|
On July 29 2013 06:57 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 06:55 Malongo wrote:On July 29 2013 05:58 Clarity_nl wrote:+ Show Spoiler +MalongoLet's take a journey, a journey through the posts of Malongo On July 28 2013 14:29 Malongo wrote:Sparrow pfff another smurf. So far in the inactive players I see 5. raynpelikoneet
7. Malongo
9. Stutters695In the hyper-activity side I see: 1. Oatsmaster
4. IMCaptainJackSparrow
10. hzflank
14. exarezeeEveryone else is meh-activity wise. So far my best pick is hzflank I really didnt like this post from hzflank: Show nested quote +On July 27 2013 21:46 hzflank wrote:
Yes I would lynch a lurker today. However, I dislike beginning the day with the thought of lynching a lurker. I think the best thing on day 1 would be for at least 3 wagons to form before we even thinking about consolidating (or lynching a lurker). If enough cases are made then there is more chance that one of them is a case against scum and the scum team may react to that. It is hard to make a good case against a lurker, so I would prefer cases against active people to be discussed first. The think about starting the day lynching a lurker is to force the players to post and force the mafia to make mistakes. I rather start the day forcing lurkers to post than "looking for 2/3 wagons" earlier. Earlier wagons are more likely to be town (in my experience) and the lurker lynching stays aside. Trying to get early wagons is also a good way to close the fence early wich help the mafia more than the town. His vote so far on Paperscraps is really weak and when I read his filter I found it really reactive (or defensive as he put it). ##Vote: hzflankId be happy to lynch CJS for no reason too ( I just hate attention-smurfs ). Let's just ignore the random list of activity, even though no one asked him. Malongo starts his case by admitting that he has no strong reads, or more specifically, that this is his strongest read. He makes this read based off a single post, despite there being a wealth of information on hz, including my one-on-one time with him. The posts he picks is very early in the game and rather than explaining why it is scummy he explains why it is wrong, and then votes for him. Much later on day 1 he repeats how the reason he's on hz (he's still on hz btw, and hasn't contributed about anything that's been going on in the thread other than a couple of 1-liners) On July 29 2013 05:24 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 04:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 29 2013 04:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
rayn your post is just a giant list of thread sentiment, your reason for calling hz town is literally stolen
Your thoughts on Malongo and Stutters make no sense to me though, could you expand on them? Malongo seems irritated by the fact he got lynched in the last game and is trying to play better. It seems like he is trying to play for town really hard compared to other games because of how people viewed him in those games. Stutters comes off as town as he noticed the same thing about Vivax i did. I tend to think people who agree with me are town, at least in things that most of the people seem to miss. My list is not based on thread sentiment. Maybe the thread sentiment is correct then if a lot of people agree on things. I think hz's tell is a strong town-tell, it's not stealing from you by any means. I just think alike you in that matter. Do you want to lynch FT? And it doesnt help me either that when I wake up I have to read 10 or more pages (and honestly didnt read with high proficiency). Our biggest problem right now is the lack of leads 3 hours to lynch. Thats why hz is still my prime suspect, I found it really bad when he posted about "consolidating 1 or 2 wagos early instead of pushing the lurkers". Clearly he wants to push Paper (wich is null to me atm) and every time he gets into an argument with someone his defence or case is slightly helped by other player around uninvolved. Read what other people has to say about him. "Guys, we have no big leads, if he had big leads, I wouldn't be on hz!" This is basically saying he doesn't believe in his own vote. Now he repeats his case, which is the exact same, and still about the same post in the early hours of day 1. Take a look at the bolded line again. What is he saying? Well let's assume he's town first: Malongo: Guys we should get more information, I'm not too certain about things right now. Okay, that's fair, but then why is his vote still on hz and in posts after this he still claims hz is scum? Malongo: Guys I don't believe in my case, but since you guys are so scattered I'm just gonna leave my vote parked riiiiiiiight here.This makes sense to me, the scum perspective. As town it does not. Low post count, low content, implying he's wrong yet pushing for it anyway.He scum yo. You are actually dodging the point when I called out the post of hz being inconsistent with the town benefit to lynch lurkers day1. When I said *no leads* I was clearly calling this post in mind On July 27 2013 21:46 hzflank wrote:
Yes I would lynch a lurker today. However, I dislike beginning the day with the thought of lynching a lurker. I think the best thing on day 1 would be for at least 3 wagons to form before we even thinking about consolidating (or lynching a lurker). If enough cases are made then there is more chance that one of them is a case against scum and the scum team may react to that. It is hard to make a good case against a lurker, so I would prefer cases against active people to be discussed first. What? You're saying when you said there were no leads you were talking about that post by hz? I really don't understand what you're saying.
Ergo I am mafia so lets write my name in colors? LOL
|
On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made?
Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though.
|
On July 29 2013 06:59 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 06:57 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Malongo wrote:On July 29 2013 05:58 Clarity_nl wrote:+ Show Spoiler +MalongoLet's take a journey, a journey through the posts of Malongo On July 28 2013 14:29 Malongo wrote:Sparrow pfff another smurf. So far in the inactive players I see 5. raynpelikoneet
7. Malongo
9. Stutters695In the hyper-activity side I see: 1. Oatsmaster
4. IMCaptainJackSparrow
10. hzflank
14. exarezeeEveryone else is meh-activity wise. So far my best pick is hzflank I really didnt like this post from hzflank: Show nested quote +On July 27 2013 21:46 hzflank wrote:
Yes I would lynch a lurker today. However, I dislike beginning the day with the thought of lynching a lurker. I think the best thing on day 1 would be for at least 3 wagons to form before we even thinking about consolidating (or lynching a lurker). If enough cases are made then there is more chance that one of them is a case against scum and the scum team may react to that. It is hard to make a good case against a lurker, so I would prefer cases against active people to be discussed first. The think about starting the day lynching a lurker is to force the players to post and force the mafia to make mistakes. I rather start the day forcing lurkers to post than "looking for 2/3 wagons" earlier. Earlier wagons are more likely to be town (in my experience) and the lurker lynching stays aside. Trying to get early wagons is also a good way to close the fence early wich help the mafia more than the town. His vote so far on Paperscraps is really weak and when I read his filter I found it really reactive (or defensive as he put it). ##Vote: hzflankId be happy to lynch CJS for no reason too ( I just hate attention-smurfs ). Let's just ignore the random list of activity, even though no one asked him. Malongo starts his case by admitting that he has no strong reads, or more specifically, that this is his strongest read. He makes this read based off a single post, despite there being a wealth of information on hz, including my one-on-one time with him. The posts he picks is very early in the game and rather than explaining why it is scummy he explains why it is wrong, and then votes for him. Much later on day 1 he repeats how the reason he's on hz (he's still on hz btw, and hasn't contributed about anything that's been going on in the thread other than a couple of 1-liners) On July 29 2013 05:24 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 04:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 29 2013 04:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
rayn your post is just a giant list of thread sentiment, your reason for calling hz town is literally stolen
Your thoughts on Malongo and Stutters make no sense to me though, could you expand on them? Malongo seems irritated by the fact he got lynched in the last game and is trying to play better. It seems like he is trying to play for town really hard compared to other games because of how people viewed him in those games. Stutters comes off as town as he noticed the same thing about Vivax i did. I tend to think people who agree with me are town, at least in things that most of the people seem to miss. My list is not based on thread sentiment. Maybe the thread sentiment is correct then if a lot of people agree on things. I think hz's tell is a strong town-tell, it's not stealing from you by any means. I just think alike you in that matter. Do you want to lynch FT? And it doesnt help me either that when I wake up I have to read 10 or more pages (and honestly didnt read with high proficiency). Our biggest problem right now is the lack of leads 3 hours to lynch. Thats why hz is still my prime suspect, I found it really bad when he posted about "consolidating 1 or 2 wagos early instead of pushing the lurkers". Clearly he wants to push Paper (wich is null to me atm) and every time he gets into an argument with someone his defence or case is slightly helped by other player around uninvolved. Read what other people has to say about him. "Guys, we have no big leads, if he had big leads, I wouldn't be on hz!" This is basically saying he doesn't believe in his own vote. Now he repeats his case, which is the exact same, and still about the same post in the early hours of day 1. Take a look at the bolded line again. What is he saying? Well let's assume he's town first: Malongo: Guys we should get more information, I'm not too certain about things right now. Okay, that's fair, but then why is his vote still on hz and in posts after this he still claims hz is scum? Malongo: Guys I don't believe in my case, but since you guys are so scattered I'm just gonna leave my vote parked riiiiiiiight here.This makes sense to me, the scum perspective. As town it does not. Low post count, low content, implying he's wrong yet pushing for it anyway.He scum yo. You are actually dodging the point when I called out the post of hz being inconsistent with the town benefit to lynch lurkers day1. When I said *no leads* I was clearly calling this post in mind On July 27 2013 21:46 hzflank wrote:
Yes I would lynch a lurker today. However, I dislike beginning the day with the thought of lynching a lurker. I think the best thing on day 1 would be for at least 3 wagons to form before we even thinking about consolidating (or lynching a lurker). If enough cases are made then there is more chance that one of them is a case against scum and the scum team may react to that. It is hard to make a good case against a lurker, so I would prefer cases against active people to be discussed first. What? You're saying when you said there were no leads you were talking about that post by hz? I really don't understand what you're saying. Ergo I am mafia so lets write my name in colors? LOL
What? Holy shit dude, Engelish, Do you Speaketh it?
|
On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though.
lol, you don't want your top scumread to contribute? wtf, maybe we should lynch Koshi.
|
On July 29 2013 07:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though. lol, you don't want your top scumread to contribute? wtf, maybe we should lynch Koshi.
You fuckers aren't lynching him. So why should he hurry?
please stfu rayn. Last time you were yelling lynch koshi, koshi was lynching your scum teammate.
|
On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though.
I did not think that Paper was scummy 40 hours ago. I disliked that he said that everything he had posted up until a point should be ignored so I voted for him. I made multiple posts which included something hinting that my vote was flexible. I fully intended to move my vote once Paper posted again, but then his posts made me think that he actually was scum.
You think I have tunneled Paper all game? What on earth do you think my conversation with you was about? You think that I was scum setting you up for a mislynch, right? I say that I was town trying to open you up to get a read on you. I was attacking you, and therefore not tunneling Paper.
|
On July 29 2013 07:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though. lol, you don't want your top scumread to contribute? wtf, maybe we should lynch Koshi.
To be more precise. You don't want your top scumread to contribute towards your other scumread.
##Unvote:
##Vote: Koshi
That's enough bullshit.
|
Alright, I'm starting to warm on the Paperscraps lynch. I have a feeling that Paper/Malongo/Koshi is one possible scum team and exarezee/hzflank is part of another possible scum team. Lynching in one of these two groups of players would give us invaluable information about the other group.
##Unvote
##Vote: Paperscraps
|
On July 29 2013 07:03 hzflank wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though. I did not think that Paper was scummy 40 hours ago. I disliked that he said that everything he had posted up until a point should be ignored so I voted for him. I made multiple posts which included something hinting that my vote was flexible. I fully intended to move my vote once Paper posted again, but then his posts made me think that he actually was scum. You think I have tunneled Paper all game? What on earth do you think my conversation with you was about? You think that I was scum setting you up for a mislynch, right? I say that I was town trying to open you up to get a read on you. I was attacking you, and therefore not tunneling Paper.
Which ones? After that he made his list right?
|
On July 29 2013 07:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though. lol, you don't want your top scumread to contribute? wtf, maybe we should lynch Koshi. To be more precise. You don't want your top scumread to contribute towards your other scumread. ##Unvote:
##Vote: KoshiThat's enough bullshit.
Paper has never been my scumread. Ohhh you are a funny one!
|
Also Koshi, imagine that I am town for a second and give me one good reason why town-hz should of unvoted Paper at any point during this game.
Paper certainly did not give me a reason to move my vote. Some other people came close, but without Paper also helping them it was not enough.
|
I think you're jumping the gun rayn, I think Koshi (might, possibly, not guaranteed) just have meant that he doesn't have to respond until after lynch, since we're not lynching hz
|
On July 29 2013 07:05 hzflank wrote:
Also Koshi, imagine that I am town for a second and give me one good reason why town-hz should of unvoted Paper at any point during this game.
Paper certainly did not give me a reason to move my vote. Some other people came close, but without Paper also helping them it was not enough.
I just f ind it strange that town-hz never used that vote to pressure other scumreads, and I am having problems thinking that town-hz wasn't able to pressure anybody else this game with the 100 posts he made.
|
On July 29 2013 07:04 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:03 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though. I did not think that Paper was scummy 40 hours ago. I disliked that he said that everything he had posted up until a point should be ignored so I voted for him. I made multiple posts which included something hinting that my vote was flexible. I fully intended to move my vote once Paper posted again, but then his posts made me think that he actually was scum. You think I have tunneled Paper all game? What on earth do you think my conversation with you was about? You think that I was scum setting you up for a mislynch, right? I say that I was town trying to open you up to get a read on you. I was attacking you, and therefore not tunneling Paper. Which ones? After that he made his list right?
It started with the list. You seen so sure of how I play this game so you should have noticed that when I think that someone is scum I start to ask them questions directly. When I was questioning Paper I was trying to get a better read on him. If he had given me good answers I may not have thought that he was scum. Why do you think I get annoyed when people ignore my direct questions? Why do you think that I go out of my way to answer questions directed at me? This is Mafia 101 here.
|
On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made?
The thing is your case on Paper was conveniently tunneled and wagoned early and nipticked and I found you lying 2 times.
A) When you said the guy was not answering you directly. hint: he did
B) When you said *how pleople find Paper townie posting. hint: null =/= townie
That and the fact that now we are ending the day with 0 pressure on active lurkers as you wanted with your initial posts.
##Vote hzflank
|
On July 29 2013 07:07 hzflank wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:04 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 07:03 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though. I did not think that Paper was scummy 40 hours ago. I disliked that he said that everything he had posted up until a point should be ignored so I voted for him. I made multiple posts which included something hinting that my vote was flexible. I fully intended to move my vote once Paper posted again, but then his posts made me think that he actually was scum. You think I have tunneled Paper all game? What on earth do you think my conversation with you was about? You think that I was scum setting you up for a mislynch, right? I say that I was town trying to open you up to get a read on you. I was attacking you, and therefore not tunneling Paper. Which ones? After that he made his list right? It started with the list. You seen so sure of how I play this game so you should have noticed that when I think that someone is scum I start to ask them questions directly. When I was questioning Paper I was trying to get a better read on him. If he had given me good answers I may not have thought that he was scum. Why do you think I get annoyed when people ignore my direct questions? Why do you think that I go out of my way to answer questions directed at me? This is Mafia 101 here.
Malongo quoted a post in which paper responded to you.
|
On July 29 2013 07:08 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? The thing is your case on Paper was conveniently tunneled and wagoned early and nipticked and I found you lying 2 times. A) When you said the guy was not answering you directly. hint: he didB) When you said *how pleople find Paper townie posting. hint: null =/= townieThat and the fact that now we are ending the day with 0 pressure on active lurkers as you wanted with your initial posts. ##Vote hzflank
No, fuck this, consolidate on paper or someone that we might reach a majority on, we need a lynch or we're gonna have a useless day 2.
You applied no pressure to lurkers yourself either, hypocrit.
|
On July 29 2013 07:11 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:08 Malongo wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? The thing is your case on Paper was conveniently tunneled and wagoned early and nipticked and I found you lying 2 times. A) When you said the guy was not answering you directly. hint: he didB) When you said *how pleople find Paper townie posting. hint: null =/= townieThat and the fact that now we are ending the day with 0 pressure on active lurkers as you wanted with your initial posts. ##Vote hzflank No, fuck this, consolidate on paper or someone that we might reach a majority on, we need a lynch or we're gonna have a useless day 2. You applied no pressure to lurkers yourself either, hypocrit.
THAT'S NOT THE POINT MALONGO MAKES
|
On July 29 2013 07:09 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 07:07 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 07:04 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 07:03 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 07:00 Koshi wrote:On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? Unless there are more votes going to pile up for you I guess I don't see why you should. I still don't see why you think Paper is so scummy for the pas 40 hours though. I did not think that Paper was scummy 40 hours ago. I disliked that he said that everything he had posted up until a point should be ignored so I voted for him. I made multiple posts which included something hinting that my vote was flexible. I fully intended to move my vote once Paper posted again, but then his posts made me think that he actually was scum. You think I have tunneled Paper all game? What on earth do you think my conversation with you was about? You think that I was scum setting you up for a mislynch, right? I say that I was town trying to open you up to get a read on you. I was attacking you, and therefore not tunneling Paper. Which ones? After that he made his list right? It started with the list. You seen so sure of how I play this game so you should have noticed that when I think that someone is scum I start to ask them questions directly. When I was questioning Paper I was trying to get a better read on him. If he had given me good answers I may not have thought that he was scum. Why do you think I get annoyed when people ignore my direct questions? Why do you think that I go out of my way to answer questions directed at me? This is Mafia 101 here. Malongo quoted a post in which paper responded to you.
Paper's response to me was that he did not want to answer my questions. That is about as good as your Unicorn response.
|
On July 29 2013 07:08 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 06:58 hzflank wrote:On July 29 2013 06:55 Koshi wrote:
Why are we ignoring Malongo? Do you want me to fully answer him now? His problem with me stems from philosophical differences regarding lynching lurkers. After that he clutches at straws. He seems to genuinely think that I am scum, though. I never responded to him earlier because until this page he talked about me and not too me, and since I have spent a lot of time replying to people doing that this game there was no town benefit to messing up the thread discussing philosophical differences. Do you want me to fully answer every point that you and Malongo just made? The thing is your case on Paper was conveniently tunneled and wagoned early and nipticked and I found you lying 2 times. A) When you said the guy was not answering you directly. hint: he didB) When you said *how pleople find Paper townie posting. hint: null =/= townieThat and the fact that now we are ending the day with 0 pressure on active lurkers as you wanted with your initial posts. ##Vote hzflank
What the fuck are you doing? If you are town, start voting someone who can actually get lynched today. Do I really need to spell this out for you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
