|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:12 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:02 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:55 Blazinghand wrote:
i categorically oppose a lurker policy lynch when there are scummy people to be lynched but fucking lurking is scummy So, since scum are the only people that ever lurk, then the scumteam must be Hassy/Sylencia/MrCC/Stutters! Thank you for solving the game! [/sarcasm] stfu No. Your entire premise is dumb, because it can be categorically proven than townies lurk from time to time, for whatever reason. Yes, lurking is bad. Yes, lurking hurts town. Yes, it is frustrating to play with people who never post. But no, lurking does not make someone scum. And there are valid reasons to actually think other people ARE scum. show me where the fuck i said every fucking lurker is scum Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all. cause we can only lynch one at a time also i value marvs opinion above anyone also why the fuck are you talking in extremes i obviously dont think every fucking lurker is scum they can be and along with marvs opinion i will go with hasy
"it's not my fault, it's marv's fault! don't lynch me for playing like scum plz"
|
On February 15 2013 08:10 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:10 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:08 Blazinghand wrote:
EBWOP: oats first and iamp second no come on lynch me i want to see your face to see how far you have fallen as a player you didnt explain at all how im scum. Considering i have no problem bussing as your association is retarded you didnt show how any of my actions match my meta for scum or town you just got pissed off i didn't agree with you got any last words? zZz
you realize im going to be here all the way up to the lynch.
justice cant be silenced.
why are you ignoring my posts do they have no meaning to you?
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:13 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:10 Blazinghand wrote:On February 15 2013 08:10 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:08 Blazinghand wrote:
EBWOP: oats first and iamp second no come on lynch me i want to see your face to see how far you have fallen as a player you didnt explain at all how im scum. Considering i have no problem bussing as your association is retarded you didnt show how any of my actions match my meta for scum or town you just got pissed off i didn't agree with you got any last words? zZz you realize im going to be here all the way up to the lynch. justice cant be silenced. why are you ignoring my posts do they have no meaning to you?
I think everyone knows what your so-called "posts" mean
|
On February 15 2013 08:12 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:12 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:02 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:55 Blazinghand wrote:
i categorically oppose a lurker policy lynch when there are scummy people to be lynched but fucking lurking is scummy So, since scum are the only people that ever lurk, then the scumteam must be Hassy/Sylencia/MrCC/Stutters! Thank you for solving the game! [/sarcasm] stfu No. Your entire premise is dumb, because it can be categorically proven than townies lurk from time to time, for whatever reason. Yes, lurking is bad. Yes, lurking hurts town. Yes, it is frustrating to play with people who never post. But no, lurking does not make someone scum. And there are valid reasons to actually think other people ARE scum. show me where the fuck i said every fucking lurker is scum Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all. cause we can only lynch one at a time also i value marvs opinion above anyone also why the fuck are you talking in extremes i obviously dont think every fucking lurker is scum they can be and along with marvs opinion i will go with hasy "it's not my fault, it's marv's fault! don't lynch me for playing like scum plz"
go fuck yourself
explain how im scum you haven't done it
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:14 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:12 Blazinghand wrote:On February 15 2013 08:12 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:02 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:55 Blazinghand wrote:
i categorically oppose a lurker policy lynch when there are scummy people to be lynched but fucking lurking is scummy So, since scum are the only people that ever lurk, then the scumteam must be Hassy/Sylencia/MrCC/Stutters! Thank you for solving the game! [/sarcasm] stfu No. Your entire premise is dumb, because it can be categorically proven than townies lurk from time to time, for whatever reason. Yes, lurking is bad. Yes, lurking hurts town. Yes, it is frustrating to play with people who never post. But no, lurking does not make someone scum. And there are valid reasons to actually think other people ARE scum. show me where the fuck i said every fucking lurker is scum Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all. cause we can only lynch one at a time also i value marvs opinion above anyone also why the fuck are you talking in extremes i obviously dont think every fucking lurker is scum they can be and along with marvs opinion i will go with hasy "it's not my fault, it's marv's fault! don't lynch me for playing like scum plz" go fuck yourself explain how im scum you haven't done it
you're literally pushing scum objectives
|
|
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
like really, a policy lynch? come on dude we've got so many scummy people to lynch and you want to policy?
|
On February 15 2013 08:14 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:14 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:12 Blazinghand wrote:On February 15 2013 08:12 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:02 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 iamperfection wrote:
[quote]
but fucking lurking is scummy So, since scum are the only people that ever lurk, then the scumteam must be Hassy/Sylencia/MrCC/Stutters! Thank you for solving the game! [/sarcasm] stfu No. Your entire premise is dumb, because it can be categorically proven than townies lurk from time to time, for whatever reason. Yes, lurking is bad. Yes, lurking hurts town. Yes, it is frustrating to play with people who never post. But no, lurking does not make someone scum. And there are valid reasons to actually think other people ARE scum. show me where the fuck i said every fucking lurker is scum Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all. cause we can only lynch one at a time also i value marvs opinion above anyone also why the fuck are you talking in extremes i obviously dont think every fucking lurker is scum they can be and along with marvs opinion i will go with hasy "it's not my fault, it's marv's fault! don't lynch me for playing like scum plz" go fuck yourself explain how im scum you haven't done it you're literally pushing scum objectives
.......
like what
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:On February 15 2013 08:01 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 Blazinghand wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 Blazinghand wrote:
iamp I want you to seriously sit down with the three oats filters I linked, or at least the quotes I linked, and tell me this is town oats
you won't be able to do that because this isn't town oats you cant just categorically say that. Each of those games is a different beast. CT has so much activity there was a ton of info to go off of ( this game not so much) The other game was a newbie of course he is going to be more forceful he doesn't have vets or better players to listen to in this game he has stuck his neck out and isnt trying to blend in he is town in this game. wow you literally didn't read my case, did you. you're actually just scum. ##unvote
##vote iamperfection whatever dude your delusional tell me why you think im scum you didn't read my case and you're acting like you read it also you want a bad policy lynch
This particular gentleman wonders if you are in fact yamato in disguise. I wonder, in particular, how lynching someone who lurks in the shadows has become in this establishment, and recent establishments, a "policy lynch" or "coinflip". This indicates that gentlemen have a lack of confidence in their ability to read those with few posts.
On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 08:02 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 08:00 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:59 Keirathi wrote:On February 15 2013 07:56 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 07:55 Blazinghand wrote:
i categorically oppose a lurker policy lynch when there are scummy people to be lynched but fucking lurking is scummy So, since scum are the only people that ever lurk, then the scumteam must be Hassy/Sylencia/MrCC/Stutters! Thank you for solving the game! [/sarcasm] stfu No. Your entire premise is dumb, because it can be categorically proven than townies lurk from time to time, for whatever reason. Yes, lurking is bad. Yes, lurking hurts town. Yes, it is frustrating to play with people who never post. But no, lurking does not make someone scum. And there are valid reasons to actually think other people ARE scum. show me where the fuck i said every fucking lurker is scum Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all.
I am aware, gentleman Keirathi, that this is not aimed at me. Hassybaby usually has enthusiasm for themed games at least when he has good intentions. I remember a previous establishment (Mad Men) where I confidently declared him of evil intentions, for the reason that he never showed any interest in his fellow gentlemen. Count Cheesecake, to my horror, is performing a similar feat to his shenanigans in the watering hole named 'LVIII', therefore I am not confident that he may have evil intentions; Stut-utt-utters has come across as amiable to discourse of late. The man known as Sylencia I also believe may well have evil intentions. He continuously makes little chitter-chatter with other gentlemen, but only ever about his own person, and never unprompted. This is why looking at such gentlemen is not merely "policy".
|
marv what do you think of the brick wall that is bh?
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
the issue here iamperfection is that many players in this game have found legit cases to make. I don't think the case on hassybaby is a legit meta case (like say my case on oats) because you're not addressing his mindset of his pattern of play as scum. you're just saying "look, he's posting less, he must be scum" and this is not a legitimate way to play. This is a policy lynch in a room filled with scummy players. We should be hunting scum, not policy lynching. Your refusal to actually read my case only further reinforces my suspicions that you are working against the town
|
BH. I didn't go back and read all his past games, I clicked the stuff you pulled out, and yes, a plot of his attitudes in those town games is inconsistent with the plot of his attitudes in his scum games.
But here...there are a couple things I get hung up on.
On February 13 2013 14:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
You didnt say it outright no, but the way you have been asking questions, is making me think you have a scum read on me.
Why does it matter, if ME as town, has a lousy and innaccurate read on BH? Just ignore it/correct it and move on.
However, if Me as scum, has a unsupported town read on BH, does it make BH scummier? Or townier?
In conclusion, the only reason to be asking me questions like these is if you think I am scum
This is just a funky post. He's responding to Keirathi, who's been poking at him, but hasn't outright called Oats scum. This post, to me, is devoid of scummy intention. He's trying to get this point across, he's trying to draw conclusions or get other people to draw conclusions from his actions, but not in a way that's like...doing much. I'm having a hard time coming up with why scumOats responds here in this way. It doesn't muddy the waters about whether you (BH) are town/scum, it doesn't try to make himself look townie, it doesn't really respond to keirathi's posts specifically, it feels like something that he just posted off the cuff and this was his thought process at the moment.
On February 13 2013 22:22 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nope, I see no reads in your 'first' post Marv.
Help us out here.
Pew pew. Super magical kurumi rule. He couldn't interpret a post that was written in an odd style, but he's trying to do so. Shows he wants to get information from the thread. Not foolproof, but in general I'm inclined to see people who try to make sense of cryptic posts/posters in a townie light --> they're trying to figure things out, which is townie to me.
All his nonsense with me. He kept derailing thread about whether I had a town read on him and DI, assuming I did, questioning me. Yes, it clogged up thread. Yes, it didn't go anywhere useful. But he wasn't creating a big ol' stink and dragging the whole THREAD into it, he was mostly pestering ME. He may have posted a bunch and not pushed things forward at that point, created clutter, but the fact that a lot of it was him chatting with me keeps me from attributing a scummy mindset/purpose to those posts.
I don't want to vote him.
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
see like my boy austinmcc actually read the case and disagrees with me for a meaningful reason. he's wrong, but not scum.
|
On February 15 2013 08:14 GreYMisT wrote:
Day 1 Votes!
Lynch Votes:
Sylencia: kitaman27, Kurumi
Crossfire99: Dandel Ion, Mr. Cheesecake
Mr. Cheesecake: Blazinghand, Stutters695
gonzaw: Marvellosity, Blazinghand, Dandel Ion, randombum
Oatsmaster: Blazinghand, Dandel Ion, Kerathi, Blazinghand
Marvellosity: Dandel Ion
kitaman27: Sylencia
Blazinghand: jcarlsoniv
randombum: Oatsmaster, gonzaw
Stutters695: iamperfection, Dandel Ion
Hassybaby: Marvellosity, Oatsmaster, randombum, iamperfection
iamperfection: austinmcc, crossfire99, jcarlsoniv, Blazinghand
Poison Votes:
Instant Majority Lynch: Blazinghand, kitaman27, Dandel Ion, randombum, Sylencia, jcarlsoniv, Crossfire99, austinmcc, Marvellosity, gonzaw, Hassybaby, Oatsmaster, iamperfection, Keirathi, Stutters695
Secret Ballot: Mr. Cheesecake
With 17 Alive it takes 9 to lynch. No one is set to be lynched!
45 minutes remain.
Hassybaby has not voted for a lynch and Kurumi has not voted for a poison. Hassy will be forcibly replaced if he fails to vote
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:16 Blazinghand wrote:
the issue here iamperfection is that many players in this game have found legit cases to make. I don't think the case on hassybaby is a legit meta case (like say my case on oats) because you're not addressing his mindset of his pattern of play as scum. you're just saying "look, he's posting less, he must be scum" and this is not a legitimate way to play. This is a policy lynch in a room filled with scummy players. We should be hunting scum, not policy lynching. Your refusal to actually read my case only further reinforces my suspicions that you are working against the town
I have quite clearly pointed out, my esteemed sir, that the little contribution that Hassybaby did make looks like a sham, a farce, a pretence. His apparent enquiry into Mr D Ion's alignment was empty and not followed through. As I have indeed mentioned before, it is the appearance of caring but in a manner that does not demonstrate as such.
|
well thats an interesting development
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
I will admit that Oats isn't PERFECTLY playing to his scum meta. there have been inklings of prods and responses to prods that weren't as present in his scum game. The fact that he's so divergent from his town play in the direction of his scum play (plus his scummy entrance into the game) to me still indicate he is in fact scummy. I'll also allow for the fact that his scum play may have improved by a small amount since he last played scum. That being said I think currently iamp should be our priority target. I'm willing to lynch oats if we can't get a majority on iamp, though.
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:19 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:16 Blazinghand wrote:
the issue here iamperfection is that many players in this game have found legit cases to make. I don't think the case on hassybaby is a legit meta case (like say my case on oats) because you're not addressing his mindset of his pattern of play as scum. you're just saying "look, he's posting less, he must be scum" and this is not a legitimate way to play. This is a policy lynch in a room filled with scummy players. We should be hunting scum, not policy lynching. Your refusal to actually read my case only further reinforces my suspicions that you are working against the town I have quite clearly pointed out, my esteemed sir, that the little contribution that Hassybaby did make looks like a sham, a farce, a pretence. His apparent enquiry into Mr D Ion's alignment was empty and not followed through. As I have indeed mentioned before, it is the appearance of caring but in a manner that does not demonstrate as such.
it may be a moot point shortly
|
Hey guys my date sucked, but at least I'm here for the deadline, amirite?
I don't really want to lynch iamp, not today at least. I mean I could consolidate on him, looks like half the game is afk after all, but it wouldn't make me feel warm and fuzzy inside.
I would be generally fine with lynching Hassy, he been lurking, and the rare times he did not he posted the most useless and meaningless stuff imaginable.
I would prefer a gonzaw lynch, but if I read correctly, nobody but Keir is willing to do that? For shame.
I would prefer an Oats lynch slightly over hassy, but not by much.
I also don't actually wanna lynch stutters. Just wanted to pressure him into posting.
For that matter:
##unvote
|
anyone that votes for me has to say why in their own words why they think i'm scum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
