|
On February 15 2013 03:32 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 03:24 austinmcc wrote:On February 15 2013 03:23 Stutters695 wrote:
Sorry guys first day of work last night and VDay today. The girlfriend is sick though so I'll be spending most the day doing online coursework to pass the time while she sleeps so I'll try to get some stuff done before the deadline. Can you give us a 20 or 30 minute where you're just here and available? Yeah. I have a class at 330 but until I leave for it at three I'm here. Fire away. I'll be back around 5. Phone posting so I don't want to bother editing that but those are in EST.
Thanks. Who here have you played the most games with, or is there anyone that you've played with and feel like you have somewhat of a handle on how they act?
|
I've played with oats, XFire, marv, dandel, iamp, and gonzaw who come to mind. I'd have to check but I think I played with BH in WLIIA but I couldn't tell you anything about his play if so. Might have missed one or two from LIX also but in that case I wouldn't remember how they played without checking their filters. I've got a decent handle on all of them I'd say, scum Marv still concerns me because I've never seen it but I've heard its really good, so he'd be the one I know the least I'd say.
|
Okay. marv isn't a good case for this, so I'm throwing him out.
Take iamperfection, if you would. Throw out his vote, just read the substance of his posts. Do you get a read off of him? If not, can you just identify like...his towniest post, his scummiest post, and the post of his that you think is the most important for whatever reason, as well as why you choose those? iirc you can't quote off phone, so just something to identify those.
|
On February 15 2013 03:48 austinmcc wrote:
Okay. marv isn't a good case for this, so I'm throwing him out.
Take iamperfection, if you would. Throw out his vote, just read the substance of his posts. Do you get a read off of him? If not, can you just identify like...his towniest post, his scummiest post, and the post of his that you think is the most important for whatever reason, as well as why you choose those? iirc you can't quote off phone, so just something to identify those.
you can quote off a phone
|
Is filtering the thing you can't do? This may be a bad phonepost question.
|
On February 15 2013 03:54 austinmcc wrote:
Is filtering the thing you can't do? This may be a bad phonepost question.
You can do anything on a phone that you can do on the forums. Its just way more annoying.
|
Oh crap, it might be seeing pictures. Whatever. My only other question right now would be for you to give your honest assessment of who would win if these two ducks fought each other to the death.
+ Show Spoiler +
They're mostly identical EXCEPT:
Duck 1 has a scar on his head, but I won't tell you why. The red spots are acne, because Duck 1 has been shooting up with DuckRoids™. Duck 1 also has a mildly uncomfortable case of athlete's foot, but it's not entirely debilitating.
Duck 2 has a teardrop tattoo, signifying that he's in a duck mexican gang and killed another duck at some point. I won't reveal how.
The ducks fight each other without outside weapons. Who wins? Why?
|
Ack, unexpectedly have to run (that's why the picture and story are so crappy). Please answer the questions though if you can, and feel free to actually do more, but I'm interested in those.
|
Duck 2 obviously its not even open for debate.
|
I could quote, but it's 1 quote per post without doing a dickload of work.
First thing that stood out was his post on Marv being bored/carefree. Unless that post was sarcasm and I just missed it, Marv just did the exact same thing and we had this conversation in MtG II where Marv was town. Not saying he's definitely wrong but that isn't top scumread material on its own.
|
On February 14 2013 11:40 randombum wrote:
So basically. I don't think your scum, but I want to kill you?
I'm not 100% certain, specially not at that point, but sure out of everybody in the game I wanted to kill you the most.
I posted it not three posts before, are you even reading my filter? Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 10:09 randombum wrote:
Just got back. I'm currently dis-liking oats and gonzow. Marv too.
[snip]
Gonzow. He called me scum. Seriously though, his play has been lacking focus. He has self admitted that he mainly cared for the role creation part. That might be true, or a mafia excuse to lurk. There's also his reasoning "too neutral" what does that even mean? Is he referring to the part that marv also mentioned where I praise BH after spending a really long post calling him wrong? That's just being polite.
Or in the quote you are responding to. Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote:On February 14 2013 10:58 randombum wrote:
So no matter what I say your going to call it "neutral" and label me scum.
Posts relatively long, but not too specific post agaisnt BH. Too neutral.
Posts concise reads on two players that stood out to him. Too neutral.
I don't like your reasoning at all. Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong, or you are purposely trying to interpret me in a negative light which only mafia would do. So that said
##vote gonzaw. Are you purposely reading my posts the wrong way or are you just bad at this game? Either way its not a very good reason to keep you around.
That first post of yours appeared to just be a comment of sorts. I don't see you calling me scum with that. It's certainly not enough justification for OMGUSing me in that second post. You just say "I don't like gonzaw" and post some wishy-washy stuff about me.
Notice I never called you scum, I just think you are not contributing which can be bad town or scum. That's better than the null reads I have on almost anybody else.
So...you don't think I'm scum?
Seems hypocritical with this in mind:
On February 14 2013 11:40 randombum wrote:
So basically. I don't think your scum, but I want to kill you?
I assume you said this with a negative tone (your whole post has a confrontational tone against me, thus no reason to assume this bit isn't). I assume this makes you "suspicious" against me or something.
Yet you do exactly the same thing...?
You basically don't think I'm scum, but you want to kill me.
You sheep other people's opinions on stuff (on Oats, on me, etc), you OMGUS me with no reasoning at all, and your intentions are contradictory. You attack me like you think I'm scum, but then instantly backpedal into saying I'm just "not contributing so I don't want to keep you around", which is hypocritical with that "suspicion" you posted about me before.
You attacking me makes no sense, and it seems you are just content on sheeping BH and parking your vote on me.
Yeah, I'm fine lynching you today.
##Vote: randombum
I haven't read other people yet though.
|
Yeah Duck 2 wins there.
Although Duck 1 could have venomous acne, could pop his zits in Duck 2's face and let him die a slow death.
|
You know, I was seconds from actually saying I probably overreacted after sleeping on it, but now that just looks silly. Let me respond a bit and end it sense the two of us tunneling on each other is not beneficial.
|
Sorry didn't mean to submit that. I've got more on him I'm typing up.
|
Yo marv, care to answer my previous question?
I wouldn't mind lynching Hassy/Sylencia/Cheesecake, but it's like a shot in the dark right now.
I don't remember Xfire and jcralson contribute anything this past 24 hours either.
Kei, you think Oats is scum?
Personally he's not playing like in LIX, where he just antagonized every excerpt of authority and cussed against everybody. Him sheeping people like this is....well dumb, but unlike his previous scum play in my mind, which gives me a town gut feeling one him
On February 15 2013 02:18 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 02:14 austinmcc wrote:On February 15 2013 02:09 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 02:07 austinmcc wrote:I don't love saying Hassy was more active "by a large margin," but for reference: Hassy's filter from the world he started out in in Parallel mafiaAt least within his D1, he's actively reading both threads. He discusses the general plan of who to swap where. He asks Foolishness, who was in the other thread, some questions concerning Foolishness's posts. When Darkfire posts his weird claim, Hassy questions Darkfire. When Dieno is being lynched (and after lynch), he's trying to draw conclusions from what was happening. A lot of his activity was on that first day, and it somewhat tailed off afterwards. I would like to see hassy more active, but I don't currently want to vote him as #1. then who do you want to kill the most? I started a post saying gonzaw, but I don't think that's my choice. Pretty sure I'm overvaluing LIX in being willing to lynch him, because there I didn't put enough stock in his activity. Here, he was momentarily Gonzaw after being called out, and then went back to being nothing. That's the same pattern that I didn't value enough in LIX, but the circumstances are also different in that he had a red check there and no red check here. What I would really like is for Sylencia or Cheesecake to show up and be able to chat with them for like 20 minutes. I could possibly get behind gonzaw. At first I was against it, but I went back and read Aperture 2 compared to WLIIA. In Aperture, he was thinking about everyone, giving thoughts about everyone, hopping around all over the place. In WLIIA, he focused in on one person (me), and spent the entirety of his time alive talking about me and why I was scum, with very few references towards questioning or commenting on other people.
Considering town Keirathi from WLIIA, this seems too "passive" from you. If you thought I was scum you wouldn't show hesitation to call me out, yet here you just post some stuff that to me even seems rehashed from other times I've played with you if I recall correctly, and don't even seem to have anything to do with this game (you just said how I played in both Aperture and in WLIIA and that's it, you make no conclusion at all)
|
On February 15 2013 04:31 randombum wrote:
You know, I was seconds from actually saying I probably overreacted after sleeping on it, but now that just looks silly. Let me respond a bit and end it sense the two of us tunneling on each other is not beneficial.
Hmm, fair enough.
If you'll say you "overreacted" then I'm willing to hear who your other "targets" are, which you haven't yet (other than me)
|
Wait, Gonzaw you think Keirathi has been too passive this game?
|
On February 15 2013 04:49 austinmcc wrote:
Wait, Gonzaw you think Keirathi has been too passive this game?
Not the game per se (haven't thoroughly read his filter yet though), but with his stance on me.
|
I'm just going to address your last paragraph since a lot of the top is reasonable. I did attack you when there wasn't much to base it on. Mainly, I just wanted to get something going since at the time there was nothing being discussed and I was bored. So a weak attack (which it is, my whole point is "you are reading me wrong, you are bad/scum") was what came to mind.
But, On February 15 2013 04:23 gonzaw wrote:
You sheep other people's opinions on stuff (on Oats, on me, etc), you OMGUS me with no reasoning at all, and your intentions are contradictory. You attack me like you think I'm scum, but then instantly backpedal into saying I'm just "not contributing so I don't want to keep you around", which is hypocritical with that "suspicion" you posted about me before.
You attacking me makes no sense, and it seems you are just content on sheeping BH and parking your vote on me.
needs to be addressed. How am I sheeping on other opinions when I'm the only one that attacked you in the way I did? Because other people have attacked you for other reasons? I'll admit I looked harder at you and oats because you two stuck out.
I don't see any backpedaling at all. In the same post where I voted you my reasoning was "Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong, or you are purposely trying to interpret me in a negative light which only mafia would do." then the post after it's " I just think you are not contributing which can be bad town or scum."
Its consistent, perhaps bad, but consistent.
|
randombum, could you please give me your thoughts on iamperfection, as well as who would win the duckfight from earlier on the page?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/MtGfCbo.png)
