EPTTL Mafia LXI - Page 110
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: My question remains. Why does ShiaoPi think Palmar is supertown and VE is scum when his reasons for VE being scum point at least as much, if not even more, to Palmar being scum. Lazy town could very well answer that question, which is think the best overall countercase to Shiao's scumminess thus far, but it's not enough to convince me. Would be nice to hear more from Shiao himself or again, Clarity. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: My question remains. Why does ShiaoPi think Palmar is supertown and VE is scum when his reasons for VE being scum point at least as much, if not even more, to Palmar being scum. because he is clueless and not reading the thread. He is just sheeping Palmar. I dont think that is a strong enough argument to make him scum. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:31 Ace wrote: because he is clueless and not reading the thread. He is just sheeping Palmar. I dont think that is a strong enough argument to make him scum. Lying to town about reading the thread to make it look like he gives a shit and is trying isn't a "strong enough argument to make him scum"? There's no "evidence" in your posts, only hypotheticals and opinions. There's concrete proof that Shiao lied to the thread. CONCRETE Ace. Why are you trying to derail this lynch out of nowhere after saying earlier that you "were willing to switch"? I mean, this "bandwagon" stuff has been on your mind the whole time right? And EARLIER you said Shiao looked like a better lynch BASED ON THE OATS WAGON. NOTHING has changed ASIDE from the fact that NOW Shiao has LIED TO THE FUCKING THREAD ACE. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
That's not lazy or clueless, it's reckless/scummy/bad. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:31 Ace wrote: because he is clueless and not reading the thread. He is just sheeping Palmar. I dont think that is a strong enough argument to make him scum. I have no idea how we can lynch anyone if we allow stuff like this to happen.. Seriously, do you need someone to say "hi, i'm scum" in thread to lynch them? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
@VE: He is lying about reading and understanding. But thats why I also asked how is it worse than what Clarity did? re-read Sharrant's case. Even if you want to say they are both Scummy for lying: ShiaoPi's voting wagon looks much worse than Clarity's. Even if you think ShiaoPi is Scum, I think we can all agree there is some possibility he is just a clueless towny. No one has made that argument for Clarity with supporting points. I add in the wagons and its just icing. I'm looking at BOTH cases from 3 different threads of thought here. And they don't add up when you assume ShiaoPi is scum. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:34 VisceraEyes wrote: Lying to town about reading the thread to make it look like he gives a shit and is trying isn't a "strong enough argument to make him scum"? There's no "evidence" in your posts, only hypotheticals and opinions. There's concrete proof that Shiao lied to the thread. CONCRETE Ace. Why are you trying to derail this lynch out of nowhere after saying earlier that you "were willing to switch"? I mean, this "bandwagon" stuff has been on your mind the whole time right? And EARLIER you said Shiao looked like a better lynch BASED ON THE OATS WAGON. NOTHING has changed ASIDE from the fact that NOW Shiao has LIED TO THE FUCKING THREAD ACE. I re-read Sharrant's case. I read ShiaoPi again. I looked at the voting thread AGAIN. I'm going back on my reads on a guy I myself originally wanted to lynch. Don't you think I have a damn good reason to derail it then? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:42 VisceraEyes wrote: It's worse because Clarity came clean and said "Yeah that might have been an exaggeration" in exactly the same way that Shiao did NOT. what? so that one sentence undoes the entire Sharrant case, but ShiaoPi's explanation just isn't good enough? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:39 VisceraEyes wrote: Ace here's a question. Why would a town ShiaoPi say that he's read the thread when he hasn't if all he's going to do is sheep Palmar with blatant disregard? Why wouldn't a town ShiaoPi just say "Hey thread, too long, no time, didn't read, sheeping Palmar"? he did say that On April 27 2013 02:35 ShiaoPi wrote: Well, that took a lot of time to read. Not so sure about whom to lynch now with tube getting modkilled (lol btw!). I also have very limited time during the entire weekend, which is obviously gimping me by quite a bit as I while only be able to drop by shortly during the evening/late night before I sleep. I am currently torn between clarity and VE. Going with VE for now because I think it is a good idea to sheep Palmar. Go figure. ##vote: VE If there are no direct questions to me in the next couple of minutes I'll be off to bed until I can come back on tomorrow at about the same time as right now. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2013 07:46 VisceraEyes wrote: So your VCA completely undoes the Vivax case, but Clarity's explanation just isn't good enough? what does VCA mean? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
"Well that took a lot of time to read" indicating that he read the thread. He didn't ever say he didn't read the thread, he said he read the thread. What are you even posting that as evidence of him saying? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
| ||
