Roulette Mini Mafia - Page 2

On June 05 2013 15:29 VayneAuthority wrote:


because hes useful if he decides to try later, no point mislynching him when there's a good chance mafia will kill him for us if he's not scum.

On June 05 2013 21:39 JarJarDrinks wrote:
##Vote Oatsmaster

His gung-ho Ace-is-def-scum-guys push seems so contrived. I can't imagine he can actually act so cocksure, especially when his reasons are so weak. Here's his reasoning (which btw came 12 hours after his vote):
I don't want to really defend Ace since he isn't exactly playing pro-town, but these reasons are terrible:

- "His contributions have been setup speculation" - Ace just made one post saying we should claim and report results. Oats was the one prodding him further which forced Ace to talk more about it

- "random vote on WoS." - OK, I'll agree w/ this one. Random votes are lame. I'd like to see him explain if he actually has a reason for voting WoS or if it was truly random.

- "defending mkfuba for basically no reason." Here's the post he's talking about:His "Scum love to defend people cause it makes them look good." is dumb. How is that post supposed to make Ace look good? Ace was specifically asked what he thought and he answered. How can that possibly be seen as scummy? Not to mention the fact that there's plenty of people posting "defences" for other people

- "His contributions have been setup speculation" - Ace just made one post saying we should claim and report results. Oats was the one prodding him further which forced Ace to talk more about it

His "Scum love to defend people cause it makes them look good." is dumb. How is that post supposed to make Ace look good? Ace was specifically asked what he thought and he answered. How can that possibly be seen as scummy? Not to mention the fact that there's plenty of people posting "defences" for other people

On June 05 2013 22:18 Zephirdd wrote:
##unvote
##vote Oatsmaster

Idk what you're doing, but you've shown a better town play as scum. This is ridiculous.

Besides, wos has been active enough and posting enough, and the three other votes on him suck. Its a bad wagon.

On June 05 2013 22:22 Zephirdd wrote:

Yes. Totally. You broke the fucking game, gratz.

On June 05 2013 22:22 Zephirdd wrote:


The same reasoning of "kill marv if he is alive by day 3"

You voted him without explaining your vote. Something that you're accusing him of. Yes, you eventually gave your weak reasoning. I don't buy how you can be so sure of yourself with such a bad case. I feel like it's an act.

And here's something else you accused him of while doing the same thing:So does defending 2 players in the same post make you like twice as likely to be scum?

you've played as a better town when you were scum => you are playing a worse town this game => you have to be scum

Your case on Ace is bad, whenever someone finds your cases bad and they vote you you call them scum, you even complained about omgus when you just did the same thing to me, JJD even pointed out a contradiction on the whole "defense" thing. You had about no contribution during the first 24 hours and now you come into the thread storming and trying to get Ace - arguably the one guy who makes no difference on day 1 but makes a lot day 2 onwards. Ace, over Sentinel, rayn, JJD, fuba, prplhz etc etc etc etc

(disclaimer: above list is not my list of scum reads)

Oats, tell us why should we kill Ace over any other player in the game considering he is not the only one being semi-inactive. Compare him to Sentinel, for instance.

Actually, Sentinel is pretty terrible here too lol.

He has to make clear if and why he intends to stay on the WoS wagon after his initial vote which seems like a pressure vote. Other than that, he discussed strategies related to the setup. Not enough to go to make a read on him.