|
On February 15 2013 08:34 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:34 iamperfection wrote: its a bad idea because it is so stupid therefore stutters is more likely to do that as town.
as scum he would worry more about pulling a stunt like that as town he'd want to push a case or like interact with the thread in a meaningful way If you're going to push Oats heavily on meta, does the fact that stutters has ninja voted, done so recently, and done so as town (apparently), not have any weight? If not, porqueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:Mainly because I don't care about the ninjavote, tbh. You yourself noted that he has ninja voted as town. AMG HERE IS A THING THAT WE PERCEIVE AS SCUMMY BUT ALSO HE HAS DONE THIS AS TOWN. LET'S LYNCH HIM UNLESS HE EXPLAINS. When just a little while before, you said Show nested quote +I also don't actually wanna lynch stutters. Just wanted to pressure him into posting. That makes me think that you don't find stutters scummy. You don't want to lynch him, just wanted him to post. Yet, despite not finding him scummy, you want to move BACK to him because of something you know he has done as town? Does not compute. Like, you say you want to go "back" to him. But if your reasons before were "wanted to pressure him into posting," you SHOULDN'T want to go back, because it's lynch time. We need to lynch SCUM. Not lynch someone to try and get them to post. The same reason you say you voted for him previously no longer applies, so going "back" is silliness.
Hm I'll admit it's possible I'm making an overreaction here as town. if he has indeed done this as town, then perhaps he's just terrible and does scum-motivated things as town. These last minute voteswings have a tendency to cause bad things to happen, so I'm willing to move back to one of my top suspects. I don't like stutters at all though. I don't like that he mysteriously voted the guy i was voting for, breaking the tie, without commenting. I don't like it one bit. It makes me suspicious that he's scum and iamp is town (yes blah blah associative tells unflipped players etc) but now I'd rather lynch oats who is more of a sure thing than imap
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
basically: Stutters, you are literally the worst person that this isn't a scumtell for you. It also makes me question my iamp case if someone like you was trying to subtly tip the scales and get him lynched.
a thousand curses upon your house.
##unvote ##vote oatsmaster
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
also why is everyone trying to lynch hassybaby you guys are all terrible
|
Kita: I am going to change my vote, there's no point keeping it on you - seeing as how the vote wasn't even a serious one in the first place, I'm just reading through the last 3 pages again to understand where the main frontrunners are getting their votes from.
|
On February 15 2013 08:39 Blazinghand wrote: also why is everyone trying to lynch hassybaby you guys are all terrible I just told you.
If people want to lynch Oats or gonzaw, I'm down. But between a coinflip Hassy and a coinflip iamp, I would rather have iamp around who is at least participating.
|
Oh shit I almost missed the deadline
I'm here now, skimmed the thread
I guess I'd be okay with a randombumb lynch, but I'm not so sure about it right now, him backing off me after that "shitty" OMGUS seems kind of weird to do as scum. It won't be happening either way though.
If we want a lynch today, then I'm willing to consolidate onto iamp/Hassy. I don't have strong scum/town feelings on either of them though. I'd prefer a Hassy lynch over iamp, iamp at least is here in the thread posting stuff, but Hassy hasn't done anything at all.
Haven't really read that much into BH's Oats case but meh it's not convincing.
|
kita, why leave the sylencia/kurumi stuff out of your read?
|
|
In any case, Blazinghand's case on Oatsmaster is more compelling to me that a lot of others, so I'll be sheeping with him on this one.
##unvote ##vote: Oatsmaster
|
get the sheep going.
Syl and I showed how it works.
|
marv where are you why are not trying to get shit done?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:39 Sylencia wrote: Kita: I am going to change my vote, there's no point keeping it on you - seeing as how the vote wasn't even a serious one in the first place, I'm just reading through the last 3 pages again to understand where the main frontrunners are getting their votes from.
Doesn't it make more sense to come up with your own reasoning for why a player is scum, rather than jump on someone else's bandwagon? How are we supposed to have any idea if you are town if you don't give us anything in return?
|
On February 15 2013 08:42 iamperfection wrote: marv where are you why are not trying to get shit done? Haven't you figured out that he doesn't care about this game by this point? :o
|
On February 15 2013 08:39 Sylencia wrote: Kita: I am going to change my vote, there's no point keeping it on you - seeing as how the vote wasn't even a serious one in the first place, I'm just reading through the last 3 pages again to understand where the main frontrunners are getting their votes from.
On February 15 2013 08:40 Sylencia wrote: In any case, Blazinghand's case on Oatsmaster is more compelling to me that a lot of others, so I'll be sheeping with him on this one.
##unvote ##vote: Oatsmaster ONE MINUTE What the heck..
|
Im liking the hassy afk less because he seems to actually be un able/willing to read the thread.
oats it is.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:40 Sylencia wrote: In any case, Blazinghand's case on Oatsmaster is more compelling to me that a lot of others, so I'll be sheeping with him on this one.
##unvote ##vote: Oatsmaster
I appreciate the support, but for your own sake you should give your thought process and reads out now, before the flip. It's important to other people forming reads on you
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:40 austinmcc wrote: kita, why leave the sylencia/kurumi stuff out of your read?
I didn't really come to any conclusions from it, other than the fact that sylencia found it important to respond to a player that was voting for him. Did you get something out of the exchange?
|
That is, I find it more reasonable that hassy had reason for not being in the thread or playing the game than he is scum but lurking to the point where he gets replaced. Its a pretty shitty move to get replaced so you can lurk an extra night.
|
##Vote: Hassy
Even if Hassy is a coinflip at this point, I think it's a better lynch than Oats. I'm not that convinced about the stuff said about Oats
|
|
|
|