|
On March 10 2013 07:17 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 07:03 OmniEulogy wrote:On March 10 2013 05:03 WaveofShadow wrote: Oops that whole thing should've been in spoilers. Oh well.
Krafla I hope you see how scummy you look to the rest of us right now; I'm not sure I care if you get targeted N1. Explain your vote process for D1 and any new reads you have please. Truthfully I don't think there is a chance Krafla is scum but I also don't think he'll be a target for the NK. The way Arctic played makes me doubt very highly that anybody he voted for was scum. I just don't think he put that much effort into his voting decisions to vote for one of his scum buddies. I'd say targets for the NK are Raven, WoS, and possibly Geript depending on how much scum is afraid of a fresh perspective. (then again Geript is Chew's replacement and could very well be mafia himself) If we do have RB/JK let's hope they know what they are doing. Between Luneth, Taco, Geript, and bduddy I'd say there has to be mafia, possibly two. I'll go more into detail just before the deadline on the off-chance I'm killed but I don't think it's very likely that I'll be the target Good target... Possible scum... Ironic... How'd you know that I like to type while taking a dump too?
that's not irony. And I saw your last game so I know how much you like to write while taking dumps
|
On March 10 2013 07:22 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 07:18 OmniEulogy wrote:On March 10 2013 07:17 geript wrote:On March 10 2013 07:03 OmniEulogy wrote:On March 10 2013 05:03 WaveofShadow wrote: Oops that whole thing should've been in spoilers. Oh well.
Krafla I hope you see how scummy you look to the rest of us right now; I'm not sure I care if you get targeted N1. Explain your vote process for D1 and any new reads you have please. Truthfully I don't think there is a chance Krafla is scum but I also don't think he'll be a target for the NK. The way Arctic played makes me doubt very highly that anybody he voted for was scum. I just don't think he put that much effort into his voting decisions to vote for one of his scum buddies. I'd say targets for the NK are Raven, WoS, and possibly Geript depending on how much scum is afraid of a fresh perspective. (then again Geript is Chew's replacement and could very well be mafia himself) If we do have RB/JK let's hope they know what they are doing. Between Luneth, Taco, Geript, and bduddy I'd say there has to be mafia, possibly two. I'll go more into detail just before the deadline on the off-chance I'm killed but I don't think it's very likely that I'll be the target Good target... Possible scum... Ironic... How'd you know that I like to type while taking a dump too? that's not irony. And I saw your last game so I know how much you like to write while taking dumps  Point?
If you can't even admit that you replaced an extremely scummy lurker who was a definite lynch candidate, then we have a problem. However there isn't really any proof that he was scum so it comes down to how you act and what you bring to the table. If mafia is afraid of a new perspective then you might be a lynch candidate. How that is ironic I'm not really sure.
@Bduddy the only person who you could say defended Arctic was Luneth. The other lurkers didn't really give their thoughts and Taco safely switched by sheeping.
|
On March 10 2013 07:37 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 07:26 OmniEulogy wrote: .. the only person who you could say defended Arctic was Luneth ... Luneth was the first person to vote for AD. Page 16.
also the only person who kept his vote on NW without giving a good reason despite the recent events and refused to vote for Arctic. Him voting for a lurker early on and switching off him doesn't scream confidence that he believed Arctic was one of his scum reads. In fact I believe... yep here it is
On March 08 2013 14:51 MLuneth wrote:My view on Arctic Daishi at the time of Voting for him + Show Spoiler +
To put it simply my Vote was a pressure vote to try and get Arctic to speak up (I'm saying this now because I believe that Arctic Daishi will stay afk). My vote on Diashi was a coin flip between Daishi/BDuddy/ChewOnStu because none had made posts at this point.
Literally two comments later from Luneth he's back tracking on his vote from Arctic.
and @Raven if you honestly think I protected him, prove it. Pushing for my own scum read while saying "yes Arctic also looks scummy, I'll lynch him if it's necessary to keep NW in the game" isn't defending him. If you read it as anything else you are fooling yourself.
|
Can we get a definite time for the end of N1 please.
|
|
On March 10 2013 08:18 WaveofShadow wrote: Wait, what? So is the cycle deadline now at 7:30 PM daily instead of 8:00? If so I feel like the OP should reflect that.
just for this night cycle I believe. theres a post 1-2 pages back where they talk about it.
|
On March 10 2013 08:20 Frorgon wrote: I think it's a scum tactic for Luneth to vote AD early on when the vote could easily be changed later, especially his explanation for it. The explanation of it being just a pressure vote almost seems like a hidden way to discourage others from voting for Arctic. It's basically saying "my vote's not serious, and I have no good reasoning behind it." Then again, at the time of Luneth's vote, AD was still mostly under the radar.
Luneth does say near the end of D1 that his vote on Arctic was never meant as an attempt to lynch him as well. He also never directly says that Arctic looks scummy while discussing the subject.
On March 09 2013 07:48 MLuneth wrote: My vote in NW stays the same because there has still been no coherent defence to tell me why NW is not scum.
I agree that other players are looking very suspicious too but I'm more confident that NW is scum than they are
Now that we know Arctic's alignment it looks more like Luneth was trying to save him without making it look too obvious. If we consider how quickly he leaves after nobody budges from Arctic it looks pretty bad.
On March 09 2013 08:06 MLuneth wrote: I am rereading cases now.
Going to be wishy washy either way, but I'd rather be correct
nothing more about Arctic vs NW after this.
|
Alright, this'll be my last post if I get killed off tonight. I don't think it's very likely but might as well just to be on the safe side.
First off, Excellent job so far town. Raven and WoS made an excellent call and took down Arctic which I believe gives us several other town reads. These include Krafla, Frorgon, and NobodyWonder. Why these three? They are the only people Arctic voted for. I don't believe he was playing with the mind set of trying to direct suspicion away from his scum buddies as he didn't even realize he was the one being voted on till we had the majority on him.
+ Show Spoiler + On March 08 2013 23:53 Arctic Daishi wrote: Sorry for the late replies everyone, I have been studying like crazy for midterms. Spring break starts today so I'll have a lot more freetime to participate now!
##vote: Krafla On March 09 2013 00:17 Arctic Daishi wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: nobodywonder On March 09 2013 06:07 Arctic Daishi wrote: I honestly do not believe that nobodywonder is scummy, he seems to honestly want what's best for the town. Also, he has been very defeatist since being accused and has stated his intention of welcoming his lynching if it helps the town. I hereby:
#unvote #Vote: Frorgon
The Omni's case against Frorgon is simply too great to ignore. On March 09 2013 09:13 Arctic Daishi wrote: #unvote #Vote: nobodywonder Although its not generally great to give town reads at night, I don't see the issue with discussing these in general. [/QUOTE]
Moving on, I believe that Taco bussed Arctic after he realized there was no way to save him. The actions Taco has made this game serve no purpose for town, even HE has admitted to that. My case against him is here. + Show Spoiler + On March 09 2013 06:20 OmniEulogy wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2013 05:54 WaveofShadow wrote: @Omni your cases so far have been solid, can you expand on your thoughts on MeatlessTaco? I agree he has been very aggressive in his posting though the only real scummy thing I've seen from him is the sheep vote onto Chew. Also what are your thoughts regarding the rest of the lurkers today? There are quite a few of them (Matriarch, Daishi, Luneth probably the worst offenders) and it's going to be very difficult to determine what to do with them once the day is over. Hmm not sure what else to say about Taco... well actually I'll go the other way, I think I've covered pretty much everything he's done that seems to go against town, but he was right when he said you have to suspect everybody in one of his first posts. Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 08:46 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 08 2013 07:07 WaveofShadow wrote: ... MeatlessTaco: Aggressively enters the thread makes a couple early game cases and leaves. Who is your top scumread right now and why? (I refuse to believe it's NW just because you voted him) ... I wanted to pounce on Raven, his initial exuberance 10 min before game starts and then lurks for a long time like he's getting help from his scum mentor. Since then, he hasn't done enough to move my suspicion. There is no instant lynch. My vote means who I suspect right now. I felt that this was a good post, generally people who have decent activity before a game starts and then disappear as soon as it starts deserve to be looked at more closely. At the same time going back to odd actions from him we also have things like this Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 08:55 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 08 2013 07:34 Krafla wrote: What I wanted to add was it seemed like people only started to consider NW once MeatlessTaco went after him, and I was going to wonder out loud if MeatlessTaco ..
Everything starts somewhere. If my analysis was poor, argue that. Don't argue that I made an argument that caught on so that is bad. It's a good thing if an argument gets some traction. On March 08 2013 07:34 Krafla wrote: And now the same thing has happened again and Matriarch has posted throwing doubt on Meatless just before I hit send, ohwell, I'm going to leave it here!
Let's hear Krafla's and Matriarch's reasoning behind suspecting me. I understand NobodyWonder hasn't said a lot, neither have I or you. We do what we can with very limited information. Make a case, but don't point fingers at me without a case better than "he made an argument that someone else agreed with". He didn't actually make a case... did he forget? It was a joke vote that stuck and other people attacked NW. There was no case from Taco. Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 08:58 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 08 2013 08:53 nobodywonder wrote: ...I'd still say if I can't find concrete proof of scum, then I would just get rid of the scummiest lurker...
Isn't that kind of a high bar for day 1? Isn't that the exact job town is trying to do? Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 14:56 MeatlessTaco wrote: No vote: OmniEulogy, Krafla, TheRavensName, Arctic Daishi, bduddy, Matriarch, Frorgon, WaveofShadows
You all need to make a stand. Are you going to let marines kills our broodlings one by one? Vote and make a case. Again from somebody who hasn't actually made a single case all game this seems really REALLY bad... looking through his filter and doing this again... I'm actually going to move Taco to my scum list. ##Unvote##Vote: MeatlessTacoI believe this case is Much stronger than my case on Frorgon and am changing my vote for that reason. What does everybody else make of this case on Taco? In fact... I am going to push for Taco's Lynch, I expect anybody who wants to hit scum to jump on this train, The Wagon of Justice has arrived. + Show Spoiler +On March 09 2013 04:49 OmniEulogy wrote:I'm also quite worried about Taco. His actions so far are a mixture of scum/town so I can't get a good read on him. We have his opening joke vote, which alone I have no problem with Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 14:47 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 14:06 WaveofShadow wrote:My GOD this thread is exciting.  On March 07 2013 14:17 nobodywonder wrote: woo! ~ exciting game Nobody's only post is sheeping the experienced guy adding no new content of his own? Now you can lurk and say "I would have contributed if the game were more exciting?" That seems pretty anti-town to me. ##Vote: nobodywonder Now it's more exciting. However we do end up sticking on NW through pressure of other people so he never actually has to vote. He uses this as an excuse to pressure others to place votes on people when he himself never actually made a serious vote. Keep in mind how early in the game these posts are. Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote: Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote: Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark? I feel that Krafla here was trying to apply pressure the Arctic who had yet said anything at all but Taco tries to pressure him to vote for somebody who hasn't said a single word so far? that's sketchy so early on in the game. Makes it seem like he doesn't care who is voting for who. Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 17:13 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:08 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote: Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark? Nope, I'm not going to vote yet, I want to make an educated decision of who to vote for instead of flinging dirt and seeing what sticks Take a stand. Are you going to side with me trying to lynch someone acting suspicious or side with nobodywonder trying to lynch a lurker who can't defend themselves? This is TL Mafia which is serious stuff. You aren't allowed to be Switzerland. Again goes after Krafla early on, Why is Taco so obsessed with getting people to vote? The game isn't even through the first 24 hours. Town doesn't need to throw votes out so quickly, they need to think about their actions as Krafla is doing. This raises more questions about how much Taco actually cares who gets lynched. And then we have these back-to-back posts. Holy Shit Hypocrisy. Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 10:35 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 08 2013 03:08 ChewOnStu wrote: Im finding nobodywonder scummy too for complaining about lurkers not contributing yet he's barely contributed anything himself.
##vote: nobodywonder ... Why are you bandwagoning on NW while your only contribution is couple of trite posts about your lurker policy? Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 14:06 MeatlessTaco wrote: You are right. His behavior is unacceptable so far. You got anything to add Chew?
##Vote: ChewOnStu His FIRST real vote is a complete sheep with nothing to add about why Chew is scum. Does he really care who gets lynched? This doesn't take away from the good points he's made and some of his questions have been really good... but the inconsistency is there. ^ My original look through his filter.
Moving on from this I also believe Luneth is looking VERY likely to be our 3rd mafia player. He started out the game rather enthusiastic but has very quickly made some questionable moves. His refusal to vote on Arctic at the end of D1 must be explained by him during D2.
Geript is a bit of a wild card at the moment. He has come in to replace Chew and should be under just as much suspicion as we had on Chew. Chew was an extremely scummy lurker who's vote was unexplained. If Geript doesn't prove himself to be town I hope you all will not let him go under the radar.
|
On March 10 2013 09:15 geript wrote: @OE you have made 2 bad cases, why should we listen to you?
my case on Frorgon was using the information available at the time, in other words almost none. Care to explain why you think Taco's case is bad?
|
FUCKING BRILLIANT!!!!!!!! do not claim your role yet. wait for Krafla.
|
either JK is amazing, RB is amazing or both so happy with this town :D
|
On March 10 2013 09:22 Krafla wrote: I was roleblocked
well that's unfortunate anybody else get RB'd?
|
On March 10 2013 09:24 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 09:21 OmniEulogy wrote: FUCKING BRILLIANT!!!!!!!! do not claim your role yet. wait for Krafla. Who are you talking to?
I doubt mafia just decided not to kill. Use your brain.
|
On March 10 2013 09:29 Frorgon wrote: I'm surprised Krafla was roleblocked. I don't feel like he was suspicious enough to be roleblocked by town. So either the mafia took a shot in the dark and got lucky, or he's lying.
I'm wondering if WoS is the one who RB'd him and it stopped the NK rofl. Otherwise
@WoS stop leaving us in the dark!
|
On March 10 2013 09:34 Krafla wrote: Aahh, be quick, it's way past my bedtime!
it's only what.. 2:30am there? 
it's unfortunate if you are telling the truth and got RB'd knowing Luneth's alignment on top of no NK would have been really nice.
|
On March 10 2013 09:36 WaveofShadow wrote: Damn. I think it's too much WIFOM to know for sure. I was roleblocked as well. Simple case scenario is JK saved me from a night shot and mafia RB chose Krafla at random. There are a LOT of other possible scenarios though, none of which I like very much.
that sounds about right as far as the JK goes. You would have been my choice for tonight as well so I'm happy somebody is on the same page.
On the other hand, if town role blocker hit WoS (if we even have one), tell us now. It's unlikely but its better to have the bases covered.
|
Anyway WoS I'm not really suspicious of you at all at this point. mafia clearly wanted you dead, time to re-read for awhile.
I also agree with Taco somewhat. Krafla probably should have kept quiet, again if town RB hit Krafla I'd like to discuss it being worth while for him to say it. If nobody comes forward Krafla is either lying about everything or is town.
@Krafla did you leave any bread crumbs to prove that you are 1 shot cop or that you were targetting Luneth tonight?
|
On March 10 2013 09:46 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 09:42 OmniEulogy wrote:On March 10 2013 09:36 WaveofShadow wrote: Damn. I think it's too much WIFOM to know for sure. I was roleblocked as well. Simple case scenario is JK saved me from a night shot and mafia RB chose Krafla at random. There are a LOT of other possible scenarios though, none of which I like very much. On the other hand, if town role blocker hit WoS (if we even have one), tell us now. It's unlikely but its better to have the bases covered. That's a bad idea and super scummy. If we have one, why try to get them to claim for no reason?
Proves WoS is scum. Are you that stupid?
|
On March 10 2013 09:53 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 09:49 OmniEulogy wrote:On March 10 2013 09:46 geript wrote:On March 10 2013 09:42 OmniEulogy wrote:On March 10 2013 09:36 WaveofShadow wrote: Damn. I think it's too much WIFOM to know for sure. I was roleblocked as well. Simple case scenario is JK saved me from a night shot and mafia RB chose Krafla at random. There are a LOT of other possible scenarios though, none of which I like very much. On the other hand, if town role blocker hit WoS (if we even have one), tell us now. It's unlikely but its better to have the bases covered. That's a bad idea and super scummy. If we have one, why try to get them to claim for no reason? Proves WoS is scum. Are you that stupid? No as I said, it proves nothing. If WoS was JK blocked then he could've been either the attacker or the target. A claim proves nothing but the RB happened. If the JK blocked Krafla the we still no nothing as WoS could be lying OR he could be town RB'd by scum. You are both wrong and scum.
your logic is so bad its funny. We aren't talking about if town JK hit WoS. I said town RB. Not town JK. Reading Comprehension is a good skill to have Geript.
|
On March 10 2013 10:01 geript wrote: There's no way to differentiate between JK and RB. Considering no NK and the WoS RB, JK is the obvious solution just as OO was 3p quite obviously in the last game. Even YOU say you trust WoS, why bother with asking RB to claim when JK is the obvious outcome. Also, congrats JK.
you just disproved yourself.................................................................................................. Do you even know what you are talking about anymore? Or ever?
|
|
|
|