EPTAnyone else around?
Smurf Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Let's play a game... | ||
|
MSmith1
59 Posts
Anyone else around? | ||
|
A McGann
81 Posts
What shall we discuss? | ||
|
MSmith1
59 Posts
| ||
|
A McGann
81 Posts
Lets discuss each other since we are both here. Would you say that your strength lies in your Early, Mid or Late game? | ||
|
MSmith1
59 Posts
What about you? By the way, my scumteam guess would be Eccleston, TheDavison, and Hurndall3. Assuming GMarshal didn't just RNG. | ||
|
A McGann
81 Posts
They look as good as any other three randomly chosen names. | ||
|
Eccleston
75 Posts
| ||
|
MSmith1
59 Posts
On May 29 2013 17:33 Eccleston wrote: Reporting in. Why do you prefer guessing at the scum team instead of trying to generate constructive discussion? Hey now don't be sour just because I called you scum. At the very start of a game (especially this one), there is hardly anything to discuss, so at that point I would call any discussion constructive. What would you have preferred me to say three posts into the game? | ||
|
Eccleston
75 Posts
| ||
|
A McGann
81 Posts
| ||
|
MSmith1
59 Posts
So far if I had to guess I'd say town on A McGann because he made a polite hello post, tried to learn something about me, and tried to generate discussion. And I would guess that you are scum because the first thing you did was throw some dirt at me which I feel was unwarranted and unnecessarily negative. Your turn. What alignment is A McGann and what alignment am I? | ||
|
Eccleston
75 Posts
Mr. McGann seems friendly enough. As for you, I don't know... Are you an angry villager or a murderous italian? Your reactions look valid from both perspectives. | ||
|
A McGann
81 Posts
Do you intend to do that all game? | ||
|
MSmith1
59 Posts
On May 29 2013 17:33 Eccleston wrote: Reporting in. Why do you prefer guessing at the scum team instead of trying to generate constructive discussion? Can you explain your motivation behind this post? I'm still wondering why you felt the need to criticize my play as opposed to perhaps generating some "constructive discussion" yourself. What were you looking to accomplish here? | ||
|
Baker1986
217 Posts
On May 29 2013 17:51 MSmith1 wrote: OK Eccleston. So far if I had to guess I'd say town on A McGann because he made a polite hello post, tried to learn something about me, and tried to generate discussion. And I would guess that you are scum because the first thing you did was throw some dirt at me which I feel was unwarranted and unnecessarily negative. Your turn. What alignment is A McGann and what alignment am I? This is a good observation. I had already made the same mental note about A McGann when I was reading these first few posts of the game. Obviously it's notoriously easy to look somewhat townie early on in the game so I'm not saying we exclude him from lynch discussion or anything, but at least this looks like a good start down that road. I was somewhat hesitant about your own posting at the start, especially this one, because it seems somewhat defensive (although in the context it may be applicable) On May 29 2013 17:41 MSmith1 wrote: At the very start of a game (especially this one), there is hardly anything to discuss, so at that point I would call any discussion constructive. What would you have preferred me to say three posts into the game? However the fact you made the same observation about McGann as I did eases my mind, and not to mention you've even set your own parameters for this game, so I can only expect you to follow them. On May 29 2013 16:53 MSmith1 wrote: Early game. I usually establish my towniness on D1 and I also have generally good D1 reads. But I don't think I'm very good at increasing the accuracy of my D1/N1 reads as the game drags on. I am eagerly awaiting to be impressed by your ability to look town! | ||
|
SMcCoy
228 Posts
I took note of Eccleston's aggressive entrance. His latest post suggests that he doesn't know what to make of MSmith. I have bad vibes about him. My first guess would have been to assume that scum did not post yet, they have no interest in driving discussion at early stages. That is what I assume. Eccleston's strange paranoid behavior with subtle criticism suggests that he has differing methods of finding scum or that he is trying to look like he's scumhunting by voicing quick, exaggerated suspicions with not much reasoning behind them. At first criticizing very early posts and then proceeding to call someone's actions ambiguous without specifying why. We might just differ in our methods but I will be observing this subject during our stay and beg him to keep posts as informative and objective as possible. | ||
|
Eccleston
75 Posts
On May 29 2013 18:34 MSmith1 wrote: + Show Spoiler [Snip] + I'm not angry at all actually.. just playing the game and trying to determine alignments. I'm probably one of the most level-headed players on this forum. Can you explain your motivation behind this post? I'm still wondering why you felt the need to criticize my play as opposed to perhaps generating some "constructive discussion" yourself. What were you looking to accomplish here? I was trying to stir the pot. Criticizing your play was more constructive than just having a wall of useless introductory posts. @Baker1986 What's the point of your post? You're talking, but you're not saying anything. | ||
|
Baker1986
217 Posts
On May 29 2013 19:26 Eccleston wrote: I was trying to stir the pot. Criticizing your play was more constructive than just having a wall of useless introductory posts. @Baker1986 What's the point of your post? You're talking, but you're not saying anything. On the contrary, I think I'm saying a lot. Did you actually read my post? It's a pretty good demonstration of my thought process towards Smith, which should both help other players make their own judgement, and help everyone get a feeling for how I play. But alright, let us hear why you think I'm not saying anything, I want you to explain in detail why you think I'm not saying anything. Maybe my perception of what I am posting is somewhat biased, as I think it's pretty clear that I gave explanations for everything I said in that post. It's somewhat annoying that you criticize my posting as having no content, when your own post can be summarized as a caveman-ish: "ECCLESTON MAKE TROUBLE, YOU ALL BAD, BAKER BAD, WHY BAD?" | ||
|
DrTennant
31 Posts
On May 29 2013 18:40 SMcCoy wrote: Hello. I took note of Eccleston's aggressive entrance. His latest post suggests that he doesn't know what to make of MSmith. I have bad vibes about him. My first guess would have been to assume that scum did not post yet, they have no interest in driving discussion at early stages. That is what I assume. Eccleston's strange paranoid behavior with subtle criticism suggests that he has differing methods of finding scum or that he is trying to look like he's scumhunting by voicing quick, exaggerated suspicions with not much reasoning behind them. At first criticizing very early posts and then proceeding to call someone's actions ambiguous without specifying why. We might just differ in our methods but I will be observing this subject during our stay and beg him to keep posts as informative and objective as possible. This is actually the scummiest post in thread in my opinion super ambiguous and actually says nothing. Says he took note of whatever that means offers some reasion why eccleston's posts might be interpreted as scummy then leaves justification for why it might not be. Why so wishy washy? You scum? | ||
|
DrTennant
31 Posts
slow start anyone agree or disagree with my point and why. | ||
| ||
