Ego Mini Mafia - Page 4

On April 08 2013 07:17 AxleGreaser wrote:
I have seen this post.



I am comfortable with my vote where it is on WoS.

I will be here for bit then nap then come back.

On April 08 2013 03:38 WaveofShadow wrote:
I'm curious about a few things, Ace.
First of all, before you showed up I was already at L-1 and having tried to give town something to use upon my death, someone unvoted me. Marv, I believe. It only got better after that point, not worse and what saved my life were the posts I made before you showed up. Therefore, no need to 'blueclaim' to save my life since it was already saved, yet you show up after and tell me I shouldn't hesitate to claim my role, since you didn't believe I already did. Why try to get a claim out of me?

Second, I am unsure as to what 'trap' exactly you were trying to set. Why would I explicitly lie about a claim like that? I am aware it turned out to be a misunderstanding, but do you think that as scum I would expect to just lie and get out of being under suspicion magically somehow?

The fact that prplhz sees all the same things I do pretty clearly makes me suspect his scumminess if his thoughts are coming from the same place as mine, which troubles me. Prplhz, can I get something else resembling town-assisting attitude from you? If you're actually town and not scum (which is still hard for me to believe given your activity and vote choices/timing) please contribute positively.

On April 08 2013 07:31 iamperfection wrote:
i dont understand all this prplhz love all of sudden.

The fucker didn't even make use of his vote so all his prodding of ace is somewhat useless and didn't even have the balls to outright call ace scum. to me he looks like scared scum afraid to do anything.

I didn't think you were saved at L-2 (which is a big reason why I didn't vote). If you were going to get lynched I'd rather you claim before the hammer and have the Town debate on that and see if it's worth keeping you alive. It's normal play in majority lynch and I'm sorry if I assumed most people around would behave like that. But once again it makes no sense for me to stick a vote on you in that situation as anyone could end the day with a hammer right after. I thought I made it clear but even though I was leaning in the direction of you being Scum I wanted a bit more information and that is how the entire "where did you claim?" thing happened.


The trap was just seeing if you said "I claimed" and then when I asked, ignored it or just made up a bunch of bs where you didn't really claim but implied it. Like I already said you had no idea I was referring to a roleclaim, and I had no clue you were referring to your post early in the game. As to the bolded - yes. Scum do it all the time because they don't think Townies are reading the thread

On April 08 2013 08:02 prplhz wrote:
@ace what exactly are you trying to do with now and how are you trying to accomplish it?

On April 08 2013 08:15 Ace wrote:
I don't know where I implied my read was based on you being a bad player. It was entirely based on catching you in a lie. I don't know how many different ways I can say this. I'm not trying to discredit your play either.



An early game post where you post "Phew. Real happy I rolled town this time around" isn't going to be taken as a legit Town claim. Especially when you are under 0 pressure and everyone is just joking around to start the game. I think you're being unrealistic on that one.

You can read any of my Mafia games and the attached QTs where I explictly talk about Townies not reading the thread, not seeing Scum lie all because we know they won't go back and look. But I don't want to go further on this as a discussion on this doesn't help the current situation in the thread right now.

On April 08 2013 08:18 AxleGreaser wrote:


The number of people I discuss things with would depend on the number of questions I had about what people had done.
The tendency not to interfere when another person is applying pressure also means, if someone else in the thread is asking the right questions i can listen to there answers rather than just chime in with me too questions.

How deeply id you think about why the difference if there is one might exist?
Did you ask if there could be a towny reason for the difference?
Did you consider the options above?

On April 08 2013 08:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Does anyone else think marv's notes on Axle are kinda... terrible?

On April 08 2013 08:30 Ace wrote:
@WoS: I'm up for being convinced about Axle, but I don't think a meta-lynch based on his activity is a strong enough reason. I also mentioned Tunkeg since I think he/she has been even more absent.

On April 08 2013 06:47 WaveofShadow wrote:
Where are Axle, Rayn and Ace? And prplhz you're going to keep your vote on me despite your apparent push on Ace?

Scib if we can't consolidate on Ace I would switch to Axle for the record, I've had scumreads on both for a little while. Axle has done too little too cryptically and while I know that's his 'thing,' he hasn't addressed my points on how weak his push on me seems considering its basis. Unlike Tunkeg's case which is at least coherent and has multiple points of fact involved (though wrong), Axle has none of this and instead chooses to focus on the semantics of my interaction with him and Rayn.

On April 08 2013 08:40 Palmar wrote:
Actually let's narrow it down.

Ace, Sciberbia.

Pick your poison guys.

On April 08 2013 08:43 prplhz wrote:
okay i simply cannot believe ace's "scum lie because they know townies don't read the thread"-thing. it's rather hilarious considering that everybody in this thread caught the supposed "lie", some (hello) even knew what the hell WoS was talking about (the town claim in the beginning).

he seriously thinks that, when it comes to a claim, WoS is banking on not a single one of the many town players in this game will gloss over his filter and fact check it. i just cannot wrap my head around that line of thought.

a lie in itself doesn't mean anything though, ace never explains why on earth scum would lie about this. "because he knows they will not catch him" is simply not a reason to lie. technically, all fits. ace could have seen it as a lie and then he could lynch him because townies don't lie. but that's the laziest excuse i have seen in as long as i can remember and ace isn't even recanting or anything, he's dead serious about it.

i simply don't get it.

On April 08 2013 08:59 prplhz wrote:
i simply just want both dead. can we push them both to 6 and then put them both to 7 at the same time for a double lynch?

On April 08 2013 08:55 prplhz wrote:
i can't believe axle just appeared out of fucking nowhere when we were about to lynch ace.