EPTwhat kind of person could put in so much time and not become emotionally invested?
also we aren't supposed to talk about modkills not matter how much it's tearing me up inside.
TL Mafia LX - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
what kind of person could put in so much time and not become emotionally invested? also we aren't supposed to talk about modkills not matter how much it's tearing me up inside. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 02 2013 05:20 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Sure but we can't only talk about him today As true as that it i don't feel like we should move the conversation on when chez still only has a few votes | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
that seems kinda contrived given vivax claimed roleblocked and we like 100% know toad was roleblocked | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 02 2013 07:02 Wade Fell wrote: Look it seems modestly clear to me that JJ is scum, but super dooper clear to me that chez is scum. We'll lynch Chez, then we'll lynch JJ for claiming for no reason. He's probably bussing Chez at this point. LYNCH THE CHEZ nobody has any good arguments against lynching chez i think ... | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 02 2013 06:36 geript wrote: ## Unvote #vote WoS | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 02 2013 19:25 MilkSuckler wrote: K.. looks like no one is here. Im swapping my vote to Chezinu .. for all the points already expressed. Im still confused by JJ role claim.. (before Toad died).. it gave scum two blues to NK? I just dont get it. Be back in a few hours milk i am fairly sure the point of it was that dr.h was saying that Toad/vivax was a confirmed liar/scum based on them both being roleblocked. personality i wrote geript off as newbie town day1 when he decided his main goal was to stop Dr.h being pardoner but not mayor. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
His rough position during day 1 was that he wanted to be mayor he thought WoS was scum and that he didn't want drh to become pardoner. Isn't is strange that his position hasn't really changed? Whilst there have been several flips shootings and an excessive number of posts for him to take in and make judgements with at the start of day2 after chezinu started to gather votes he sticks his vote on WoS. But the last time he gave reasons for Wos being scum was on Feb 26!* He doesn't even try to get WoS lynched and yet he throws his vote unannouced in the voting thread. If he was town then he had basically decided to give up and that was before he was under pressure and started martyring. He also finally decides to call Dr.h scum but it's based off of an alleged and very weak "scumslip" that isn't a scumslip at all. Frankly i feel like he wanted to discredit Dr.h and picked WoS so that he could say he was scumhunting. + Show Spoiler [*] + although he does interact with him We should lynch geript. But we should do it tomorrow. I think we have scum in chezinu so i am wary of a switch. Since chezinu cannot use his power again killing geript could be more beneficial if he does flip scum since he might have a role. But what if he flips 3rd party? We know chezinu cannot be 3rd party and if we kill scum they will lose KP. Because of this i don't think switching is worth the risk. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 02 2013 23:41 layabout wrote: why the hell is a 142 day2 thread in the yellow? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
i.e. they are both thinking like town. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 03 2013 04:21 geript wrote: So if two people arrive at different reads does that make one of them not town? No, scum can 'arrive' to the same reads as town. Crazy talk I know right... Different read means different perspective, there is a whole range that players can have, but players with the same one are more likely to share alignment, i wasn't talking in absolutes so don't try to misrepresent my point then shoot it down. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
it's also pretty reasonable to assume that scum are less likely to push a protown agenda. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Before today i wrote him off as as a crazy newbie, but i can no longer feel i can justify why that would be the case. He is very likely scum. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 03 2013 05:54 TestSubject893 wrote: The whole thing just struck me as WIFOMy and honestly, I agreed with geript more than you on it (although it had no bearing on my view of his alignment). It looked like you were just trying to attack him for the sake of attacking him. I don't see much point in doing that since he's already highly likely to get lynched tomorrow, unless you're just looking for easy town cred. I don't need towncred, there are only 3 ppl in the game that might look townier than me. And asking someone what they think is not attacking them, calling them scum or insulting them is attacking them. When it comes to mafiavs3rd party if we kill mafia it reduces the number of KP each night by 1 guaranteed. A bartender can at most do this by only choosing to mark targets. A mutant is less likely and in any case our jailer is outed and our medic was modkilled so the KP is only as dangerous as mafias. 3rd party can also kill mafia. Mafia flipping is also more useful in terms of information. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
| ||
