[T] Bastard "Mini" Mafia! - Page 41
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Same with Ange I think. What do you think about Jampi yamato? I kinda feel he is too tryhard and posted his stuff for the sake of looking active and also because he didnt feel comfortable joking. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
BH, are you gonna play this game like Les Mis? | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
BH, y u troll me? | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:54 Blazinghand wrote: this is normally the part where I post something helpful since the game has begun but it's 3 am so I'm going to sleep instead. yamato is bad though and should feel bad I'm trying to poke you to make you do something where I can read you. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:57 yamato77 wrote: I'm trying to poke you to make you do something where I can read you. no you're trying to herp so hard that you derp and you are succeeding | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
It's worth noting that both of these players voted for the other for cohost and both of them are lurky and non-contributing. 2 solid scum reads already. This seems extremely tenuos. How is the cohost election in anyway alignment indicative? Why not just randomly pick a cohost as both alignments like what we did? Makes no sense Yamato. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:57 Blazinghand wrote: Dude trying to analyze people based on the co-host election is like really dumb. I voted Ange because she's been hosting forever without playing and hasn't had a chance to play, and it would be HILARIOUS if she had to co-host instead of playing now that she's finally /in. I assume her reasons for voting me are the same. Do you really think we're both scum based on the idea that we didn't give a dick about hunting scum during the co-host election? No, but I have to prod you toward contributing to the hunt at some point. People are doing nothing and I really hate losing. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:55 Blazinghand wrote: I'm not going to discuss a game that's currently in progress, and neither will you. You flipped already. I assume its a no then. Thats a shame. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
night | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:58 Oatsmaster wrote: This seems extremely tenuos. How is the cohost election in anyway alignment indicative? Why not just randomly pick a cohost as both alignments like what we did? Makes no sense Yamato. It's just weird. I guess I should just ignore the whole cohost election? It seems mostly useless anyway, I suppose. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:55 yamato77 wrote: I could see jampi as scum, but it's harder to tell with him. I don't have a lot of experience played with him personally, so it's hard to set what I expect from his play. Just based on content alone, he's fairly scummy in that he's seemed VERY interested in the cohost thing versus actually talking about people's alignments. He also sheeped on the geript lynch with virtually zero thought, so that's antoher point against him. Wait wait what? Jampi was interested in actually playing the game, not the cohost elections. What yamato. Clarify please. | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:59 Blazinghand wrote: my case is simple: yamato will be more valuable to us by not talking, and the quickest way to do that is to lynch him night Maybe you are a good lynch. | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On May 25 2013 19:00 Oatsmaster wrote: Wait wait what? Jampi was interested in actually playing the game, not the cohost elections. What yamato. Clarify please. Almost all of his filter is about the cohost stuff. Come on, now. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 25 2013 18:58 Oatsmaster wrote: You flipped already. I assume its a no then. Thats a shame. The hosts have revealed information in the observer QT which both you and I have access to. Any statement I make about Les Mis or my play in Les Mis necessarily references information in this QT. The game is ongoing and the players there are reading this thread. Even if we didn't have extra info, since i'm dead I shouldn't be sharing any thoughts about the game since as a dead player I can't analyze and contribute any more legally in the thread. I can't believe I'm explaining this to you: don't discuss ongoing games. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
| ||