|
On July 02 2013 05:32 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
We are not lynching Vayne. We are lynching you/WoS/Fuba, so why can't you just comment on them?
You had two days to make a case on Vayne, and you failed. You don't get us to look at him now, 30min before the lynch, when you have shown no interest in asking us to do that before. why are we not lynching Vayne? His filter is extraordinarily short (i know, i know). also just found this Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 01:16 VayneAuthority wrote:
can we agree collectively as a game to not claim roles in this open setup? It's pretty broken and I didn't sign up for a lets all claim and lynch at 50/50 game.
With that said I am mainly looking at lazer/WoS now.
Lazer's posting has been fairly more townie as of recently but the fact that he OMGUS'd me from my accusations is a bit alarming when he gave very little reasoning. It seems like he's trying to keep himself on the good side of most of the people in the game so instead of scum hunting he just goes right back at the accuser.
As for WoS I am not really a fan of what he's done so far, he has been very passive yet exceedingly angry which is somewhat how he played in Les Mis. The fact that he says I am playing differently and doesn't know what to make of it leads me to believe that he knows I am town somehow, might have been a scumslip. Vayne pretty much admits himself in past games that he likes to solve games by night interactions and kills, claims etc. Seems completely against his MO to advise against it this game. Marv
12
Points
!
|
##Unvote
##Vote: Vayne
YOLO, will swap to WoS if need be.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I want to hear from rayn why he thinks Vayne is a bad lynch.
I cannot find anything in his filter that suggests he's a bad lynch.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
EBWOP: as in, i can't find anything in vayne's filter to make me think he's town. it was ambiguous.
|
I just told why i think he is town.
|
On July 02 2013 05:32 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
We are not lynching Vayne. We are lynching you/WoS/Fuba, so why can't you just comment on them?
You had two days to make a case on Vayne, and you failed. You don't get us to look at him now, 30min before the lynch, when you have shown no interest in asking us to do that before. why are we not lynching Vayne? His filter is extraordinarily short (i know, i know). also just found this Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 01:16 VayneAuthority wrote:
can we agree collectively as a game to not claim roles in this open setup? It's pretty broken and I didn't sign up for a lets all claim and lynch at 50/50 game.
With that said I am mainly looking at lazer/WoS now.
Lazer's posting has been fairly more townie as of recently but the fact that he OMGUS'd me from my accusations is a bit alarming when he gave very little reasoning. It seems like he's trying to keep himself on the good side of most of the people in the game so instead of scum hunting he just goes right back at the accuser.
As for WoS I am not really a fan of what he's done so far, he has been very passive yet exceedingly angry which is somewhat how he played in Les Mis. The fact that he says I am playing differently and doesn't know what to make of it leads me to believe that he knows I am town somehow, might have been a scumslip. Vayne pretty much admits himself in past games that he likes to solve games by night interactions and kills, claims etc. Seems completely against his MO to advise against it this game.
Gumshoe said he wouldn't do that either.
Either way, we wait for confirmation from the host, then we can still do that eventually, and it's not necessarily scummy if you think that resorting to strategies like that is lame.
Treat it as WIFOM if you like, but scum would be afraid to oppose such a request openly imo.
I'm dropping my vote on Lazer.
##Vote Lazermonkey
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
What do you marv think about Lazer having Vayne as a scumread for all the game and not pushing him at any point until 30min before the lynch? That does not raise red flags at all?
|
I saw that too Marv. Why that's null for me is there is a huge difference between mass claiming that breaks the game before anyone has even been lynched and solving it via actions that are controllable.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 02 2013 05:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He has similar suspects to me, besides Stutters. He has good reasoning behind his posts. He is looking into places i think are right.
you mean this?
|
On July 02 2013 05:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What do you marv think about Lazer having Vayne as a scumread for all the game and not pushing him at any point until 30min before the lynch? That does not raise red flags at all? You realize I was gone all day, right?
|
WHEN DA FUCK IS THE DEADLINE.
I really need to know if I need to claim...
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 02 2013 05:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What do you marv think about Lazer having Vayne as a scumread for all the game and not pushing him at any point until 30min before the lynch? That does not raise red flags at all?
haven't got time to work all that out, i'm just looking at Vayne's filter and it's pathetic.
Lazer's filter looks like he's trying.
|
On July 02 2013 05:36 Stutters695 wrote:
I saw that too Marv. Why that's null for me is there is a huge difference between mass claiming that breaks the game before anyone has even been lynched and solving it via actions that are controllable. That is far from the only scummy thing he has done this game...
|
Pretty sure it's in an hour and change, no?
|
On July 02 2013 05:37 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 05:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What do you marv think about Lazer having Vayne as a scumread for all the game and not pushing him at any point until 30min before the lynch? That does not raise red flags at all? You realize I was gone all day, right?
Yet you have posted a lot yesterday. Instead of pushing Vayne you hopped on JarJar "because nobody would lynch Vayne with you".
On July 02 2013 05:36 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 05:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He has similar suspects to me, besides Stutters. He has good reasoning behind his posts. He is looking into places i think are right. you mean this?
Yes.
|
Hey Lazer, what about Oats and me?
Where did your reads of us go?
|
I'm back, catching up now.
|
On July 02 2013 04:59 Vivax wrote:WAIT WHAT Rereading fuba I just noticed this shit: Show nested quote +On July 01 2013 07:00 mkfuba07 wrote:
Oats's vote on rayn was interesting, because I didn't think of rayn's actions from that persepective. The thing is, though, rayn had thought the situation through. The way oats presents it is as though rayn simply saw marv claim miller, and accepted it as true. Then went on to buddy him. This is clearly not what happened.
*snip*
rayn: After Vivax's marv post, I expected rayn to be less insistent on him being confirmed town. It would have been *much* easier for scum to fakeclaim miller in this situation than I thought, and I don't see how this isn't obvious from a town perspective. Add to that Vivax's case, where he points out that rayn accepts the existence of a miller at face value, and I'm pretty convinced. He's far too eager to accept the claim as truth, when it should now have little effect on the mind of a townie. My only reluctance to vote for him is his activity level, which I tend to associate with town.
##Vote: raynpelikoneet
Everyone else is gonna need a filter dive, and I'm going to have to reread the posts I read while writing this, but I feel comfortable with my vote where it is. In the same post he says Rayn didn't take the claim at face value, then he says I pointed it out and suddenly it's true? Wtf. This needs explanation.
The writing of the first line and the writing in the last substantial paragraph happened about four hours apart. There were quite a few pages between those, and you presented a perspective I hadn't considered.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 02 2013 05:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 05:37 Lazermonkey wrote:On July 02 2013 05:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What do you marv think about Lazer having Vayne as a scumread for all the game and not pushing him at any point until 30min before the lynch? That does not raise red flags at all? You realize I was gone all day, right? Yet you have posted a lot yesterday. Instead of pushing Vayne you hopped on JarJar "because nobody would lynch Vayne with you". Show nested quote +On July 02 2013 05:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 02 2013 05:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He has similar suspects to me, besides Stutters. He has good reasoning behind his posts. He is looking into places i think are right. you mean this? Yes.
they're shocking reasons and you need to re-read his filter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
