|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
|
11589 Posts
On May 19 2013 11:12 s0Lstice wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. What the hell? Did you read the games you linked? This is his first post after the /in post in the scum game you linked Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 21:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
K, just caught up.
I think jrkirby is my scummiest read at the moment. He votes rainbows pretty early. Then later on he tells us that he feels like he "might actually be a fatty, and is just acting stupid" BUT he feels like he has to vote for him because he's "helping the skinnies".
Anyone that votes for someone and then defends them is gonna read scum to me.
##vote: jrkirby
He voted in his first post and then tunneled the entire time. In fact, I reach pretty much the opposite conclusion you do from the games you linked.
That's actually exactly what he said.
|
On May 19 2013 11:12 Blazinghand wrote:
wos or jarjar
have your read the thread recently
|
On May 19 2013 11:13 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:12 s0Lstice wrote:On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. What the hell? Did you read the games you linked? This is his first post after the /in post in the scum game you linked On April 05 2013 21:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
K, just caught up.
I think jrkirby is my scummiest read at the moment. He votes rainbows pretty early. Then later on he tells us that he feels like he "might actually be a fatty, and is just acting stupid" BUT he feels like he has to vote for him because he's "helping the skinnies".
Anyone that votes for someone and then defends them is gonna read scum to me.
##vote: jrkirby
He voted in his first post and then tunneled the entire time. In fact, I reach pretty much the opposite conclusion you do from the games you linked. That's actually exactly what he said.
Um, no it's not. Voting in your first post in the thread, and voting methodically (or saying this stuff is suspicious and then voting a little later, as GK put it) are not the same.
|
On May 19 2013 10:56 iamperfection wrote:
stutters you said you were back and all you did was ask one lousy question is that all you have to say?
Thread was dead and I'm trying to filter dive to get some good reads. Seriously though, you don't see anything wrong with his second highest scumread being an association twenty four hours into a game?
|
11589 Posts
On May 19 2013 11:17 s0Lstice wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:13 yamato77 wrote:On May 19 2013 11:12 s0Lstice wrote:On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. What the hell? Did you read the games you linked? This is his first post after the /in post in the scum game you linked On April 05 2013 21:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
K, just caught up.
I think jrkirby is my scummiest read at the moment. He votes rainbows pretty early. Then later on he tells us that he feels like he "might actually be a fatty, and is just acting stupid" BUT he feels like he has to vote for him because he's "helping the skinnies".
Anyone that votes for someone and then defends them is gonna read scum to me.
##vote: jrkirby
He voted in his first post and then tunneled the entire time. In fact, I reach pretty much the opposite conclusion you do from the games you linked. That's actually exactly what he said. Um, no it's not. Voting in your first post in the thread, and voting methodically (or saying this stuff is suspicious and then voting a little later, as GK put it) are not the same.
He clearly says that his town games are more methodical, and that his scum games are more tunnelish. I'm wondering if you're reading his post that closely.
|
On May 19 2013 10:04 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 09:26 Spicydinosaur wrote:I'm reading raynpelikoneet as a shitty town. He claimed that GK was scum and supported it with a number of points in a couple of posts. This may not be the best argument but at least he's supporting his position. On May 19 2013 03:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay, here is the case, Goodkarma:
- Shitty case on Stutters with backpedalling without explanation.
- Contradicting himself on grush, REALLY BAD! STARSENSEESSSSSS!
- His meta comparsion on Jarjar is false.
- His meta comparsion on me is false.
- His stance on WoS is that Wos plays town "bad" and here he is bad, so he is scum. Bad =/= scum.
On May 19 2013 03:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
GK:
- Do you know haw Jarjar plays? Did you explain why he is scum as he does what he does?
- About me. What games about me you have read?
- About grush. You say "So in other words, you will always be town when you say starsenses. And you haven't said starsenses this game. Further, you say you will try to counter you own meta from now on, meaning you weren't starting to as of this game..." Look at your argument. You are basically saying "you didn't claim STARSENSES, YOU ARE SCUM, BUT IF YOU DO, YOU ARE ALSO SCUM".
I don't need to tell you why you are wrong, you need to tell me why you are right. so quotes please. Make sure you quote me from my last (town) game where i said i'm working 12h/7d/week. And call me a lurker then. However he then goes off the rails with iamperfection after he gives his quick view of the group. On May 19 2013 07:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:9. s0Lstice-town for now- Since he dislikes sputnik and gk that seems good to me.
16. raynpelikoneet-null- wants to kill gk and sputnik makes him ok in my book bad activity though Okay, this guy claimed scum. ##Unvote;
##Vote: iamperfectionggyo On May 19 2013 07:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
iamp, yamato, marm; i am involved, i am voting for iamp atm. he is calling one gut town and one guy null for same reasons. that is bullshit imo.
and marv. do not talk about martyring, you are the king of it. end of discussion. This seems more like a impulse child vote than anything throwing a hissy fit because he feels his play is on a different level. There is a clear difference in the mentality that went into the voting of GK and iamp. Seems very spammy for spammy sake. Who do you want to lynch. I agree with you on Rayn being shitty town. What I want to know is who is getting the noose. I suggest you take a look at sputnik for being a solid lynch for today.
I agree that Sputnik has posted absolutely nothing but garbage but I feel he should be shot by a vig and not lynched d1. I highly doubt his play is some grand scum plan that his scum buddies are comfortable with. Everyone could get behind a sputnik lynch because he's a shitty player. So if everyone agrees to lynch sputnik, what does that get us? More likely than not he'll show up as town, but everyone will have a solid defense for voting him.
I'm going to put my vote on WaveofShadow
His first few posts are complete spam. Then he sheeps on me about s0Lstice's meta game. A lot of his posts are full of self doubt and lack confidence.
On May 18 2013 04:37 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 04:28 grush57 wrote:
damnit sputnik you're playing textbook scum VT claim too, quelle surprise. ugh this is almost too easy, I'm feeling less good about it now. Whatever vote stays on 'till he gets back and actually contributes.
Jarjar on the other hand has posted some content, though very little. He's been the subject of attack a number of times but he has yet defended himself properly. Whether his in-activeness is due to RL or deliberate scum, I don't like it. I get the feeling he tried coasting D1 and got caught and really doesn't know what to do. His posts contain a lot of excuses which is scummy. I'm putting my vote on him.
##vote jarjardrinks
|
On May 19 2013 11:17 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 10:56 iamperfection wrote:
stutters you said you were back and all you did was ask one lousy question is that all you have to say? Thread was dead and I'm trying to filter dive to get some good reads. Seriously though, you don't see anything wrong with his second highest scumread being an association twenty four hours into a game?
what is scummy about it can be bad logic but it isn't necessarily scummy
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On May 19 2013 11:19 Spicydinosaur wrote:
I'm going to put my vote on WaveofShadow
##vote jarjardrinks
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On May 19 2013 11:13 iamperfection wrote:have your read the thread recently
yes
|
On May 19 2013 11:20 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:13 iamperfection wrote:On May 19 2013 11:12 Blazinghand wrote:
wos or jarjar have your read the thread recently yes
and you still think wos would make a good lynch
|
On May 19 2013 09:34 Stutters695 wrote:
I'm back.
Vayne can you explain why you think I'm scum except that s0l asked if I had played scum before. Pretty weak reasoning. I get asked that at least once a game by people who don't know me.
Pretty much your entire filter is making excuses and deflecting attention from yourself. Its not much but its a gut read.
|
On May 19 2013 11:20 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:19 Spicydinosaur wrote:
I'm going to put my vote on WaveofShadow
##vote jarjardrinks
EBWOP. Was supposed to be jar jar. wave was on my copy/paste from looking at his filter
|
On May 19 2013 11:19 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:17 s0Lstice wrote:On May 19 2013 11:13 yamato77 wrote:On May 19 2013 11:12 s0Lstice wrote:On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. What the hell? Did you read the games you linked? This is his first post after the /in post in the scum game you linked On April 05 2013 21:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
K, just caught up.
I think jrkirby is my scummiest read at the moment. He votes rainbows pretty early. Then later on he tells us that he feels like he "might actually be a fatty, and is just acting stupid" BUT he feels like he has to vote for him because he's "helping the skinnies".
Anyone that votes for someone and then defends them is gonna read scum to me.
##vote: jrkirby
He voted in his first post and then tunneled the entire time. In fact, I reach pretty much the opposite conclusion you do from the games you linked. That's actually exactly what he said. Um, no it's not. Voting in your first post in the thread, and voting methodically (or saying this stuff is suspicious and then voting a little later, as GK put it) are not the same. He clearly says that his town games are more methodical, and that his scum games are more tunnelish. I'm wondering if you're reading his post that closely.
Do I really need to quote this twice? The first paragraph is all about describing scumplay, which he says is tunnely and methodical.
|
On May 19 2013 11:24 s0Lstice wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:19 yamato77 wrote:On May 19 2013 11:17 s0Lstice wrote:On May 19 2013 11:13 yamato77 wrote:On May 19 2013 11:12 s0Lstice wrote:On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. On May 19 2013 11:07 goodkarma wrote:
As scum, he'd pop in and be like "look at these things that are suspicious about this dude," then a little later plop down a vote. His townie games he just kinda goes this and that are kinda suspicious and more slowly (and naturally) comes to a conclusion on who he thinks is scum.
In short, he comes down a lot harder on his scumsuspect in his play as scum.
Look at those filters I've linked and you should see what I mean. What the hell? Did you read the games you linked? This is his first post after the /in post in the scum game you linked On April 05 2013 21:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
K, just caught up.
I think jrkirby is my scummiest read at the moment. He votes rainbows pretty early. Then later on he tells us that he feels like he "might actually be a fatty, and is just acting stupid" BUT he feels like he has to vote for him because he's "helping the skinnies".
Anyone that votes for someone and then defends them is gonna read scum to me.
##vote: jrkirby
He voted in his first post and then tunneled the entire time. In fact, I reach pretty much the opposite conclusion you do from the games you linked. That's actually exactly what he said. Um, no it's not. Voting in your first post in the thread, and voting methodically (or saying this stuff is suspicious and then voting a little later, as GK put it) are not the same. He clearly says that his town games are more methodical, and that his scum games are more tunnelish. I'm wondering if you're reading his post that closely. Do I really need to quote this twice? The first paragraph is all about describing scumplay, which he says is tunnely and methodical.
I have a simple question for you:
Looking at JarJar's past games, do you feel his play this game more closely resembles his scumgame or his towngames?
|
On May 19 2013 11:10 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:09 DarthPunk wrote:On May 18 2013 07:32 Dandel Ion wrote:
Hey guys this thread looks extraordinarily dumb and only dumb shit is happening and I am extremely uninterested in everything that's happened so far.
I just was like "oh yeah another thread that's as full of irrelevant bs as Personality*, that gotta be FUN" so I just HAD to replace in.
Now I shall read my role PM.
Or shall I?
I guess I shall, but I'm not decided yet! This is something I just remembered. How many of you have replaced into a game before? I have several times and every single time I have recieved my role PM along with permission to start posting in the thread. I find it hard to believe Dandel did not read his role PM cause he was replacing in. He also then goes on to claim scum. Seems like standard Dandel trolling, no? Or do you think he's actually mafia making jokes like this?
Well he trolled as scum in a game I believe, but could do so as either alignment. But yeah I think he was probably not telling the truth about his role PM.
|
11589 Posts
On May 19 2013 11:31 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:10 yamato77 wrote:On May 19 2013 11:09 DarthPunk wrote:On May 18 2013 07:32 Dandel Ion wrote:
Hey guys this thread looks extraordinarily dumb and only dumb shit is happening and I am extremely uninterested in everything that's happened so far.
I just was like "oh yeah another thread that's as full of irrelevant bs as Personality*, that gotta be FUN" so I just HAD to replace in.
Now I shall read my role PM.
Or shall I?
I guess I shall, but I'm not decided yet! This is something I just remembered. How many of you have replaced into a game before? I have several times and every single time I have recieved my role PM along with permission to start posting in the thread. I find it hard to believe Dandel did not read his role PM cause he was replacing in. He also then goes on to claim scum. Seems like standard Dandel trolling, no? Or do you think he's actually mafia making jokes like this? Well he trolled as scum in a game I believe, but could do so as either alignment. But yeah I think he was probably not telling the truth about his role PM.
I don't feel like that, in particular, is alignment indicative.
|
On May 19 2013 11:32 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 11:31 DarthPunk wrote:On May 19 2013 11:10 yamato77 wrote:On May 19 2013 11:09 DarthPunk wrote:On May 18 2013 07:32 Dandel Ion wrote:
Hey guys this thread looks extraordinarily dumb and only dumb shit is happening and I am extremely uninterested in everything that's happened so far.
I just was like "oh yeah another thread that's as full of irrelevant bs as Personality*, that gotta be FUN" so I just HAD to replace in.
Now I shall read my role PM.
Or shall I?
I guess I shall, but I'm not decided yet! This is something I just remembered. How many of you have replaced into a game before? I have several times and every single time I have recieved my role PM along with permission to start posting in the thread. I find it hard to believe Dandel did not read his role PM cause he was replacing in. He also then goes on to claim scum. Seems like standard Dandel trolling, no? Or do you think he's actually mafia making jokes like this? Well he trolled as scum in a game I believe, but could do so as either alignment. But yeah I think he was probably not telling the truth about his role PM. I don't feel like that, in particular, is alignment indicative.
It's not fucking useful. But your probably right. Still. after that big entrance there isn't much to say in regards to Dandel. Doubt He is on the cards for a lynch today either.
|
11589 Posts
I don't like that people townread him just for shitting up the thread with Marv.
|
by your own criteria GK..
scum JarJar tunnels his top scum read
agree, in the scum game you linked, he voted in his first post, and tunneled from then on. he did not mention anybody else he is suspicious of until 4 days (real time) after game start, only supplying town reads as supporting information
scum JarJar was sure of himself
agree, tunneling makes you look pretty sure of yourself
scum JarJar was methodical with his vote
yes, he voted early
In this game, he has been suspicious of iamp here
On May 18 2013 03:07 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Sup fellas.
So far the only person acting suspect to me is iampi. I'm not even sure what he's trying to say about DP. That the little funny script he wrote makes him look bad?
@iampi, please explain in more detail what about DPs post looks scummy to you. Keep in mind that some of us weren't in previous games so we may not get some the references he was making.
suspicious of grush here:
On May 18 2013 21:09 JarJarDrinks wrote:So, in case I'm missing anything: this STARSENSES thing: I get that it's something grush usually says and didn't this game. Is there more to it than that or is that about it? I'd think that'd be a pretty dumb scum mistake if that's all it is. Though he'd obviously know all that so I don't think I'd read anything into it. HOWEVER, looking @ his filter, I'm trying to see if there's anything that looks townie about him. First he tells sputnik that he's playing textbook scum but when I ask about it he says he sounds noob town. The only other insight he offered was jumping on vayne. Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 04:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:On May 18 2013 04:28 grush57 wrote:
damnit sputnik you're playing textbook scum You're saying that as if you're upset about it. Are you actually reading him as scum right now? The reason I questioned him here is it just sounds like he knows sputnik is town and playing bad.
and this comes AFTER he started in on BH.
I would definitely say he is not tunneling here, in comparison to his scum game. His vote came only in response to iamps claim that he was bussing BH, it did not come with the case. His tone this game is definitely NOT sure of himself. He has been expressing remorse for his activity, and soft pressuring people as illustrated in the posts I showed.
Like, this is such a terrible meta case. I need to think on what that means some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
