vote switch onto another scum to make it less obvious. Because they needed 2 switches to either Kush or blubb.
But it's cool.
|
@Koshi: Oh wait, They all were the people on kush except for S&B before the zealos switch. It is possible that they pushed Zealos over in order to keep BH alive if BH was scum and already had this survivor claim planned out. Not a bad theory.
|
Also Pandain has posted way more than just a policy lynch.
Dude. There is so much more that Pandain posted as opposed to what OP posted when I first entered the thread.
Grack is so scum for trying to call me/pandain scum in the same post but not really. Dude. All the stuff you have been asking me is bullshit. So bad. Bullshit. So scum. Guys.
|
On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well.
yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum.
|
On September 15 2013 00:50 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:38 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:12 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nice extremely useless Post Grack. EXTREMELY. *sigh* Looks like I'm getting myself into the classic game of scum or dumb. *sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum. BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow. I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared. Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not. Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch? It was excellent. BH was playing anti townish. I was the second person to talk about OP and I arguably caused him to be almost lynched. See. OP's post were way more bullshit than Pandain. Also Pandain's vote switch is only scummy if Zealos is scum. Which I dont think so.
You need to read the thread. Rayn was the first person to call BH scum and he gave reasoning. I was the second person to call OP scum and I gave my own reasoning. I don't think you were at all the cause for OP being almost lynched, you had little reasoning.
|
On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum.
Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore.
|
On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore.
uh. Yeah.
Ok.
|
On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok.
I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town.
|
On September 15 2013 00:57 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:38 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:12 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nice extremely useless Post Grack. EXTREMELY. *sigh* Looks like I'm getting myself into the classic game of scum or dumb. *sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum. BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow. I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared. Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not. Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch? It was excellent. BH was playing anti townish. I was the second person to talk about OP and I arguably caused him to be almost lynched. See. OP's post were way more bullshit than Pandain. Also Pandain's vote switch is only scummy if Zealos is scum. Which I dont think so. You need to read the thread. Rayn was the first person to call BH scum and he gave reasoning. I was the second person to call OP scum and I gave my own reasoning. I don't think you were at all the cause for OP being almost lynched, you had little reasoning.
Lol so why were there only 2 votes on OP for like more than 12 hours?
Dat Ego.
|
On September 15 2013 01:01 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:57 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:38 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:12 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nice extremely useless Post Grack. EXTREMELY. *sigh* Looks like I'm getting myself into the classic game of scum or dumb. *sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum. BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow. I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared. Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not. Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch? It was excellent. BH was playing anti townish. I was the second person to talk about OP and I arguably caused him to be almost lynched. See. OP's post were way more bullshit than Pandain. Also Pandain's vote switch is only scummy if Zealos is scum. Which I dont think so. You need to read the thread. Rayn was the first person to call BH scum and he gave reasoning. I was the second person to call OP scum and I gave my own reasoning. I don't think you were at all the cause for OP being almost lynched, you had little reasoning. Lol so why were there only 2 votes on OP for like more than 12 hours? Dat Ego.
You had only one point and I had already used it in my argument for OP being scum earlier. I don't know why people ended up jumping on it, but I don't think it's fair to say it was because of you. I do think think it's likely a scum jumped on this vote at the end of the day and I don't think there's anything that excludes that scum from being you.
|
On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town.
So thats your problem.
Ok. Right.
Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about?
|
On September 15 2013 01:06 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:01 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:57 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:38 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:12 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nice extremely useless Post Grack. EXTREMELY. *sigh* Looks like I'm getting myself into the classic game of scum or dumb. *sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum. BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow. I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared. Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not. Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch? It was excellent. BH was playing anti townish. I was the second person to talk about OP and I arguably caused him to be almost lynched. See. OP's post were way more bullshit than Pandain. Also Pandain's vote switch is only scummy if Zealos is scum. Which I dont think so. You need to read the thread. Rayn was the first person to call BH scum and he gave reasoning. I was the second person to call OP scum and I gave my own reasoning. I don't think you were at all the cause for OP being almost lynched, you had little reasoning. Lol so why were there only 2 votes on OP for like more than 12 hours? Dat Ego. You had only one point and I had already used it in my argument for OP being scum earlier. I don't know why people ended up jumping on it, but I don't think it's fair to say it was because of you. I do think think it's likely a scum jumped on this vote at the end of the day and I don't think there's anything that excludes that scum from being you.
So me as scum decides to start up a dead vote because why? Also why did you unvote?
|
On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about?
When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
