|
On April 29 2013 07:23 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 07:06 Sharrant wrote: VE, aside from Palmar who do you want to lynch today? And if you could instantly lynch someone right now, no discussion with anyone, that person just drops dead, who would it be? Would it be the same person you want to lynch today? Yamato would be my immediate lynch if I had one. His attitude makes it hard for me to want to lynch anyone else.
Is there anything aside from his attitude? Can you show me specific posts you don't think a town Yamato would make?
|
On April 29 2013 07:41 VisceraEyes wrote: I go over his posts later man, I'm about to do family night tonight. You asked me who I'd lynch with no discussion LMAO
Like, I get that you and several others are highly suspicious of me for my Shiao push but honestly reading overnight has left me more unsure than when I started. I'm gonna have another look and I'll provide my thoughts about the lynch later on. Right now I'm just following along on my phone.
I asked you two questions. Basically, "if you had a bullet, who would die", and "who would you push for lynch today"? Perhaps I could have phrased that better to begin with, but I wanted it to be in the most neutral terms.
You don't have to be so defensive, I'm not trying to push for your lynch like I did Clarity, I'm trying to get a read on you to know if I that's what I need to do later. Have a good night with your family, drop some good reads tomorrow, and I'd like for you to answer both questions with some explanation on your choices.
|
Well, this certainly suddenly gained a flair for the dramatic. I'm diggin' it.
|
I agree with the two of you, Yamato should swing today.
|
On April 29 2013 10:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Hell. I didn't want to claim but fuck I guess I have to now that Palmar is being retarded if he really is another cop.
I'm an Alignment Cop
NIGHT 1 = SHIAOPI INNOCENT
NIGHT 2 = SYLENCIA GUILTY
I wanted to lynch ShaioPi yesterday because I didn't know his alignment despite my check. It would help confirm my sanity. I now know that I cannot be paranoid or naiive, so I'm sane or insane. I'm going to trust Shia is town based on yesterdays events. I am SANE. Sylencia is mafia.
I didn't think I'd have to claim today if I could just case Syl T.T
This seems pretty reasonable. I will be voting Sylencia.
Palmar Who did you try and check on N1?
|
On April 29 2013 10:30 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:28 Sharrant wrote:On April 29 2013 10:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Hell. I didn't want to claim but fuck I guess I have to now that Palmar is being retarded if he really is another cop.
I'm an Alignment Cop
NIGHT 1 = SHIAOPI INNOCENT
NIGHT 2 = SYLENCIA GUILTY
I wanted to lynch ShaioPi yesterday because I didn't know his alignment despite my check. It would help confirm my sanity. I now know that I cannot be paranoid or naiive, so I'm sane or insane. I'm going to trust Shia is town based on yesterdays events. I am SANE. Sylencia is mafia.
I didn't think I'd have to claim today if I could just case Syl T.T This seems pretty reasonable. I will be voting Sylencia. Palmar Who did you try and check on N1? BC
Well, if nothing else that part of your story is believable.
I think that it's funny that your "attempting to play awful" gave me a strong town read on you though.
|
On April 29 2013 10:34 Ace wrote: Sharrant dont vote syl yet. Look at those detective checks. Why would he investigate those 2 and claim when he is unconfirmed? he just made a case on sylencia - what is the rush? Palmar's claim should cause him to NOT claim if he is a real detective.
You're right. I'll think about this more, I'll be taking my vote off for now.
I guess the first place to start is where CC ended up on ShiaoPi yesterday.
|
On April 29 2013 11:20 Ace wrote:This game shall forever be known as The Triple Cop Claim Caper. I proclaim it thus.![[image loading]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yXP1AG1axkY/TjZ1ONY5BvI/AAAAAAAAAhk/Vw-NpEIqneo/s1600/crossing-the-red-sea.png)
Everything up to this post has pretty much had me in tears. This is just amazing.
At this point I feel like we have to lynch Sylencia just because everything somehow landed on his head, but I don't even. I just don't even.
|
On April 29 2013 11:26 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 11:25 Ace wrote:On April 29 2013 11:20 ObviousOne wrote: Why WOULDN'T people investigate lurkers, people who are unlikely to be FRAMED and in the absence of vigis will not be SHOT either? if you believe this then you are claiming Scum. Ve and Mr.CC's checks would be real implicating Sylencia and then you by extension genius lol. Assuming they're both sane, and real But yeah, instead of thinking about figuring the game out, just call everyone mafia Real town, Ace
What is this post? Seriously? Are you not reading the thread?
Ace has been the biggest one saying it's likely at least one of the checks are faked, and you feel the need to sling dirt at him in that way?
|
And we just had another claim... lol
|
OO, reading your post earlier, are you claiming vanilla?
|
On April 29 2013 11:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Nah you've drawn your conclusions "from my filter". Good luck with that bruh.
VE, I'd like an answer on this one too. The worst thing you can possibly do right now, is get huffy and not explain. If you're mafia, you're painting a big target on your forehead. If you're town, you're doing the same while making everyone actively work against your claim and checks.
|
On April 29 2013 12:00 ObviousOne wrote: I think if it helps with your investigations you should kill me today to check your results, but as far as I know I am plain old vanilla as a motherfucker and I want to lynch objectively-scummy and extremely infuriating to read Sylencia.
Sylencia received a warning for inactivity, yes?
This problem may solve itself, and we can look at a different lynch today. Or at least up until he flips, if he does not come back.
|
On April 29 2013 12:01 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Focus people focus. We know (or at least I do, if you don't believe me go away kk) that one of Sylencia or ShaioPi is scum. We lynch one of them today. I'm hedging my bets on Sylencia. Any more of any other claims and focus on any other people is nonsense. We lynch into Syl and Shaio and come out with our hands covered in red blood.
That's our focus for today. All else can wait.
However unlikely it is, it's still possible for all 3 people checked to be town, is it not?
If Shiao is miller, and CC is insane we could have 3 townies.
Unlikely, I know, but still possible.
And if OO and Syl are both millers and Shiao town it's also possible.
Again, very unlikely scenario, but it worries me that we could lynch 3 people based on these claims and still have the possibility of hitting 0 scum.
|
On April 29 2013 12:25 Ace wrote: Wos we need to figure this scenario out. Voting for WoS is implusive. Before we do anything lets all sit down, take a deep breath, and think our way through this.
Your analysis on the situation looks sound. I think the right course of action then is to flip Sylencia, and have the cops make a little circle.
On April 29 2013 12:28 VisceraEyes wrote: I PROBABLY agree that there's one fake-claim in the cop claims.
But I don't want that to be a given in any scenario right now. Palmar losing steam after that buildup should really earn him a policy lynch tbh but I digress.
I have town read on OO. If I'm to believe CC's cop claim, I want to lynch Shiao because Sylencia is the same alignment as OO. Shiao was on the block yesterday too. Shiao could still be scum and no one is talking about him anymore. Talk about Shiao.
I have a town read on OO as well, but I still think Sylencia is the better lynch. He is the keystone of the checks. I'll read over Shiao and post something on him tomorrow, he's not going to be forgotten.
QUOTE]On April 29 2013 12:31 Sylencia wrote: In any case before you guys rush things let me catch up before quick lynching, since that's literally the worst thing you could do right now[/QUOTE]
It won't be a quick lynch. I want to hear every read you've got.
|
On April 30 2013 02:23 Stutters695 wrote: Well since the thread has died down, let's try this:
ShiaoPi: You have yet to adress any points against you ever, much less give a reason a single reason why we should lynch a claimed cop over you (except that he's wrong).
So I'll ask you:
What made you drop your suspicion on Sharrant (note: not why you voted Oats, why you never pushed Sharrant in D2)?
You say Gigyas should be lynched for being non-committal, no thread presence, and just going with the flow of the thread. That's awfully similar to your 3 reads throughout the game, none of which you have voted for.
Any explanations or are you just going to say more obvious stuff like "Kill stutters" to try and deflect from yourself again?
You said you were already caught up. It's been about two and a quarter hours since that point. You already know Shiao is likely to have his neck in the noose come tomorrow. Either give some really, really strong analysis of Shiao OR find someone who you think is suspicious and write up a case about them OR at least weigh in on the cop situation, and what you think is the best course of action.
|
GiygaS, what's your current read on Ace? I'd like you to explain what you draw on as your evidence as explicitly as possible.
VE, are you around? Do you want to like... talk about stuff or something. Let's talk about someone you think isn't getting as much attention as their play deserves.
|
On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles.
I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be.
Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this?
On April 30 2013 03:19 yamato77 wrote: Wondering where hopelesswunder went
I'm wondering where the conversation about Hopeless1der went. You are making me a little sad that I didn't post my alliteration about Ace's actions and accusations.
|
On April 30 2013 03:21 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Sanity doesnt flip on death.
That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all. Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere.
Do you think it's scummy he's saying that, when you don't know?
|
On April 30 2013 03:27 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:25 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles. I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be. Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this? On April 30 2013 03:19 yamato77 wrote: Wondering where hopelesswunder went I'm wondering where the conversation about Hopeless1der went. You are making me a little sad that I didn't post my alliteration about Ace's actions and accusations. I got swept underneath the cop claimings and whatnot. I think the best course of action is to verify whether sanity gets flipped and then follow through on CC's claims, pending NK information.
And how did you take Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles?" And if you could answer whether you think CC claiming that "sanities aren't revealed upon flips" is scummy or not.
|
|
|
|