You had read the thread you knew that Sharrant was a town read for almost everyone in thread. Why did you decide to make a case that would not possibly gain support instead of figuring out what was the deal with yamato/Oats?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 21:54 GMT

#1241

Okay Clarity, could you now look at BC/GiygaS/ShiaoPi and tell us what you think about them.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 22:17 GMT

#1245

On April 24 2013 06:32 WaveofShadow wrote:

Show nested quote +

Because I'd like to hear his opinion on arguably the most important thing that has gone down in the thread thus far.

It doesn't really matter what he says about Oats as he already knows the results and it's his genuine thoughts or WIFOM and you have no way of telling which is it.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 22:19 GMT

#1249

I'm not trying to prevent you from scumhunting. I'm just interested in knowing what are you trying to achieve by knowing Sharrant's thoughts on Oats because i find it useless information.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 22:36 GMT

#1256

BM the point here is he later on said he actually read for three hours. He either lied to you earlier or to us later on, or in general. Anyways seems like he lied.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 22:58 GMT

#1269

So why did you decide those three players were the ones you should be reading more into over, let's say yamato/Oats?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 23:13 GMT

#1277

Apparently Clarity does not think anyone is scum besides Sharrant..

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 23:27 GMT

#1279

WoS: Why is Sharrant the only one you want to have thoughts from regarding late D1? after all he is your town read. Why don't you want to question your scumreads instead?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 23 2013 23:28 GMT

#1280

Also what do you make of this little chat of ours with Clarity?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 24 2013 01:26 GMT

#1282

I actually think WoS is scum. His play basically is the definition of blending in, i can't see who he thinks is scum, at all.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 24 2013 01:46 GMT

#1287

Since you are here:

On April 24 2013 08:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
WoS: Why is Sharrant the only one you want to have thoughts from regarding late D1? after all he is your town read. Why don't you want to question your scumreads instead?

On April 24 2013 08:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also what do you make of this little chat of ours with Clarity?

And most importantly. Who do you think is scum and why?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 24 2013 01:51 GMT

#1289

The problem is that you have a shitton of questions in your filter and none of them seem to lead you into any kind of a conclusion. I have gone though your filter for two times now to understand what are you trying to do in this game (how your posting = you trying to find scum) and i don't just see it.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 24 2013 02:06 GMT

#1291

Actually that's what lead me to re-read WoS and his couple of last games.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 24 2013 02:06 GMT

#1292

TRN, do you have any other candidates for scum?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 24 2013 02:23 GMT

#1294

I would like to see what Sharrant contributes next when he comes back. I think he is town atm.
Do you think Clarity's case was well thought out? I think he only pointed out the facts that speak against Sharrant from his filter and left Sharrant's real contributions out.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

April 24 2013 03:04 GMT

#1296

No i don't think Claritys entrance is a scumtell, but what he has done after that is really fishy. Not taking a stance on Oats/yamato, instead promising to read some random people (and not doing so), and when he finally does, one of the guys end up town for him and other ones are "no clue". I think it's really weak.