If this game starts after the 18th of June I will /in
Otherwise sadly I will not be able to play
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
If this game starts after the 18th of June I will /in Otherwise sadly I will not be able to play | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
"BC is not allowed to have cool / good roles" also, dandels insane spamming is annoying. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 22 2013 09:53 s0Lstice wrote: Yea BC I'd say your entrance post is the scummiest thing that has happened so far. Do you think the dandel spam is alignment indicative? alignment indicative? possibly not? something I hate passionately and if I had a gun would shoot over? Very likely. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 22 2013 10:48 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2013 10:45 geript wrote: On June 22 2013 10:37 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 10:33 WaveofShadow wrote: I WISH I could stream, sadly small children and lack of internet do not allow for such frivolities, at least not until late August or something. I'ma go play a bot game for my win of the day. Dandel you should play with me. Why don't I have you on my flist? Is it 'cause you're SCUM??? I will not fall for such a weak excuse. You will not trick me into stopping my surveillance! You found me out. I haz role. Why you blu hunting biznatch? Those who don't ##lovetap are SCUM I see you trying to make me jealous by lovetapping WaveofShadow. Anyone potentially activating your role when they have 0 information on you is retarded. You attempting to force said issue makes you more likely scum than town. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 22 2013 11:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2013 10:55 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 22 2013 10:48 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 10:45 geript wrote: On June 22 2013 10:37 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 10:33 WaveofShadow wrote: I WISH I could stream, sadly small children and lack of internet do not allow for such frivolities, at least not until late August or something. I'ma go play a bot game for my win of the day. Dandel you should play with me. Why don't I have you on my flist? Is it 'cause you're SCUM??? I will not fall for such a weak excuse. You will not trick me into stopping my surveillance! You found me out. I haz role. Why you blu hunting biznatch? Those who don't ##lovetap are SCUM I see you trying to make me jealous by lovetapping WaveofShadow. Anyone potentially activating your role when they have 0 information on you is retarded. You attempting to force said issue makes you more likely scum than town. I'm just spreading the love. Don't be upset cuz you aint getting any ##Lovetaps Show nested quote + On June 22 2013 11:04 Acrofales wrote: I'm home! Haven't read anything yet, but after umpteen scumgames and a fairly longish break, I finally rolled town! Also, in case this plan hasn't been proposed yet, I think everybody should say what character they made the role for. That way, if someone claims, someone else can back that shit up, or act as a lie detector. And then scum can just kill the person who wrote their role and claim whatever they want. Let's not do this guys. except you did try and give me some and i refused. Also, saying the name you made a role for could ultimately be retarded as someone could have ended up designing their own role. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 02:27 Acrofales wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 02:18 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 02:15 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 02:11 Acrofales wrote: On June 23 2013 02:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 01:56 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 01:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: StrongandBig, WaveofShadow, and BC are the scums 100%. Sk8 for MVP. Thank you, good night. Also about my role, the player who wrote it wanted to gain an advantage on player roles. Everyone suspects something, but only he and I know what it does and now he knows the role he received and mine. Possibly more if he is scum. I thought about not doing it, but then he still wins if he is scum by knowing i'm out there not using my abilities. Meta-scum > Care to explain exactly what you're talking about in this post? Also sorry about letting my tryhard pants fall off, guys, I forgot to put on a belt and someone pantsed me. In all honestly the reason my posing twas crap then picked up and devolved again is because having never played in this kind of a game before I wasn't exactly sure how seriously people take it and how hard town/scum really try to win (ie do people scumhunt as normal with crazy as fuck roles flying around). It seems as though while there is likely to be more trolling in a game sch as this, people definitely do still want to win; as such I will begin to contribute in earnest. I'm still not sure of you, Acro. Why haven't you commented much on what Xatalos has to say about me aside from you sharing his suspicions? I am arguably his strongest scumread and so I probably warrant discussion, yet you keep bringing conversation into role-claiming/setup speculation type stuff. First part - My suspicions currently based on posting and defending. I don't know about the Meta, perhaps these players are known for defending other towns. Note I have not changed my vote. Second part - Self explanatory. Whoever wrote my role now knows that they wrote it. If I die, it's because of this and that they flipped mafia. I still have no clue what you're on about with the second part. Presumably the lovetaps are part of your role, and not just random crap you made up to have something to talk about on D1. That's fine. However, I fail to see how this gives you any indication of what alignment the maker of your role was. It doesn't yet. I was letting town know this so if something happens to me then we know the writer of MY card is scum. Ideally thats the only reason why you would force your target to reveal to do their ability is so that the writer are aware of it and can respond according to their alignment. How were you forced to reveal your ability exactly? I really don't follow your train of thought. Inept noobie card again Clearly, he has to get people to lovetap him. Or lovetap them, or something. Publicly in the thread. So whoever wrote the role knows that sk8r has the role he wrote. Obviously, the bit about him getting bumped off means whoever made the role is scum, is him having illusions of grandeur. PTP games tend to be full of pretty crazy powerful roles. As for who I have suspicions about? I've mentioned them in my filter. SnB: I expect more from him. WoS: for fumbling over the tryhard pants. Zephirdd: for being angry at people for not posting anything useful while not posting anything useful. Slight pings on my scumdar: Kurumi: for being D1 Kurumi BC: for being D1 BC and coming up with a pretty bogus artificial reason for being against my plan. Xatalos: for seeming insincere in his early tryhard posts. is it bogus and artificial, or did people get the role they created? Who knows who knows. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 02:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 02:25 strongandbig wrote: On June 23 2013 01:16 Acrofales wrote: On June 23 2013 01:05 strongandbig wrote: Acro you voted me but what do you think of my first post? Y u vote me btw. Voted for you because you're tricksy scum. You used to be easy to catch, but you've upped your game. Your first post picked on a pretty easy target and gave a rather dubious reason for calling him scum (or at least FoS'ing him). You're voting me because I'm harder to catch than I used to be? Okay great. When you say it was "dubious", do you mean that you disagree with my analysis? Because whatshisface just admitted that his bc vote had no real motivation, and I don't buy the "I did it to gauge reactions but I'm not gonna explain what they were or what my analysis is" line, so I'm not feeling too "dubious" here. You think a random vote before BC even posted would have actually meant something? I am keeping it on him because I'm surprised at how you are trying to discredit me for an action that normal people would have just marked off as trolling. to be honest what you just said would implicate snb as scum not me, but keep up the good work. your record of not lynching townies is going to be broken if you manage to lynch me. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 03:06 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 02:53 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 02:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 02:25 strongandbig wrote: On June 23 2013 01:16 Acrofales wrote: On June 23 2013 01:05 strongandbig wrote: Acro you voted me but what do you think of my first post? Y u vote me btw. Voted for you because you're tricksy scum. You used to be easy to catch, but you've upped your game. Your first post picked on a pretty easy target and gave a rather dubious reason for calling him scum (or at least FoS'ing him). You're voting me because I'm harder to catch than I used to be? Okay great. When you say it was "dubious", do you mean that you disagree with my analysis? Because whatshisface just admitted that his bc vote had no real motivation, and I don't buy the "I did it to gauge reactions but I'm not gonna explain what they were or what my analysis is" line, so I'm not feeling too "dubious" here. You think a random vote before BC even posted would have actually meant something? I am keeping it on him because I'm surprised at how you are trying to discredit me for an action that normal people would have just marked off as trolling. to be honest what you just said would implicate snb as scum not me, but keep up the good work. your record of not lynching townies is going to be broken if you manage to lynch me. It's only 1 vote, and yes but I am not sure enough of Snb to put him at 2 votes, yet. but you are sure of me? Why. You must have reasons to think I am scum as you have said that I am scum 100% You even said snb was scum 100%. If you are so sure that we are scum you would be actively pushing said reads. Instead you are fine with not attempting to do that. So, whats the deal? If you have a 100% read on people as scum you should be pushing. Also before you say you were "just jking" or some other dodge of your own words you have actively responded and claimed they are your legit reads. So, why are you not attempting to push lynches on your 100% reads. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote: I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript. BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 03:38 Kurumi wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 03:25 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote: I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript. BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? This question is very interesting. Very interesting indeed. Why would you ask such a question Kurumi? I think BC played all of PTP games and died D1 twice. So I am just asking if he's planning a quick leave again. I died day 2 the third game. VE killed me twice, and town lynched me once. I have never once planned for a quick leave, Decon just has a sick sense of humour -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. Discrediting you? Defending myself? I can arguably be doing the second only in the fact I AM PUSHING YOU TO ACTUALLY POST YOUR REASONINGS. You walked into a thread voted me before I posted and then have not explained jack shit aside from "i think hes scum" Good job. You aren't trying to convince anyone else I am scum. IE you aren't trying to get your highest scum read lynched IE you aren't doing playing to the town win con. Pity unvote? Sounds more like you want a reason to back off me to avoid any heat. Tough shit you now have people watching your play. As for me discrediting you? How did I do so? I asked you questions you refuse to answer. You say you are committed to pushing me but you haven't attempted it once. You then say making a list is not scummy? It is if you provide 0 reasoning and refuse to provide said reasoning. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game. ##Vote BloodyC0bbler We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game. ##Vote BloodyC0bbler We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. Well his arguments about your mental inability from refraining of posting cat pictures with the overarching connection theory that scum players tend to be cat people have a lot of merit, and his points about your easy acceptance of the confirmed scum flip acro's excuses also resonate deeply with my soul. Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote: On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote: I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript. BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:09 s0Lstice wrote: BC friggen stop. The first post you quoted was obviously a joke. What are you doing? honestly? Debating whether or not to kill him. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:20 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I'm defending my FOS. You guys can think that I'm the worst player ever if you want. In all honestly I have no real reads, but you asked for some, so I attemped to give them. Also BloodyCobbler has revealed he has a killing ability. My role is pretty weak / lame. I just giving you my opinion, you know in this game that is based on opinions? Also if I was Mafia, It would be pretty dumb of me to gather this much attention. I find that this day has actually been fairly useful. You are defending your FoS but you have no real reads and lied about some because you were asked? You are also using a WIFOM argument as a defense. Fuck it. I have no tolerance to deal with this bullshit all game Jack the ripper has claimed another victim | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:28 s0Lstice wrote: yea well I think skater just died... unless he has an ability that defends from day shots, yes, yes he is. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:34 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:28 s0Lstice wrote: yea well I think skater just died... unless he has an ability that defends from day shots, yes, yes he is. See, now we have a problem. If he flips newbie town (which may or may not have been completely obvious depending on how you think about it) then you may again be finding yourself getting lynched D1. Reasoning: I don't think his posting warranted a vig shot as he was contributing. This means the rationale for a shot like that is supposedly that BC thinks Skater is scum, which given the way he has played isn't completely obvious. Skater could very well have been noob town and BC is good enough to know this. Read my belief on how to use vig shots early game. Shooting people early game who are actively hurting town regardless of their alignment is a solid vig shot. He can flip town for all I care at this point, he has actively admitted to playing against town interests. I am sick and tired of people getting away with this thus I am punishing it. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:35 s0Lstice wrote: You are alive until a mod flips you. I hope I'm wrong, but I really am not a fan of this BC. He was at least talking a lot, and would have been readable more and more as we continued...annoying or not, I think you just killed a townie. See, this is the mentality of keeping people like kush/grush/etc... alive until late game when no one can read them at all but because they lived so long they are almost always given a free pass regardless of alignment. Vigi's job is to clear town of mafia/people who are actively hampering towns ability to win. You can disagree with my shot however you want, but I am sick and tired of having to deal with this shit behaviour. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:38 kitaman27 wrote: Can the role creator of Jack the Ripper confirm that the day vig can be used anonymously? The role is not jack the ripper and no one can confirm my role, because I got my own role. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:43 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:38 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:35 s0Lstice wrote: You are alive until a mod flips you. I hope I'm wrong, but I really am not a fan of this BC. He was at least talking a lot, and would have been readable more and more as we continued...annoying or not, I think you just killed a townie. See, this is the mentality of keeping people like kush/grush/etc... alive until late game when no one can read them at all but because they lived so long they are almost always given a free pass regardless of alignment. Vigi's job is to clear town of mafia/people who are actively hampering towns ability to win. You can disagree with my shot however you want, but I am sick and tired of having to deal with this shit behaviour. How could you possibly know to put them in the same boat as Grush/Kush? Isn't this his first game here? This honestly looks like a masking attempt kita, don;t you see it? Like, I get the frustration and I'm all on board to start policy lynching/vigging people like Kush/Vayne/whoever in other games, but I don't see what Skater was doing as actively hurting town, and it's WAY too early in the game to determine that he'd be one of those left alive at LYLO. its the behaviour hes already shown. Who cares if hes alive at lylo? Its the behaviour hes showing. Tell me how his play currently is any different from Kush/Vayne/etc... currently? He has one of the largest filters this game already and has actively admitted to not having reads/trolling. Fuck that shit. Stop defending trolls and start punishing them. The only players I will take shit like this from are ones like Chez who actively do help win games even when trolling. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:44 geript wrote: I'm absolutely going to laugh if BC just killed the role I created. does that mean I just offed myself? Because I'd laugh too | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:44 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:38 kitaman27 wrote: Can the role creator of Jack the Ripper confirm that the day vig can be used anonymously? The role is not jack the ripper and no one can confirm my role, because I got my own role. I'm waiting for someone to WIFOM that 'scum BC would never say something this blatantly scummy.' I don't plan on letting this go. Waiting on the Skater flip right now. How is that so blatantly scummy? I got the role I made. I also said what my role name isn't. Don't like that? Take it up with decon. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:48 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:43 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:38 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:35 s0Lstice wrote: You are alive until a mod flips you. I hope I'm wrong, but I really am not a fan of this BC. He was at least talking a lot, and would have been readable more and more as we continued...annoying or not, I think you just killed a townie. See, this is the mentality of keeping people like kush/grush/etc... alive until late game when no one can read them at all but because they lived so long they are almost always given a free pass regardless of alignment. Vigi's job is to clear town of mafia/people who are actively hampering towns ability to win. You can disagree with my shot however you want, but I am sick and tired of having to deal with this shit behaviour. How could you possibly know to put them in the same boat as Grush/Kush? Isn't this his first game here? This honestly looks like a masking attempt kita, don;t you see it? Like, I get the frustration and I'm all on board to start policy lynching/vigging people like Kush/Vayne/whoever in other games, but I don't see what Skater was doing as actively hurting town, and it's WAY too early in the game to determine that he'd be one of those left alive at LYLO. its the behaviour hes already shown. Who cares if hes alive at lylo? Its the behaviour hes showing. Tell me how his play currently is any different from Kush/Vayne/etc... currently? He has one of the largest filters this game already and has actively admitted to not having reads/trolling. Fuck that shit. Stop defending trolls and start punishing them. The only players I will take shit like this from are ones like Chez who actively do help win games even when trolling. He has actively engaged people in discussion and shown interest in the game unlike those I mentioned. I can name like 6 other people in the thread who haven't given reads and have trolled. Hell I trolled at the start and I'm pretty sure one of my posts included the fact that I didn't have any scumreads yet. You going to shoot me? Again, I agree with the general sentiment of eliminating the chaff from town before it becomes an issue and given the chance I may start putting it into practice myself in other games. But these are KNOWN problems we're talking about. This? Terrible shot if it's true, BC. Just fucking terrible. Difference is I know you are able to at least try. Not all your posts are troll ones. His only "non troll" posts are ones talking about me in which he then says "i have no real scum reads" thus making all the shit he posted on me total bs because he didnt want to say "i have no reads right now that I am confident in" etc... Guy may be new here but he said hes played elsewhere before. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:51 s0Lstice wrote: So in your intro post BC you bashed the role you yourself created as boring/not good? This game is getting spicy(dinosaur). Course I did. I have bashed my role in every ptp game. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote: On June 22 2013 17:40 Xatalos wrote: On June 22 2013 14:56 Kurumi wrote: For a moment I thought I was still drunk after yesterday but this thread actually makes no sense. No trolling for me I guess. We're running the classic lynch, so the most votes person dies? LOL. This post *would* be scummy if it showed any actual effort to be safe from lynching. Now, it seems more like a clueless town post. On the other hand, might be 100% clueless Mafia... Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time. Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! Show nested quote + On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote: On June 22 2013 23:43 Xatalos wrote: On June 22 2013 11:54 Crossfire99 wrote: ##Pants: WaveofShadow I'm going to bed now. I'm gone all day tomorrow and doubt that I will be able to post. I should be around Sunday, though. Ugh. This is basically Crossfire99's whole contribution so far (not including his earlier one-liner). And it seems like it'll remain that way for the rest of D1. Not sure if such blatant lurking can even be called scummy, but it's at least definitely anti-town.. He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote: On June 22 2013 21:23 Acrofales wrote: In general, I am pretty suspicious of those who have come into the thread and lamented the pitiful state it is in (Kurumi), yet have shown absolutely NO inclination to improve it in any way, shape or form. Yadda yadda What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on. I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game. ##Vote BloodyC0bbler We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game. ##Vote BloodyC0bbler We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. Well his arguments about your mental inability from refraining of posting cat pictures with the overarching connection theory that scum players tend to be cat people have a lot of merit, and his points about your easy acceptance of the confirmed scum flip acro's excuses also resonate deeply with my soul. Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote: On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote: I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript. BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum? It's simple numbers. would lynch BC. Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote: On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote: I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript. BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Whoa, wow. This post is horrible and reeks of bias. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that? Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad? You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote: On June 22 2013 17:40 Xatalos wrote: On June 22 2013 14:56 Kurumi wrote: For a moment I thought I was still drunk after yesterday but this thread actually makes no sense. No trolling for me I guess. We're running the classic lynch, so the most votes person dies? LOL. This post *would* be scummy if it showed any actual effort to be safe from lynching. Now, it seems more like a clueless town post. On the other hand, might be 100% clueless Mafia... Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time. Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote: On June 22 2013 23:43 Xatalos wrote: On June 22 2013 11:54 Crossfire99 wrote: ##Pants: WaveofShadow I'm going to bed now. I'm gone all day tomorrow and doubt that I will be able to post. I should be around Sunday, though. Ugh. This is basically Crossfire99's whole contribution so far (not including his earlier one-liner). And it seems like it'll remain that way for the rest of D1. Not sure if such blatant lurking can even be called scummy, but it's at least definitely anti-town.. He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote: On June 22 2013 21:23 Acrofales wrote: In general, I am pretty suspicious of those who have come into the thread and lamented the pitiful state it is in (Kurumi), yet have shown absolutely NO inclination to improve it in any way, shape or form. Yadda yadda What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on. I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game. ##Vote BloodyC0bbler We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game. ##Vote BloodyC0bbler We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. Well his arguments about your mental inability from refraining of posting cat pictures with the overarching connection theory that scum players tend to be cat people have a lot of merit, and his points about your easy acceptance of the confirmed scum flip acro's excuses also resonate deeply with my soul. Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote: On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote: I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript. BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum? It's simple numbers. would lynch BC. On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote: On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote: I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript. BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Whoa, wow. This post is horrible and reeks of bias. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that? Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad? You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. eh? Why? depending on setup / roles you can have 3 or 5. or 2 with 3 sk's etc... I personally treat all games where the mafia team # isn't included as the game ends when one side wins. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote: On June 22 2013 17:40 Xatalos wrote: [quote] LOL. This post *would* be scummy if it showed any actual effort to be safe from lynching. Now, it seems more like a clueless town post. On the other hand, might be 100% clueless Mafia... Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time. Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote: On June 22 2013 23:43 Xatalos wrote: [quote] Ugh. This is basically Crossfire99's whole contribution so far (not including his earlier one-liner). And it seems like it'll remain that way for the rest of D1. Not sure if such blatant lurking can even be called scummy, but it's at least definitely anti-town.. He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote: On June 22 2013 21:23 Acrofales wrote: In general, I am pretty suspicious of those who have come into the thread and lamented the pitiful state it is in (Kurumi), yet have shown absolutely NO inclination to improve it in any way, shape or form. Yadda yadda What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on. I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: [quote] Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: [quote] Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: [quote] Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. [quote] I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum? It's simple numbers. would lynch BC. On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: [quote] Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. [quote] I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Whoa, wow. This post is horrible and reeks of bias. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that? Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad? You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math. RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:11 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. I didn't reveal I was a vigi on day one. I didn't get raged at trolls either. So? Who cares that I reveal that I am a vig. I used my shot on someone creating an anti town atmosphere thus making the game easier to solve once you are flipped. It also creates information about myself for the thread to read and determine my own alignment. Seems like I played intelligently. What did you do? Troll and act like a tard in hopes a vig would shoot you. Sad thing that you didnt think a day vig would get you. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote: [quote] How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! [quote] Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. [quote] Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? [quote] Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. [quote] Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum? It's simple numbers. would lynch BC. [quote] ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math. RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. "hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before" Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things. Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum. huhuhuhuhuhuhuh Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25 you quoted the numbers and said it was simple math. You then called me a troll for asking how you got said numbers as if I must be crazy to not have them. Given how sure of yourself you were its an absolute. If you didn't phrase it the way you did or respond to my question the way you did then I would say you are right it wasn't an absolute. However your behaviour indicates otherwise. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: [quote] go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. I don't see how it makes him scum. How does it make him scum BC? How does it make him town? Why do you want someone who is town playing like this? Please, enlighten me as to how what he did should be acceptable town play. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:23 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote: [quote] It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math. RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. "hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before" Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things. Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum. huhuhuhuhuhuhuh Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25 you quoted the numbers and said it was simple math. You then called me a troll for asking how you got said numbers as if I must be crazy to not have them. Given how sure of yourself you were its an absolute. If you didn't phrase it the way you did or respond to my question the way you did then I would say you are right it wasn't an absolute. However your behaviour indicates otherwise. If it was absolute I would have said it was absolute. You're the one blatantly putting words I never said in my mouth. (which is called lying btw.) Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote: [quote] its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. I don't see how it makes him scum. How does it make him scum BC? How does it make him town? Why do you want someone who is town playing like this? Please, enlighten me as to how what he did should be acceptable town play. See that's what I'm saying. You can't even explain why he would be scum. You're shooting him for being "anti-town" which like THE most easy and convenient excuse for scum because you don't need to explain a false scumread, which also means you won't be wrong, so you can pretend to be smart while blatantly shooting townies. as much as I hate using it as an example go look at LXI. I as town, actively pushed people who were actively anti town. Why? Because I thought they were scum for it. I recognize day 1 skater could easily be a douchebag trolly town. However I am sick of dealing with players like that in games and finally have a gun to at least remove one cancer from the game. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:25 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:21 s0Lstice wrote: On June 23 2013 05:15 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 05:15 s0Lstice wrote: WoS, you are suggesting that BC, aware of his meta, is impersonating his town meta (losing temper) for the purposes of manipulation? If so, how is this more likely than the simple explanation that 'BC is playing to his meta.' Remember Les Mafia? That's how. The reason meta works at all is because people play to it without realizing it. If meta was manipulable i.e. I know my meta and can therefore use it to confuse people...then meta would break down entirely. I think you believe what you are saying though, so I don't care so much about how correct I think your view on it is. You really think something this obvious that people recognize BC for is something he'd do without realizing it? This isn't a subtle tell we're talking about here like misspelling words or using certain phrases. Meta is completely manipulable on a grand scale; it's the subtle things that actually make meta reads useful. I found it particularly easy to play to my town meta on all the obvious points that people recognized me for, but I can think of a couple things I definitely did completely differently that game that nobody picked up on that would have gotten me nailed. Tell me this. If I am scum and you think I am faking my town meta just answer me this. Why would I bother shooting someone I think is actively fucking with the thread when its far easier to sit back and let him be a fucktard? Why would I not wait until someone appeared everyone wanted dead and shoot them, or just hold off and wait and strike at a more advantageous moment? I honestly don't care if you think I am scum or not, but arguing based on the fact I can change my own meta while not accounting for the rest of the things that should be accounted for is odd. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:35 WaveofShadow wrote: BC prove how LXI is an example? I don't remember you pushing Kush until he was one of the very few in the game left. I am well aware you rail against shitposting but as I've already said I don't personally take your meta as good evidence here because you are obviously aware of it. Maybe you will be able to convince me if there's something I'm missing. Yamato, Palmar, Kush. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:25 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 05:21 s0Lstice wrote: On June 23 2013 05:15 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 05:15 s0Lstice wrote: WoS, you are suggesting that BC, aware of his meta, is impersonating his town meta (losing temper) for the purposes of manipulation? If so, how is this more likely than the simple explanation that 'BC is playing to his meta.' Remember Les Mafia? That's how. The reason meta works at all is because people play to it without realizing it. If meta was manipulable i.e. I know my meta and can therefore use it to confuse people...then meta would break down entirely. I think you believe what you are saying though, so I don't care so much about how correct I think your view on it is. You really think something this obvious that people recognize BC for is something he'd do without realizing it? This isn't a subtle tell we're talking about here like misspelling words or using certain phrases. Meta is completely manipulable on a grand scale; it's the subtle things that actually make meta reads useful. I found it particularly easy to play to my town meta on all the obvious points that people recognized me for, but I can think of a couple things I definitely did completely differently that game that nobody picked up on that would have gotten me nailed. Tell me this. If I am scum and you think I am faking my town meta just answer me this. Why would I bother shooting someone I think is actively fucking with the thread when its far easier to sit back and let him be a fucktard? Why would I not wait until someone appeared everyone wanted dead and shoot them, or just hold off and wait and strike at a more advantageous moment? I honestly don't care if you think I am scum or not, but arguing based on the fact I can change my own meta while not accounting for the rest of the things that should be accounted for is odd. If you are scum you can get away with a free kill on someone and just say it was because he was trolling. If I flipped town, you claim I was trolling anti-town and have helped the town. Also you can go ahead and stop pushing that you have day vig abilities. It's been over an hour. so? Hosts have lives too. Ive as a host shown up 12 hours after someone used their ability due to my schedule. Decon could be working, sleeping, etc.. as could sentinel. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:41 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:30 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:23 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote: [quote] Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. "hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before" Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things. Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum. huhuhuhuhuhuhuh Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25 you quoted the numbers and said it was simple math. You then called me a troll for asking how you got said numbers as if I must be crazy to not have them. Given how sure of yourself you were its an absolute. If you didn't phrase it the way you did or respond to my question the way you did then I would say you are right it wasn't an absolute. However your behaviour indicates otherwise. If it was absolute I would have said it was absolute. You're the one blatantly putting words I never said in my mouth. (which is called lying btw.) On June 23 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote: [quote] What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. I don't see how it makes him scum. How does it make him scum BC? How does it make him town? Why do you want someone who is town playing like this? Please, enlighten me as to how what he did should be acceptable town play. See that's what I'm saying. You can't even explain why he would be scum. You're shooting him for being "anti-town" which like THE most easy and convenient excuse for scum because you don't need to explain a false scumread, which also means you won't be wrong, so you can pretend to be smart while blatantly shooting townies. as much as I hate using it as an example go look at LXI. I as town, actively pushed people who were actively anti town. Why? Because I thought they were scum for it. I recognize day 1 skater could easily be a douchebag trolly town. However I am sick of dealing with players like that in games and finally have a gun to at least remove one cancer from the game. why are you trying to play like in LXI? (need i remind you of the outcome?) You could be trying to improve instead of repeating the same old mistakes, and you not doing so has a clear motivation as mafia since it's ez town meta to mold yourself into As town, the explanation is basically that you are unwilling to learn from your mistakes. Do you want me to think that of you? Cuz it seems like you do. unwilling to learn? I am actively fixing the solution before it can cause serious problems for the town. That shows learning to me. I am not saying LXI is my best game ever as its obviously not. I fucked up there. However I have currently done something I view will stop that potential situation from happening again. It was also a rash decision out of insane annoyance but one I would do with a clear head as well. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:39 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:35 WaveofShadow wrote: BC prove how LXI is an example? I don't remember you pushing Kush until he was one of the very few in the game left. I am well aware you rail against shitposting but as I've already said I don't personally take your meta as good evidence here because you are obviously aware of it. Maybe you will be able to convince me if there's something I'm missing. Yamato, Palmar, Kush. Yamato shitposting I can see someone making an argument for, but Palmar? Yeah he played like ass that game and we lost 'cause we got fucked at LYLO but is he KNOWN for that kind of play? Isn't Palmar widely regarded as a good player? You're right in that we should have offed Palmar way earlier in the game just to remove all reasonable doubt, and if this is your thought process rather than the fact that he was shitposting I might be able to see your POV, but this doesn't seem to be your train of thought towards Skater. Like...it's so fucking EARLY in the game. I have killed palmar for that behaviour before and pushed for his death for that behaviour before. Palmar and I butt heads often based on our respective play styles. Also people can widely regard many people as good players. I know I am regarded as one to some and not as one to others. When analyzing a player don't take reputation into the equation, just how they are performing that game. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:47 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 05:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:41 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:30 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:23 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote: [quote] Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. "hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before" Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things. Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum. huhuhuhuhuhuhuh Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25 you quoted the numbers and said it was simple math. You then called me a troll for asking how you got said numbers as if I must be crazy to not have them. Given how sure of yourself you were its an absolute. If you didn't phrase it the way you did or respond to my question the way you did then I would say you are right it wasn't an absolute. However your behaviour indicates otherwise. If it was absolute I would have said it was absolute. You're the one blatantly putting words I never said in my mouth. (which is called lying btw.) On June 23 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote: [quote] I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. I don't see how it makes him scum. How does it make him scum BC? How does it make him town? Why do you want someone who is town playing like this? Please, enlighten me as to how what he did should be acceptable town play. See that's what I'm saying. You can't even explain why he would be scum. You're shooting him for being "anti-town" which like THE most easy and convenient excuse for scum because you don't need to explain a false scumread, which also means you won't be wrong, so you can pretend to be smart while blatantly shooting townies. as much as I hate using it as an example go look at LXI. I as town, actively pushed people who were actively anti town. Why? Because I thought they were scum for it. I recognize day 1 skater could easily be a douchebag trolly town. However I am sick of dealing with players like that in games and finally have a gun to at least remove one cancer from the game. why are you trying to play like in LXI? (need i remind you of the outcome?) You could be trying to improve instead of repeating the same old mistakes, and you not doing so has a clear motivation as mafia since it's ez town meta to mold yourself into As town, the explanation is basically that you are unwilling to learn from your mistakes. Do you want me to think that of you? Cuz it seems like you do. unwilling to learn? I am actively fixing the solution before it can cause serious problems for the town. That shows learning to me. I am not saying LXI is my best game ever as its obviously not. I fucked up there. However I have currently done something I view will stop that potential situation from happening again. It was also a rash decision out of insane annoyance but one I would do with a clear head as well. Yes, you are still trying to kill town over mafia. To win as town, you should kill mafia. not town. Y'know. Cuz, cuz, if you kill all mafia right away, you never get anywhere near lylo. y'know. So that's actually how you would win games. Instead you're getting us closer to lylo. To win as town you Should kill mafia you are right. However if a town member is playing so atrociously they appear mafia or are actively pushing mafia goals you off them too. Otherwise you know, Mafia could just troll every game and because they might be town and would be virtually impossible to determine they were scum you would leave them alive. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On June 23 2013 09:16 geript wrote: @Sk8ter. You missed my key question. How is it that pre-shot you have BC as 100% scum (of 130%) but aren't trying to use the shot to help divine BC's alignment? Your post shot conclusion is not a bigger better push on BC but that Dandel is town. Explain. I have been gone for a bit partially to cool off, but also because i was asked to be a buddies groomsmen for his wedding and we were out for dinner, but this is kinda in the forethought of my mind. I am not intending on harping on this a terrible amount but suffice to say this. My shot was roleblocked / blocked in a manner that refunded my bullet. Given that veteran roles / bulletproofs don't refund shots just take lives off, the only solution is a roleblock of some sort. I find it odd that skater was claiming I faked a shot and calling me a liar based on the fact he didnt flip / he got no mod feedback about my shot not going through (he would not if i was blocked). I can also confirm that I was targeted by at least 2 roles of the batch that sentinel was working through although I think It was actually 3. I will be going through the thread briefly again with a clear head to see if anything stands out now. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Meapak has done dick all which not uncharacteristic of him is something that has him on a radar. If he doesn't appear for anything aside from being modkilled/warned for inactivity I will have him down as scum until otherwise proven. Sk8 is firmly a red read. You all can call me insane or crazy or bad, etc.. as much as you want. He has actively said "The second part - Killing anti town is not the same as killing scum. I will disagree with you there. Even if he believed I was anti town, acting on it day one is a poor move. I did post the new reads on BC after I believed it was fake, you are quoting only my most recent post." A town only knows for sure someone is mafia given a flip, or red check with no dt fucking roles in the game with sane dt only mechanics. So me wanting to off an anti town is me aiming for scum and if it flips town it sucks but ends up not fucking town horribly. By actively saying "if he believed I was anti town acting on it day 1 is a poor move" that is saying trying to get scum killed day 1 is bad. He is also admitting to be anti town, ie NOT TOWN. Dandel is really fucking weird after this events. I fully understand why he went ape shit on me. I do and find that perfectly normal. However On June 23 2013 09:19 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 09:16 geript wrote: @Sk8ter. You missed my key question. How is it that pre-shot you have BC as 100% scum (of 130%) but aren't trying to use the shot to help divine BC's alignment? Your post shot conclusion is not a bigger better push on BC but that Dandel is town. Explain. Look at this guy It's like he really wants people to read BC as scum (without calling him so himself) and like he really doesn't want people to see how supertown I am (without calling me scum himself) It's like he's scum. This is wtf. Geript asked a question that actually makes a ton of sense. Rather than try and label me as scum, or scumhunt, sk8 comes out with dandel is town. Not only that, Dandel takes massive offense to this. The seeming need to be viewed as "super town" is weird. Day 1 no one should be viewed as super town nor be pissed if someone doesn't see them that way. For the good. Currently Gonza, and geript look really good. May have differing opinions but both seem to be performing as a town player should. Kita should be heavily watched carefully until he starts to perform. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
He was surprised by the fact I tried to shoot him during the day and not night. This leads me to believe he was attempting to draw (based on his play purely) vig shots for whatever reason. He admitted to playing like a troll and anti town. Given Acros analysis as well and sk8 being my strongest read I am voting there. I will be back later tonight to talk more but I must run off to see the venue for my buddies wedding. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 05:32 GMT
#1114
Also, why did sk8 not get lynched? Guy actively was saying shit about how I must have faked a shot when HE ACTIVATED A POWER to save his ass. The guy has lied enough times now that he should be dead. Anyone saying "well xfire confirmed his role can do that shit" doesn't make sk8 town. Roles do not equal fucking alignment. I do not know how many times I have to say this in every bloody ptp / pyp games. I will be continuing to catch up on the thread now. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 05:36 GMT
#1115
On June 24 2013 10:18 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 10:15 austinmcc wrote: On June 24 2013 10:13 gonzaw wrote: First you let your buddies shoot me in the game.If I was scum I'd like to know who got my role to NOT shoot him at night and let him live until end-game or something (unless there's a party-pooper marv in my scumteam >_> ), so if a scum made your role...congrats you are going to live for a long time Now you try to lynch me in THIS game, where I get my own friggin' role. Marv isn't here this time either. So...it's you or kita. You guys are the PTP fun police. Really. Are we going to believe him now too? Remember people, 6% chance. So we're talking MASSIVE chances that BC is lying about him having gotten his own role, and now austin too. I guess I shoud actually start reading austin. Why? Likely decon had us make roles then random # generates roles to people. Sures theres a shitty chance of getting it, it also means that the game is balanced to prevent a mass claim strat. How about instead of FoS someone because they got a role they made, you FoS for behaviour. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 05:45 GMT
#1116
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 17:13 GMT
#1150
On June 24 2013 19:54 Xatalos wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 19:20 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 24 2013 14:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Why are people suspicious of Austin? He is actively saying who he is targetting with his role in thread. Mafia has no reason to do this whatsoever. -_- On June 24 2013 14:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Roles do not equal fucking alignment. I do not know how many times I have to say this in every bloody ptp / pyp games. LOL hahahaha... Good point.. Maybe I should reconsider my townread on BC after all. This heavy bias and inconsistent attitudes towards players sadly doesn't radiate townishness Being AFK for the pre-lynch hour(s) doesn't make me feel any better either. BC town -> null. Different line of thinking completely. -_- what role someone has does not equal alignment. It is also not in a scums best interests to publically claim they are performing a role on a player. Why? Because it opens them up to watchers, trackers, etc.... Being insanely free with information and publically announcing you are doing something is a good alignment indicator. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 17:22 GMT
#1152
On June 25 2013 02:18 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 02:13 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 24 2013 19:54 Xatalos wrote: On June 24 2013 19:20 Dandel Ion wrote: On June 24 2013 14:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Why are people suspicious of Austin? He is actively saying who he is targetting with his role in thread. Mafia has no reason to do this whatsoever. -_- On June 24 2013 14:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Roles do not equal fucking alignment. I do not know how many times I have to say this in every bloody ptp / pyp games. LOL hahahaha... Good point.. Maybe I should reconsider my townread on BC after all. This heavy bias and inconsistent attitudes towards players sadly doesn't radiate townishness Being AFK for the pre-lynch hour(s) doesn't make me feel any better either. BC town -> null. Different line of thinking completely. -_- what role someone has does not equal alignment. It is also not in a scums best interests to publically claim they are performing a role on a player. Why? Because it opens them up to watchers, trackers, etc.... Being insanely free with information and publically announcing you are doing something is a good alignment indicator. if they actually use those actions, they don't give a shit about watchers etc. Soooo... Eh? Why? He publically claimed an action. IF dt roles check him they can quickly figure out if hes bullshitting. Rolecops would find out if he can do even what hes suggesting, trackers would know if he wandered around to the right spot, watchers would know if he even left, etc... It also actively puts peoples eyes on him. Why? Because if I end up dead he will be one of the first people everyone goes after for my dead because he openly stated he was using a role on me. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 17:25 GMT
#1154
The reason i view sk8s ability use as not townlike is this. He has actively had posts that are heavily heavily anti town. He actively admitted to trolling, and lying about reads. Denying to give his reads when he could have died as it "was people fishing" He then near instantly starts claiming my shot was fake and proceeds to toss suspicion on me for it when he would know his power was responsible for him not dying. Given the fact he openly admitted to wanting to get shot, and has been behaving overall as someone attempting to take a vig bullet, I would put him down as a scum read. Just because he has a self defense power and that he came out and admitted it WELL AFTER a situation while using the role as a reason to call bullshit and clutter the thread even more. Kita and Meapak both need to post more. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 17:49 GMT
#1160
On June 25 2013 02:29 Dandel Ion wrote: So do you have opinions on people not-sk8er yet or do we have to wait a couple more days for those? I have to filter the entire list that voted for austin last minute. Why? Because the entire wagon is scummy as hell in its conception. You are high on my list of potential scum for being disruptive and trolly. You do have some moments of "im glad he said that" sort of bit but you have a ton of stuff I don't like. However nothing really has changed with any of these reads http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=415738¤tpage=29#571 I also need to re-read carefully all the stuff surrounding s0lstice. As that entire situation was clearly what the fuck as well. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 17:52 GMT
#1162
On June 25 2013 02:49 Xatalos wrote: Okay, I don't see any reason for scum Dandel Ion to post his latest posts. Maybe this is his master plan to gain towncred but I'm willing to believe in Occam's razor and assume he's town for now. his he can be very persuasive post? How is that a "i am town" post? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:15 GMT
#1169
On June 25 2013 02:54 Dandel Ion wrote: So explain your townread on geript. Because he has not done anything I see as anything other than town? The worst bit he has done is his vote while he said he was "gone" However who cares? He voted for someone who was virtually more likely to flip mafia (in my eyes) than a last minute rushed wagon. hes pressured people for reasons that I would, etc.. In short he has done nothing major to make me see him in any light other than town. Could I be wrong? yes, however unless someone knows geripts playstyle 100% they will have to explain how hes magically scum when hes done far more this game to help than he has whenever ive seen him as scum. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:19 GMT
#1172
On June 25 2013 02:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also, xat. The reason i view sk8s ability use as not townlike is this. He has actively had posts that are heavily heavily anti town. He actively admitted to trolling, and lying about reads. Denying to give his reads when he could have died as it "was people fishing" He then near instantly starts claiming my shot was fake and proceeds to toss suspicion on me for it when he would know his power was responsible for him not dying. Given the fact he openly admitted to wanting to get shot, and has been behaving overall as someone attempting to take a vig bullet, I would put him down as a scum read. Just because he has a self defense power and that he came out and admitted it WELL AFTER a situation while using the role as a reason to call bullshit and clutter the thread even more. Kita and Meapak both need to post more. Still pressuring me. Did someone write an Executioner role that can also day vig? My self defense power does not roleblock you or return your bullet which is why I think you are lying or someone else saved me. Just so everyone knows, I am Sally Sparrow, town aligned, and used my ability during the day. I will be using my ability AGAIN tonight. Dovie'andi se tovya sagain So let me get this straight? You are a town aligned role that can make shots not work on you (refunded to holder) and can use this role, every half cycle? You can call me a liar, I know what PM I got from the hosts. So far only you have claimed a power that could stop my shot (mafia could clearly be hiding behind this fact and not claiming a block). However, you role use to save yourself is an alignment null. Anyone in your position would try to avoid dying town or mafia. your behaviour is what I find horrifically scummy. The fact you knew you used a role to avoid death, immediately claimed bullshit on my shot well before hosts had even started trying to sort out roles, is baffling. You then after hosts has resolved and I stated what happened were still harping on fake shot and bullshit. You actively have lied, trolled and admitted to these things. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:21 GMT
#1173
On June 25 2013 03:17 Xatalos wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also, xat. The reason i view sk8s ability use as not townlike is this. He has actively had posts that are heavily heavily anti town. He actively admitted to trolling, and lying about reads. Denying to give his reads when he could have died as it "was people fishing" He then near instantly starts claiming my shot was fake and proceeds to toss suspicion on me for it when he would know his power was responsible for him not dying. Given the fact he openly admitted to wanting to get shot, and has been behaving overall as someone attempting to take a vig bullet, I would put him down as a scum read. Just because he has a self defense power and that he came out and admitted it WELL AFTER a situation while using the role as a reason to call bullshit and clutter the thread even more. Kita and Meapak both need to post more. Hmm. I hope this doesn't turn into the same page-burying quarrel as yesterday, but I'm still a bit confused about the whole thing. So... You shoot sk8r, he uses some kind of power to defend, you get the bullet back. Sk8r claims it was a fake shot (wth?), but soon admits he nullified it. It really is a confusing situation, but I don't see why would sk8r lie(?) about that as either alignment. It just doesn't make sense. Even less so if he's scum, since it would come back to bite him sooner or later. And what would he even gain really. I don't get why sk8r would lie about something like that. Even less I understand why he would accuse you without basis..? Well, it's pretty clear now that he *has* that defensive role, but certainly, it doesn't mean he's town yet. On the other hand, Crossfire99 "putting his faith" on sk8r and generally sk8r being very vocal and open speak for him being town. How does xfire saying "i made the role and know why sk8r lived" make sk8r town? All it means is we know sk8r didn't lie about having a self defense role. Or xfire and him are mafia buddies. Xfire is someone who is lurking and actively doing nothing to help win this game. Vocal does not mean you are town. Mafia can fake being vocal just as easily as town does it. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:35 GMT
#1179
On June 25 2013 03:30 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 03:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 02:54 Dandel Ion wrote: So explain your townread on geript. Because he has not done anything I see as anything other than town? The worst bit he has done is his vote while he said he was "gone" However who cares? He voted for someone who was virtually more likely to flip mafia (in my eyes) than a last minute rushed wagon. hes pressured people for reasons that I would, etc.. In short he has done nothing major to make me see him in any light other than town. Could I be wrong? yes, however unless someone knows geripts playstyle 100% they will have to explain how hes magically scum when hes done far more this game to help than he has whenever ive seen him as scum. He essentially voted for the no-lynch. Don't sugarcoat that part. So? No lynches aren't bad if the person you try to lynch is town. To be honest based purely on flips, gonza and xat look the single worst in the thread (more or less) for being the ones to push a lynch on someone who has flipped town. or how about kita whos entire list of suspects in this game has followed thread sentiment? as well as attempting to draw at least 2 role uses towards himself. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:39 GMT
#1182
On June 25 2013 03:31 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 03:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 02:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 25 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also, xat. The reason i view sk8s ability use as not townlike is this. He has actively had posts that are heavily heavily anti town. He actively admitted to trolling, and lying about reads. Denying to give his reads when he could have died as it "was people fishing" He then near instantly starts claiming my shot was fake and proceeds to toss suspicion on me for it when he would know his power was responsible for him not dying. Given the fact he openly admitted to wanting to get shot, and has been behaving overall as someone attempting to take a vig bullet, I would put him down as a scum read. Just because he has a self defense power and that he came out and admitted it WELL AFTER a situation while using the role as a reason to call bullshit and clutter the thread even more. Kita and Meapak both need to post more. Still pressuring me. Did someone write an Executioner role that can also day vig? My self defense power does not roleblock you or return your bullet which is why I think you are lying or someone else saved me. Just so everyone knows, I am Sally Sparrow, town aligned, and used my ability during the day. I will be using my ability AGAIN tonight. Dovie'andi se tovya sagain So let me get this straight? You are a town aligned role that can make shots not work on you (refunded to holder) and can use this role, every half cycle? You can call me a liar, I know what PM I got from the hosts. So far only you have claimed a power that could stop my shot (mafia could clearly be hiding behind this fact and not claiming a block). However, you role use to save yourself is an alignment null. Anyone in your position would try to avoid dying town or mafia. your behaviour is what I find horrifically scummy. The fact you knew you used a role to avoid death, immediately claimed bullshit on my shot well before hosts had even started trying to sort out roles, is baffling. You then after hosts has resolved and I stated what happened were still harping on fake shot and bullshit. You actively have lied, trolled and admitted to these things. Again, my role does not return a bullet to you which is what confirmed to me that you lied OR that someone else targeted you. Your scum hunting skill is what I find to be horrifically bad. Basically you think because I'm trolling that I am scum. All your other arguments are poor and just based off your tunnelling. you lied you trolled you have said pushing anti town players day 1 is bad you have played in a way to draw town shots These are 4 of my main reasons for not liking you. This isn't me tunneling you anymore. This is me looking at a player who has done fucking nothing all game. You still don't scumhunt. You spend time defending yourself more than anything else. You know what? If you scumhunt or appear to be doing things that help the town, people wont look at you. You have not changed your behaviour in my eyes at all since all the shit went down between us. As such you are still firmly red. Difference is? i am also looking at other people. Also given that I think you are scum, I don't believe you on how you say your role works. Nothing xfire said clears you of suspicion. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:46 GMT
#1188
On June 25 2013 03:39 gonzaw wrote: Okay, FINALLY So BC; what about kita? You think he's scummy scummy scum? Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 03:31 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 25 2013 03:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 02:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 25 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also, xat. The reason i view sk8s ability use as not townlike is this. He has actively had posts that are heavily heavily anti town. He actively admitted to trolling, and lying about reads. Denying to give his reads when he could have died as it "was people fishing" He then near instantly starts claiming my shot was fake and proceeds to toss suspicion on me for it when he would know his power was responsible for him not dying. Given the fact he openly admitted to wanting to get shot, and has been behaving overall as someone attempting to take a vig bullet, I would put him down as a scum read. Just because he has a self defense power and that he came out and admitted it WELL AFTER a situation while using the role as a reason to call bullshit and clutter the thread even more. Kita and Meapak both need to post more. Still pressuring me. Did someone write an Executioner role that can also day vig? My self defense power does not roleblock you or return your bullet which is why I think you are lying or someone else saved me. Just so everyone knows, I am Sally Sparrow, town aligned, and used my ability during the day. I will be using my ability AGAIN tonight. Dovie'andi se tovya sagain So let me get this straight? You are a town aligned role that can make shots not work on you (refunded to holder) and can use this role, every half cycle? You can call me a liar, I know what PM I got from the hosts. So far only you have claimed a power that could stop my shot (mafia could clearly be hiding behind this fact and not claiming a block). However, you role use to save yourself is an alignment null. Anyone in your position would try to avoid dying town or mafia. your behaviour is what I find horrifically scummy. The fact you knew you used a role to avoid death, immediately claimed bullshit on my shot well before hosts had even started trying to sort out roles, is baffling. You then after hosts has resolved and I stated what happened were still harping on fake shot and bullshit. You actively have lied, trolled and admitted to these things. Again, my role does not return a bullet to you which is what confirmed to me that you lied OR that someone else targeted you. Your scum hunting skill is what I find to be horrifically bad. Basically you think because I'm trolling that I am scum. All your other arguments are poor and just based off your tunnelling. See? You just had to say that single line to make things clearer instead of making everybody confused as fuck about this whole shit. That does indeed make things interesting. Kurumi might have something to do with that, if not one of you is lying (although this kind of seems improbable, there's little reason for scum to lie with pointless shit like this) Also sk8 please thoughts on someone other than BC as well I think kita is fishy as fuck. Look at his filter? He voted austin and sol but never provided any reasoning on why he views either as scum. His only solid analysis post ever is on sk8r. Again when sk8r was peak of thread sentiment. Hes not trying to push lynches, hes sheeping them. Also this looks horrible. On June 24 2013 04:18 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 04:17 s0Lstice wrote: On June 24 2013 04:13 kitaman27 wrote: On June 24 2013 04:09 s0Lstice wrote: Why the hell would I try to explain what happened to the roleblocker? I can make up a bunch of scenarios where the two of them can be either alignment based on what happened with the roleblocker, and not have any idea which is more likely, because its flippin PTP. I'm reading them like I'm not in PTP...like I said before, the old fashioned way. I kinda think you didn't even read my filter dude, because I've been over this. So it is your opinion that a town roleblocker saved Sk8r, but will not claim because he wants to see Sk8r burn at the stake? Or that a mafia roleblocker saved Sk9r because he wanted to lynch him rather than vig him? oh this is fun ...or one of the million lurkers we have has an automatic dayvig shutdown and hasn't been around to say anything about it or isn't caring/is checked out to the point that they don't realize that information would be pertinant right now? Like Xfire? your focus on this is silly So you're saying that there was a town dayblocker that happened to be around in time to save Sk8r, but hasn't returned in the thread since? That's a silly explanation.[/QUOTE] On June 24 2013 04:44 Crossfire99 wrote: Sigh...I didn't want to have to do this, but looking at the voting thread and thread sentiment I have to speak up. I created sk8r's role and know how he survived his shot. That is all. Now lynch someone besides him because I don't think he is mafia. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:47 GMT
#1190
On June 25 2013 03:45 gonzaw wrote: ##Silence: BC ##Silence: sk8 STOP arguing with each other for a few moments, and interact with us. If you two could answer my questions then I'd be happy Know that I charge you 100$ each for the counseling sessions, so you better make the most of it! im capable of talking to multiple people at once while im around. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 18:48 GMT
#1191
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 19:17 GMT
#1200
On June 25 2013 03:50 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 03:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 03:31 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 25 2013 03:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 02:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: On June 25 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also, xat. The reason i view sk8s ability use as not townlike is this. He has actively had posts that are heavily heavily anti town. He actively admitted to trolling, and lying about reads. Denying to give his reads when he could have died as it "was people fishing" He then near instantly starts claiming my shot was fake and proceeds to toss suspicion on me for it when he would know his power was responsible for him not dying. Given the fact he openly admitted to wanting to get shot, and has been behaving overall as someone attempting to take a vig bullet, I would put him down as a scum read. Just because he has a self defense power and that he came out and admitted it WELL AFTER a situation while using the role as a reason to call bullshit and clutter the thread even more. Kita and Meapak both need to post more. Still pressuring me. Did someone write an Executioner role that can also day vig? My self defense power does not roleblock you or return your bullet which is why I think you are lying or someone else saved me. Just so everyone knows, I am Sally Sparrow, town aligned, and used my ability during the day. I will be using my ability AGAIN tonight. Dovie'andi se tovya sagain So let me get this straight? You are a town aligned role that can make shots not work on you (refunded to holder) and can use this role, every half cycle? You can call me a liar, I know what PM I got from the hosts. So far only you have claimed a power that could stop my shot (mafia could clearly be hiding behind this fact and not claiming a block). However, you role use to save yourself is an alignment null. Anyone in your position would try to avoid dying town or mafia. your behaviour is what I find horrifically scummy. The fact you knew you used a role to avoid death, immediately claimed bullshit on my shot well before hosts had even started trying to sort out roles, is baffling. You then after hosts has resolved and I stated what happened were still harping on fake shot and bullshit. You actively have lied, trolled and admitted to these things. Again, my role does not return a bullet to you which is what confirmed to me that you lied OR that someone else targeted you. Your scum hunting skill is what I find to be horrifically bad. Basically you think because I'm trolling that I am scum. All your other arguments are poor and just based off your tunnelling. you lied you trolled you have said pushing anti town players day 1 is bad you have played in a way to draw town shots These are 4 of my main reasons for not liking you. This isn't me tunneling you anymore. This is me looking at a player who has done fucking nothing all game. You still don't scumhunt. You spend time defending yourself more than anything else. You know what? If you scumhunt or appear to be doing things that help the town, people wont look at you. You have not changed your behaviour in my eyes at all since all the shit went down between us. As such you are still firmly red. Difference is? i am also looking at other people. Also given that I think you are scum, I don't believe you on how you say your role works. Nothing xfire said clears you of suspicion. Everything bolded is wrong. Where have I lied? I was mislead/confused about how the shot went down. There was no lie. Also their is a fundamental flaw in the way you guys are scum hunting. If you go and tunnel everything someones posting, tell them that's why you think they are being scummy. Then they will defend it and try to fix it. Which will just make it harder to pinpoint them as scum later. I get my reads, hold them until I am sure and then post it. That way there is no wiggling out for the scum. It also makes me more of a threat to Mafia since they do not know if my reads are going to condemn them or not. @Austin I can explain the cryptic posts to a degree if you would like. How is the bolded wrong? You have A) given scumreads then said you didnt actually have any and they werent your reads B) have actively said you were trolling (this is anti town) ie you are attempting to draw shots. You have done nothing to help town so only vigis would shoot you C) On June 23 2013 09:05 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2013 08:47 geript wrote: On June 23 2013 07:50 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: I am not seeing what makes you think he is asusming BC and myself are town. He was comparing BC to another game and saying if he is town, he is not playing well. Dandel would assume that BC would not continue to play poorly and instead concluded that he is scum. *My interpretation, Dandel may have been thinking something else. In LXI BC played terribly and gave the game to scum on a silver platter. The assumption is that he's playing badly again and therefor town. But if he's playing badly and shoots you, that impugns that you're town (shooting scum d1 is good play obviously). On June 23 2013 06:59 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Berating a vigi who will kill people that are anti town is in hopes that he will not continue day killing for no reason. A very pro town thing. However, since Dandel is in the same position as me i.e. Threatened by an over-emotional vigi. It makes sense that he is going to call him out on making a bad decision. The thing is as a vigi, you're supposed to kill anti town elements. How is it that you've come out of this whole D1 shot scenario with the fact that Dandel is town instead of trying to get a better read on BC or be able to build a good case on BC being scum? The first thing sounds good. The second part - Killing anti town is not the same as killing scum. I will disagree with you there. Even if he believed I was anti town, acting on it day one is a poor move. I did post the new reads on BC after I believed it was fake, you are quoting only my most recent post. While it's possible that someone created a role that can roleblock after something happened. I don't see any reason why someone wouldn't admit to at least making the role. I will say that I did not make that role. I initially thought perhaps there was a day healer, but I had no message about being attacked, and dismissed that. Until someone claims that they created a role that can either roleblock someone after they declared their action (which btw is a terrible role. Seeing as it only affects day abilities. Be ashamed of yourself for giving someone that) then I think it is fake. I know for sure I was not attacked and healed. What I conclude - BC attempted to confuse me into revealing information about my role before death by faking a vigi kill and that he picked the role for himself, which is notably convenient. His reasoning was because I'm a troll and anti-town and that killing me early would prevent me from hurting the game in the future, by comparing me to other players who have apparently done this. I would like to say again, trying to Meta an unknown player and comparing me to players you know is not going to give you a good idea of my playstyle. I am curious why other players are not seeing him as scummy after all this? Perhaps scum protecting. Killing someone you think is a town because they posted something anti-town is even more Anti town. @Solstice, what is your opinion on BC, and me while you are at it? See bolded. You also lie in this post about me trying to confuse you into revealing information. I was actively asking you to post your reads, and give justification for things. I still think you are more likely to be mafia than town, I do think there is a slight chance you flip town. Why? Because town play terribly like this a lot. Seriously dude. Start posting new information. I may be "tunnelling" you but at least I am also looking at other people. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 19:19 GMT
#1202
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 19:23 GMT
#1206
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 19:30 GMT
#1211
On June 25 2013 04:26 Xatalos wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Do I still want sk8r to eat a bullet/lynch? Yes. I know a few others deserving of the same treatment. Okay.. Great. Let's put it this way: is sk8r still your #1 priority right now? What if it was close between WOS/sk8r? And what if it was close between WOS and someone else than sk8r? atm, kita is pretty high on my list. I keep harping on sk8r because he keeps posting his bullshit. -_- Hes likely tied for my #1 read atm | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 19:36 GMT
#1215
On June 25 2013 04:32 Xatalos wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:30 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 04:26 Xatalos wrote: On June 25 2013 04:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Do I still want sk8r to eat a bullet/lynch? Yes. I know a few others deserving of the same treatment. Okay.. Great. Let's put it this way: is sk8r still your #1 priority right now? What if it was close between WOS/sk8r? And what if it was close between WOS and someone else than sk8r? atm, kita is pretty high on my list. I keep harping on sk8r because he keeps posting his bullshit. -_- Hes likely tied for my #1 read atm Hmm. Kitaman.. Didn't really look at him yet. Next on to-do. But what about WOS? Isn't he up there at all? Or even on the scummy category? I have him more or less null at the moment. He has done stuff that looks fucking bad, but hes also done stuff that looks good. If not for Meapaks analysis post right now how many people would put him as a #1 scum read? hes done very little since the lynch and thus you would think if he was this heavily suspected would have been pushed as an option over austin. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 20:04 GMT
#1231
On June 25 2013 05:02 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:59 kitaman27 wrote: On June 25 2013 04:49 Dandel Ion wrote: BC, since your shot has been refunded, why did you never try shooting anybody else? lol that's actually a really good question. Furthermore, why not shoot sk8r again? cant use til day 2. Which is why i thought roleblock not just refund | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:25 GMT
#1265
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:28 GMT
#1269
On June 25 2013 06:28 Xatalos wrote: Wait a minute. Are you Vig + Detective?? yes =) | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:35 GMT
#1278
On June 25 2013 06:30 Xatalos wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 06:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 06:28 Xatalos wrote: On June 25 2013 06:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Meapak is mafia Wait a minute. Are you Vig + Detective?? yes =) That sounds really overpowered. Hmm. Well, we have to lynch A) you or B) Meapak now. I liked Meapak's case on WOS but he's been lurking otherwise. Brb rereading filters. Its not as OP as you think | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:36 GMT
#1279
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:38 GMT
#1282
On June 25 2013 06:37 Xatalos wrote: I'm starting to think that my role is underpowered Damn it, Vig+DT.... That's so good. 1 shot vig, but meh. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:40 GMT
#1283
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:42 GMT
#1287
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:45 GMT
#1290
On June 25 2013 06:44 geript wrote: Are you subject to sanities? You know because the last game we played... I built the role to be absolute. So basically a miller or gf will dodge me if those were included in this game. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:48 GMT
#1294
On June 25 2013 06:46 Dandel Ion wrote: You wouldn't be told if it was nerfed though, as I understand it. Since sanities are not usually in the role PM. id be told if I had to rework it. I put my own "nerfs" into the role to avoid that situation. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 21:57 GMT
#1304
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:02 GMT
#1312
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:03 GMT
#1313
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:04 GMT
#1314
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:11 GMT
#1320
On June 25 2013 07:07 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 07:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also, sorry for the item Gonzaw. It is designed in a way that has a higher chance of killing mafia. I am well aware it can backfire and hurt town instead though =( You mean, it has a higher chance of killing a townie because EVERYBODY HAS NIGHT ACTIONS (except me obviously)? Yes, yes you are correct Eh you know the gimick built into it via reading the PM. It arguably has higher shots of hitting mafia. Yes it can still hit town tho =\ | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:18 GMT
#1327
On June 25 2013 07:15 gonzaw wrote: So do I shoot now or what? It will get shot no matter what anyways. Although if it kills a townie maybe lets just let that guy live a little while longer you have to shot it. But you control when. Longer you wait, more likely scum get caught in it. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:21 GMT
#1332
On June 25 2013 07:20 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 07:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 07:07 gonzaw wrote: On June 25 2013 07:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also, sorry for the item Gonzaw. It is designed in a way that has a higher chance of killing mafia. I am well aware it can backfire and hurt town instead though =( You mean, it has a higher chance of killing a townie because EVERYBODY HAS NIGHT ACTIONS (except me obviously)? Yes, yes you are correct Eh you know the gimick built into it via reading the PM. It arguably has higher shots of hitting mafia. Yes it can still hit town tho =\ so far we got 1) you investigating 2) zeph shooting 3) the guy that gave the gun in the first place and 4) mafia NK that's 2-3 town actions and 1-2 mafia actions already. Add a couple town actions that are gonna be there and I don't see how it's more likely to hit mafia. ? I was the inventor. I made the gun like 37 hours ago. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:22 GMT
#1333
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:23 GMT
#1334
Acrofales BloodyC0bbler Meapak_Ziphh kitaman27 Thank you for your participation! Was the other action I know i was selected for. I think it paired with the power someone else quoted earlier in thread. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:26 GMT
#1341
On June 25 2013 07:25 kitaman27 wrote: BC, how did you know Meapak was mafia if he had a godfather role? I made an alignment cop role, checked him, it flipped not town. I proceeded to shoot him? His role doesn't say his alignment doesn't get returned, he just hides his role. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:27 GMT
#1342
On June 25 2013 07:25 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 07:22 BloodyC0bbler wrote: and by I was the inventor, someone made me the inventor. It was one of the 2 actions I know I was targetted by after sentinel was figuring out all the actions he got at once. You were inventor... ...and you made that shitty gun. We should have lynched you on D1 then meapak wouldnt be dead -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:31 GMT
#1346
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:35 GMT
#1347
On June 25 2013 07:29 Dandel Ion wrote: dunno the way i read it, it sounded like he was disguised as blue (=green) too. But considering how colossally dumb it would be to bus your godfather with a fake redcheck, I don't really give much of a shit tbh. why? Two names were red, one was blue. Seems to me he only fooled rolechecks. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:37 GMT
#1349
On June 25 2013 07:36 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 07:27 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 07:25 gonzaw wrote: On June 25 2013 07:22 BloodyC0bbler wrote: and by I was the inventor, someone made me the inventor. It was one of the 2 actions I know I was targetted by after sentinel was figuring out all the actions he got at once. You were inventor... ...and you made that shitty gun. We should have lynched you on D1 then meapak wouldnt be dead -_- yes, your day-gun is awesome but the one I got is shitty. You have to be less selfish man! Don't create the best inventions to yourself and give others shit ;_; well. To be honest. It was a way for me to get a better read on you. Mafia would be jumping for joy at that shit right now | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:39 GMT
#1355
On June 25 2013 07:38 gonzaw wrote: So, let's talk about the elephant in the room: Does MZ being red heavily implicate austin as scum? You know, considering MZ DISAPPEARED when the austin wagon happened and came shortly after the lynch to complain about it As for my thoughts....yeah I haven't read the thread yet, but so far austin made some weird as shit posts that I couldn't understand at all, and is un-austin-like (at least his town self) He seems more like jester than scum at some points. But well whatdoiknow? Or SnB. He was against killing snb as well. He pushed suspicion onto myself, WoS, and solstice and zeph. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:40 GMT
#1356
On June 25 2013 07:39 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 07:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 07:36 gonzaw wrote: On June 25 2013 07:27 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 25 2013 07:25 gonzaw wrote: On June 25 2013 07:22 BloodyC0bbler wrote: and by I was the inventor, someone made me the inventor. It was one of the 2 actions I know I was targetted by after sentinel was figuring out all the actions he got at once. You were inventor... ...and you made that shitty gun. We should have lynched you on D1 then meapak wouldnt be dead -_- yes, your day-gun is awesome but the one I got is shitty. You have to be less selfish man! Don't create the best inventions to yourself and give others shit ;_; well. To be honest. It was a way for me to get a better read on you. Mafia would be jumping for joy at that shit right now *sigh* Did you make my role by any chance? You and my role creator may seem to have the same mindset for giving me shitty stuff No, I am quite serious in that I made my own role. I told decon when I got it that I wish I had made it OP as fuck had I realized I was going to get it. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 24 2013 22:41 GMT
#1358
On June 25 2013 07:39 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: That's some bullshit Rofl Sorry duder. you rolled red, had to die. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 25 2013 01:08 GMT
#1382
Why would mafia make a non mafia inventor | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 25 2013 15:33 GMT
#1466
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 25 2013 15:37 GMT
#1467
as such until he contributes or explains why hes being completely useless Kitaman | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 25 2013 15:42 GMT
#1469
On June 26 2013 00:39 austinmcc wrote: Show nested quote + Each applies only for that night, so it vanished at the end of N1.On June 26 2013 00:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Austin, did the power you gave to my choice vanish after the night? Or does it stay on until its used? regardless, he didn't claim it. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 25 2013 15:42 GMT
#1470
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 25 2013 15:47 GMT
#1472
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359357&user=kitaman27 or this http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=313426&user=kitaman27 Both of these are games he was town. His play currently is underwowing and downright terrible. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 25 2013 15:49 GMT
#1473
On June 26 2013 00:44 austinmcc wrote: Show nested quote + Right, I dunno if that's what you were angling for, but no. There shouldn't have been a downside to claiming it, because it should have faded.On June 26 2013 00:42 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 26 2013 00:39 austinmcc wrote: On June 26 2013 00:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Each applies only for that night, so it vanished at the end of N1.Austin, did the power you gave to my choice vanish after the night? Or does it stay on until its used? regardless, he didn't claim it. As I wrote and understood the role, he would have been messaged that he was being made a vet for N1 during the night. It also wouldn't make sense for the hosts NOT to message the guy, because if I give medic/vigi/rb, the guy has to use his power and so has to be notified. So he should have known, but didn't say anything. For anyone halfway following, BC voted for kitaman yesterday, and I made kitaman a vet last night. He didn't claim it last night, which is fine, because announcing you're a vet sort of negates it. But he didn't say today "Hey guys, someone made me a vet last night," which is NOT cool because he's hiding information that doesn't really affect the game going forward. Whats more interesting is how interested he is in everyones roles and how they work but is not sharing the same level of information. Compare his play currently to the few links from the last ptp and storm mafia. I chose both of them because I knew he played in both (died early in ptp3 and lived for ages in storm) I see no similarities between his posting this game and the two I posted. I also chose games that had a fairly large gap of time between them to account for how drastic his "meta" could have changed over time. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 04:40 GMT
#1629
On June 26 2013 12:21 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 12:16 gonzaw wrote: On June 26 2013 12:09 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: The Tardis has a limitation against Mafia using it twice to prevent them from just constantly passing it to eachother, If Mafia attempt this it sends it to a randomized player. Thus if I use it, pass it to Kita, and Kita uses it and passes it back to me and I receive it. Then you knokw that - 1. Either Kita or I am not Mafia 2. If this is continued with another player i.e. I pass it to you since you can't do shit anyways. You pass it back. Then we know that between me and you one of us is not Mafia. Lynch me if you want. If it can confirm Austin as scum then I'm all for it. 1)Is the limitation about any SINGLE mafia using it twice, or about the Tardis passing hands between 2 mafia members? So if there is 1 Mafia and 1 Townie, they can't pass the Tardis to each other? 2)How do you know this? Because you got the Tardis at the beginning of the game? Who can confirm this other than kita? I assume you got 100% confirmation from the hosts right? And there is no thread of doubt in your head that can work? 3)Okay, imagine (1) is true, how does that prove you are not 3P? Or another anti-town faction (maybe a hidden scum like Sleeper Cell whatever) 4)I was going to ask a question about why you are still not scumhunting yet, but I know better now 1. No the Tardis has to be passed after use. The limitation is to prevent mafia from passing it back and forth to eachother. 1 mafia and 1 townie can pass to eachother. 2. 100% confirmation on what? Me having the Tardis. yeah. I passed it to solstice. Solstice died, it came back to me. I passed it to Kita. 3. I can't prove im not 3p. Sry 4. good So let me get this straight. You managed to give the tardis away not once, but twice in a single day? You said you had to use it to pass it on which means day 1 you used your own role, the tardis, then the tardis again at night? I call fucking bullshit. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 05:04 GMT
#1630
On June 26 2013 02:48 Crossfire99 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 02:40 kitaman27 wrote: It has a night action associated with it's passing. Sk8r can confirm. So you can't pass it until night? I'm confused what you're trying to say here. If this is true, Sk8 just lied again. Dropping a vote on him until he explains this suitably. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 12:55 GMT
#1641
On June 26 2013 17:00 Xatalos wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 14:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 26 2013 02:48 Crossfire99 wrote: On June 26 2013 02:40 kitaman27 wrote: It has a night action associated with it's passing. Sk8r can confirm. So you can't pass it until night? I'm confused what you're trying to say here. If this is true, Sk8 just lied again. Dropping a vote on him until he explains this suitably. Isn't it allowed to use day ability + TARDIS at night after that...? That would make sense. He said Tardis had to be used before it could be passed. Sk8 said he passed it to solstice, and Kita. Kita said it has a night action associated with the passing. If it can only be passed at night then how the fuck did sk8 pass it twice? -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 13:31 GMT
#1643
On June 26 2013 22:12 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 21:55 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 26 2013 17:00 Xatalos wrote: On June 26 2013 14:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 26 2013 02:48 Crossfire99 wrote: On June 26 2013 02:40 kitaman27 wrote: It has a night action associated with it's passing. Sk8r can confirm. So you can't pass it until night? I'm confused what you're trying to say here. If this is true, Sk8 just lied again. Dropping a vote on him until he explains this suitably. Isn't it allowed to use day ability + TARDIS at night after that...? That would make sense. He said Tardis had to be used before it could be passed. Sk8 said he passed it to solstice, and Kita. Kita said it has a night action associated with the passing. If it can only be passed at night then how the fuck did sk8 pass it twice? -_- Why are you mad over this. Check your blood pressure BC i worry about you. ##Lovetap BC Use Tardis @ day -> Pass Tardis to Sol Sol die -> Tardis randomly distributed to player Get Tardis back -> OMG WUT LUCK, Use Tardis at night -> Pass to Kita I never said it can only be passed at night. Stop manipulating my words. Kita said it did. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 19:30 GMT
#1725
If he is mafia he is actively giving powers to people in the fucking town. Let him continue doing so. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 19:31 GMT
#1726
What does the tardis do. Either sk8 or Kita. Sk8 this is really the only chance you have at saving your ass currently. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 19:33 GMT
#1730
On June 27 2013 04:32 geript wrote: U ded bc what? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 19:37 GMT
#1736
On June 27 2013 04:36 Crossfire99 wrote: Sorry for disappearing, I've been really busy. I'm here now until lynch. Gonzaw you're right that I have your role, but I didn't use any abilities last night because I didn't want to waste anything when I wasn't sure about people. I didn't get any new abilities, maybe because I didn't use anything last night T_T. I'm not liking sk8r too much anymore. He already answered what questions I wanted to ask, but didn't get a chance to. Basically, I still don't understand why he gave the TARDIS to the people he supposedly gave it to. Why solstice and why kita? Did you create the Tardis? Or did you create Sk8s role? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 19:37 GMT
#1737
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 19:44 GMT
#1742
On June 27 2013 04:43 Crossfire99 wrote: Might as well not hide it anymore, but the TARDIS is basically sk8r's role. There was a small change to his role which makes things a lot clearer now, which I didn't learn about until today because stuff wasn't making sense. Why did you learn it today and not before? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 19:48 GMT
#1750
On June 27 2013 04:47 Crossfire99 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 27 2013 04:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 27 2013 04:43 Crossfire99 wrote: On June 27 2013 04:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Or is it part of the role? Might as well not hide it anymore, but the TARDIS is basically sk8r's role. There was a small change to his role which makes things a lot clearer now, which I didn't learn about until today because stuff wasn't making sense. Why did you learn it today and not before? Because I didn't ask about it until today. When kita said he received the TARDIS today, things weren't adding up with the way I designed the role, so I asked. Dec then answered. Then how specifically is the Tardis passed. IE what is required to pass it, and how frequently can you do this? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 20:09 GMT
#1774
On June 27 2013 05:07 austinmcc wrote: HEY HEY HEY. If you haven't yet sent in answers (or can change): Kurumi please choose MEDIC. WoS or Xatalos please choose VIGILANTE. BC please choose BC Gonzaw please choose GONZAW. That way, I can assign either medic or vigilante to one of you two tonight. No overlap, maximum options. Depending on what comes out of all this, having both a defensive and offensive role seems best. im also fine with being a vet for a night | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 20:09 GMT
#1775
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 20:45 GMT
#1795
On June 27 2013 05:42 Xatalos wrote: There's only 20min left?? I thought it was 1h 20min. It's a good thing I could make it before deadline then. I voted for sk8r also since it seems like the only option atm and he's not that bad of a lynch either (although austin/kita would have been better IMO). No one but me would want to kill kita at this point I think | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 21:05 GMT
#1817
On June 27 2013 05:59 kitaman27 wrote: Been busy at work and won't get out for another hour to catch up, but I just wanted everyone to know that I've passed the TARDIS to kurumi. Hopefully if Sk8r flips mafia, Kurumi can verify the anti-mafia clause that should confirm me as not being Sk8r's scum buddy. why not me? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 26 2013 21:10 GMT
#1827
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 00:10 GMT
#1885
On June 27 2013 09:08 gonzaw wrote: Unless I or BC get a vig gun and we shoot kita I guess if you get the med powers tonight, prot me so I can use my dt check please. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 19:57 GMT
#1976
Kitaman Scum/thirdparty gonzaw Town? geript Likely Mafia kurumi Town? austin Town? scum if he didnt give item to gonza or bc xatalos 50/50 town scum crossfire Likely Mafia dandel ion 99% town Here is basically how this game plays out. Each of these conclusions I came to based off how people are playing in thread. My check is currently on xat because I want to clear his 50/50 mark. To anyone saying kurumi or austin is scum. We will know instantly this cycle based on where their powers are used. Until said role uses (and viewing the last few days as what to go on) They are both likely town. Of the two Austin is more likely to be scum however he is more or less forced to give items to the confirmed town now which means hes more or less controlled via his power. Geript and Xfire are both likely scum. Geript is a higher priority to remove than xfire. If we have enough guns / kp tonight, we have to off kita. Lynch geript tommorrow/dayshot | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 20:24 GMT
#1984
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 20:32 GMT
#1989
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 20:51 GMT
#1995
On June 28 2013 05:49 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 28 2013 05:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Tomorrows lynch now that I think of it barring extreme shenanigans should be on crossfire. Geript if he is town should use his power to kill xat. i thought you were checking xat tnight This is basing my shit before check tho | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 21:22 GMT
#2005
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 21:23 GMT
#2006
Guess what? Returned not town. Lynch him ? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 21:26 GMT
#2011
Not sure which to use argg | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 22:02 GMT
#2038
IE it likely can't do fucking shit right now. Does anyone other than me have access to a gun currently? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 22:03 GMT
#2039
Then we shoot Kita. I can instantly fire at any point at someone. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 22:06 GMT
#2046
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 22:07 GMT
#2048
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 22:09 GMT
#2052
On June 28 2013 07:08 gonzaw wrote: Kay this is complicated bc i think its possible for you t stop geripts mortal kombat, but ask host im not sure itll work xfir...last day you KNEW kita could have bussed himself to kill a towni....yet you VOTED HIM IN THE MORTAL KOMBAT fuck we are surrounded by scum damn you sk8 should I stop the action tho? or save the gun for later --- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 22:59 GMT
#2078
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 23:45 GMT
#2096
On June 28 2013 08:44 WaveofShadow wrote: Don't use shit on me, it won't work. I think YOLOing is best right now since I feel like the only reason scum outed themselves is because they think (or know) they've already won. I did dt check one -_- and the other was trying to live via fake claim. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 23:55 GMT
#2100
On June 28 2013 08:53 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 28 2013 08:46 austinmcc wrote: Gonzaw, I don't think there IS any geript shit. The PMs rescinded, no voting. Unless he can kill without the voting, he's just shitting up thread. If we got the right answers I would have wanted his shit to work :/ If there is no mortal kombat right now then, I dunno what to do really. Shooting for the 4th scum might be the best choice, but scum know that so they may actually bus drive him with one of us, so if we miss, we kill a townie, if we hit right, we kill a townie. If we shoot we have to gamble on where the TARDIS will be on, kita/geript or the 4th scum. Well....that's up to BC I guess. Surely 100% one of kita/geript is unprotected (...ehm....they should.....right?), so at worst it's a 50/50 to shoot one and lynch the other. BC can try to find out the remaining scum (if he has any luck); but if we can just kill 1 scum today, will it be enough? Knowing scum doesn't do shit if they are still alive and can fuck us up. Anyways whatever. I at least want this game to go over to N3/D4 so Xfire can see the ending of my role (please tell me if you get the PM instantly or not so I can worry if the game should be prolonged to D4 or not) How insanely balls to the wall do you want me to go? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 27 2013 23:59 GMT
#2103
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 00:06 GMT
#2106
On June 28 2013 08:59 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 28 2013 08:55 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 28 2013 08:53 gonzaw wrote: On June 28 2013 08:46 austinmcc wrote: Gonzaw, I don't think there IS any geript shit. The PMs rescinded, no voting. Unless he can kill without the voting, he's just shitting up thread. If we got the right answers I would have wanted his shit to work :/ If there is no mortal kombat right now then, I dunno what to do really. Shooting for the 4th scum might be the best choice, but scum know that so they may actually bus drive him with one of us, so if we miss, we kill a townie, if we hit right, we kill a townie. If we shoot we have to gamble on where the TARDIS will be on, kita/geript or the 4th scum. Well....that's up to BC I guess. Surely 100% one of kita/geript is unprotected (...ehm....they should.....right?), so at worst it's a 50/50 to shoot one and lynch the other. BC can try to find out the remaining scum (if he has any luck); but if we can just kill 1 scum today, will it be enough? Knowing scum doesn't do shit if they are still alive and can fuck us up. Anyways whatever. I at least want this game to go over to N3/D4 so Xfire can see the ending of my role (please tell me if you get the PM instantly or not so I can worry if the game should be prolonged to D4 or not) How insanely balls to the wall do you want me to go? Don't do anything yet, and we lynch geript. With luck, we might get the TARDIS back. After that you shoot kita at night (has no TARDIS, no geript, no defense), he flips by D4 and with your DT check we lynch the remaining scum. You'll get DT check because I'll medic you when austin does the same shit he did last night Surely we could find something for Xfire to do with the shit he has now so maybe he can help (if he's town). Read the EWW PM carefully, you know what I want you to do. I do know yes | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 00:07 GMT
#2107
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 00:18 GMT
#2111
On June 28 2013 09:16 gonzaw wrote: It should be obvious that the townie that gets the TARDIS uses it to protect himself. Well, at least if I don't get the Tardis and BC doesn't get the Tardis. Alternatively, the townie can use the Tardis to bus me/BC and one of austin/Xata. In case me/BC get shot and we don't have protection, then one of austin/Xata will die instead (either the scum...or well the town one I don't care if the townie of them flips on N3). We have lots of possibilities with that shit. If i get the tardis I just prot you, you prot me. Or the like. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 00:21 GMT
#2112
Why? Because his power apparently is vote theft. However, we know both kita and geript at this point are scum. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 00:52 GMT
#2118
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 00:58 GMT
#2122
On June 28 2013 09:57 austinmcc wrote: Show nested quote + Is your campaign pro and anti-bear?On June 28 2013 09:53 gonzaw wrote: On June 28 2013 09:49 geript wrote: I <3 Gonzawga Why can't scum and town get along like this in all games? We are all human people! Both town and scum! We can be together! Say no to Alignism. If you are town or scum you don't deserve to be treated differently. Occupy Lynch 2013 What all is entailed with your bears yo. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 01:03 GMT
#2126
On June 28 2013 10:01 geript wrote: Not in the slightest. It's a minor ripple in the plan, but not a real issue. To be honest, after how badly you fucked up the last game I'm very surprised that you didn't do it N2. I almost did. Meapak worried me more though which his bullshit -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 01:03 GMT
#2127
On June 28 2013 10:01 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 28 2013 09:57 austinmcc wrote: On June 28 2013 09:53 gonzaw wrote: Is your campaign pro and anti-bear?On June 28 2013 09:49 geript wrote: I <3 Gonzawga Why can't scum and town get along like this in all games? We are all human people! Both town and scum! We can be together! Say no to Alignism. If you are town or scum you don't deserve to be treated differently. Occupy Lynch 2013 This is unbearable austin, please I can't bear you talking about your bears again. I'm bear-y disappointed in you, I could claw your face off Also, there's no reason to make BC choose BC. Make Xfire choose BC, but make BC choose Medic gonzaw+medic is what we really want. Therefore give those 2 options to the guys that won't really fuck up or aren't scum Give dandel and Xfire BC+vig in whatever order. To be honest, I like picking my own name from the list -_- makes me feel more secure | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 01:05 GMT
#2129
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 01:12 GMT
#2138
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 02:03 GMT
#2154
On June 28 2013 11:01 geript wrote: So... how funny is it that the mods forgot about my mortal combating being once per game? I mean honestly... pretty hilarious. they realized it after you tried to do it again | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 02:04 GMT
#2155
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 02:08 GMT
#2160
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 19:58 GMT
#2355
-_- Also gonza are you sure you want me to use the power you are talking of over the shot? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 19:59 GMT
#2356
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 19:59 GMT
#2357
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:04 GMT
#2360
Why? Because meapak had a extra shot, geript has had one, and if we are right, xat has had one. 3 extra kp + 2 nights is 5 kp total by day 3 (if meapak had shot) Figure 3 mafia and 1 third party or 4 mafia. for an argument 5 kp by day 3 if uninterrupted is going to drop town from 11-6. If we fuck up lynches then its 4 town left vs 3 mafia and 1 3p(or 4 mafia). By day 3. Is it possible there is 4 mafia and 1 3p ? possibly but it seems unlikely as hell. Theres an easy way to explain a ton of this. Gonza, does xfires role include a dayvig shot he could have had for day 1? if not, xat or kita must be scum or both are. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:05 GMT
#2361
On June 29 2013 05:03 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2013 04:59 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Only reason I say this, is im pretty sure the gun of slots raped zeph day 1 Oh god another randomization thing? That shit's dumb. (Says the guy who wrote a resurrection role---I consider it a vet though) I was incredibly angry still when I submitted it. In hindsight I had thought of a better role idea but was too late to change it =( | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:10 GMT
#2363
On June 29 2013 05:07 WaveofShadow wrote: BC shooooot somebodyyyyy Preferably before da lynch. kthx. why before? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:14 GMT
#2366
On June 29 2013 05:12 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2013 04:59 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Only reason I say this, is im pretty sure the gun of slots raped zeph day 1 Yes, using it at night is a random risk But you can use it now. We just need to avoid Xata using his day vig...that's all we need to do to win Then I dunno who to lynch first, geript kita or Xata. I'd say Xata in case he doesn't use his day vig and can use it on D4. We don't know kita's role, so his may be dangerous Although geript is the only 100% sure scum... choices choices how do we know xata has more than 1 day vig shot? how do we know kita didnt day vig sol day 1? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:18 GMT
#2373
Also guess what? i can deal with xata at night to prevent his role shite without checking him. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:19 GMT
#2375
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:22 GMT
#2377
On June 29 2013 05:21 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: fuck -_- I can easily confirm who shot sol day 1, but its not the best thing for me to do If you are going to do what I think you are going to do, you can't use the EWW twice (both to shoot and to use whatever you want to use) I know lol. One potentially is slow and steady and solves the game the other is balls wall. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:24 GMT
#2380
On June 29 2013 05:23 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2013 05:18 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Seems like the easiest way to do this is for me to shoot kita. His powers are unknown, and xata's are more or less under control. Also guess what? i can deal with xata at night to prevent his role shite without checking him. Doo eeet BC I can't really talk more about reasoning for what I've been saying today. Like I said I need a very specific set of conditions to use my hidden power to effectiveness. does your hidden power matter if its hidden or not? ie why can't we know | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:27 GMT
#2388
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:28 GMT
#2390
On June 29 2013 05:27 Crossfire99 wrote: gonzaw i just thought of an idea. what if i choose myself for austin's thingy? It doesn't matter what he gives me as long as i can use both my role and austin's gift in one night. I then can use one of the items plus austin's gift to create awesome combos. What do you think? or we just keep having me check people -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:39 GMT
#2393
I think its gun time | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:42 GMT
#2396
On June 29 2013 05:40 geript wrote: Oh Noes... Don't kill me You are getting lynched so you are dying soon enough. os'eesht Time to kill dem kitaman | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:43 GMT
#2399
On June 29 2013 05:42 kitaman27 wrote: DON'T BC, YOU'RE THROWING THE GAME AWAY. then fuckign help me asshat | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:45 GMT
#2402
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:46 GMT
#2405
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:48 GMT
#2409
On June 29 2013 05:48 Crossfire99 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2013 05:46 BloodyC0bbler wrote: why do I just think we lost the game -_- change your shot then real fast to someone else can't change, its instantaneous when a host sees it | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 20:56 GMT
#2416
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 21:14 GMT
#2433
##Call: os'eesht | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:00 GMT
#2448
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:02 GMT
#2452
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:25 GMT
#2458
fuck it go big or go home. Bye Kita | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:26 GMT
#2459
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:27 GMT
#2462
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:30 GMT
#2465
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:33 GMT
#2467
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:41 GMT
#2471
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:42 GMT
#2472
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 28 2013 22:43 GMT
#2475
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 18:36 GMT
#2517
You kill him. day vig has fired damage is done. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 18:36 GMT
#2518
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 18:57 GMT
#2520
On June 30 2013 03:39 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 03:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also scum team more or less claimed in thread. Which is what makes me believe we've lost. incorrect. EVERYONE VOTE GERIPT. Confirmed scum kill. I am likely dead tommorrow, but I am going to be roleblocking who I believe is scum. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:02 GMT
#2521
WoS if you actually can throw a vote into the game I will likely need you to toss it on geript. Scum day shots were clever as fuck. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:05 GMT
#2523
On June 30 2013 04:04 WaveofShadow wrote: Well obviously if kita is 3P he's not going to vote scum since if he was telling the truth he'd win with them. And if he's scum he's not going to vote scum. I think the issue is I get one vote to prevent a game loss but then after that my vote is gone so we lose. not true. I roleblock, we lynch whoever got zephs role, win game. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:08 GMT
#2524
Me as confirmed town Austin as confirmed town Geript confirmed mafia Kita confirmed non town This leaves us with xfire and gonza. Of the two we know these things. Gonza created xfires role, and gonza HASN"T CLAIMED. Of these two, ONE IS ACTIVELY ATTEMPTING TO SAVE A FUCKING CONFIRMED SCUM. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:12 GMT
#2526
On June 30 2013 04:10 WaveofShadow wrote: Who was it who had the devouring over the course of a day power? I'll vote around deadline if it becomes necessary; I'd rather not kill myself just yet. I appreciate that. Ill put it to you this way. If geript flips with the day vig shot we already know of (mortal combat) and was allowed a second unnanounced day vig shot we know kita is the third party survivor. If he flips with only his one KP. We know kita shot sol, and gonza just shot dandel | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:17 GMT
#2530
On June 30 2013 04:16 gonzaw wrote: lol, yes please kill me BC I beg you switch your damn vote back to geript you jerk. If you are town you will stop throwing the game this friggen minute. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:20 GMT
#2532
On June 30 2013 04:18 gonzaw wrote: no, kita is scum and he has infinite day vigs geript has useless mortal kombat kita is as confirmed scum as geript, because of that chart I made yesterday Bullshit. We don't know geripts specific role. If Kita got zephs role he can't fire tommorrow. However killing geript lets us know something insanely valuable. Who shot sol day 1. Guess what? It wasn't zephs role. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:39 GMT
#2541
On June 30 2013 04:37 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Votes: kitaman27 (0) - geript (5) - gonzaw (1) - geript Bubbas not voting: Everybody is voting, hurray for democracy! geript is going to die! Tell me if I missed anyone. Only votes in the voting thread count! CUNTDOWN: How many people are needed to lynch? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:42 GMT
#2543
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:44 GMT
#2544
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:47 GMT
#2547
On June 30 2013 04:45 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 04:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Gonza, do you think the mods would be bastard enough to let WoS have a gun as well as a "free life role" that allows him to avoid having to vote around lynches? ....wat? The shot on Sol has no shooter. How do we know? Look at the flavour of kills. We know zephs role just killed dandel (consumed) Sol was shot. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:52 GMT
#2555
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:53 GMT
#2556
WoS could still very well be a scum treestump his alignment was never flipped | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:54 GMT
#2560
On June 30 2013 04:53 gonzaw wrote: I assume if you Bus yourself, attempts to RB you RB your target instead In my experience, RB's go through first. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:54 GMT
#2561
On June 30 2013 04:54 Crossfire99 wrote: ok i know that bc, gonzaw and wos are 100% town. I know that I am town. That means I am left with geript, kita, and austin. Geript claimed scum. Kita claimed scum or 3rd party working with scum. That means if kita is 3rd party, austin has to be scum. how is WoS 100% town. He flipped blue, so did meapak -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:57 GMT
#2566
On June 30 2013 04:55 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2013 02:15 Crossfire99 wrote: Also, just got word that roleblocks give notifications and the hosts got my action last night, so that means xata is lying which means he's scum trying to frame me. Show nested quote + On June 28 2013 18:24 Xatalos wrote: On June 28 2013 06:00 Crossfire99 wrote: I roleblocked Xata. This is a lie btw - unless you don't receive a "roleblocked" PM in this game for some reason. Wth Crossfire99? Hosts: do you receive a "roleblocked" PM in this game? Show nested quote + On June 29 2013 07:42 deconduo wrote: Xatalos as Martha Jones has been mobbed to death by E'woks. You win with The Alliance Seems legit brah that means He would have had to have used his Bus drive already no? or that someone else had visited him since he's had the tazer since xata didn't die | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:58 GMT
#2568
WoS did you at any point visit Xfire | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:59 GMT
#2570
On June 30 2013 04:58 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 30 2013 04:53 gonzaw wrote: I assume if you Bus yourself, attempts to RB you RB your target instead In my experience, RB's go through first. Even if that was the case, then kita carries the scum kill and we end with 2v2 or 3v3 if all of us currently alive You, me, austin, xfire, kita all vote for geript. IF anyone drops, WoS drops his vote in to secure the lynch. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 19:59 GMT
#2571
On June 30 2013 04:59 Crossfire99 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 04:57 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 30 2013 04:55 gonzaw wrote: On June 30 2013 04:50 Crossfire99 wrote: cause i'm town On June 29 2013 02:15 Crossfire99 wrote: Also, just got word that roleblocks give notifications and the hosts got my action last night, so that means xata is lying which means he's scum trying to frame me. On June 28 2013 18:24 Xatalos wrote: On June 28 2013 06:00 Crossfire99 wrote: I roleblocked Xata. This is a lie btw - unless you don't receive a "roleblocked" PM in this game for some reason. Wth Crossfire99? Hosts: do you receive a "roleblocked" PM in this game? On June 29 2013 07:42 deconduo wrote: Xatalos as Martha Jones has been mobbed to death by E'woks. You win with The Alliance Seems legit brah that means He would have had to have used his Bus drive already no? or that someone else had visited him since he's had the tazer since xata didn't die nope cause i still have the rubber duck which gonzaw can confirm How can he confirm you still have the rubber duck? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:01 GMT
#2574
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:02 GMT
#2575
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:05 GMT
#2578
On June 30 2013 05:03 Crossfire99 wrote: BC you still want me to choose you for austin's thing? i can change it to myself if you want, but I won't cause i'm town. please stop assuming i'm scum cause i'm not what item did you use to roleblock xata, or did you just outright lie? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:08 GMT
#2582
Either gonza is scum (well played if you are) Or mafia team is as followed WoS (yes im being serious here) Kita Geript Meapak. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:10 GMT
#2587
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:11 GMT
#2589
This post | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:12 GMT
#2592
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:13 GMT
#2594
On June 30 2013 05:12 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Gonza, why do we have to kill kita right now if he just used his day vig? It takes a full day to reuse itself BECAUSE WE CANT KILL ANYBODY ELSE WOS DOESNT HAVE A VOTE OMG BC IS SCUM OMG .............IF XFIRE IS TOWN, YOU ARE TOWN, I AM TOWN, AND AUSTIN IS TOWN WE KILL GERIPT | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:20 GMT
#2606
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:20 GMT
#2607
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:21 GMT
#2610
On June 30 2013 05:20 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 05:12 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Only explanation is that For some fucked up reason, WoS is a mafia treestump or you are red. Take your pick gonza. Please explain this BC misread a claim in someones filter -_- fuck im retarded. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:23 GMT
#2612
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:27 GMT
#2614
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:33 GMT
#2623
Strax only had one aspect of his role claimed, Medic. I don't think geript was bullshitting when he said he could prot kita. Kita is madam vastra. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:34 GMT
#2626
IF austin doesn't reappear before 5 minutes to lynch we kill geript, I block kita at night (thus blocking his factional KP/his ability to regenerate his shot) | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:35 GMT
#2629
On June 30 2013 05:35 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 05:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Madam Vastra and Strax we both know are in this game. Strax only had one aspect of his role claimed, Medic. I don't think geript was bullshitting when he said he could prot kita. Kita is madam vastra. It was kita who claimed Strax was medic (back when he wanted people to give him the TARDIS in N1) kita is the ONLY one that constantly claimed geript had medic (well, as well as geript himself) Do you believe both confirmed anti-town/scum about that? Could this "medic" protection protect kita from a fucking lynch? That would be broken as fuck -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:36 GMT
#2630
On June 30 2013 05:35 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 05:35 gonzaw wrote: On June 30 2013 05:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Madam Vastra and Strax we both know are in this game. Strax only had one aspect of his role claimed, Medic. I don't think geript was bullshitting when he said he could prot kita. Kita is madam vastra. It was kita who claimed Strax was medic (back when he wanted people to give him the TARDIS in N1) kita is the ONLY one that constantly claimed geript had medic (well, as well as geript himself) Do you believe both confirmed anti-town/scum about that? Could this "medic" protection protect kita from a fucking lynch? That would be broken as fuck -_- If you are worried about that then we kill geript, i block kita. Lynch tomorrow | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:36 GMT
#2632
On June 30 2013 05:36 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 05:34 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Gonza you were right. Kill kita now, Geript tomorrow. ...I was? Show nested quote + IF austin doesn't reappear before 5 minutes to lynch we kill geript, I block kita at night (thus blocking his factional KP/his ability to regenerate his shot) Why that switch if austin doesn't turn up? Well Xfire, I'll assume you are town for now then I suppose. What is that plan of yours? Did you get your item instantly right now? You could use the vote thief ability right now so WOS doesn't have to kill himself because that way we can save WoS for a night | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:37 GMT
#2633
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:41 GMT
#2640
On June 30 2013 05:40 gonzaw wrote: The problem I find with this "block" thing BC is that you seem to think it will stop factional KP. But there will most likely be 2 scum remaining tonight, if you RB one then the other one can carry the kill Possible. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:41 GMT
#2642
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:44 GMT
#2645
On June 30 2013 05:42 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 05:40 Crossfire99 wrote: On June 30 2013 05:36 gonzaw wrote: On June 30 2013 05:34 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Gonza you were right. Kill kita now, Geript tomorrow. ...I was? IF austin doesn't reappear before 5 minutes to lynch we kill geript, I block kita at night (thus blocking his factional KP/his ability to regenerate his shot) Why that switch if austin doesn't turn up? Well Xfire, I'll assume you are town for now then I suppose. What is that plan of yours? Did you get your item instantly right now? You could use the vote thief ability right now so WOS doesn't have to kill himself My plan is for you to secretly use your ability on someone tonight that you think is town and if scum try to lynch that person tomorrow then we have a chance to still survive and go to the next day. Yeah I planned on doing that tonight as well But that works only if WOS is alive and somehow scum can force a lynch on a townie. How can that happen without us having lost already (being 2v2 or 3v3 etc)? Vote geript. Most votes on him, most likely to die at this point unless people reappear in thread | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:47 GMT
#2651
On June 30 2013 05:46 Crossfire99 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 05:42 gonzaw wrote: On June 30 2013 05:40 Crossfire99 wrote: On June 30 2013 05:36 gonzaw wrote: On June 30 2013 05:34 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Gonza you were right. Kill kita now, Geript tomorrow. ...I was? IF austin doesn't reappear before 5 minutes to lynch we kill geript, I block kita at night (thus blocking his factional KP/his ability to regenerate his shot) Why that switch if austin doesn't turn up? Well Xfire, I'll assume you are town for now then I suppose. What is that plan of yours? Did you get your item instantly right now? You could use the vote thief ability right now so WOS doesn't have to kill himself My plan is for you to secretly use your ability on someone tonight that you think is town and if scum try to lynch that person tomorrow then we have a chance to still survive and go to the next day. Yeah I planned on doing that tonight as well But that works only if WOS is alive and somehow scum can force a lynch on a townie. How can that happen without us having lost already (being 2v2 or 3v3 etc)? worst case scenario is that we are at 4-3 with wos vote, so scum have to die today, but then wos dies if we do that ugh. WE ABSOLUTELY NEED AT LEAST 1 SCUM (OR ALIGNED 3RD PARTY KITA) TO DIE TODAY. IT MIGHT BE "SAFER" TO LYNCH GERIPT CAUSE EVERYONE'S ALREADY ON HIM, BUT THAT ASSUMES THAT AUSTIN IS TOWN AND WON'T JUMP SHIP. uuuuuuggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh. idk what to do. EVERYONE STAY ON GERIPT. WoS if a single person unvotes you use your power and dump it on geript to ensure his lynch | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:48 GMT
#2655
On June 30 2013 05:47 gonzaw wrote: ...I told you to use Kna Kna BC >_> Yea I know, you and I both thought xata was scum tho -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:50 GMT
#2659
On June 30 2013 05:50 austinmcc wrote: Do we know why geript is not on kita? If Xat was town, geript's vote should be there, right? modconfirmed xat was roleblocked. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:53 GMT
#2661
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:56 GMT
#2667
But gave no further info into it. Possible hes scum -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:57 GMT
#2670
On June 30 2013 05:57 gonzaw wrote: Is there any difference if you or BC gets it? I didn't really get that part No idea. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 20:59 GMT
#2674
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:00 GMT
#2679
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:01 GMT
#2683
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:01 GMT
#2686
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:02 GMT
#2689
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:03 GMT
#2694
On June 30 2013 06:01 kitaman27 wrote: lolol mafia team such cowards. its not like it isn't obvious already -_- Town would have lost instantly had we voted for you wouldn't we? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:04 GMT
#2697
On June 30 2013 06:03 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 06:03 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On June 30 2013 06:01 kitaman27 wrote: lolol mafia team such cowards. its not like it isn't obvious already -_- Town would have lost instantly had we voted for you wouldn't we? Probably. -_- I hate you so much right now | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:05 GMT
#2701
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:07 GMT
#2705
On June 30 2013 06:07 kitaman27 wrote: lol there is no way that this setup wouldn't have 4 mafia. They straight up chickened out. rofl. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:13 GMT
#2715
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:14 GMT
#2719
On June 30 2013 06:12 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2013 06:07 kitaman27 wrote: lol there is no way that this setup wouldn't have 4 mafia. They straight up chickened out. Because even if they didn't they would have to telepathically know they would have to vote BC and not some other random townie instead; you know....considering you are Survivor and have no contact with the scum team makes sense Hes vastra. Say vastra did hit as a 3p (wouldnt be horribly surprising in some weird way) he would have mason abilities still. IE contact with mafia. However There is no way that it was 11v5 from square one -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:17 GMT
#2727
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:19 GMT
#2732
On June 30 2013 06:18 kitaman27 wrote: Hosts buffed it with that absorb kp stuff. I made him as a martyr revive/1 shot mortal combat. sigh. you me austin gonza xfire. We know your scum. leaves the one needle in the haystack | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:22 GMT
#2735
On June 30 2013 06:19 gonzaw wrote: okay, so 3v2 now we lost basically you guys do whatever you want to do if you think we can NOT lose tonight, I have no powers anyways honestly dude. There is only one way to win this. Somehow don't end up dead. I have no idea what Dandel chose for a role but I chose medic as per original plan. So we shall see what item one of you gets. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:26 GMT
#2738
On June 30 2013 06:25 Crossfire99 wrote: bc, i fully recommend roleblocking kita or something tonight. I'm not scum and it will hurt town if you roleblock me do. Plus i chose myself in austin's poll so i can do 2 things tonight. We still have a chance tonight especially with bus drive shannies which will probably be happening from both sides tonight. I'd die if I rb'ed you apparently. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:27 GMT
#2739
On June 30 2013 06:25 Crossfire99 wrote: bc, i fully recommend roleblocking kita or something tonight. I'm not scum and it will hurt town if you roleblock me do. Plus i chose myself in austin's poll so i can do 2 things tonight. We still have a chance tonight especially with bus drive shannies which will probably be happening from both sides tonight. You can only do two things if he chooses you -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:27 GMT
#2741
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:28 GMT
#2743
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:30 GMT
#2745
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:32 GMT
#2748
On June 30 2013 06:31 gonzaw wrote: Since when did you have a RB BC wtf? N1 My role is jenny flint. I have the option of alignment check or rolecheck I choose which I want to use on any player but can only check dem the once. Roleblock and a one shot anytime vig | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 29 2013 21:33 GMT
#2749
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:21 GMT
#2837
BC can do one of three things tonight and has no idea on who to do it to or what to use on them | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:25 GMT
#2839
On July 01 2013 05:22 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 01 2013 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote: bc just got home from work. -_- BC can do one of three things tonight and has no idea on who to do it to or what to use on them Dt check me! what good would that do me | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:29 GMT
#2842
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:30 GMT
#2843
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:31 GMT
#2846
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:33 GMT
#2848
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:36 GMT
#2852
Hey kita? How funny would this game be if it was 4 scum and 1 3p. -_- | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
June 30 2013 20:39 GMT
#2856
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 02 2013 23:03 GMT
#3475
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 02 2013 23:12 GMT
#3480
I hate you for not medicing me n3 gonza | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 02 2013 23:14 GMT
#3482
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 02 2013 23:29 GMT
#3487
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 02 2013 23:32 GMT
#3491
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 00:01 GMT
#3496
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 00:17 GMT
#3499
On July 03 2013 09:04 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On July 03 2013 09:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Austins power was so fucking pro town that he blended in so well with terrible townies -_- Wait wasn't there somebody ranting about people equating role = town? I think I remember somebody like that. Do you know who it was? Cause you should totally talk to him. His role wasn't what made him town in my head, it was how he used it. HE never was using it on my scum reads. Always giving shit ot me and gonza | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 00:20 GMT
#3502
On July 03 2013 09:17 Acrofales wrote: Well, I just raged at town from obs QT from the moment I was dead. Yes, sk8r played pretty badly, but you had fucking AUSTIN to lynch and he wiggled his way out of it. Then you got a retry with all that confirmed scum around and shot XATALOS. Town threw this game pretty badly Endgame was fun, though :D Austin was playing more "pro town" than xat was tho -_- Hell you can rage at me but I still nailed geript, kita and meapak -_- Yes I made a few mistakes, but I think my good things made it better | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 00:27 GMT
#3507
On July 03 2013 09:22 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Honestly I do agree a little bit with geript's balance whine and think kita should have just been scum. Even though we won town still had waaaaaay too much leniency to fuck up. Other than that it was a fun game, thanks to decon and sent for hosting. Also fuck you BC I thought we were bros lol Your oddly timed analysis post was just way to suspect dude. Had to check you for it | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 00:28 GMT
#3508
On July 03 2013 09:20 strongandbig wrote: Still the role I made was the best which role did you make? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 00:29 GMT
#3511
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 20:54 GMT
#3645
On July 03 2013 23:44 Xatalos wrote: ALTHOUGH!!! I did clearly ask in the thread for host confirmation about this mess. What we got were two opposite answers by two different hosts ("no" by deconduo and "yes" by Sentinel). This could all have easily been resolved, and somewhat likely my death avoided, if it had been just made clear in the thread as I requested to begin with. Hosts pls (PS. I would have repeatedly demanded the situation to be resolved in the thread if I hadn't been AFK for that crucial time. Thus, I am also to blame for being AFK, although less than the hosts for contradicting each other IMO.) (PS+. Otherwise good job hosts, but this one failure *might* have caused town to lose. I hope I don't sound too much like geript now, I'm just.... Sad, I guess. Since I wrongly suspected Crossfire99 and he wrongly suspected and pushed me to death.) actually this host bit is what made me shoot you in conjuction to gonza also thinking it made you scum. I had a solidish townread on xfire based on how he was playing and gonza was clear town. It came down to geript, kita and austin. Given that I thought kita was third party and geript was confirmed scum who I thought had tardis I would have a) used a diff ability or shot austin So had the hosts not kinda fubared the situation a bit with their pm's then you'd never have been shot and kitas day shot would have been blocked via ewok whistle, or austin shot. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 20:56 GMT
#3646
On July 04 2013 05:34 kitaman27 wrote: I think it was a nice improvement that players did not know who they were picking for. The possibility of players creating their own role really opened up the fake claim options as well. Introducing a couple non-submitted roles (while omitting a few of the player created ones) might make fake claiming even easier. The problem with all blue games is that everyone wants to be superman and that leads to really swingy games. Players that don't wind up with overpowered roles are disappointed, yet a game full of them is too rough on town. Even normal roles like detective or 2-shot vig become too powerful in a setup like this because there is too much role synergy when everyone has an ability every night. this is the first PTP game I didn't have a total shite role. I am fine with how it worked P | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 03 2013 20:59 GMT
#3647
On July 04 2013 00:56 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 04 2013 00:41 austinmcc wrote: In mafia's hands, especially with only 3 of us and getting outed early, it was "Force yourself to give town powers." I send out PMs, have to claim the PMs eventually, and then it becomes horribly obvious that I've been gifting powers to mafia if I ever do. I can't even fake anything, because I'd have to fakeclaim both a fake target of my role-gifting AND lie about someone choosing that person AND have that person on the list anyway, because the second person-chooser would know if they weren't. You created your own role didn't you? Couldn't you just include a mafia player in the group, rig the results every night, turn your role into a mafia kp and then never claim how it works? You'd eventually have to come up with a fake claim at endgame, but that endgame would come a cycle sooner and you didn't need to tell the truth about how the role works because only you know how it works. First night was like me gonza meapak kita I chose you, and i think whoever else chose chose gonza? | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
July 04 2013 19:05 GMT
#3657
| ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv22022 Liquid`RaSZi3100 gofns1770 Grubby1592 shahzam893 sgares470 NuckleDu97 Maynarde86 ViBE50 Organizations StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • musti20045 34 StarCraft: Brood War• davetesta29 • RyuSc2 17 • HeavenSC 7 • Gussbus • IndyKCrew • Poblha • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • aXEnki • LaughNgamez Trovo • intothetv • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
StarsWar
Maru vs Stats
Cure vs Classic
Solar vs GuMiho
ByuN vs herO
Big Brain Bouts
BSL
TerrOr vs XuanXuan
Dark vs JDConan
Korean StarCraft League
StarsWar
WardiTV Invitational
CSO Cup
ForJumy Cup
BSL
Zhanhun vs WolFix
Dienmax vs Cross
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] StarsWar
WardiTV Invitational
ESL Open Cup
Afreeca Starleague
StarsWar
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
Afreeca Starleague
StarsWar
Club NV x Duckling Show…
GSL Code S
Stats vs SHIN
Cure vs GuMiho
|
|