|
On March 19 2013 13:39 Wade Fell wrote:
As an aside, another reason I masoned GK is that I've interacted with him in QTs before when I coached him, and I knew I'd be able to get a perfect read on him from doing so, as well as help his scumhunting.
Coming in as a replacement.
I noticed you keep trying to reenforce you know GK well cos you coached him
I find, a one time admission of this is usually what a town player does.
But you have done it repeatedly, leading to two conclusions
(1) You hope you have town cred, and trying to make an appeal to popularity for GK to be town
(2) You are establishing a minor "newbie" shroud over GK, essentially an additional appeal
Considering I dont have a town read at all from GK... and factoring your coach comments above AND CONSIDERING AS WELL you're a much more meek and timid personality (comp. Mafia LX). I would bank you are both scum
Sandroba said it best...Let me remind you.
On March 16 2013 22:24 sandroba wrote:
BH is trying to emulate his previous behavior.
|
On March 19 2013 13:42 geript wrote:
Look unlike you, I don't need to make up for a high squeaky voice with an abnormally large epeen.
Unlike you I don't have to make up for being hideously bad at mafia by resorting to ad hominem attacks. Does the pitch of the voice or the size of my enormous gargantuan epeen have any bearing whatsoever on the game? You're just trying to make me mad. And let me tell you this, geript: it ain't gonna work. You can't stop me from scumhunting with cheap emotional attacks. Unlike you am I above such things.
|
On March 19 2013 13:45 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:39 Wade Fell wrote:
As an aside, another reason I masoned GK is that I've interacted with him in QTs before when I coached him, and I knew I'd be able to get a perfect read on him from doing so, as well as help his scumhunting.
Coming in as a replacement. I noticed you keep trying to reenforce you know GK well cos you coached him I find, a one time admission of this is usually what a town player does. But you have done it repeatedly, leading to two conclusions (1) You hope you have town cred, and trying to make an appeal to popularity for GK to be town (2) You are establishing a minor "newbie" shroud over GK, essentially an additional appeal Considering I dont have a town read at all from GK... and factoring your coach comments above AND CONSIDERING AS WELL you're a much more meek and timid personality (comp. Mafia LX). I would bank you are both scum Sandroba said it best...Let me remind you. Show nested quote +On March 16 2013 22:24 sandroba wrote:
BH is trying to emulate his previous behavior.
>BH is meek and timid
wat
|
Or in my words BH
Mafia LX, I pictured you as this alpha male, big chest deep voice
This game, I can fully visualise the man in the podcast with that high pitched voice.
|
In Mafia LX I pictured you as useful and trying to help town, because you were
This game, you're just insulting people for no discernable reason. Get your head in the game mocsta
|
On March 19 2013 13:45 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:42 geript wrote:
Look unlike you, I don't need to make up for a high squeaky voice with an abnormally large epeen. Unlike you I don't have to make up for being hideously bad at mafia by resorting to ad hominem attacks. Does the pitch of the voice or the size of my enormous gargantuan epeen have any bearing whatsoever on the game? You're just trying to make me mad. And let me tell you this, geript: it ain't gonna work. You can't stop me from scumhunting with cheap emotional attacks. Unlike you am I above such things.
Keep trying to emulate you're Mafia LX play
|
10024 Posts
|
On March 19 2013 13:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
Why not?
Because if he's town he's a free shot on a strong role paired with a potentially strong player for scum. Makes more sense to wait until day time if you had to do it.
@BH/Geript: Can you two cut it out? It's a game, you don't have to get personal.
|
On March 19 2013 13:47 Wade Fell wrote:
In Mafia LX I pictured you as useful and trying to help town, because you were
This game, you're just insulting people for no discernable reason. Get your head in the game mocsta
Classic scum
launch ad-hom
and avoid commenting on the crux of what i said
|
On March 19 2013 13:48 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Because if he's town he's a free shot on a strong role paired with a potentially strong player for scum. Makes more sense to wait until day time if you had to do it. @BH/Geript: Can you two cut it out? It's a game, you don't have to get personal.
I'm not the one getting personal here
|
On March 19 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:47 Wade Fell wrote:
In Mafia LX I pictured you as useful and trying to help town, because you were
This game, you're just insulting people for no discernable reason. Get your head in the game mocsta Classic scum launch ad-hom and avoid commenting on the crux of what i said
Is your criticism of me the fact that I'm playing meek, or the fact that I'm playing aggro? You say "oh BH is meeker than he was in LX, so he is scum" but also that I'm being aggressive to emulate my play in LX. You can't have it both ways.
|
On March 19 2013 13:48 geript wrote:
Nutter butter Moc?
can not compute?
|
On March 19 2013 13:49 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:On March 19 2013 13:47 Wade Fell wrote:
In Mafia LX I pictured you as useful and trying to help town, because you were
This game, you're just insulting people for no discernable reason. Get your head in the game mocsta Classic scum launch ad-hom and avoid commenting on the crux of what i said Is your criticism of me the fact that I'm playing meek, or the fact that I'm playing aggro? You say "oh BH is meeker than he was in LX, so he is scum" but also that I'm being aggressive to emulate my play in LX. You can't have it both ways.
Lol.. what i wrote is very clear cut
im not going to paraphrase it for you, because you have shown no effort to attack the argument (yet)
|
10024 Posts
Sure Wiggles. It's just hard not to rub it in.
|
On March 19 2013 13:50 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:49 Wade Fell wrote:On March 19 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:On March 19 2013 13:47 Wade Fell wrote:
In Mafia LX I pictured you as useful and trying to help town, because you were
This game, you're just insulting people for no discernable reason. Get your head in the game mocsta Classic scum launch ad-hom and avoid commenting on the crux of what i said Is your criticism of me the fact that I'm playing meek, or the fact that I'm playing aggro? You say "oh BH is meeker than he was in LX, so he is scum" but also that I'm being aggressive to emulate my play in LX. You can't have it both ways. Lol.. what i wrote is very clear cut im not going to paraphrase it for you, because you have shown no effort to attack the argument (yet)
My meta defense of GK has convinced plenty of people he's town. He wasn't even a lynch target. He can come in and confirm I was in a Mason QT with him D1. He is not scum. I am not scum. If you view this as a mark against me, so be it; I will demonstrate we have bigger fish to fry tomorrow.
|
On March 19 2013 13:45 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:39 Wade Fell wrote:
As an aside, another reason I masoned GK is that I've interacted with him in QTs before when I coached him, and I knew I'd be able to get a perfect read on him from doing so, as well as help his scumhunting.
Coming in as a replacement. I noticed you keep trying to reenforce you know GK well cos you coached him I find, a one time admission of this is usually what a town player does. But you have done it repeatedly, leading to two conclusions (1) You hope you have town cred, and trying to make an appeal to popularity for GK to be town (2) You are establishing a minor "newbie" shroud over GK, essentially an additional appeal Considering I dont have a town read at all from GK... and factoring your coach comments above AND CONSIDERING AS WELL you're a much more meek and timid personality (comp. Mafia LX). I would bank you are both scum Sandroba said it best...Let me remind you. Show nested quote +On March 16 2013 22:24 sandroba wrote:
BH is trying to emulate his previous behavior.
Respond to this post BH, because it contains no ad hom attacks and raises points I'd like you to address. Why were you so bent on emulating your previous, confident play earlier on while your play since suggests a more cautious, reserved approach?
|
On March 19 2013 13:49 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:On March 19 2013 13:47 Wade Fell wrote:
In Mafia LX I pictured you as useful and trying to help town, because you were
This game, you're just insulting people for no discernable reason. Get your head in the game mocsta Classic scum launch ad-hom and avoid commenting on the crux of what i said Is your criticism of me the fact that I'm playing meek, or the fact that I'm playing aggro? You say "oh BH is meeker than he was in LX, so he is scum" but also that I'm being aggressive to emulate my play in LX. You can't have it both ways.
Ahh i misread what you wrote
lol.. u dont get it, so let me paraphrase
Im finding you timid
You are trying to emulate your aggressive play, but its not manifesting itself that way.. you are timid and meek
|
On March 19 2013 13:51 geript wrote:
Sure Wiggles. It's just hard not to rub it in.
Rubbing it in has nothing to do with scumhunting and is a waste of my time, and almost certainly yours. mocsta is following up on his case against me. Why aren't you? Where's the continued pressure? Or are you just butthurt about last game, or just scum trying to hide in case I actually get lynched tomorrow and flipped town?
If you have criticisms of my play, come at me bro
otherwise, get the hell out of my way
|
On March 19 2013 13:52 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:50 Mocsta wrote:On March 19 2013 13:49 Wade Fell wrote:On March 19 2013 13:49 Mocsta wrote:On March 19 2013 13:47 Wade Fell wrote:
In Mafia LX I pictured you as useful and trying to help town, because you were
This game, you're just insulting people for no discernable reason. Get your head in the game mocsta Classic scum launch ad-hom and avoid commenting on the crux of what i said Is your criticism of me the fact that I'm playing meek, or the fact that I'm playing aggro? You say "oh BH is meeker than he was in LX, so he is scum" but also that I'm being aggressive to emulate my play in LX. You can't have it both ways. Lol.. what i wrote is very clear cut im not going to paraphrase it for you, because you have shown no effort to attack the argument (yet) My meta defense of GK has convinced plenty of people he's town. He wasn't even a lynch target. He can come in and confirm I was in a Mason QT with him D1. He is not scum. I am not scum. If you view this as a mark against me, so be it; I will demonstrate we have bigger fish to fry tomorrow.
Yes, I would expect you to be a valid NK target if town, based on the knowledge of your "role"
Pls leave your reads before nights end.
|
On March 19 2013 13:52 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2013 13:45 Mocsta wrote:On March 19 2013 13:39 Wade Fell wrote:
As an aside, another reason I masoned GK is that I've interacted with him in QTs before when I coached him, and I knew I'd be able to get a perfect read on him from doing so, as well as help his scumhunting.
Coming in as a replacement. I noticed you keep trying to reenforce you know GK well cos you coached him I find, a one time admission of this is usually what a town player does. But you have done it repeatedly, leading to two conclusions (1) You hope you have town cred, and trying to make an appeal to popularity for GK to be town (2) You are establishing a minor "newbie" shroud over GK, essentially an additional appeal Considering I dont have a town read at all from GK... and factoring your coach comments above AND CONSIDERING AS WELL you're a much more meek and timid personality (comp. Mafia LX). I would bank you are both scum Sandroba said it best...Let me remind you. On March 16 2013 22:24 sandroba wrote:
BH is trying to emulate his previous behavior. Respond to this post BH, because it contains no ad hom attacks and raises points I'd like you to address. Why were you so bent on emulating your previous, confident play earlier on while your play since suggests a more cautious, reserved approach?
I'm not emulating my confident play-- my play, if you don't count my blue actions, is utterly confident. Yes, my choice of mason targets was cautious, but I was unable to post as much as I'd like during D1 because TPS and sandro's cycles lined up. The fact of the matter is, I had more to gain and far less to lose from masoning GK than from masoning one of my scumreads, especially when those scumreads are TPS and Testsubject, both of whose intransigence would likely not translate well to a mason QT.
Was GK a newbie, and probably easily impressioned by me? Sure, of course. But on the other hand, he's also a newbie who has been coached by me. He knows how I think and how I hunt scum. Of all the various newbies in this game to mason, GK is the most likely to figure me out if I am scum. Of all the various vets in this game to mason, Ve is the most ly likely to figure me out if I am scum. My blue actions are for discussion scumreads, and cautious, but if I were scum they'd be hideously risky.
I'd really feel better if GK were here to talk also *nudge nudge*
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
