EPTThemed Game Mafia - Page 44
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
##vote stutters695 NO NINJAING GET HIM NOW | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:24 Stutters695 wrote: ##unvote ##vote: imperfections what is this | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9648 Posts
so stupid to do that as scum | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:15 marvellosity wrote: This particular gentleman wonders if you are in fact yamato in disguise. I wonder, in particular, how lynching someone who lurks in the shadows has become in this establishment, and recent establishments, a "policy lynch" or "coinflip". This indicates that gentlemen have a lack of confidence in their ability to read those with few posts. I am aware, gentleman Keirathi, that this is not aimed at me. Hassybaby usually has enthusiasm for themed games at least when he has good intentions. I remember a previous establishment (Mad Men) where I confidently declared him of evil intentions, for the reason that he never showed any interest in his fellow gentlemen. Count Cheesecake, to my horror, is performing a similar feat to his shenanigans in the watering hole named 'LVIII', therefore I am not confident that he may have evil intentions; Stut-utt-utters has come across as amiable to discourse of late. The man known as Sylencia I also believe may well have evil intentions. He continuously makes little chitter-chatter with other gentlemen, but only ever about his own person, and never unprompted. This is why looking at such gentlemen is not merely "policy". Forgive me for not jumping to sheep you then, but your weakly reasoned policy-but-not-policy lynch of Kenpachi in Parallel has turned me away from following you down those rabbit holes. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
That said, jumping back onto him looks tempting. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:26 Keirathi wrote: Forgive me for not jumping to sheep you then, but your weakly reasoned policy-but-not-policy lynch of Kenpachi in Parallel has turned me away from following you down those rabbit holes. That lynch was butt, but marv wasn't the only reason it went down. Heck, iirc, he wanted to lynch ME at first. He was also 3P. That lynch was also SPECTACULARLY butt. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:27 Dandel Ion wrote: It sucks major dick, but stutters does this as town too. See: MTG mafia. That said, jumping back onto him looks tempting. >:| | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
If he explains within the next 10 minutes, it's k. If he doesn't let's lynch him, k? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Right now I'm quite interested in Kita's returning thoughts. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:30 Dandel Ion wrote: If he explains within the next 10 minutes, it's k. If he doesn't let's lynch him, k? This is entirely reasonable. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:30 austinmcc wrote: That is a bad idea DI. Right now I'm quite interested in Kita's returning thoughts. Why? | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9648 Posts
as scum he would worry more about pulling a stunt like that | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
AMG HERE IS A THING THAT WE PERCEIVE AS SCUMMY BUT ALSO HE HAS DONE THIS AS TOWN. LET'S LYNCH HIM UNLESS HE EXPLAINS. When just a little while before, you said I also don't actually wanna lynch stutters. Just wanted to pressure him into posting. That makes me think that you don't find stutters scummy. You don't want to lynch him, just wanted him to post. Yet, despite not finding him scummy, you want to move BACK to him because of something you know he has done as town? Does not compute. Like, you say you want to go "back" to him. But if your reasons before were "wanted to pressure him into posting," you SHOULDN'T want to go back, because it's lynch time. We need to lynch SCUM. Not lynch someone to try and get them to post. The same reason you say you voted for him previously no longer applies, so going "back" is silliness. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:34 iamperfection wrote: its a bad idea because it is so stupid therefore stutters is more likely to do that as town. as scum he would worry more about pulling a stunt like that as town he'd want to push a case or like interact with the thread in a meaningful way | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9648 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:34 Blazinghand wrote: as town he'd want to push a case or like interact with the thread in a meaningful way its so stupid though bh because when i flip he would so get called out for it. no scum is that dumb. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote: Mainly because I don't care about the ninjavote, tbh. You yourself noted that he has ninja voted as town. AMG HERE IS A THING THAT WE PERCEIVE AS SCUMMY BUT ALSO HE HAS DONE THIS AS TOWN. LET'S LYNCH HIM UNLESS HE EXPLAINS. When just a little while before, you said That makes me think that you don't find stutters scummy. You don't want to lynch him, just wanted him to post. Yet, despite not finding him scummy, you want to move BACK to him because of something you know he has done as town? Does not compute. Like, you say you want to go "back" to him. But if your reasons before were "wanted to pressure him into posting," you SHOULDN'T want to go back, because it's lynch time. We need to lynch SCUM. Not lynch someone to try and get them to post. The same reason you say you voted for him previously no longer applies, so going "back" is silliness. The problem is he doesn't post, but shows he's here. Call it a policy lynch if you want, and revel in the irony of BH being on board of a policy lynch. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 15 2013 03:03 Dandel Ion wrote: @Kita: If your read is "newbie lurker", but you want to lynch him for that,does that mean you have no scumreads at all? That should have read "mafia newbie lurker". It's 40 minutes from the deadline and Sylencia still has his vote on myself. It would be one thing if he explained why he thought I was mafia, but from what I can tell he doesn't. He has shown no interest in hunting mafia today and out of the group of lurkers, I think he has the highest chance of flipping scum. I'd be stutters lynch, simply because he has a valid excuse for one cycle. Hassy is tougher, but I don't feel confortable voting for someone who is null, solely for the fact that we need to lynch someone. iamimp I have down in my notes as leaning town, but I can't actually remember why I wrote that down for him. He seems to be freely giving out alignment opinions early in the game, which is a plus, but his lynch choice on stutters was pretty weak. I wouldn't put him in my top two though today and would prefer if we didn't lynch him right now. oats would be my backup if I can't convince the majority to switch onto sylencia in the next 30 minutes (go do so now). The thing that caught my attention from him was his weird post with Keirathi. He seemed to infer that he thought Keirathi was scum based on his question, but when I pointed out the contradiction in his logic, he backed off the issue. If he truly was just poking at Keirathi like he claims, I'm not sure what answer he was expecting to get that would point to a town/scum alignment. He has swapped his vote three times to the flavor of the hour, but shows little interest in actually pushing his target. As I said, I'm more confident of the chance that Sylencia will flip scum, but I have a moderate scum read on oats and would be willing to lynch him as well. We really should consolidate our votes though. With a day one no-lynch, we essentially end up in the same place tomorrow, expect with the mafia night kills resolved. We might pull off an investigative check to help with the lynch, but a no lynch essentially shortens the game by one cycle and we shouldn't throw away our chance of generating information from the lynch vote today. | ||
| ||
