EPTTL Mafia LXI
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
I'll probably rejoin when it's about to start but I don't want to risk forgetting about this while it's waiting to fill up | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Some thoughts as to what I've seen so far but they're not really worth shit until I'm caught up since most of it was probably answered. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
I'm drawing up a more detailed post at the moment. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 26 2013 07:36 VisceraEyes wrote: Stutters: Palmar's interaction with me. He clearly doesn't give a shit about the game, and he's hiding in his VE tunnel to excuse himself from doing anything productive. He's actively not giving a shit. I'm not paying much heed to it this game they but I've seen him play similarly before while town (prplhz in yanmm iirc, maybe in a big game too but can't remember). Others seeing him as wrong while he isn't really pushing because he expects people to sheep him doesn't necessarily mean he's scum. How he reacts after is much more telling imo. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Of the people who seem lynchable today: VE: I really don't see how VE is doing anything lynchable that ShiaoPi isn't doing worse. I disagree with his reads, but I'm not seeing the "lazy" VE that Palmar is mentioning. At least not to the extent that he should be lynched over some of these other people. ShiaoPi: Pretty much the only thing I've said in my few posts. Easily my choice for a lynch currently. When I was catching up before joining I noticed similar things to VE and Vivax on that. He hammered a town player (would be understandable if he had expressed any interest before that) and has actively been avoiding major topics. Clarity-nl: TBH he doesn't seem as bad as others are making him sound but I need to go over his stuff in context of the thread. Again I see questionable stuff but nothing that comes close to what i see as shady about Shiao. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 27 2013 04:02 WaveofShadow wrote: Uh, so stutters, I appreciate a ninjavote on my scumread as much as the next person, but for a guy who professes to find someone scummy for not interacting with their scumread, you're certainly looking mighty hypocritical right now. What's up, guy? Was typing out a response and I thought I made it pretty clear here + Show Spoiler + On April 26 2013 07:34 Stutters695 wrote: VE:I thought between the Vivax case and your points that the case on Shiao was pretty good. What specifically made you switch to Palmar over Shiao? I can understand why Palmar's posting is like he is, but Shiao has hammered oats when he hadn't interacted or even mentioned him all game with a very weak justification (Oats wasn't doing shit so why not hammer him for info [which he never brought up again]). I'm just not following what made you so sold on Palmar over him. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
ShiaoPi: You have yet to adress any points against you ever, much less give a reason a single reason why we should lynch a claimed cop over you (except that he's wrong). So I'll ask you: What made you drop your suspicion on Sharrant (note: not why you voted Oats, why you never pushed Sharrant in D2)? You say Gigyas should be lynched for being non-committal, no thread presence, and just going with the flow of the thread. That's awfully similar to your 3 reads throughout the game, none of which you have voted for. Any explanations or are you just going to say more obvious stuff like "Kill stutters" to try and deflect from yourself again? | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 30 2013 03:07 ShiaoPi wrote: LOL The points raised against me are mostly just inactivity and a fucking cop check which is just wrong. Besides hammering someone is kind of committal dont you think so? My read on sharrant changed as d1 progressed. Unfortunately I was unable to be active, so all you see is a seemingly total turnaround. Also I did adress points against me, so you are either dumb and unable of doing reading comprehension or just lying. Dunno why I answer to you anyway seeing that you are scum and should be dealt with fire. bed time now You hammered Oats when he was sitting at L-1 for fifteen minutes. Of fucking course he didn't have time to contribute more. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt considering you hammered a townie WHO YOU NEVER HAD A SCUMREAD ON but if you're just going to dodge answering I'll await your flip. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 30 2013 03:32 TheRavensName wrote: I called him giggleS recently, and I believe that post was in response to something I said. Correct, the post I called him giggles was a direct response to that post (plus its just fun to call people names). | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 30 2013 03:54 ShiaoPi wrote: yeah you claim to have read my oh so small filter. just stop lying At no point in that post did you say what made you think that Sharrant was now not a suspect at all. You didn't provide new reads so it clearly wasn't that you just found a better candidate. And sitting at L-1 is significantly different than L-2 or higher. Oats might have still been lynched but had he sat at L-1 for a while I would expect much better content out of him than he was giving, given that he's town. I'm saying you hammered a townie "to know more" and never said anything about it after. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 30 2013 04:44 Ace wrote: what? I've been around the entire game - where could I have slipped by? VE -> Palmar Palmar->CC CC->VE Town JK dont target any of them, let town docs take care of that. roleblocking any of them will screw us. let scum worry about who to rb. I tend to be not trusting of people pushing plans, especially when its like someone saying a wagon is bad without a way to verify. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 30 2013 05:35 Ace wrote: Palmar has a guilty on you tho - thoughts? @stutters: what exactly are you referring to is being based on assumptions and should be done another way? I'm in my phone now so can't pull the exact quote but I remembered a detailed post about how people on the oats &ships wagons probably had a scum among them. Then your posts about cop claims and what they mean is all dependanrt on assumptions and thus could just be conjecture to appear active without giving out as much as you would with your earlier play which felt more solid to me. Since I'm a prime vig target and could easily die before or with Shiao i felt it worth bringing up because you're clearly able to pull off such a play. | ||
| ||
