| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Acrofales
Spain17959 Posts
On August 09 2013 02:39 Onegu wrote: There is no way of knowing SnB did it to become lord though. And there could be eole names that are alignment indicative or not we cant know so passing that info on does nothing for scum. Can we lynch Joffrey? I really want to lynch Joffrey. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On August 09 2013 03:45 iamperfection wrote: very try hard for scum no? Its just was full of stupid If he was trying at all, he wouldn't read me incorrectly. Not like it's hard. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Oberyn
United Kingdom508 Posts
Could the Lannisters explain to me why they felt iamp was the best choice as Lord? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17959 Posts
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity. So events happened like this. I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy? Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around. While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On August 09 2013 03:43 Chromatically wrote: Xatalos, what do you think of Grack now? He claimed you were tunneling him on N0. I didn't like his early posts which were very passive, wishy-washy and went with the flow of our PM circle. He also expressed zero interest in becoming a Lord and didn't seem very interested in who we should choose as Lord. I tried pressuring him for quite a bit, but I didn't see any reason to move him from null to scum. Definitely the most lynchworthy player in our House, but not that lynchworthy compared to several players outside our House (s0Lstice, Koshi at least). | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On August 09 2013 03:53 Oberyn wrote: Dandel is playing thread bully and I'm strongly considering switching my vote to put him in time out. Nearly every player (koshi, sol, s&B, risen) that has brought up suspicion of dandel, he has responded by attacking their abilities and suggesting that they could be scum. This is extremely indicative of mafia play. Could the Lannisters explain to me why they felt iamp was the best choice as Lord? not at all, I haven't even called you scum yet. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote: Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy? Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around. While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum? Yes because obviously with that exchange between me and oats, the possibility that we're both scum somehow still remains? But yeah, whether I am town or scum I'd have reacted the same way, most likely. That said, do you think Oats as scum pushes me really hard for my rolename (he underemphasized this, it was like 5 pms each of him asking me rolename and me asking "why?") and then when I refuse to give it he makes up a role like that? Seems a bit farfetched for scum just to "dick around" | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On August 09 2013 03:53 Oberyn wrote: Dandel is playing thread bully and I'm strongly considering switching my vote to put him in time out. Nearly every player (koshi, sol, s&B, risen) that has brought up suspicion of dandel, he has responded by attacking their abilities and suggesting that they could be scum. This is extremely indicative of mafia play. Could the Lannisters explain to me why they felt iamp was the best choice as Lord? What the heck? If you think that's extremely indicative of Mafia play, you should take a look at DI's earlier games. He's active and spammy as town, inactive and useless as scum. Which do you think fits him here? I preferred myself, but gumshoe preferred iamperfection and grackaroni also agreed with iamperfection being our Lord. I wasn't opposed to iamperfection either, just preferred myself (naturally I know I can trust myself 100%). | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 09 2013 04:01 Risen wrote: So yeah Clarity's interaction with REDACTED makes much more sense to me now. He told REDACTED about snb's role b/c they were scum mates. Clarity_nl is scum. So I told Oats snb's rolename, and then oats told snb that I told him his rolename? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On August 09 2013 04:00 Xatalos wrote: What the heck? If you think that's extremely indicative of Mafia play, you should take a look at DI's earlier games. He's active and spammy as town, inactive and useless as scum. Which do you think fits him here? I preferred myself, but gumshoe preferred iamperfection and grackaroni also agreed with iamperfection being our Lord. I wasn't opposed to iamperfection either, just preferred myself (naturally I know I can trust myself 100%). I think the scumteam has coached him to post this way so he appears to be playing to a town meta. | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
This ASSUMES that DI is scum, which Sol apparently thinks is very unlikely based on his read. It also assumes that DI would just claim scum N1 in exchange for some nightactions. And even if this did happen, who cares? I would gladly trade a 1-shot HP check and a vigi shot for a confirmed scum. | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 09 2013 04:03 Risen wrote: I think the scumteam has coached him to post this way so he appears to be playing to a town meta. So you agree that he appears like his town meta. But you seem really confident he's scum? I don't even.... | ||
| ||
|
|
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
HomeStory Cup
BSL: ProLeague
SOOP
Sparkling Tuna Cup
HomeStory Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
