Aperture 1 was the game that made me try mafia.
Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Aperture 1 was the game that made me try mafia. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 08 2013 00:12 GreYMisT wrote: they do not T_T | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
actually yeah. if I have kp I will use them on the person with the most posts. promise. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 17 2013 07:38 VisceraEyes wrote: I've actually encrypted all of my GP and they're out of reach of even you GreY. It was a precaution I took after getting banned due to Chrono. um that's like saying "i've put all my treasury bonds where the treasury department will never ever find them." it kind of ruins the point | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I will plat double! | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 24 2013 06:06 FiveTouch wrote: /out nooooooooooooooo | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I like playing with Marv. Idk why, maybe it's a touch of masochism or something. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Anyway: On August 30 2013 10:31 WaveofShadow wrote: What about 4) Cora is trying to get killed/lynched? There are certainly a lot of people I'm going to have to ignore this game, golly gosh. Where does 'Are you fo realz?!?!' fit? This one is so clearly wrong it kind of makes me want to kill wos. Cora was obviously butthurt, but he also had posts where he was trying to play the game. neither of those points to jester. What's the thought process here? It really feels like saying something just for the sake of saying it. More importantly, On August 30 2013 10:30 VisceraEyes wrote: This is an awful lot of words to say "I have no opinion on Cora yet" and "I still attest that you're, in fact, butthurt." A lot. Sup BH? VE what happened to this? BH is clearly not playing to his town "persona". As well as not responding to alakaslam like I would expect. I'm really not sure why but I'm thinking it might be alignment indicative. Also, No one else reveal their item names. One last thing - Ryan is town. Scum I'm giving you this townread for free to help direct your night kills plz kill him. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Kita plz. If you're town, DI is a terrible target for a troll policy lynch. Better targets are alakaslam, cep hiro at this point, vayne. But policy lynching dandel is useless since he gives up as scum anyway. Kill list: wos, Kita, bh, anyone with less posts than me. Gogo | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 31 2013 00:34 kitaman27 wrote: Frankly I'm pretty amazed at the number of people spazzing out at me for a policy lynch 12 hours into the game against a reasonable target. Based on the number of people willing to come to Dandel's defense calling his contributions valid as if he wasn't a complete anti-town troll, it usually points to scum players trying to defend a town player for town cred. Wave calling Dandel one of the most active players in the thread is mind boggling. Even Dandel would probably admit to the fact that he has been completely useless. I'm still not satisfied with Dandel's play so far though, so my vote will remain for now. I would actually be quite content with most of the names you have listed. Ceph is quite capable so I might be more willing to keep him around past day one, even though he is a better scum player than town player. Yeah my problem isn't that dandel is contributing and that was one of many weird things from wos. My problem was that he's a bad policy lynch for a townie to propose. On August 30 2013 21:56 kitaman27 wrote: States that I wanted him dead as town in GoT in previous post. Infers that my scum meta is to want him dead because of I fear his abilities. Justifying vote based on false conclusion. Also, I just saw this post in your filter. I don't like it. Being amorphous between policy lynch and calling do scum. Did you want to kill him for policy reasons or did you think he was scum? It feels like it didnt really Maggie to you. Guys other than Kita: I really think he might be scum. Policy talk is okay but there's a lot of it. The wos attack is like his only solid post. And also this: On August 30 2013 23:14 kitaman27 wrote: On an unrelated note, BH has a history of trying to pick fights on day one as mafia to try to spam up the thread. I'm currently suspicious of his intentions. First, I could d wrong but my impression is tha bh picks fights regardless of alignment, because picking fights and insulting people is like bu's main mode of social interaction (like, that one time he made Cora ragequit the Skype group). That's beside the point though, because what bh has done in this thread is definitely not pick fights. Like, part of the reason I'm suspicious of bh is that he's only called one person bad and that person was corazon; bh declined ve's fight offer over previous games, and now he's being self-deprecating (scum wtf) over the cep hiro case. But Kita just tossing that one liner in there feels to me like throwing suspicion around. Man why do I think all three of VE, Kita, and bh are scummy now... | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
What if hiro and alakazam actually are in a sleeper cell together. Hiding in plain sight. That would be humorous and I see no reason to disbelieve it at this point. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 31 2013 04:40 randombum wrote: The biggest gut reaction I had was vayne. His reveal makes no sense to me. Like why reveal it then? Like why mention anything about it at all. Why does he have to shout to everyone "Hey guys I'm playing pro-town". When the obvious best thing to do was be reasonable and continue scum hunting. He does that immediately after anyways. So that makes me think why reveal at all? Another thing that struck out to me was Bold mine. When reading though the thread I don't feel like there was any town sentiment that Vayne was scummy at the time. Did I just read the thread wrong/forgot about it in the 500+ posts I read, or was there actually town sentiment who wanted vayne lynched? Some people wanted to kill him but more didnt, it was sort of a "more likely e bad than scum" situation. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 30 2013 09:25 VisceraEyes wrote: Y U NO VOTE GERIPT? ##Vote: geript 1000% is a pretty high percentage to not be accompanied by a vote - or at the very least some sort of supporting reasoning. bad five more of the same: + Show Spoiler + On August 30 2013 09:48 VisceraEyes wrote: Oh shit Wave hur. Wave vote geript cause he scum. On August 30 2013 10:59 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm totally okay with you deciding who you want to lynch today. More than okay, actually. For my part, I'll be deciding who I want to lynch, thanks though. Right now it's geript. On August 30 2013 13:32 VisceraEyes wrote: I want everyone who isn't voting for geript to explain very clearly why they're not voting for geript, Thank you in advance. On August 30 2013 14:49 VisceraEyes wrote: 'Ala I'll be interested in your thoughts on who is scum whenever you have them. I really think you should reconsider not voting for geript though. He's like totes magotes scum. bad oh wait this might be real On August 31 2013 01:30 VisceraEyes wrote: [snip] I think geript is scum. I thought he was scum based on how he entered the game, as I said, and I've thought that everything he's said since has been an anti-town influence on the game. If anyone disagrees with me, I'd love to discuss the matter. well, you don't actually provide reasons. your 1000% thing was obviously stupid and i see no actual comments on anything else geript has done. no idea why what geript is doing this game is different than the shitty shit he does every game. + Show Spoiler [talking with clarity] + On August 31 2013 01:36 VisceraEyes wrote: Except it didn't - it ONLY drew MY ire Clarity. I'm the only one who had any issue with geript at the beginning of the game. On August 31 2013 01:41 VisceraEyes wrote: Geript hasn't played enough scum for me to guage how "ballsy" his scum play is. But I do know how ballsy his town-play is. And it's way more ballsy than the weak ass shit I'm seeing out of him this game. Look at it like this: all he said was someone is scum. Like 1000%. Why would that draw any more attention to him than people trolling or people saying they haven't read their role PMs or people getting butthurt and ragequitting? these posts are basically irrelevant, clarity's defense was dumb and ve's responses to it don't matter either. no reason geript's opening whatever would or should have been especially notable, it was someone who says dumb things saying a dumb thing at the start of the game. + Show Spoiler [more bads] + On August 31 2013 04:33 VisceraEyes wrote: He says this as if any fucks were given up to this point. LMAO Still reading :d On August 31 2013 04:45 VisceraEyes wrote: EVERYONE SHOULD BE LYNCHING GERIPT THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND UNDERSTANDING IN THIS MATTER. On August 31 2013 05:47 VisceraEyes wrote: Geript just doesn't feel townie to me when he normally is very obviously town to me. He isn't doing anything that makes me feel like he's trying to discern anyone's alignment, clarify peoples positions, anything. He's one of a few people that I have found I can count on to do that sort of thing (at least until they give up due to apathy of a lurky town) when they're town. And he's not doing that shit this game. So it's mostly meta. I could go through his posts and show you why I think they're scum motivated I suppose, but that's all conjecture and subjective. What I can say about it as a whole however is that it doesn't feel like he's trying to figure out the game or get more information or anything. He looks like he's just trying to appear active and not get lynched. Look at the way he defends himself against me. He's not even trying - he's just going "lol" every time. Why? If he was town and suspicious of me he'd be furious about my continued push on him and be calling for my head. He's doing nothing. [snip] Okay lets look at your history with geript. The most recent game you and geript were both in was boardwalk empire. you were scum. doesn't count. Then there's hydra mafia where you were hydras. doesn't count. Prior to that was the game and TL LX. In the game, you and geript were both town. you never mention a read on him. but you do talk about him a few times, so it's possible that you got a town read through his obviousness. Then there's LX where before you die: On March 01 2013 08:59 VisceraEyes wrote: I can't write a will post guys. I'm too busy at work. Don't lynch Toad TOMORROW. Make him contribute and tell you if he's scum in earnest, don't just sheep me/DocH/BC on our suspicions this cycle. If it's a bus, then it was orchestrated and that means there was a purpose to it. That purpose may be to implicate those immediately responsible for it (me/Toad) or those who perpetuated it (MS/DocH/WF). We just can't be sure without more info, so don't act on that premise yet. Instead lynch someone who's more obviously scummy. I suggest Hassybaby, grepit, ObviousOne, Chezinu. Geript gets mislynched. So you've played with geript in two games, both six or more months ago. One time you misread him and probably contributed to his mislynch. The other time you never mention what your read on him was. + Show Spoiler [more nothings] + On August 31 2013 06:18 VisceraEyes wrote: You should, there's some good stuff in there. I don't necessarily disagree with you, but prefer to lynch geript as it's kinda been my hobby this game and I'd really like him to die. Plz? On August 31 2013 06:26 VisceraEyes wrote: No you're throwing in your lot with the likes of geript. If he flips scum you're next, and I don't like that it has to be like that. On August 31 2013 06:29 VisceraEyes wrote: "the likes" as in "players playing like they're obviously scummy scum" I don't like it because I like playing with you when we're on the same team and if we're on the same team, it will be sad to lynch you next if/when geript flips scum. On August 31 2013 06:39 VisceraEyes wrote: You got it. While we're engaged here, talk to me about things about other people you've noticed. I'm obviously not going to sway you on geript *wink wink* and a large part of your problem with Cephiro IS his issue with geript so that's not doing much swaying me in that regard, so what else is there? What of this WaveOfShadow talk that's going on? I'm starting to have doubts on my initial read but not enough to want to lynch him. It's mostly the lack of content when he's around. Which I'll admit, he's around a fair enough amount to clear MOST players - but Wave pretty good imo and I'm starting to have doubts. What do you think? I'm calling bullshit on your geript push, VE. you've been yelling about lynching him all game, but no one's actually pushed back and you've never bothered to provide any reasons why he's scum. you've just been yelling at people. This isn't how you push a lynch effectively, it's how you distract and divide a town. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:50 geript wrote: VE. I'm very disappoint in you. Don't you know I'm unlynchable. Well here let me tell you. I'm unlynchable. Go ahead and try, but you're not much more than kuso little fish. You'll see when I damn well please. IF GERIPT FLIPS SCUM IT DOESNT MEAN VE'S PUSH ON HIM WAS GOOD | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:27 Clarity_nl wrote: strongandbig what do you make of geripts lynchproof claim? yeah that's kind of throwing me for a loop i have to think about if we should lynch him just for that cause what does it tell us if it fails? not much, he could be anything from unlynchable townie to one-shot lynchproof scum. but if it succeeds, it just tells us but otoh how can you let someone claim that and just ignore it? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:27 VisceraEyes wrote: This is all fairly pointless. You don't like HOW I've pushed geript - but what are you going to do about it? You're not calling me scum, and you're not voting for me and you're not defending geript and you're not agreeing with me about geript. It says nothing about anything other than "Phooey VE! Phooey!" Phooey right back my friend. fine bro ##vote: VE | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:55 HiroPro wrote: Clarity and strong. I haven't found the others yet, but I will! what? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
they have existed before probably more frequently than multishot lynchproof town | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On August 31 2013 19:24 Dandel Ion wrote: Oh I see what the brown thing is. well, what it was. the house that has been built need not stay the same. clarity, are you town? snb, are you town? These are ez yes/no questions. Surely you will not have trouble answering them. i win with town. winning with town is my only win condition. i am a member of no other alignment than town. this is literally true i am town. this is metaphorically true but my rolename is not "town" so it is not literally true. On August 31 2013 23:10 yamato77 wrote: What about lynching Rayn? 1) It's hilarious. 2) He's been less than useless. 3) He'll bitch for all eternity. 4) I've never seen him play town and give so little of a damn about a game. Yeah, I like this idea. nope rayn's filter is way more game-related and way less fight-picky than when he was scum in got either he's suddenly gotten much better at playing scum or he's a different alignment, either way we're not lynching him today. OKAY SO GERIPT possibilities: 1 he's town and some-shot lynchproof 2 he's scum or third party and some-shot lynchproof 3 he's town and lying 4 he's scum or third party and lying i'm going to ignore 3 for now because fuck him then. I don't think 1 is likely. if he was really town then the only reason to try to get lynched like he has been would be if he gains some kind of power. there is literally no reason not to tell us that, but instead he just sits around and trolls the thread. so he's scum. which is more likely, 2 or 4. i think 2 is more likely. geript claimed unlynchable on page 49. when he claimed it he was at 3 votes, only one of which had even come in the previous 20 hours. this was not a desparate move by a scum or a 3p trying to reverse-psychology us into not lynching them. there's no way that was anything other than someone trying to get lynched. why give scum what they want. we don't know why they want it but i think it's more likely that geript wants to be lynched than that he doesn't. and i don't want to give him what he wants. who do I want to kill? Well, VE. I still think his geript case was suspicious as fuck. The fact that I now believe geript is scum doesn't mean I don't think VE is also scum. Remember, geript wants to get lynched! VE could easily be his scum buddy. Also, remember the possibility of multiple scum factions. regardless of whether or not the black mesa pm circle thing is one of them. last aperture game there was a mixed-alignment pm circle and also two scum factions. I challenge everyone to read what I wrote about VE's case on geript up until geript claimed lynchproof. tell me how VE could have been pushing that case from a townie mindset. Hell, when VE answered me he didn't even respond to my takedown of his case at all, he just attacked me for "not drawing strong enough conclusions from it." I guess since it's less than twelve hours from lynch I should be talking about consolidation as well. Currently I would also lynch Kita. Not so sure about BH anymore. Don't want to kill wos anymore either. I could get down with lynching felkyr but the case on him is kind of a coinflip between scum or noob imo. still better odds of hitting scum than a policy lynch on zentor or alakaslam (both of whom are reasonable policy lynch targets). I'm leaving my vote on VE for now, there's still 6+ hours until the lynch. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
why dont you want to kill VE? talk to me about it. alternatively: how strongly do you feel about not giving geript the lynch he so fervently desires? would you switch to felkyr or mrzentor if need be to avoid it? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 01 2013 02:41 HiroPro wrote: It's not possible to kill VE today strong. They aren't reading his posts ![]() but maybe they will! I already wrote a big takedown of his day1, all they have to do is read it there's still hope! | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 01 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote: I agree with most of your post but came to a different conclusion. If he is unlynchable as any alignment I see zero reason to claim it, if you are town or 3p means scum cant mislynch you and will shoot you. And if you are scum, you become a vigi shot. He is most likely lieing about being lynchproof, and there is no reason for town to do that. Therefore ##VOTE:Geript he could gain powers when he gets lynched, there have been roles like that before or he could just be trying to waste town's time. dandel ion scum style "i know i'll get caught how can i do the most damage before i do" but i think the former is more likely | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
do you disagree? why should we lynch him | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
no because he pushed him badly | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
let's see what happens i'm kinda leaning towards geript telling the truth so i'll vote him so you can shenannigize. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 01 2013 13:33 austinmcc wrote: gg BH geript, I'd like to hear a specific explanation from you. If you are town, then you know mafia knows you're town. Yet you still picked up boatloads of votes, and there weren't any strong pushes off of you except a bit of movement towards felkyr at one point. Knowing that mafia would know you're town, but still let you pick up votes and didn't try to push things off you means BH likely town. I even mentioned that earlier, figuring that you were actually going to choose another target. But you didn't. So I'm interested in why your thought process never wavered, given that there wasn't really any attempt to get a different lynch going when you were constantly saying you'd shoot BH. This logic doesn't work. Why would scum care whether the votes were on geript or not. His claimed power didn't require that he be the lynch target, he was saying the votes just don't matter. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 01 2013 13:33 austinmcc wrote: gg BH geript, I'd like to hear a specific explanation from you. If you are town, then you know mafia knows you're town. Yet you still picked up boatloads of votes, and there weren't any strong pushes off of you except a bit of movement towards felkyr at one point. Knowing that mafia would know you're town, but still let you pick up votes and didn't try to push things off you means BH likely town. I even mentioned that earlier, figuring that you were actually going to choose another target. But you didn't. So I'm interested in why your thought process never wavered, given that there wasn't really any attempt to get a different lynch going when you were constantly saying you'd shoot BH. This is partially correct. rayn fakeclaimed that nuke, not Vayne. FORGET THE NUCLEAR COMPARISONS. However, blatantly lying about past games figuring nobody will go back and read them (or just remember playing in them) would be an AWFUL strategy. And, despite some of my nuclear play, I'm not usually awful. You guys just have rhyming names that are very similar. Austin this logic is bad. Why would scum be pushing votes off geript if bh was scum? That's not how vote rigger works, geript a claimed role was such that it didnt matter who voted were on. Guys I feel like geript is more likely to be a yolo townie than scum given how his power worked out. There is like zero reason for him to have told us how his paper worked and who he was going to use it on rather than just continue to play the same way as he was before his claim. I think geript is not a good vig target tonight. Shoot VE, shoot zentor, etc before geript. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 02 2013 01:54 MrZentor wrote: I'm extremely suspicious of the following people: Oatsmaster, Dandel Ion, Mr. Cheesecake, Clarity_nl, Koshi, raynpelikoneet, VayneAuthority and their shady attempt to save geript. We should definitely lynch one of them if a vigilante manages to kill geript. What about me and my completely open attempt to persuade people not to vote geript? Did you read the thread or just the votes? Why would scum try to "save" geript if they knew the votes didnt matter anyway? And isn't trying to "save" geript only scummy if he flips scum? Or do you already know that he will? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 02 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote: Ohai guise. Why are we not talking about BH's reads again? Hiro/Shiao scum, Shiao dies tomorrow gogogogo i like this post, no one ever looks at dead peoples' reads but we should more Anyway let me look at the lynch targets for today since we have a double lynch. im considering voting shiaopi. i dont like his non-claim. i dont like his reasons for voting hiropro (hiro's def been less useless than shiao lol). i dont like the "dropping his vote on geript" thing. i don't want to lynch geript. i still don't see how it makes any sense for him as scum to claim unlynchable when he did. alakaslam's item use thing seems pretty solidly antitown. i could support a lynch on him for the combination of that plus the lack of analysis or other traditional pro-town mafia play in his filter. hiropro i'm not sure about. like i said yesterday, his push on bh didn't seem like it was a serious attempt to get bh lynched but rather just an attempt to make noise, and that's scummy. however, i found myself nodding at his case on cakepie (although I also like cakepie's case on him) and i don't think "not going along with axlegreaser's plan" is a reason to call him scum when we have no idea what axlegreaser's plan does or whether axlegreaser is town. overall I guess I wouldn't mind hiropro dying but I dont think he's the best lynch for today, or even one of the best two. I also still want to kill the kitaman. look at his filter. scummy policy lynch on dandel, then a bunch of setup stuff without reads, then a big list post (scummy) with a couple of sentences on a bunch of players, calling them all scum. he makes one reference to those reads later, when prompted, but now that the next day has started and we actually have a lynch, he hasn't actually brought any of them up again, even though he's been in the thread to make a few useless comments. In fact, let's see what happens. ##vote: kitaman27 my next lynch preferences are alakaslam > shiaopi > hiropro. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
@onegu was the namecheck or the greencheck posted first? if the rolenamecheck was posted first, it would make me even more suspicious of the "green check" on him, given that the rolename was bound to draw attention in the first place. although i don't think we can put much faith in a green check when it comes from someone completely anonymous in the first place. anyway we definitely shouldn't lynch shiaopi now. kanti was town's standout strongest power role in aperture 1. if shiaopi is actually a town kanti then scum will absolutely have to kill him tonight. then if he doesn't die tonight we can decide whether to lynch him tomorrow. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 03 2013 01:29 WaveofShadow wrote: SnB you didn't read my most recent post. I also have stated since before the game fuck attempting to read Alakaslam and what he is doing/did so if people need me to vote for him I will but I'm not analyzing that shit. you mean about you and shiao being masoned? you're right i didn't read that before my other post. im not sure if there's any information in there though that makes me change my mind. what do you think about kitaman's alignment? Should he be lynched? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 03 2013 01:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: ShiaoPi what has your role to do with pikachu dying and why did you comment on the matter so much? If you refer yourself as the messenger, what the fuck? If not, are you referring to me, in that case, wtf? You need to explain because nothing in your rolename suggests you have anything to do with pokemons. this seems pretty obvious betcha shiao was masoned with the other pokemon person yesterday and he's the "messenger" because his role has something to do with masoning people. anyway rayn what do you think of kitaman's filter? do you agree with my summary? it's only a few lines, easy to read! but read his whole filter though. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 03 2013 01:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: Fuck. My obsession is that i want to find the other dude to be sure they are town! That helps us. ShiaoPi: Why did you mason WoS? Why did you not mason him on D1? Is your mason ability multi-use? SnB: I actually think you are the pokemon dude from your stance on me when i had the conversation with Hassy early on D1 and your wording of "i choose you randombum" on D1. Am i correct? no | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Either hassy is lying or Kita is ##unvote ##vote: kita | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 03 2013 10:15 VayneAuthority wrote: C) this game makes no fucking sense for all we know some role could have done something to make his protection not go through but he still thinks it did. In this case, neither of you are lying. You aren't thinking over everything Hassy would have gotten an rb notification then | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 03 2013 14:40 Felkyr wrote: S&B Would you comment on that? Why would you boldface that sentence? Anyone who grew up watching the Pokemon cartoon knows why I molded that sentence. It was not a breadcrumb and Pokemon have nothing to do with my role. I wanted someone to explain why geript was the right lunch choice when I believed he wanted people to vote for him, and randombum had just posted recently; plus I figured it was a good chance to get him to post more of his thought process cause I didn't have a good read on him. On September 03 2013 11:48 randombum wrote: Ok I'm back. First thing's first I still believe geript is scum. There's just this sense of not caring about the lynch. Then there's the fact that he basically wasted everybody's time with his un-lynchable claim (which was a lie) and subsequent discussion about it. He eliminated a lot of town information by using this ability so early. As he said Vote placement is normally a good source of information for town since when somebody flips we know his alignment and who voted/pushed for him. And it doesn't help that he killed a townie. Basically, everything he did day 1 has hurt town. He wasted our time, denied us information, and killed a town player. This is all true... I wonder if I'm getting my feelings towards geript and grush confused, because I want to say "this is just what he does as town, he doesn't actually try to play the game" but I know geript has, like, hosted newbie games and shit so that doesn't actually seem true. Can people comment? Is geript usually a grush style player? On September 03 2013 20:41 Koshi wrote: ahhh. ok. Well I am torn about Alakaslam tbh, because I somewhere can believe he did this as town, but I am lynching him. What What what If you believe his actions can have come from town, why doesn't that make you reconsider lynching him? Why is the fact that you are currently voting for him relevant to your decision whether to vote for him? alakazam's item use was blatantly antitown and his playstyle hasn't shown any serious attempt to find scum. (Although "why would scum claim the use of a blatantly antitown item" is a good-ish point; but the fact that nothing in his play makes sense from a strategical perspective makes that point less relevant, i could believe that he just used it for the sake of red alert references). But this post makes me wonder if its time to revive "kill the koshi" Anyway: Kita, there is one key piece of information that I don't have about your role. Does your role reveal the names of the actions performed on VE or does it reveal their effects? Please ask greymist and commit to one or the other in the thread. If its names, we should 100% kill hassy. Dandelion's role proves that not every ability in the game has a name, but I'm willing to gamble that most do, and there's no way an action that does what hassy claims would just be called "shooting". On the other hand, if your role reveals effects of actions, then we are in a difficult place. The more I think about it, the less reasonable it seems for hassy to claim a failed protection on VE as scum. Note that VE's role does not explain the no-flip, and neither does any action on him. so either his no-flip was an effect of whatever KP was used on him (factional power or special role that's not just a vig shot?) or there's a role which somehow conceals one player's flip without targeting that player. So here's another thing for you to ask greymist, Kita: if VE was killed by some role which had other effects than just a KP, would you still get back "shot"? For now, I'm keeping my vote on hassy. But I want to know more about this situation. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
What did hiro do that changed your mind? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
ooh its after midnight in korea woooo | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 04 2013 00:11 kitaman27 wrote: The role PM is pretty ambiguous, but any role such as a tracker/watcher/PGO that I've ever seen is always triggered by targeting, with the exception of a roleblock. Hassy stated that he had to target VE via PM to a host, so it doesn't make sense that it wouldn't show up as "VE was targeted with the Dice of Fate" or whatever it may be. I'll try to clarify with GreYMisT if he is able to comment. Hopefully greymist will answer, because those are fundamentally different roles imo. If hassy uses "dice of fate" would you get back different responses from greymist depending on what the diceroll is? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
not sure what to make of this. ugggggggggggh | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 04 2013 00:24 kitaman27 wrote: s&b, in the event that Hassy were to flip town, would you want to lynch Vayne for his reaction to the claim? not necessarily. his reaction was pretty bad but it seemed more like he was super butthurt about alakaslam than like he had secret extra information. like, he was arguing really hard based on a completely wrong interpretation of what you were saying had happened. idk, it's not like it's not scummy, but i would have to hear some more analysis about why his reaction makes him scum before i vote him. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
anyway i read a bunch of hassy's old games. he's like never been scum so i'm having trouble finding a pattern. i really don't like his filter. there's zero discussion of who might be scum except for an ill-reasoned shoutout at wos (srsly, as far as I can tell his only read is based off of confusing who said what between wos and va?) and the "oh my action didn't go through" excuse is pretty much the only thing scum could say if they feel caught... but it could also be true... okay so conclusion: scummy filter + night action suspicion = i'm going to keep my vote on hassy. i think our other lynch should be alakaslam. i would also support a shiaopi lynch or a geript lynch, since geript is still refusing to play the game. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
dont lynch shiaopi he still hasn't done anything but i forgot about the check, we should leave him for now but clarity, you're wrong about hassy. he didn't claim "maybe my action didn't go through" until after kita did his thing. What he claimed at first was that he tried to protect VE but either his protection failed or VE was double stacked. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
What would that even mean? How would yi know hiro was in the chat? Other than if they're, like, actually both scum? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 04 2013 04:50 kitaman27 wrote: If this mysterious third party player has proof hiro is mafia, then he should simply claim in the thread and he can ride the town cred to victory. I'd even consider letting Hassy live to protect them (though no guarantees he will actually send in any night actions). Otherwise, we should ignore it because it's an anonymous anti-town player. do you believe hassy that he didn't send in any actions? do you believe hassy has the power to protect people? are you sure we shouldn't be lynching you instead of hassy? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I'm not sure but I think I want to back off Kita ATM. But I don't know why he's being called confirmed town. I agree that his behavior and thought process surrounding his role use and the hassy situation seemed pro town. That makes me feel like he may not be the best lynch for tomorrow. On the other hand, there's still the same stuff about his behavior before that which makes me dubious - focus on irrelevant things, very few reads and the ones that there were were bad, the di policy lynch. So here's a question for hassy and ve who are calling Kita 100% town - suppose he's scum and his team shot VE, hassy's town, and kita's role claim is true. Scum knows that his claimed medic action on VE didn't block their shot, so there's a pretty good chance it either wasn't sent in or didnt do what hassy wanted it to. How is Kita's use of his role not optimal? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Town dt shouldn't claim yet - for sure - but I don't think we should be ignoring shiao because of the anonymous green check. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 04 2013 23:49 kitaman27 wrote: Ehh maybe save the conversation for tomorrow if I'm around. Probably better ways to spend time. I'll try to get a post out before the night post. But what if I actually think you're town and am trying to get scum not to shoot you? (Wifomwifomwifom) The reason I wanted to get into this tonight even though you might die is because I want to hear what hassy says, since he'll soon be confirmed alignment and he can only post at night. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Haven't read cep hiro. I'll do that in a couple hours when I'm at my comp. anything specific you want to point me to? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 05 2013 01:41 Hassybaby wrote: As a small bit of setup speculation, I'm having difficulty thinking that the scum team would have a power that reveals actions and full role, especially if they were the ones who hid it in the first place yeah i trust "traditional" role-alignment linkages about as far as geript can throw them. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 05 2013 02:49 Stutters695 wrote: It isn't anonymous, just hasn't been said who checked in the thread in case BM doesn't have a scum in it. Without saying too much to reveal their identity, sanity hasn't been confirmed. i guess that's a good idea since last time the "house chezinu" qt all were told that there might be scum in their QT but there actually were none. But all the people in the QT know the actual name of the person who claimed the one-shot DT check? i guess that becomes interesting if they turn up dead... anyway what do you make now of the hiropro/third party claim thing? do you think hiro is actually in blackmesa? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 05 2013 03:00 Koshi wrote: Read Onegu his log and trow your hands in the air in disbelief. Okay wait what do you mean by this? Onegu hasn't said anything that would explain or resolve the hiropro thing. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 05 2013 03:56 Stutters695 wrote: Yeah, that's probably for the best. I know who did it and it really does seem like he checked him but I wouldn't trust it enough to clear him until the guy talks about his sanity. how can a oneshot cop have sanity | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 10 2013 01:54 HiroPro wrote: If only s&b was still here ![]() <3 | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Getting shot by scum N2 always makes me feel good as a townie but this puts me on a pretty impressive losing streak. I think it's like four or five in a row? Cba to check ATM. Tbh though I don't feel bad about pretty much anything I did this game except forgetting to use my role night 1. The hassy lynch was unfortunate but given the claims from him and Kita plus his filter I think it was the right choice. I was totes right that alakazam should have been the second lynch that day, lame that he wasn't but since he ragequit or whatever that was okay. I was also right about VE not being town and the rest of my reads were not too bad. Oh also I really don't know why people are saying the axle lynch was so bad. I was dead by that point, but how it looked to me was that he'd been trying to get other people to go along with an unknown plan the whole game, then when he was under pressure from town to reveal what it was he just shut up and afk'd. Seriously if he had just claimed before going to sleep or if he'd showed up again before deadline there's no way he would've been lunched, but just shutting up made it seem like town had no choice but to lunch him. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Actually did cheesecake ever even have to explain why he was visiting Kita? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
| ||