| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Hi guys I'm reading. I have a feeling I'm not gonna like something I read, anyone wanna tell me what it is to lessen the impact reading it has? Posts that have "Ghor" at the top of them. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:20 VisceraEyes wrote: Psh try again Cheese Ghor a badass. But I thought I was your designated badass? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 03 2013 00:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Jesus you guys are active while I'm asleep. ##Unvote I don't think we should lynch Risk today. How I got +2 to my pressure vote is beyond me. -znipplez- Found it. Cheese you unvoted and said "Gee golly guys I never really wanted to lynch risk and I'm confused by the extra votes that aren't mine" when reading could have told you everything you needed to know about the extra votes. You don't comment on any of the content against risk, simply discredit the wagon by saying the other votes were merely "+2" to your vote...which is very obviously not the case. And so I ask. Why do you not want to lynch risk today specifically? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:23 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: But I thought I was your designated badass? No you're just a sexy beast. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Hopeless... At this point in time risk had 3 votes on him. You kinda threw some shit at him and called him scummy. What was your intention with this post? I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip. Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:25 VisceraEyes wrote: Found it. Cheese you unvoted and said "Gee golly guys I never really wanted to lynch risk and I'm confused by the extra votes that aren't mine" when reading could have told you everything you needed to know about the extra votes. You don't comment on any of the content against risk, simply discredit the wagon by saying the other votes were merely "+2" to your vote...which is very obviously not the case. And so I ask. Why do you not want to lynch risk today specifically? Ughhhhhh making me type things. The vote on Risk was basically to make him post after he said hi. Worked, cool story. The only evidence against Risk is that he was 'looking like he wanted a kenpachi rule wagon'. Other than that, he's a bit floppy poppy on some things but not that candidate I was to lynch right meow. I'm more concerned with Lazerman, hopeless, and RoL right now. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote: I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip. Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch. It's that type of post I hate, Hopeless. I call it a Clarity. Clarity_nl did that in a game as scum, it was like he was bolstering a case without actually committing. I think that's what you were doing, prodding people to vote with no committal. And look, you can back out of it easy :D How do the intentions behind voting sylencia not match with a scumread on risk.nuke? Both of them could be scum, according to him? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
risk.nuke's read on Hopeless is actually not bad. Not bad enough for me to ##Unvote: risk.nuke What I find interesting about Hopeless is how he's cheerleading the risk.nuke lynch while never himself being on the risk.nuke wagon. He excuses it with "Well I just didn't want the day to end early" or whatever, but risk.nuke now only has 2 votes on him out of 5 needed to lynch. The interesting thing about Hopeless is that while he's cheerleading the risk.nuke lynch, he's voting for Ghor. Why? On April 03 2013 00:34 Hopeless1der wrote: so...you want to polarize the lynch between your initial scumread and somone who you say "won't comment" on your initial scumread. Why not just push to get risk lynched? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:38 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: It's that type of post I hate, Hopeless. I call it a Clarity. Clarity_nl did that in a game as scum, it was like he was bolstering a case without actually committing. I think that's what you were doing, prodding people to vote with no committal. And look, you can back out of it easy :D How do the intentions behind voting sylencia not match with a scumread on risk.nuke? Both of them could be scum, according to him? Yes, but by that logic any two players could be scum. ghor seemingly had a limited read on sylencia and was trying to develop one based on sylencia's response to risk's filter and the surrounding discussion. Sylencia "failed" whatever Ghor's criteria was, but during the whole process, ghor isn't really pushing risk nuke at all, he's needling away at sylencia, someone who maintains that he can see both sides of the coin and is hesitant to commit. Calling them both scum would involve tying the non-commital stance to a scum motive, something that ghor has neglected. Its a very straightforward thing to say, but he doesn't do it. I don't think he's legitimately trying to push for risk's lynch because I believe ghor and risk.nuke are the scum team. His pushing sylencia as risk`s teammate doesnt make sense because we should just lynch risk in that case, theres enough support for it. Why bother introducing a new candidate? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
[QUOTE]On April 03 2013 01:38 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: [QUOTE]On April 03 2013 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote: [QUOTE]On April 03 2013 01:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Hopeless... [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 10:49 Hopeless1der wrote: [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 10:44 risk.nuke wrote: [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 10:29 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: ##unvote: VE ##Vote: Risk.nuke It's like you brought up the Kenpachi rule just to see if someone else was willing to run with it and kill me. Wanting townies to do your work for you?[/QUOTE] Why would I fake a perfectly legit argument?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 09:50 risk.nuke wrote: [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 09:47 VisceraEyes wrote: [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 09:45 risk.nuke wrote: VE, RoL. If you're going to tunnel-bitch-argue in the thread atleast argue about something remotely relevant.[/QUOTE] If you're going to criticize me for anything, you should answer questions posed of you first. Do you think RoL is scum for "contesting" my "claim" a la Kenpachi Rule?[/QUOTE] No I don't.[/QUOTE] Doesn't seem all that legit to me. [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote: [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 08:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: [QUOTE]On April 02 2013 08:37 risk.nuke wrote: Worst vote ever.[/QUOTE] On the contrary, best vote ever.[/QUOTE] I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.[/QUOTE] Also, scumslip in that he knows CC is town.[/QUOTE] At this point in time risk had 3 votes on him. You kinda threw some shit at him and called him scummy. What was your intention with this post?[/QUOTE] I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip. Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch.[/QUOTE] It's that type of post I hate, Hopeless. I call it a Clarity. Clarity_nl did that in a game as scum, it was like he was bolstering a case without actually committing. I think that's what you were doing, prodding people to vote with no committal. And look, you can back out of it easy :D How do the intentions behind voting sylencia not match with a scumread on risk.nuke? Both of them could be scum, according to him?[/QUOTE] Yes, but by that logic any two players could be scum. ghor seemingly had a limited read on sylencia and was trying to develop one based on sylencia's response to risk's filter and the surrounding discussion. Sylencia "failed" whatever Ghor's criteria was, but during the whole process, ghor isn't really pushing risk nuke at all, he's needling away at sylencia, someone who maintains that he can see both sides of the coin and is hesitant to commit. Calling them both scum would involve tying the non-commital stance to a scum motive, something that ghor has neglected. Its a very straightforward thing to say, but he doesn't do it. I don't think he's legitimately trying to push for risk's lynch because I believe ghor and risk.nuke are the scum team. His pushing sylencia as risk`s teammate doesnt make sense because we should just lynch risk in that case, theres enough support for it. Why bother introducing a new candidate?[/QUOTE] Okay I see what you mean. But we need to stop the association cases pre-flip. Now. You're pushing Ghor as risks teammate... why bother introducing another candidate? That's hyporcritical. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:46 VisceraEyes wrote: Hopeless if you really felt that way your vote would be on risk.nuke. You're accusing Ghor of being risk's "scumbuddy" because he's not voting for risk. What the hell are you doing? Not voting for risk. You say Ghor is attacking Sylencia in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. What are you doing? Attacking Ghor in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. Your play is wholly and completely contradictory and scummy as sin. Do you have anything to say for yourself? My vote on ghor was to get him to answer my bloody question about his stance on risk instead of directing me to his filter. ##Unvote: Ghor ##Vote: risk.nuke | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote: -snipples- Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch. But see this post tells a different tale. This post tells of a D1 in which Hopeless1der is leading a Ghor lynch with reasoning. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:49 Hopeless1der wrote: CC, the difference is I've presented them as teammates, not Scum A and Scum B I thought the connection between syl and risk was implied in Ghors post. Scum Risk under pressure ---> scum syl deflects said pressure by voting me. Is it not the same thing you are implying about ghor? Scum Risk under pressure ---> Scum ghor deflects said pressure by voting Syl. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
*brofist risk.nuke* We cool dawg. For now. | ||
|
Ghor
Russian Federation140 Posts
All reasoning laid out, hopeless not absorb it. Hopeless, question: Ghor saw the scumslip you pointed out that was none.Ghor answered to your assessment, what do you deduce from it? (Ghor deduces it another example of hopeless amazing reading comprehension) | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:56 Ghor wrote: ghor think hopeless braindead if he thinks ghor teammate with risk. ghor pointed out fallacies with risk early, try get proper opinion on him from sylencia. All reasoning laid out, hopeless not absorb it. Hopeless, question: Ghor saw the scumslip you pointed out that was none.Ghor answered to your assessment, what do you deduce from it? (Ghor deduces it another example of hopeless amazing reading comprehension) it was what initially put me onto you as scum, so thank you for the compliment. | ||
| ||
|
|
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Ret
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
