EPTTL Mafia LXI - Page 236
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Sharrant
Canada543 Posts
On May 05 2013 05:17 Bill Murray wrote: happy birthday share ant Thank you, Bill Murray! I have a question for you, are you suspicious at all of Palmar right now? (Sorry if I've missed it if you've brought it up in recent conversation.) | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
TRN: I don't see scum coming off their Hopeless vote that easily, especially when the first vote, and 3 sheep on it doesnt add up to me, at least | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On May 05 2013 04:23 Bill Murray wrote: bc wasnt even in that game stutters you doof Yeah they pointed it out minutes after I said that. That game was forever ago lol. Read it in context though. I defended part of the case against BC because I saw some bias. How is that distancing? | ||
getmoript
1016 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
On May 05 2013 05:53 TheRavensName wrote: i'm personally not a fan of how Artanis is saying we shouldn't lynch two of the most supicious people in the thread until were at a mislynch and lose. Kinda suggests to me hes scum with one of them/someone unlikely to be lynched and its an easy way to avoid killing them and its a crappy plan to cause a mislynch when at lylo. 1. I'm not saying we wait until MYLO, I'm saying we wait until 1 lynch before M/LYLO so we'll have time to lynch both. 2. I'm pretty much confirmed town to anyone that has read the thread. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On May 05 2013 08:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote: 1. I'm not saying we wait until MYLO, I'm saying we wait until 1 lynch before M/LYLO so we'll have time to lynch both. 2. I'm pretty much confirmed town to anyone that has read the thread. No. No your not. NO ONE is confirmed town until thy flip green. Anyone who has to insist that they are so townie when they are not about to be hammered is scummy for it. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
Who did you mason? | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On May 05 2013 09:13 Artanis[Xp] wrote: If you want me to reword it to incredibly unlikely to be scum then I'll indulge you. Who did you mason? Why does it matter? | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
GG GL! | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
It doesn't matter much, just curiosity. GG OO. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On May 05 2013 09:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote: It doesn't matter much, just curiosity. GG OO. l everyone else claimed who they were. The one from tonight is free to do the same, unless he says something i dislike. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
Applications will be reviewed after sleep. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On May 05 2013 10:29 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Actually I'd only need one more if the JK claimed with whom he protected. How would his protection list prove anyone town? | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On May 05 2013 12:13 TheRavensName wrote: How would his protection list prove anyone town? It was impossible for scum to die n1 (other than to a sk maybe, not sure how that would work) so it's very improbable that scum jailed their own. Thus whoever scum jailed of bc and palmar is probably town. And obviously the jk is town. | ||
|
Sharrant
Canada543 Posts
If they did that, they'd first come to your conclusion, and then realize that they only had probably 1/3 chance of hitting a role that would be hampered by a role block, and that they could use their own roleblock for town cred. Now it doesn't matter whether they did that or not, because just the fact that they could have done that means that you can't confirm a second person from a jailer claim. Thus I urge the jailer not to claim. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
| ||
