EPT[T] Nuclear Winter Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 00:46 Z-BosoN wrote: Discussion is diving hard atm towards set-up speculation. Scum love this discussion because it's easy to participate in and look like they are contributing. Let's focus on consolidating our vote and try to dish out them scum, please. Right now I am waiting for WoS and austin to respond and going through some other filters. What I know now is that I do not want Chezinu dead, as I stated before, and that this discussion is pointless unless there is new info that people with roles are willing to share. Xatalos, why do you feel Meapak is town? I find his play so far to be a bit confusing from a town perspective. Please elaborate. Why is it pointless to lynch Chezinu? He nuked me, the strongest general townread at the time, for no (apparent) reason. Maybe he was just being insane, but unless he soon A) starts explaining his actions and B) reveals what type of nuke he launched at me (solving the problem of Oatsmaster's anti-nuke), I feel we should lynch him. Reasons for Meapak being town: 1) he was nuked secretly - only scum would have a natural reason not to claim their nukes - likely the launcher is scum and Meapak is town (both CAN'T be scum, since it would be 100% insane to secretly kill your own scum team) 2) he didn't shut up after being nuked, but rather started scumhunting with renewed motivation, which is a clear town trademark (why would scum act pro-town after being sentenced to death?) 3) overall he has posted townishly and scumhunted a lot IMO | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote: Im going to sleep. <3 Xatalos, PLEASE DONT BE SCUM ##Defend Xatalos Too bad you couldn't wait. I think we could have pressured the answer out of Chezinu and maybe saved Meapak. But at least now I know I'll live, which is kind of a relief, I guess. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 01:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay Oats. I understand you need to go to bed, that was probably the best possible thing you could do. The problem is that Xatalos is kinda vanilla now. Unless some townie has a radiation nuke. If you do, launch that towards Xatalos the first thing on D2 if he is alive. I'm not giving Chezinu a "free pass", he still needs to explain himself. There is plenty of time before the lynch. I would have like Oats to clarify from hosts does the anti-nuke block only KP or all the effects. Apparently all, and given that i would definitely defend Xata over Meapak. There is still a chance scum launched a fake-nuke on their scumbuddy Meapak. Imagine what it does. First of all you gain town credit. Second, you become "unlynchable" for the phase. Like, "why would we even look at that guy who is going to die either way". I think there's a high chance that I'm NK'd (apparently everyone thinks I'm town). Another sensible NK would be Oatsmaster with his anti-nuke. If I live, it might be a good idea to give me that KP, although it might be risky (I'd be an obvious roleblock target, if there are scum roleblockers in this game). The bad thing about this is that now there's zero chance of a scum shooting me with a Radiation nuke. Oh well, at least I'll live for now. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 01:29 WaveofShadow wrote: I'm a one-shot Hacker. I can redirect any nuke anywhere else once in the game. I've had a pretty decent townread on MZ for most of the game. Yes it's possible it's a fake nuke and MZ is scum (I find this a little unlikely) but then if the nuke IS fake we find out when I redirect it and it doesn't hit. Either way I'm thinking of redirecting to NG. I give my approval. I'd trade NG for Meapak any day of the week. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 01:34 Ace wrote: also if we cant come to a consensus on who to lynch, vote someone that will get nuked off What do you mean with this? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 01:42 Artanis[Xp] wrote: NUCLEAR ROCKET REDIRECT ![[image loading]](http://en.newsbharati.com/Encyc/2012/9/17/39_04_46_32_pakistan_tests_nuclear_capable_H@@IGHT_300_W@@IDTH_400.jpg) A nuclear rocket that was previously heading towards Meapak_Ziphh is now heading swiftly towards Nirvana.Gabo. YEEESSS :D | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 01:37 OriginalName wrote: he means that we apply 2 kp to a person to insure they die thus avoiding a mislynch as they would die anyways. Wtf? We play to win, that's playing not to lose. Most likely it'd be the same as no-lynch. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
So Chezinu it is (unless he shows up to redeem himself)? Maybe Dandel Ion would be better, not sure. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 01:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Is Ace scum? That's like saying it's OK to vote for no-lynch without actually voting for no-lynch... I hope not, but that post didn't feel good at all. Maybe I should move him from town to null :/ | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 02:11 Ace wrote: That was a stupid decision WoS. Less stupid than no-lynching today Ace... In fact, infinitely less stupid. A beacon of brilliance compared to your ideas. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
Name your top scumreads and reasons for them now that you're finally here. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 02:33 Ace wrote: I've never advocated no lynching. Stop saying that. Lynching someone who was going to die anyways = no-lynch. It's simple logic. How can you refute that? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 02:40 Ace wrote: It is not a no lynch. Read what I said again. If we can't come to a consensus - vote on the person getting nuked. Here is a question. If I'm advocating a No lynch who was I trying to save from dying? Chezinu? Dandel Ion? They seem to be somewhat even atm so it's possible that you're scum with one of them and wanted to ensure that nobody got lynched. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On July 09 2013 02:48 Ace wrote: Look at who was leading when I posted that. Dandel didn't have many votes, and Chezinu was leading. I then voted from Chezinu to Dandel. Why would I be trying to save the people I'm voting for? :/ Hmm. Well, I guess that's not such a likely scenario (I'd put it in the same category as scum launching a fake nuke at scum Meapak). I don't know why town Ace would advocate a no-lynch even instead of a random lurker though. Why is that your FIRST thought is to advice no-lynching if we can't get a clear consensus? Shouldn't you be pushing your own opinion right now instead of waiting for a consensus or softly pushing a no-lynch? It feels overall scummy. | ||
| ||
