|
On April 05 2013 11:08 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 10:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 10:47 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 10:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
and yeah, RO is scum i think. Can you walk me through this please. From what I saw, the only build up you had to claiming RO is scum is: On April 05 2013 03:28 Restraining Order wrote:
Ok, you can keep townhunting them townreads if you want, I sent in my numbers already. They shouldn't be too obtrusive to whatever nonsense you'll come up with, so it's okay. Where I am having trouble following you is: I dont see how *only* scum would would or could make a statement like this. RO is failing to contribute to anything at all. See his filter. No more need to be said. Good kill on D1/N1. I still dont follow. What has there been to contribute? We have been talking about plans; just because someone disagrees with you, does not make them scum. I think this is clutching at straws, and is providing preferential treatment. RO duly pointed out others that also did not agree with the plan; yet you seem to be singling him out specifically. If you want traction: I am going to need more than "failing to contribute". Otherwise, this looks like a weak attempt to "scum hunt" - which can indeed be construed as scummy. In short, all I am asking for is: Why are ROs actions specifically scummy, and can not be a townie that shares a different mindset to that of yourself? To answer: read his filter.. is not an appropriate answer, because I already disagree with you.. you're meant to be trying to convince me...show me what you see
RO is failing to contribute to the plans provided pre-picking phase by " lolololollllll, i sent my numbers, can't change, fu all,, i don't need to do shit.."
Kill him.
|
On April 05 2013 11:09 Palmar wrote:
I was thinking I wanted the Ver role so I could bully everyone into claiming to me.
I can claim to you if you take the role.
|
On April 05 2013 11:12 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 11:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 11:08 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 10:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 10:47 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 10:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
and yeah, RO is scum i think. Can you walk me through this please. From what I saw, the only build up you had to claiming RO is scum is: On April 05 2013 03:28 Restraining Order wrote:
Ok, you can keep townhunting them townreads if you want, I sent in my numbers already. They shouldn't be too obtrusive to whatever nonsense you'll come up with, so it's okay. Where I am having trouble following you is: I dont see how *only* scum would would or could make a statement like this. RO is failing to contribute to anything at all. See his filter. No more need to be said. Good kill on D1/N1. I still dont follow. What has there been to contribute? We have been talking about plans; just because someone disagrees with you, does not make them scum. I think this is clutching at straws, and is providing preferential treatment. RO duly pointed out others that also did not agree with the plan; yet you seem to be singling him out specifically. If you want traction: I am going to need more than "failing to contribute". Otherwise, this looks like a weak attempt to "scum hunt" - which can indeed be construed as scummy. In short, all I am asking for is: Why are ROs actions specifically scummy, and can not be a townie that shares a different mindset to that of yourself? To answer: read his filter.. is not an appropriate answer, because I already disagree with you.. you're meant to be trying to convince me...show me what you see RO is failing to contribute to the plans provided pre-picking phase by " lolololollllll, i sent my numbers, can't change, fu all,, i don't need to do shit.." Kill him. False, I never said I can't. I said I wouldn't.
Yep, that' why i shoot you on D1 <3
|
|
|
why wont all of you jsut claim what you picked?
|
On April 05 2013 11:18 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 11:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 11:08 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 10:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 10:47 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 10:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
and yeah, RO is scum i think. Can you walk me through this please. From what I saw, the only build up you had to claiming RO is scum is: On April 05 2013 03:28 Restraining Order wrote:
Ok, you can keep townhunting them townreads if you want, I sent in my numbers already. They shouldn't be too obtrusive to whatever nonsense you'll come up with, so it's okay. Where I am having trouble following you is: I dont see how *only* scum would would or could make a statement like this. RO is failing to contribute to anything at all. See his filter. No more need to be said. Good kill on D1/N1. I still dont follow. What has there been to contribute? We have been talking about plans; just because someone disagrees with you, does not make them scum. I think this is clutching at straws, and is providing preferential treatment. RO duly pointed out others that also did not agree with the plan; yet you seem to be singling him out specifically. If you want traction: I am going to need more than "failing to contribute". Otherwise, this looks like a weak attempt to "scum hunt" - which can indeed be construed as scummy. In short, all I am asking for is: Why are ROs actions specifically scummy, and can not be a townie that shares a different mindset to that of yourself? To answer: read his filter.. is not an appropriate answer, because I already disagree with you.. you're meant to be trying to convince me...show me what you see RO is failing to contribute to the plans provided pre-picking phase by " lolololollllll, i sent my numbers, can't change, fu all,, i don't need to do shit.." Kill him. Did you read what I wrote? Geript asked before what I thought of you prior. The longer you cast out scum suspicion like this.. the quicker my read of you is dropping and the quicker I am getting concerned that you are high up on the draft list. I asked you to explain why RO specifically is acting scummy, and can not be a townie who disagrees with you. I have yet to receive a valid answerFact: i submitted my #'s yesterday as well; and was not a supporter of the plans. Did you miss my commentary with yamato yesterday? Just because I was willing to discuss plans in detail, and RO hasnt been as much.. does not make either of us town or scum. This whole phase is foreplay; and the action to discuss is itself alignment null. Im still not clear why you cast RO as scum for this action; yet leave others alone.
BLARFFFFFFF::::: RO is using "i do what i want to" as an "evidence" to not contribute. How has he contributed at all? Show me.
|
On April 05 2013 11:20 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 11:15 Restraining Order wrote:
These 5 players picked [8] as their first numbers.
This means, at least 4 of those 5 are town. I know Im town, even though my [8] was RNG. So; yam finds palmar suspicious I find austinmcc suspicious Who in that list is your "?certain?' scum read.
Keirathi.
|
|
|
|
|
thank god im allowed to pick a role that kills thme both.
|
|
|
If you idipts are not gonna pick inventor ima do it.
|
On April 05 2013 11:35 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 11:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 11:18 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 11:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 11:08 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 10:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 10:47 Mocsta wrote:On April 05 2013 10:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
and yeah, RO is scum i think. Can you walk me through this please. From what I saw, the only build up you had to claiming RO is scum is: On April 05 2013 03:28 Restraining Order wrote:
Ok, you can keep townhunting them townreads if you want, I sent in my numbers already. They shouldn't be too obtrusive to whatever nonsense you'll come up with, so it's okay. Where I am having trouble following you is: I dont see how *only* scum would would or could make a statement like this. RO is failing to contribute to anything at all. See his filter. No more need to be said. Good kill on D1/N1. I still dont follow. What has there been to contribute? We have been talking about plans; just because someone disagrees with you, does not make them scum. I think this is clutching at straws, and is providing preferential treatment. RO duly pointed out others that also did not agree with the plan; yet you seem to be singling him out specifically. If you want traction: I am going to need more than "failing to contribute". Otherwise, this looks like a weak attempt to "scum hunt" - which can indeed be construed as scummy. In short, all I am asking for is: Why are ROs actions specifically scummy, and can not be a townie that shares a different mindset to that of yourself? To answer: read his filter.. is not an appropriate answer, because I already disagree with you.. you're meant to be trying to convince me...show me what you see RO is failing to contribute to the plans provided pre-picking phase by " lolololollllll, i sent my numbers, can't change, fu all,, i don't need to do shit.." Kill him. Did you read what I wrote? Geript asked before what I thought of you prior. The longer you cast out scum suspicion like this.. the quicker my read of you is dropping and the quicker I am getting concerned that you are high up on the draft list. I asked you to explain why RO specifically is acting scummy, and can not be a townie who disagrees with you. I have yet to receive a valid answerFact: i submitted my #'s yesterday as well; and was not a supporter of the plans. Did you miss my commentary with yamato yesterday? Just because I was willing to discuss plans in detail, and RO hasnt been as much.. does not make either of us town or scum. This whole phase is foreplay; and the action to discuss is itself alignment null. Im still not clear why you cast RO as scum for this action; yet leave others alone. BLARFFFFFFF::::: RO is using "i do what i want to" as an "evidence" to not contribute. How has he contributed at all? Show me. I personally dont value pre-draft contribution as highly as you do. Perhaps that is the crux of our differences. Let me re-direct your attention to Sinani. This gentlment is in the top 5 for the draft; yet this is essentially his sole contribution Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 02:50 sinani206 wrote:
The real problem with all of these plans is that the entire town has to cooperate. As we can see (Caller), not everyone is willing to do that. I've sent in numbers that agree with rayn's system, but I really don't think that it's going to help town any more than randomly picking numbers. I sincerely hope this person is not on your radar; JUST because he "sent in numbers that agree with rayn's system" Because, if he actually did; he wouldnt be in the top 5 would he....
fair point. maybe sianani is scum too.
|
also, fu sno_man if you are dumb. I HATE YOU IF YOU ARE DUMB!
|
|
|
I REQUESTED A DENIEABLE A GOOD ROLE!! :D
|
Interested in finding out too.
|
On April 05 2013 11:51 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 10:10 gonzaw wrote:On April 05 2013 06:00 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 05 2013 04:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
3 scum reads:
Caller, RO, Oats. Why On April 05 2013 05:46 strongandbig wrote:
this whole discussion is stupid until we get the drafting list btw yes Gonzaw would you mind telling me what you think of oats, artanis, sharrant, and decondou? Would like to hear someone else's thoughts. Yo how about YOU tell me what you think of them? You can't force the wise man to do your bidding, he forces you to do his, and then enlightens you or punishes you accordingly  I have to agree with yamato on Oats. Makes little sense for scum Oats to "intentionally disrupt" town like this in the drafting phase for no reason (if he's scum), rather than doing so when it matters to them: The Day phase. No reason to call him scum right now, wait until the game actually "matters" to state so. So you 5 guys are you sending the 1-5 draft choices? If so it may be better to claim so you don't clash between each other, and so you can convince other people not to take those as well (I already changed my number). I guess it's too late though, meh. I initially had a pretty bad feeling about oats, however he's just been too loud for me to think he's scum at this point. I'm rather suspicious of artanis, I actually wanted an opinion on sharrant because I have him as a complete null, and decondou was a red herring which I threw out on a whim. In hindsight you'd be too smart to go for it as scum anyway  currently I have rayn as probable town since I've learned that the most annoying people tend to be town. That being said, I also really don't think RO is scummy. Also for the record, I'm not trying to force a wise man to do my bidding, just wanna check in with someone who completely played me before :D
Oats is bad town or scum.
Artanis is .. hmm.. idk..
sharrant almost definitely town.
deconduo, leaning on scum at him.
RO = scum. kill him <3
|
VE is scum almost definitely, aswell..
|
On April 05 2013 11:58 sinani206 wrote:
I was [7][2] (my birthday)
You should have been [2] [1] or smth.. :/
Happy birthday!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
