|
On September 01 2013 07:06 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2013 06:53 WaveofShadow wrote:On September 01 2013 06:51 geript wrote:
Vote placement is completely inconsequential and doesn't matter in the slightest. People should wholly disregard a large majority of the votes today. Ok that's one answer. On September 01 2013 06:43 WaveofShadow wrote:On September 01 2013 06:40 geript wrote:On September 01 2013 06:39 ShiaoPi wrote:On September 01 2013 06:37 Blazinghand wrote:On September 01 2013 06:37 ShiaoPi wrote:
hai guys, I am back. before I go through 250+ posts anything I should absolutely read before deadline? it takes 16 votes to lynch (majority) and geript is a vote off from it. If you don't know who to vote, vote geript so we don't no-lynch So we are testing whether or not he really is unlynchable? Sounds fun. Dropping my vote there then, hopefully I wont take too long to go through the thread so I might have sth. useful before deadline. ##Vote: geript So let me get this right, you know about the unlynchable claim but haven't read the thread... Bullshit So....do you agree with me that Shiao is scum? How about this one? And another: you say a large majority of the votes won't matter. Which ones will and why? By a large majority of the votes not mattering my point was that most of the votes throughout the day are non-alignment indicative. Not worth paying any attention to. As for Shaio, I'd add him to my would shoot list but I really need to go back and reread the thread. CBA right now bout to go play more SC2
Is your ability some sort of listcheck?
|
On September 01 2013 07:04 ShiaoPi wrote:
my reads in a large game on day 1 are like 99% useless anyway, because I suck at reading too many players.
Since geript also says that votes today dont matter I am more or less content with just waiting for the nightpost to see what in the actual fuck will happen.
No one is asking you to give reads on 16 people.
I'll take two reads, please.
|
|
|
On September 01 2013 06:57 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2013 06:55 AxleGreaser wrote:On September 01 2013 06:48 Clarity_nl wrote:
Caught up. Felkyr seems to be putting in an effort so I'm fine with him around.
Consolidating I guess, although my kneejerk response was to test the unlynchable claim, the more I thought about it the less it made sense.
I think dandel is a good lynch, but since my case there's been no interest so I don't think I'll get 15 votes. If I'm wrong please let me know, we do have 3 hours left after all.
##Unvote
##Vote geript @Clarity Consolidating is great. if we have the breathing room please if you think its safe to swap your vote to me at the end. (see my previous posts) @everyone (who is town) unless you have your own plans consolidating is great. Also if you consolidate then Clarity VE and BH can swap to vote for me. Oh I kinda forgot about this. Do you need all three of us? And is there a reason you choose those three?
The stated reason is that I trust you three to get the shenanigans right and correctly allow for vote stealers etc....
aka perceived SKILL
It is not a three or nothing thing. (I wont even cry if I get no votes today)
It is not worth messing up the lynch. (hence a skill requirement)
|
On September 01 2013 07:09 geript wrote:
Which ability?
Hmm.
So you have an ability that does something to people who voted for you (ie maybe listcheck), and you have (presumably) a one-shot voterigger ability?
|
##vote: geript
Although on the off chance you're not trying to be sneakypants here, I'd like to remind you that saying I WON'T BE LYNCHED AND IF YOU LYNCH ME I'MA KILL BH should actually be leading you to be townie on BH right now and NOT shoot him. So, if you weren't being sneakypants, you've telegraphed a target and are still getting lynched/are picking up a buncha votes. Leading me to believe that BH isn't a good alternate target, just based on that.
I'd rather you pop kita, ShiaoPi, or VA.
|
On September 01 2013 07:10 austinmcc wrote:
##vote: geript
Although on the off chance you're not trying to be sneakypants here, I'd like to remind you that saying I WON'T BE LYNCHED AND IF YOU LYNCH ME I'MA KILL BH should actually be leading you to be townie on BH right now and NOT shoot him. So, if you weren't being sneakypants, you've telegraphed a target and are still getting lynched/are picking up a buncha votes. Leading me to believe that BH isn't a good alternate target, just based on that.
I'd rather you pop kita, ShiaoPi, or VA.
Ohai Austin.
Why?
|
On September 01 2013 07:10 austinmcc wrote:
##vote: geript
Although on the off chance you're not trying to be sneakypants here, I'd like to remind you that saying I WON'T BE LYNCHED AND IF YOU LYNCH ME I'MA KILL BH should actually be leading you to be townie on BH right now and NOT shoot him. So, if you weren't being sneakypants, you've telegraphed a target and are still getting lynched/are picking up a buncha votes. Leading me to believe that BH isn't a good alternate target, just based on that.
I'd rather you pop kita, ShiaoPi, or VA.
Read the thread. I expect better from you.
|
On September 01 2013 07:10 AxleGreaser wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2013 06:57 Clarity_nl wrote:On September 01 2013 06:55 AxleGreaser wrote:On September 01 2013 06:48 Clarity_nl wrote:
Caught up. Felkyr seems to be putting in an effort so I'm fine with him around.
Consolidating I guess, although my kneejerk response was to test the unlynchable claim, the more I thought about it the less it made sense.
I think dandel is a good lynch, but since my case there's been no interest so I don't think I'll get 15 votes. If I'm wrong please let me know, we do have 3 hours left after all.
##Unvote
##Vote geript @Clarity Consolidating is great. if we have the breathing room please if you think its safe to swap your vote to me at the end. (see my previous posts) @everyone (who is town) unless you have your own plans consolidating is great. Also if you consolidate then Clarity VE and BH can swap to vote for me. Oh I kinda forgot about this. Do you need all three of us? And is there a reason you choose those three? The stated reason is that I trust you three to get the shenanigans right and correctly allow for vote stealers etc.... aka perceived SKILL It is not a three or nothing thing. (I wont even cry if I get no votes today) It is not worth messing up the lynch. (hence a skill requirement)
Alright well I see no reason not to. I'm around at lynchtime. I'll make sure there is a big enough gap between geript and anyone else, and if there is I'll switch my vote to you a bit before deadline.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
@Clarity:
I have some suspicion on WoS mainly due to the way he entered the thread at the beginning, dont have much in regards of scumreads though. more on the townleaning side which is not helping us right now
|
On September 01 2013 07:14 ShiaoPi wrote:
@Clarity:
I have some suspicion on WoS mainly due to the way he entered the thread at the beginning, dont have much in regards of scumreads though. more on the townleaning side which is not helping us right now
lol.
Scum trying to stick with what he originally said because it's harder for scum to just switch reads like that.
He professed to have read the thread but if you had read it you'd know that I am unquestionably town atm.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
You say that, I dont think so <3
But see, thats the reason I dislike giving reads on day 1 in large games they are literally worthless.
|
On September 01 2013 07:05 Cephiro wrote:
What I mean is, if you're going to stick with those 3 people as your "trusted ones" for shenanigans, I will vote on you instead.
Why?
Does that mean you dont trust them?
(BTW I am happy if only two of the three are town)
That you now dont trust me because I chose them?
If you vote for me instead then they cant so safely swap to vote for me?
If you are town please dont do that (swap to vote for me)
if you are scum (and not one of those three VE Clairty BH ) feel free to vote for me.
|
On September 01 2013 07:17 ShiaoPi wrote:
You say that, I dont think so <3
But see, thats the reason I dislike giving reads on day 1 in large games they are literally worthless.
Your read is only worthless because you have offered nothing to back it up.
If you feel so strongly about me being scum why not at least pursue that somewhat or give town SOMETHING?
Why are you offhandedly calling me scum then when I attack you, you just shrink back and say 'see this is what happens boo hoo.' This is not how town should be playing.
I'll leave you alone if you give the town something to work with. I don't care how worthless you think the reads are, so long as they have some substance.
|
And note: 1.5 hours until a possible BH death and he gives town nothing.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
I offer nothing to back it up since it is a gutread with little to no evidence. Which (Surprise) is worthless. But sorry to say that is how I work in large games until I am able to get an overview once flips happen. If you dislike it that much go ahead and keep calling me scum, I dont give a fuck.
|
On September 01 2013 07:04 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2013 07:02 AxleGreaser wrote:On September 01 2013 06:54 Cephiro wrote:
@Axle
I am going to change on my vote if you will stick with those three. I am not understanding either this or the EBWOP. TBMK. Cephiro: is currently voting for Geript. Thats where i want Cephiros vote: Id like some other townies to consiolidate onto geript so that BH Clarity and VE can safely vote swap to me. (remember vote stealers) I dont want or need any other votes on me. I don't think I will be changing my vote so you may have to rely on others.
Is there any reason you want your vote parked somewhere like Shiaopi?
|
On September 01 2013 07:19 AxleGreaser wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On September 01 2013 07:05 Cephiro wrote:
What I mean is, if you're going to stick with those 3 people as your "trusted ones" for shenanigans, I will vote on you instead. Why? Does that mean you dont trust them? (BTW I am happy if only two of the three are town) That you now dont trust me because I chose them? If you vote for me instead then they cant so safely swap to vote for me? If you are town please dont do that (swap to vote for me) if you are scum (and not one of those three VE Clairty BH ) feel free to vote for me.
Yes, it means there are people I don't trust enough in there. However, if your tricks are of such manner they cannot cause anti-town to gain a benefit, then I don't mind. But you're clearly looking for people you trust, which is why I'm assuming there is something that can go wrong.
On September 01 2013 07:15 WaveofShadow wrote:
...if you had read it you'd know that I am unquestionably town atm.
Since when? I've read it multiple times and I do not agree with this statement.
|
On September 01 2013 07:21 ShiaoPi wrote:
I offer nothing to back it up since it is a gutread with little to no evidence. Which (Surprise) is worthless. But sorry to say that is how I work in large games until I am able to get an overview once flips happen. If you dislike it that much go ahead and keep calling me scum, I dont give a fuck.
If you have read the thread, why is a gutread on me that happened at some point yesterday the only fucking thing you have to contribute in 48 hours? How is that acceptable?
You don't have ANYTHING at all to contribute on anyone else?
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
I have several townreads, dont feel like sharing them.
It is perfectly acceptable, maybe not to you but to me 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
