TL Mafia LX - Page 60

On February 27 2013 09:35 TestSubject893 wrote:
I've been working all day and just now got caught up on the thread. Here's what I've got.


Promethelax is still my top scum read and I will be voting for a mayor that wants to kill him. Jungle Jorge and ObviousOne, in that order, are next on my scum list.


I think we're placing a little too much trust in DoctorHelvetica. It seems like some people are treating him as nearly confirmed town, and frankly he's not even close to that in my book. Moreover, I'm afraid that should DrH get either of the elected roles, his perception as confirmed town will only be furthered, without him doing anything more pro-town.

Most of his cred has come from telling people they aren't scumhunting enough and how great scumhunting is, and while these things are pro-town, its not something that's hard to fake. On top of that, the only contribution he's made on the scumhunting front is to really amplify the pressure on Prome. While again, this is great, the fact that he seems to be distancing himself from it slightly in this post + Show Spoiler + is a little concerning to me.

I think it's likely that DrH is town, but lets make him prove that to us before we show him so much trust. Hopefully, we've gotten it right with Prome, in which case DrH will be deserving of the town cred he seems to currently have.


With the this in mind, I'm going to vote for someone who is going lynch Prome, but whose election I think will not stunt discussion and critique of the mayor himself.

##Vote: VisceraEyes

On February 27 2013 09:49 Wade Fell wrote:
JJ you're just so bad


just share your thoughts. they're terrible

but just share all of them

god

On February 27 2013 09:48 JungleJorge wrote:
DocH and Wade Fell, you both seem to believe scum Prome wouldn't behave in the way I described, yet you believe Prome is scum. What gives?
If you believe it is a null tell and I have reached the correct conclusion, by your own standards, what exactly is the problem here? Wouldn't you be better off taking in the information in regards to the reactions of many players, including the one set to be lynched, and ultimately have a better picture of the situation prior to the lynch so you could make a more informed decision and even after if we end up lynching him? If you believe it produced no meaningful content you can safely ignore it. It's funny how you accuse me of being anti-town when I'm trying to produce information by my own means, yet you both share my conclusion.
Also how exactly my withholding information for some amount of time to observe the reactions to my post damages the town in any regard? I've said I'd share the concerns I had with prome's lynch and I did. As it stands right now I believe the best lynch is prome and I'd be foolish to try to persuade town that The Macho Man is a better lynch, if even I don't share that point of view. Yes I do have problems with TMM, but I'll discuss those when the time is appropriate. It's a common mistake by many players to say every single thought that comes to their minds, instead of keeping the focus on what needs to be done.
Most of you so far seem to believe I'm some sort of idiot who ought to be dismissed. It's actually a barrier that I'm trying to overcome by making long quality over explanatory posts. I assure you I'm pretty good at this game, you would be surprised to know who you are dealing with. I assure you that if I had my name attached to my posts I would need to right a third as much and would have three times the influence.

On February 26 2013 09:40 randombum wrote:
Hello. Everybody should vote me for mayor, I'm 100% correct on my first impression scum-reads for the last 2 years. That's an amazing track record.

On February 27 2013 04:01 jcarlsoniv wrote:
He is intentionally making a point to put his mark on a lot of different people. He seems somewhat supportive of the Prom lynch, but again, it's hard to tell, he's not committing to anything. He's largely contributing very little, but casting his little doubts upon enough people that eventually, one has to stick.

I would not be sad to see VayeshMoru die.

On February 27 2013 09:48 MilkSuckler wrote:
EBWOP fail
TestSubject893
Can i please have your Wade Fell read (just town, null, scum) will suffice.

On February 27 2013 09:51 JungleJorge wrote:

As opposed to you who are good? Tell me how is the offensive name calling helping? I don't believe there was enough time for you to read carefully my post before responding to it. Spend less time typing and more time reading, it will go a long way.

On February 27 2013 09:50 layabout wrote:

Why are you trying to make people doubt the alignment of somebody that you think is town?

And isn't the same thing happening for VE that you say is happening for Dr.h? People are treating VE like confirmed town too and him being elected might cause reads to be strengthened too?

On February 27 2013 09:53 TestSubject893 wrote:


Null. Or maybe on the town side of null.

On February 26 2013 23:52 MilkSuckler wrote:
Im a sceptic of those antics being town, because as mafia; I have no qualms trying to push that agenda D1. To me they are easy to take stances, as long as you are willing to commit to being active. An aggressive player like BH to me suits that modus operandi.

Having said that, I think I figured out the missing piece of the puzzle.
With no bodyguards, mayor is not a role that I think scum is gunning for THAT majorly. Its nice to secure a mislynch D1; but ultimately, the risk of thread presence probably does not outweight the reward.

So if BH is pushing that hard for such a low gain, I can see that as town inspired play as opposed to scum.

On February 27 2013 09:57 layabout wrote:
ObviousOne are these scumreads or you just pressuring inactives for no helpful reason whatsoever?

On February 27 2013 09:57 TestSubject893 wrote:


My point is that I think electing DrH could be detrimental to the town if we don't take a careful look at our opinion of him and why it is the way it is. I'm only mentioning his alignment as it concerns him being elected.

On February 27 2013 10:01 ObviousOne wrote:

Who elected you to be the only one allowed to ask questions? I'm trying to get some answers here and you're shitting all over me.

You know who is scum? Layabout is scum.

On February 27 2013 10:01 ObviousOne wrote:

Who elected you to be the only one allowed to ask questions? I'm trying to get some answers here and you're shitting all over me.

You know who is scum? Layabout is scum.

On February 27 2013 10:03 layabout wrote:

Please respond to my post as if your not a child in a strop.

On February 27 2013 10:04 MilkSuckler wrote:

Whilst I appreciate the effort to contact lurkers.

Lurkers gonna lurk.. and what happens if no reciprocation ==> Your post becomes meaningless.

Can we please see some more efforts regarding the posts we DO have to work with.

Can you give me your updated thoughts on Geript pl0x