EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XLII - Page 38
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xzavier
United States393 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18004 Posts
On June 08 2013 09:24 StiMaDDict wrote: I really don't want to see multi-modkill Day 1. Come on, tE_ and Yavanna. VOTE!! I know it sounds stupid but how many mafia? All information you need is in the OP Also. Neener neener neener. | ||
|
iVLosK!
Djibouti545 Posts
Those of you who were not on the correct lynch, step into my office. | ||
|
iVLosK!
Djibouti545 Posts
On June 08 2013 13:44 Onegu wrote: Yeah I got that also, but I didnt really get a gotard being scum feeling in the first place, but I had a null feel on fire also so I dont know where that leaves me. I would like lonemeow to respond some more before placing a strong read on him. I just dont like how skan just refused to give good answers to me. I still have a scum read on umasi at this point, but mybe my bandwagon thing without good reason is just off base. Explain why you made your vote useless today by voting for someone who was never in a million years going to be lynched and failing to even try to convince others to join you. A vote is a terrible thing to waste, Toss. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
Essentially, since voting is mandatory, I had to choose between Firere345 (who I mostly wanted to lynch for lurking so much and not really being very useful when he was around) and Gotard, on whom there was a relatively good case. Originally, I thought Gotard looked way too brash to be scum, but then he went on the "wasting time on me" tangent which felt scummy, discussing opinions on anyone is useful even if the target is later proven town. | ||
|
Xzavier
United States393 Posts
Somebody tell me if the above is correct logic pls? | ||
|
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 08 2013 15:41 iVLosK! wrote: Explain why you made your vote useless today by voting for someone who was never in a million years going to be lynched and failing to even try to convince others to join you. A vote is a terrible thing to waste, Toss. I put my vote on someone I thought was scum, why is that a bad thing. I am not the only one either. I wanted to check back in before the deadline but I slept. I dont think me voteing for someone who may or maynot be lynched is such a bad thing, I didnt have strong feelings on either of the two main canidates for myself to justify puting a vote on them. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On June 08 2013 11:16 fferyllt wrote: Where was the sudden chance? What changed in the gamestate before that vote? I mean that the votes were very close, so he only needed 1 person to change vote to lynch Gotard. That is the chance. On June 08 2013 16:38 Xzavier wrote: Hno like when i try to think of gotards posts as if he were scum: its suicidal. Like how stupid do you hav to be to consistantly attack the confermed town. firere's flip also supports him being town. Is it safe to say no scum bussed firere? cuz he only got lynched by one vote? this gives us a list of people to check on. Somebody tell me if the above is correct logic pls? You aren't confirmed town On June 08 2013 13:44 Onegu wrote: Yeah I got that also, but I didnt really get a gotard being scum feeling in the first place, but I had a null feel on fire also so I dont know where that leaves me. I would like lonemeow to respond some more before placing a strong read on him. I just dont like how skan just refused to give good answers to me. I still have a scum read on umasi at this point, but mybe my bandwagon thing without good reason is just off base. Geez, for the last time, you were accusing me of something that isn't a scumtell. Thats like me saying "Hey, do you like bunnies? Then you're scum!" Its silly. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
 Onegu, most of my initial votes are pressure votes, after someone had said something that I thought could be scum indicative, and I use them to pressure people so that I can get better reads on them. If I had to announce that they are pressure votes, then it defeats the entire purpose. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 06 2013 13:11 Umasi wrote: First of all, thanks for saying something other than brofists as a response. Second, your second underline: I'll make this clear. Scum want to sow confusion and get emotional. I think brofists is an emotional term. Scum want to sow confusion, and you did not do something to figure things out, you, as I said, "poked the fire". Don't try to say that's not what scum want to do, that's the entire POINT of what scum wants to do. I'm not sure you're scum, but I think you've a better chance of flipping scum than anyone else here at this point. And I still think you were trying to excuse yourself for future scumminess, which I dislike. Ok this is the first thimg he tells us emotion is scum the procedes to make more confuseing post and get more and more invested in his posts, but even after all of this for a long time and people call him on it he just drops it. Sorry im on a tab and cannot figure out how to quote multiple things I am going to do it in multiple posts. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 06 2013 15:28 Umasi wrote: I'll operate under the assumption that you're town, because everyone else thinks so, and it seems like more will get done this way. oh, and before you poke fun at me for pulling off of you, let me offer this preemptive rebuttal (see the irony?) shut up and stop using stupid wordplay. fun as it is for you, it may be confusing for other people (specifically me) and that's bad. ##UNVOTE iVLosK! The reason is just sheeping at this point in time. No reasons given after going on over 10 posts making a case against iV. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 07 2013 05:48 Umasi wrote: I will address the blue part at the end. I agree with you, that scum would benefit from a shitfest, which is what annoyed me the entire time. It felt like he was taking a standoffish /come at me stance, and I felt this could be scum motivated, to start a shitfest, and he was confident he would come out of it on top, so I pursued the avenue of "this guy probably is scum", because he wants me to start a shitfest. Which I unfortunately did, but i don't think it actually messed up the thread too much, I think it made it possible for the thread to get GOING, since before that, it was just talk about lynching lurkers, which I didn't see the point in. The entire blue thing was me addressing all possibilities, and I was led to think he was scummy based on his responses, but I wouldn't have discounted the possibility of him being blue from that line, because it's equally telling either way. But I'm not going to straight up say "you are blue, PUNK" because that's STUPID, that doesn't generate discussion, that just turns people around to say ".....so?" and then he doesn't claim because that'd be an awful idea and we're nowhere. Scum would benifit from a shitface and you just kept going on. And the blue thing you dont really answer it and I dont see the connection between being blue and being scum. How would someones responses peg them as blue I dont understand this point. And you say Im not going to straight up say you are blue punk but that is almost exactly what you did. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 08 2013 00:02 Umasi wrote: Spicy, I agree that Firerer looks suspicious, because he hasn't posted anything of worth yet, but I think it's okay to give him a bit of time to come contribute. I don't want to be distracted from a Gotard lynch today unless someone posts a super rock solid defense of him. But if Firere hasn't posted anything of worth by the next lynch period, I'll happily consider him. His first defense of firere even though he has said firere was a town feel in his earlier posts. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 08 2013 10:20 Umasi wrote: Firere dying with his vote on Gotard makes me quite a bit less sure about Gotard, since it was close enough he was probably hoping for him to be lynched instead of himself. And by quite a bit less sure I mean a huge amount less sure, although Gotard is still scummy imo t.t Why do you think gotard is still scummy? I would like to hear this please. I get the feel of newb town not scum and with fireres vote on him makes me feel even stronger in that opinion. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
Gotard
Poland446 Posts
I agree with fferyllt. LoneMeow's filter looks suspicious. On June 07 2013 19:05 LoneMeow wrote: Gotard's posts are extremely weird, jumping in and straight away pushing lynch on you who most seem to find the strongest town read at the moment. Even weirder that he's pushing his second best scum read instead of the best. On the other hand, this is such a suicidal move that it makes me wonder if scum would dare do something like that. Your case on him seems pretty good, but I still worry that he might be just overeager townie since as said, the move seems too suicidal for scum to dare try. I'm fine with lyching him if he doesn't provide better input, though. If you read my filter I didn't really try to lynch Xzavier on day 1. It was more like "Hey, this guy could be a scum but at the same time He's helping town so I don't really know". Ok I looked like a scum for a moment but you took my words and overreacted really heavily. At the end pressuring me gave us great results and we were able to find a scum. And about "jumping in and straight away pushing lynch" that was my first post because I only post during EU afternoons and evenings (but he couldn't know that) and I had to go through a lot of text before posting.. On June 07 2013 20:59 LoneMeow wrote: It's not really a strong scum read at all, but right now I'd want to lynch Firere345. Doesn't say much, sheeps the current "consensus". Promises to participate more but doesn't seem to be doing so. This situation with Gotard has me worried, I can understand why people would want to lynch him but I'm having hard time convincing myself scum would dare be so brash. And changes he's mind (is he trying to save his friend Firere?). Look at the timing Firere was going down hill at this point and it was really close (after his vote Firere345 (5), Gotard (4)) On June 08 2013 15:42 LoneMeow wrote: Crap, running out of time. Essentially, since voting is mandatory, I had to choose between Firere345 (who I mostly wanted to lynch for lurking so much and not really being very useful when he was around) and Gotard, on whom there was a relatively good case. Originally, I thought Gotard looked way too brash to be scum, but then he went on the "wasting time on me" tangent which felt scummy, discussing opinions on anyone is useful even if the target is later proven town. Main suspects right now: Skanjab1s and LoneMeow. | ||
| ||
