~marv
Hydra Mini Mafia II - Extra Nuke Edition - Page 76
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
![]()
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
~marv | ||
John Matrix
163 Posts
too lazy to actually discuss things now. | ||
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
MockArmor, WoC, and Vivax should all be talked about to some degree. And FMB if for whatever reason BH decides to never post in this game. | ||
![]()
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
~marv | ||
NeutralSrvivngBalrog
Kyrgyzstan43 Posts
| ||
NeutralSrvivngBalrog
Kyrgyzstan43 Posts
| ||
NeutralSrvivngBalrog
Kyrgyzstan43 Posts
| ||
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
| ||
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
NeutralSrvivingBalrog (2): FiveTouch, Vivax420 FondleMyButtocks (1): John Matrix Votes not on hydra accounts don't count because I'm too lazy/bad to check/remember who is who. You should only post on your hydra accounts anyways. | ||
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
##Vote NSB | ||
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
GL TOWN! | ||
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
Again, any intention to start playing? | ||
NeutralSrvivngBalrog
Kyrgyzstan43 Posts
On April 16 2013 07:48 ShotgunBiceps wrote: @ NSB Again, any intention to start playing? When the flood control goes away | ||
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
On April 16 2013 07:49 NeutralSrvivngBalrog wrote: When the flood control goes away Clearly the flood control is already gone. Who do you want to lynch? | ||
![]()
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:56 MockArmor wrote: I mean, this guy hasn't really made any cases, pops in and says "Hi guys! I'll vote for the leader. Kthx bye!" He says nothing of what he thinks about FMB here. He just throws down a vote and afks... He doesn't followup at all on his reads on Rayne or myself... This guy shows no real investment in the game... I mean FMB's definitely scummy looking, but at its heart it feels more like a lurker lynch than anything else... And lurker lynches are stupidly easy for scum to get behind without real fallout later. It just doesn't make sense to me in a game where we could hypothetically have day 2 LYLO that we're pretty much policy lurker lynching someone. It's admittedly a little weak, and to be frank NSB fits the bill for exactly the same reason in this post if I'm wrong and Moc is town... On April 15 2013 04:45 NeutralSrvivngBalrog wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 14 2013 11:49 MockArmor wrote: @WaveofCheesecake: I believe you said something about "waiting" for me? I'm here, so fire away. Your entire case for MockArmor being scum was for "shifting our read on Hapa from scum to town," or something like that. In reality I made it a point to call out Hapa for what I perceived as buddying with potential scum motive. What caught my eye is as town Hapa must have more justification for his read. The way he thought you were town with such little justification didn't make sense to me from a town persepective. Hapa then satisfactorily justified his townread to me. I had been through the rest of his filter and seen nothing else that was suspicious. So with that clarification, I moved on. Sure an FOS is a flimsier version of an actual vote, but what I was pursuing was one suspicious point. It wasn't enough to vote him for without further investigation. Like what were you expecting? Right after my exchange with Hapa I'd be like, "Before I thought you were totes scum (which wasn't the case), now I think you're totes town (Which isn't the case either. Definitely leaning town on Hapa, but he's nowhere near "confirmed town" to me or anything...). Didn't you criticize my counterpart for the exact same thing?: So here's a question for you: Would you care to "expound" on this Rayne read of yours? Plenty of time has past and from what I've seen you've still been caught up on your exchange with Mocsta. I understand to some extent "waiting" for people like me, but why even bother posting if you're not going to help contribute meaningfully to discussion? More on that in a little bit... Posting the quote as a reminder: -GK On April 14 2013 12:14 MockArmor wrote: So some of the posts that have stuck out for me, as previously promised.: Comments like this. Like maybe in a normal mafia game where no one can communicate with each other could I see this, but in a hydra game where you have a buddy to tell you this shit there's NO EXCUSE for shitting up the thread with this. You then go on to post even more meaningless crap that isn't scumhunting.: Hi there. I'm WaveofCheesecake. Oh darn my scumread's not here. Need to keep waiting for him instead of expounding on Rayne who I've conveniently forgotten... THERE'S NO SCUMHUNTING HERE. This was actually done twice in quick succession. Only like a few minutes prior.: Like, you know, maybe pursue Rayne or some of those other scumreads you must have while you wait? You're doing a darn good job of remaining active in thread while not contributing much of anything except maybe a few points here and there in your own defense... Instead, let's make more pointless posts.: O rly? Clearly you're town. Because you're like SO acting like it... If you plan on convincing us you're town you'd better start actually pushing cases and scumreads. Instead of shitting up thread and "waiting" on people, be it your partner or a scumread. There's three scum right now, and you should have no problem posting stuff without first consulting your partner, so there's like zero reason why as town you should feel compelled to behave as you guys are right now. Both of these strike me as needlessly aggressive defenses. What I mean is that they're both putting a lot of effort into defending themselves without doing the corresponding amount of effort scumhunting. + Show Spoiler + On April 14 2013 14:14 WaveOfCheesecake wrote: I don't have the time for this now; if I feel it's appropriate I will post the meta case I have on Mocsta tomorrow. I can't be drawin into a million-hour discussion with Mocsta atm; I have too much work to do. The whole point of CC's discussion with Mocsta (for me) was to keep him talking so I could find out more. I don't care what the rest of town thinks about that conversation; the two of us know what we're doing. And where the fuck are you getting that I have to check everything through with CC? All I said was I don't know why he finds Rayn scummy because we never discussed it. Actually fuck it, I'll post the short form without proof atm; that'll have to be enough for now. If my meta reads are still shit then they're shit but that's why I wanted to hear more from GK---I'm not 100% cemented on my scumread/meta read and I was hoping GK could confirm in for me one way or another, which it hasn't. In short, two things. At the time of be making my meta case, Mocsta had already posted a ton without calling anyone scummy; just making careful posts and not giving a solid read on anyone. This is indicative of his early game scum play from both NMM 37 and Hydra I. As town he throws out reads left and right constantly and ACTUALLY MAKES CASES to follow up with his reads and endless lines of questioning, which he hasn't done here. He votes for us here without actually even calling us scum---obviously amounts to the same thing but rubs me the wrong way. Another random interesting meta tidbit to mention is Mocsta often enters a thread with much fanfare and hysteria, regardless of alignment (though MORE likely to do so as town.) Hydra mini I (scum) - was there when the game started, lots of trolling, lots of joking around. The Game (town) - replaced sandro after a day or so, lots of joking, calling people scum, whatnot. Nomination (town) - jovial lighthearted posting style, throwing votes and shit around at game entry. NMM 37 (scum) - Enters the thread with lighthearted tone and RNG fluff. This game he was not around when the game started, and you'll notice he did NOT joke around at all, rather he got supersrs right from the get-go. I believe this is because entering a game late as scum, he missed the 'permissible first few hours joking-around period' and doesn't want to start fooling around when people are actually having discussion for fear he will look scummy for trying to derail. NOTE: He had NO problem joking around in the middle of The Game when he entered because he was town and had no reason to be afraid or look guilty. Make of this case what you will for now. I might be able to expand on it further with better proof (especially since people are unlikely to go sifting through his meta themselves). CC was asking me to post this much earlier when the discussion was happening but I didn't want to derail trying to learn what I could at the time. I figure it's better out than in right now especially given thread sentiment. I'm going to attempt to study then go to bed but I might be able to check back on the thread a couple more times. The bolded hypothetical seems to me a pretty good explanation for what wos finds peculiar in mocsta's play. additionally, the other bolded thing. + Show Spoiler + On April 15 2013 00:19 InsertSmurfHere wrote: I'm in the same boat as Marv. People I am not willing to lynch: FT/Shotgun/JM/SLJ/Vivax That leaves: Raynmaster/MockArmor/Balrog/FMB/WoC Mock is involved in the most idiotic arguing in the game and seems to want to perpetuate the fighting with both WoC and Rayn. I actually feel that out of the three actives in this group, they are the most likely to be mafia. WoC actually seems more townish throughout this whole ordeal, since I think they've made more of an effort to clarify their stance and actually make a case on Mock, even if the meta argument is weak. Rayn is a fucking tossup, and I'm not at all sure of their alignment. I would rather not lynch into them yet. Balrog is a lurker lynch that I'd rather avoid, but simply by process of elimination has to be mafia if I'm right about all my town reads. That said, it's probably better to lynch a more active person, as a rule of thumb. Prom's hydra looks pretty awful. They've done almost nothing today, and I know Prom as someone that likes to get into the thick of things. What they have done is also not what I call good scum hunting, so it's a decent tell that they are lazy scum. Out of this comes two choices for lynch. Next post I decide which of Mock and Fondle is the better lynch. this seems like a decent summary of how i feel about it. + Show Spoiler + On April 14 2013 00:26 MockArmor wrote: No it doesn't explain the situation at all. For brevity once more + Show Spoiler + On April 13 2013 23:45 raynmaster wrote: From what i remember Palmar has a lot of meta on VE. VE could think Palmar is actually nuking him for a reason. Also the answer to their post came pretty quick and without thinking it much further. If it was marv i would think you would have thought about the possibilities from every perspective before posting a response. As it was VE, it's more likely that you guys actually are scum. Not sure though. I gotta consult Oats about what he does think of you guys. /rayn On April 13 2013 23:53 MockArmor wrote: Why do you feel the need to post in the thread to contribute; and then limp-dick finish with "I need to consult with my partner." This aligns very much with what Syllo said earlier - and from my experience in Hydra 1, I 100% agree. On April 13 2013 18:31 SamuelLJackson wrote: In a hydra format players should be more confident in sharing their thoughts and lacking the need to comment on irrelevant things as they can discuss things with their partner. Meanwhile mafia still feels the pressure of posting.. Let us re-cap the situation thus far:
If you are incapable of contributing to the thread, due to weak meta history; or, needing to reference with your partner in general. Why post in the first place? Before trying to bullshit me: keep in mind, I was scum in the last Hydra game. Henceforth why I agreed in full with the Syllo quote, which I will post for you one more time. P.S. Im not quoting this post, because Syllo saying it makes it valid. Im quoting it because he said it in better words than I. I also think there's an element of hypocrisy in giving advice to town, which is one of my favorite scumhunting heuristics. I've described it more in depth before, but basically scum love to give good advice to town on how to play, but they don't have any intrinsic motivation to follow that advice later. So when players give good advice to town and then don't indicate that they are keeping that advice in mind later, they're scum. The specific instance: in the middle of engaging in a pretty pointless back-and-forth about minutiae, mockarmor tells his opponent that people shouldn't be posting unless they ahve something to say, and they shouldn't be posting about talking to their hydra partner. However, i would argue that the whole tunnely argument was just such an exchange, since it wasn't designed to tell us more about either player (certainly mockarmor would say so but that's not the sense I get) and it just gives both sides something to rant about. some other examples: + Show Spoiler + On April 14 2013 03:32 MockArmor wrote: Whats a read on a null tell.. lol? On April 14 2013 04:04 MockArmor wrote: Hes going to sleep. And im very content with where "our" vote is. Regardless; I have said my piece, and laid my out my vote. Won't comment any further till I have had a chance to discuss with my other slot. Night. On April 14 2013 03:46 MockArmor wrote: Are you implying that because "i'm so high" you can not be held accountable? put all the quotes in spoilers so ppl wont be like omg hes augmenting his filter also putting this in spoiler for the same reason + Show Spoiler [ascii penis] + …………………...„„-~^^~„-„„_ ………………„-^*'' : : „'' : : : : *-„ …………..„-* : : :„„--/ : : : : : : : '\ …………./ : : „-* . .| : : : : : : : : '| ……….../ : „-* . . . | : : : : : : : : | ………...\„-* . . . . .| : : : : : : : :'| ……….../ . . . . . . '| : : : : : : : :| ……..../ . . . . . . . .'\ : : : : : : : | ……../ . . . . . . . . . .\ : : : : : : :| ……./ . . . . . . . . . . . '\ : : : : : / ….../ . . . . . . . . . . . . . *-„„„„-*' ….'/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '| …/ . . . . . . . ./ . . . . . . .| ../ . . . . . . . .'/ . . . . . . .'| ./ . . . . . . . . / . . . . . . .'| '/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'| '| . . . . . \ . . . . . . . . . .| '| . . . . . . \„_^- „ . . . . .'| '| . . . . . . . . .'\ .\ ./ '/ . | | .\ . . . . . . . . . \ .'' / . '| | . . . . . . . . . . / .'/ . . .| | . . . . . . .| . . / ./ ./ . .| PS i guess drazerk posted something? ...but frankly the whole martyr thing has me doubting it's NSB simply because we only have 1 scum left. Rather than subjectively playing against his win-condition if he's town, he's LITERALLY playing against his win-condition if he's scum requesting town lynch him. Marv disagrees with me, but we thought it was worth bringing to the thread. What do you guys think? | ||
NeutralSrvivngBalrog
Kyrgyzstan43 Posts
and that you should all kill him for doing it | ||
![]()
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:17 NeutralSrvivngBalrog wrote: i think drazerk shouldn't be martyring and that you should all kill him for doing it Okay belay that town, I'm taking this as scum concession. GG guys. | ||
NeutralSrvivngBalrog
Kyrgyzstan43 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:19 FiveTouch wrote: Okay belay that town, I'm taking this as scum concession. GG guys. what no its not | ||
![]()
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Interesting - why not claim scum if you really feel like it's in town's best interest to lynch you? Does that not seem like the fastest course to an NSB lynch? Why put on the show if anytime someone calls you scum you're like "No I'm not scum! But lynch me anyway!" | ||
NeutralSrvivngBalrog
Kyrgyzstan43 Posts
| ||
| ||