EPTI agree to all the rules and activity requirements in the OP.
Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 1
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I agree to all the rules and activity requirements in the OP. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 02 2013 08:52 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Well i sure don't feel like studying. You need to change that attitude or you won't be of much use to me in this game. Nevertheless I will humor you and grant you your request. I have some supersimple unwritten guidelines that work well for the majority of mafia situations. I use my head and I lynch scum. And that is my answer to your question. To assure you understand my ground I will elaborate. At any lynch in this game I will advocate lynching the scummiest fish in the pond. Out of place hammering can ofcourse change a players position in the list. But there is no point in lynching him if despite his hammering there is someone else who looks more scummy. That's why I say ney on policy lynching. It's ment to work as a threat to keep lazy/bad townies from doing rash stupid stuff that makes them look scummy and with that allow mafia to do what they want without sticking out. But that's no differen't from normal. In the end it all comes down to the townies to play intelligently and try not to do scummy stuff out of nowhere. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 02 2013 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: Elaborate. There are so many "rules" and "traps" that I can't keep them all straight. The legend goes...+ Show Spoiler + Kenpachi claims vanilla townie and the first person to contest it is mafia. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 02 2013 09:47 VisceraEyes wrote: If you're going to criticize me for anything, you should answer questions posed of you first. Do you think RoL is scum for "contesting" my "claim" a la Kenpachi Rule? No I don't. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I was scumhunting. Nothing of real worth was happening and an opportunity opened to fish for reactions, what I mostly wanted was RoL's reaction and or if someone else appeared to comment on RoL. However you cornered me instantly and asked me what I thought about it which was something I wanted to avoid. Because answering that would be eating my cookie. And here we are. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 02 2013 10:29 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: ##unvote: VE ##Vote: Risk.nuke It's like you brought up the Kenpachi rule just to see if someone else was willing to run with it and kill me. Wanting townies to do your work for you? Why would I fake a perfectly legit argument? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 02 2013 10:43 VisceraEyes wrote: Can you point out where I've been talking about "the dangers of voting"? I'm pretty sure all I've talked about was how Lazer's and RoL's policies were retarded and unfair respectively. Will you please god damn stop tunneling? The thread have talked about it, I assume you read the thread? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Instead I told the truth of what I believed in which made me look worse. Why did I do that, because I am mafia and retarded or because I am town and interested in finding scum, not just looking like I'm trying to find scum. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
You want REAL scummy shit. Everyone that's not posting are scummier then those who are posting. For 2, I personally think Hopeless1der look very uninterested in finding scum. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I don't KNOW you're town but I did have and still have a townread on you. There is no right or wrong answer about the Kenpachi Rule, some people believe strongly in it, some people believe less strongle. undeniably It has a high accuracy from statsistics but in my memory players who've been busted by it was generally newer players and doesn't neccersary mean the same thing for a player like RoL, but that wouldn't had been something I would have had to share with you now? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 02 2013 11:16 VisceraEyes wrote: But this isn't the case at all. I voted for you. In my vote post I even outline where I tried to consider a town motivation. I'm TRYING to keep an open mind, but you keep slamming it shut with appeals and bullshit. Like what do you mean "aggressively"? I've kept a cool head about this whole thing. You're the one freaking out bro, not me. the lashing out is about when I said people had talked about instant hammer, and you asked me to point out where YOU specifically had talked about it, even though I never said you specifically had. | ||
| ||
